Agent skill

Technical Writing

by openclaw in openclaw/openclaw-enterprise

Write, organize, name, edit, or review Enterprise developer documentation, specifications, and technical instructions; ground claims in current source and finish with a plain-language cleanup.

MITAuto-check passedWriting & Content

Install Technical Writing

skills CLI
$ npx skills add openclaw/openclaw-enterprise --skill technical-writing -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install openclaw/openclaw-enterprise technical-writing --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw-enterprise.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/.agents/skills/technical-writing .claude/skills/technical-writing && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
technical-writing
GitHub stars
359
Token cost
~2.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,140 words
Files
4 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
9
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Write, organize, name, edit, or review Enterprise developer documentation, specifications, and technical instructions; ground claims in current source and finish with a plain-language cleanup.

  • Works in 5 steps: Identify the reader, intended action or… → Choose the requested mode: create from… → Lead with what the reader can accomplish… → …
  • Tasks that involve Technical writing
  • SKILL.md covers Establish the reader and…, Write precise prose, Always deslop the writing and Organize and name development…, plus 5 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Technical Writing is an agent skill from openclaw/openclaw-enterprise. Write, organize, name, edit, or review Enterprise developer documentation, specifications, and technical instructions; ground claims in current source and finish with a plain-language cleanup.

Its SKILL.md is about 2.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 4 other files, including reference files (for example `references/documentation-navigation.md`, `references/driver-contracts.md` and `references/specifications.md`).

It sits in Writing & Content, covering Technical writing and Plain language and style rules. The repository describes itself as: The Enterprise-grade Control Plane for modern agentic workloads. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Technical writing
  • Tasks that involve Plain language and style rules

Example prompts

  • “/technical-writing”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Identify the reader, intended action or decision, page scope, and source of
  2. Choose the requested mode: create from evidence, edit while preserving useful
  3. Lead with what the reader can accomplish and one recommended path. Mention
  4. Verify claims, examples, defaults, paths, and failure behavior. Label material
  5. Before handing off any writing, complete the required plain-language pass.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 96faf10. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Technical Writing loads about 2.4k tokens when it runs, and up to ~5.9k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 53 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,140 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~53
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2.4k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~5.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from openclaw/openclaw-enterprise at commit 96faf10, republished under its MIT licence (© openclaw). 1,140 words, ~2,354 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/technical-writing/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 3 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
technical-writing
description
Write, organize, name, edit, or review Enterprise developer documentation, specifications, and technical instructions; ground claims in current source and finish with a plain-language cleanup.

Technical writing

Use for repository documentation, including READMEs, guides, references, flow docs, specifications, and technical PR descriptions. Read the applicable AGENTS.md first; it owns documentation destinations, length limits, and repository terminology. This skill needs no global tools or skill installation.

Establish the reader and evidence

  1. Identify the reader, intended action or decision, page scope, and source of truth. Read current code, schemas, tests, command output, and the relevant diff.
  2. Choose the requested mode: create from evidence, edit while preserving useful facts and the author's intent, or review with findings before proposed fixes.
  3. Lead with what the reader can accomplish and one recommended path. Mention implementation first when explaining architecture or internals is the task.
  4. Verify claims, examples, defaults, paths, and failure behavior. Label material uncertainty and name the missing evidence; polished prose is not verification.
  5. Before handing off any writing, complete the required plain-language pass.

Write precise prose

  • Use present tense, active voice, concrete nouns, and one term per concept. Expand unfamiliar abbreviations at first use; use established product names.
  • Define unfamiliar concepts through their owner, action, and observable role. Replace “the controller handles deployment” with what it reads, decides, and starts, when those details matter to the reader.
  • Make every sentence help the reader decide, act, or understand a boundary. Delete repeated background, meta-commentary, and generic benefits.
  • Treat all, only, and never as literal claims. Name the surface they cover. Use must for requirements and can for options; preserve consequential limits.
  • Use sentence-case, action-specific article headings and descriptive links. Explain why when it changes a decision or prevents a failure.
  • Give each contract, default, and behavior one owning page. Link its definition from other pages rather than copying it into competing references.
  • Make diagrams agree with prose: actors and resources are nodes, containment uses regions, and arrows describe interactions. Do not imply deployment proof from source alone or rely on color alone to convey meaning.

Always deslop the writing

Run this pass whenever you write, edit, or review prose, including small changes, PR descriptions, and review findings. The user does not need to request it. For edits, clean up the prose in scope and read the surrounding text for flow. For a review-only task, clean up your feedback and flag wording in the document when it obscures meaning; do not silently rewrite the source.

  • Name who does what and under which conditions. Replace vague verbs and noun piles such as “performs readiness observation” with “checks whether the workload is ready.” Prefer familiar words; define necessary technical terms.
  • Delete filler, canned transitions, empty claims, and repeated explanations. Remove contrasts or caveats the reader does not need. Avoid invented labels.
  • Put the main point first. Split a sentence when the reader has to untangle several actions, actors, or conditions; give each paragraph one main point.
  • Check the edit against the original and the evidence. Preserve scope, required actions, permissions, warnings, failure behavior, and uncertainty. Do not make an unsupported claim sound certain or cut a useful detail merely to shorten it.

Organize and name development docs

When adding, grouping, moving, or renaming documentation, read Organization and naming. Choose one home based on the reader's task. Use short sidebar labels and give the article enough context to make sense when opened directly. Check repository guidance and the current navigation before treating a proposed layout as implemented.

Choose the smallest useful page

Keep quickstarts and main guides focused on the normal supported workflow. Put platform-specific failures, uncommon environment workarounds, and extended diagnostic steps in the owning troubleshooting page or section. Link to that guidance with a short, symptom-based pointer beside the affected step; do not front-load the main guide with edge cases. Keep required prerequisites, security boundaries, destructive effects, and recovery needed for the normal workflow beside the action they affect.

PageInclude
Overview or READMEReader outcome, scope, recommended starting path, and links to detail.
QuickstartPrerequisites, minimum configuration, one runnable example, expected result, and next step.
Operator guideInputs, command, completion evidence, and recovery in execution order. Keep required inputs separate from optional inputs and show defaults beside options.
API or CLI referencePurpose, permissions, exact inputs, defaults, constraints, outputs, side effects, errors, and examples. Keep generated schemas owned by their generator.
Testing guideSetup, fixtures and permissions, success/failure proof, cleanup, and differences from production.
TroubleshootingObservable symptom, first discriminating check, likely causes, concrete fix, and proof of recovery.
Architecture or specificationSelected model, owners, boundaries, invariants, tradeoffs, and proof; read specification guidance.
Runtime flowTrigger, source pointers, runtime order, state and ownership transitions, decisions, failures, and handoff; follow the repository's local-dev flow contract.

Omit empty or irrelevant sections. Split independently useful topics when a page mixes too many reader tasks. Keep the root documentation map and affected links current, following repository page ownership and length limits.

Show full SKILL.md (339 more words)Show less

Driver contracts

When writing or rewriting a base Driver contract, read and follow the Driver contract template. Use its eight sections: Overview, Interface, IAM, Lifecycle, Limits, Troubleshooting, Implementations, and Related. Keep concrete backend setup and behavior in implementation pages; the template takes precedence over the generic option to omit sections.

Make examples usable

Show realistic, safe inputs and exact identifier types. Mark placeholders clearly, quote YAML values when needed, and specify each code block's language. Include the working directory, prerequisites, invocation, and expected success output when they are necessary to run a command. Verify examples when feasible; report when they have not been executed.

Put permissions, secret handling, destructive effects, concurrency limits, timeouts, ordering, retries, and recovery beside the affected step when mistakes have consequences. Separate development, test, and production behavior. Never include real credentials. Remove explanation before removing information needed for a command to succeed safely. Keep internal orchestration in its owning flow or reference unless the operator needs it to make a decision.

Edit and verify

Correct inaccurate or unsafe claims first, add missing requirements or failure handling, then remove repetition and tighten prose. Update current docs with the behavior they describe; mark a page stale with a source-of-truth link if a full update cannot be completed. Preserve historical specs and user-owned Manual Notes in source. The site omits document Changelogs and empty Manual Notes. Do not rewrite history to match later implementation.

Check commands, examples, terminology, local links, and navigation. For documentation-only changes, use formatting, builds, link checks, and visual inspection; do not add or run tests. Report checks run and gaps.

For a review, cite the conflicting text, explain its consequence, and suggest the smallest correction. Order findings by reader impact, distinguish correctness from optional polish, and state what evidence was checked. Say when no actionable findings remain.

Provenance

Adapted from Docy's core technical-writing and document-lifecycle guidance, developer documentation, concise instructions, and specification references. The repository maintains this self-contained selection; see the developer-skills catalog for source details. Docy's CLI and personal installation are not required.

© openclaw, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 3 other files (references) in .agents/skills/technical-writing of openclaw/openclaw-enterprise.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/documentation-navigation.md
  • references/driver-contracts.md
  • references/specifications.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 96faf10

Compare with similar skills

Technical Writing next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Technical Writing compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Technical Writing this skillopenclaw/openclaw-enterprise359—~2.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Technical Writing Standardcursor/plugins10k10 repos~2.4kAutomated safety check: PassNone
JavaScript Concept Page Writerleonardomso/33-js-concepts67k—~14kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
ISO 24495-4 Plain Language AuditGaZmagik/iso-24495188—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Chinese Technical Writingleter/zh-tech-writing332—~656Automated safety check: PassMIT
Technical Writing Workflowtokenbender/agent-guides367—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • Official

    Applies four layers of technical-writing rules to docs, RFCs, readmes, PR descriptions and commit messages so a tired engineer follows them on the first read.

    10k GitHub starsUsed in 10 repos~2.4k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • JavaScript Concept Page Writer

    leonardomso/33-js-concepts

    Writes or reviews documentation pages for the 33 JavaScript Concepts project, following its structure, a beginner-friendly voice and rules against AI-sounding language.

    67k GitHub stars~14k tokensUpdated 26 days ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Assesses how ready an organization is to produce plain language, through evidence sweeps, interviews and a maturity gap report.

    188 GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated today
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Chinese Technical Writing

    leter/zh-tech-writing

    Sets writing rules for Chinese technical docs: short plain sentences, consistent typography and a checklist for removing AI-sounding filler.

    332 GitHub stars~656 tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Technical Writing Workflow

    tokenbender/agent-guides

    A skill your agent uses for planning, researching, drafting, revising, or auditing technical write-ups, textbooks, papers, reports, READMEs, research notes, PR narratives, and public technical prose.

    367 GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Nbj Write Clearly

    daniel-p-green/nbj-write-clearly

    Drafts, revises, and audits reader-first technical and product documentation.

    117 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed

More from openclaw/openclaw-enterprise

All 9 skills in this repo
  • Local Dev

    openclaw/openclaw-enterprise

    Develop OpenClaw Enterprise changes with proportional verification and source-backed flow documentation for non-trivial behavior.

    359 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Enterprise Testing

    openclaw/openclaw-enterprise

    Select proportional Enterprise validation and diagnose exact CI runs, distinguishing product, harness, infrastructure, and credential failures.

    359 GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Test Audit

    openclaw/openclaw-enterprise

    Gate new or changed Enterprise tests and audit existing tests for observable behavior, credible regressions, duplicate coverage, and test-only production seams.

    359 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Mermaid Diagrams

    openclaw/openclaw-enterprise

    Create or refine readable Mermaid diagrams for changes, architecture, lifecycles, and dependencies in Markdown documents and PR descriptions.

    359 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Design Review

    openclaw/openclaw-enterprise

    Assess designs, public interfaces, state ownership, readability, and refactor proposals when the task calls for design review or structural simplification; not for unrelated routine edits.

    359 GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Deslop

    openclaw/openclaw-enterprise

    Clean only the current Enterprise diff before autoreview, preserving behavior, security boundaries, required TODOs, and useful test-intent comments.

    359 GitHub stars~739 tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Technical Writing

What does Technical Writing do?

Write, organize, name, edit, or review Enterprise developer documentation, specifications, and technical instructions; ground claims in current source and finish with a plain-language cleanup. Technical Writing is an agent skill from openclaw/openclaw-enterprise. Write, organize, name, edit, or review Enterprise developer documentation, specifications, and technical instructions; ground claims in current source and finish with a plain-language cleanup.

When should I use Technical Writing?

Technical Writing fits situations like: tasks that involve Technical writing; tasks that involve Plain language and style rules.

How do I install Technical Writing in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add openclaw/openclaw-enterprise --skill technical-writing -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (.agents/skills/technical-writing in openclaw/openclaw-enterprise) into .claude/skills/technical-writing in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Technical Writing in Codex?

Run `npx skills add openclaw/openclaw-enterprise --skill technical-writing -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (.agents/skills/technical-writing in openclaw/openclaw-enterprise) into .agents/skills/technical-writing in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Technical Writing in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add openclaw/openclaw-enterprise --skill technical-writing -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/technical-writing, .gemini/skills/technical-writing, .github/skills/technical-writing and .opencode/skills/technical-writing in your project.

What does Technical Writing need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Technical Writing is instructions for the agent only.

Does Technical Writing access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Technical Writing safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Technical Writing use?

Technical Writing is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Technical Writing use?

About 2.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 9.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 3.6k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Technical Writing?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Technical Writing: Technical Writing Standard (cursor/plugins, 10k stars), JavaScript Concept Page Writer (leonardomso/33-js-concepts, 67k stars), ISO 24495-4 Plain Language Audit (GaZmagik/iso-24495, 188 stars) and Chinese Technical Writing (leter/zh-tech-writing, 332 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Technical Writing?

openclaw (a GitHub organization) maintains it in openclaw/openclaw-enterprise, which has 359 GitHub stars. The repository holds 9 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 7, 2026.

Source: openclaw/openclaw-enterprise on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.