Review Elixir/Phoenix changes before committing — bugs, security, Ecto, LiveView, and Oban anti-patterns, via parallel specialist agents.

MITAuto-check passedAI & LLM Engineering

Install Review

skills CLI
$ npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill review -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix review --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/plugins/elixir-phoenix/skills/review .claude/skills/review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
review
GitHub stars
565
Token cost
~2.2k tokens
SKILL.md length
938 words
Files
7 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
109
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Review Elixir/Phoenix changes before committing — bugs, security, Ecto, LiveView, and Oban anti-patterns, via parallel specialist agents.

  • Works in 5 steps: Identify Changed Files and Prepare… → Spawn Review Agents (MANDATORY) → Collect and Compress Findings → …
  • Asked to review changes
  • SKILL.md covers Usage, Arguments, Workflow and Iron Laws, plus 1 more section
  • Calls git and gh

What it does

Review is an agent skill from oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix. Review Elixir/Phoenix changes before committing — bugs, security, Ecto, LiveView, and Oban anti-patterns, via parallel specialist agents. Use when asked to review changes, a component, a diff, or a PR.

Its SKILL.md is about 2.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 7 other files, including reference files (for example `references/agent-spawning.md`, `references/blocker-handling.md` and `references/conventions.md`).

It sits in AI & LLM Engineering, covering LLM observability. It works with Elixir. The repository describes itself as: Claude Code plugin for Elixir/Phoenix/LiveView — 26 specialist agents, Iron Laws enforcement, and Tidewave MCP integration. Plan features with parallel research agents, execute… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Asked to review changes
  • Tasks that involve LLM observability

Example prompts

  • “/review”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Identify Changed Files and Prepare Directories
  2. Spawn Review Agents (MANDATORY)
  3. Collect and Compress Findings
  4. Generate Review Summary
  5. Present Findings and Ask User

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 9767a82. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • git
    • gh

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md. Its commands use git and gh, which can reach the network depending on how they are called.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Review loads about 2.2k tokens when it runs, and up to ~6.9k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 52 tokens; SKILL.md has 938 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~52
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2.2k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~6.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix at commit 9767a82, republished under its MIT licence (© oliver-kriska). 938 words, ~2,238 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 6 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
review
description
Review Elixir/Phoenix changes before committing — bugs, security, Ecto, LiveView, and Oban anti-patterns, via parallel specialist agents. Use when asked to review changes, a component, a diff, or a PR.
effort
high
argument-hint
[test|security|oban|deploy|iron-laws|all]

Review Elixir/Phoenix Code

Review code by spawning parallel specialist agents. Find and explain issues — do NOT create tasks or fix anything.

Usage

/phx:review                          # Auto-detects task ID from branch/commits
/phx:review test                     # Review test files only
/phx:review security                 # Run security audit only
/phx:review oban                     # Review Oban workers only
/phx:review deploy                   # Validate deployment config
/phx:review iron-laws                # Check Iron Law violations only
/phx:review ENA-8931                 # Force Linear issue
/phx:review #42                      # Force GitHub issue
/phx:review .claude/plans/auth/plan.md    # Force plan / spec file
/phx:review --no-requirements        # Skip requirements coverage check
/phx:review --codex                  # Add Codex CLI as cross-model reviewer

Arguments

$ARGUMENTS = Focus area, task ID, or path to plan/spec file.

When no requirements argument is passed, the skill auto-detects a task ID from the branch and recent commits (see ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/requirements-detection.md).

Workflow

Step 1: Identify Changed Files and Prepare Directories

Create output dirs before spawning agents — agents cannot create directories, so their writes would fail.

  1. Determine SLUG via Glob on .claude/plans/*/ (default: "review")
  2. Run mkdir -p ".claude/plans/${SLUG}/reviews" ".claude/plans/${SLUG}/summaries" .claude/reviews
  3. Run git diff --name-only HEAD~5 and git diff --name-only main
  4. Save the diff base for pre-existing detection in Step 3b
Step 1b: Load Plan Context and Prior Reviews
  • Read .claude/plans/${SLUG}/scratchpad.md for planning decisions and rationale
  • Pass relevant decisions to agents as WHY-context (eliminates session archaeology)
  • Check .claude/plans/${SLUG}/reviews/ for prior output; if present, include a consolidated summary as "PRIOR FINDINGS" with: "Focus on NEW issues. Mark still-present issues as PERSISTENT."
Step 1c: Detect Requirements Source (skip on --no-requirements)

Find a task/spec whose requirements should be cross-checked against the diff. Priority order (stop at first match): explicit arg → conversation context → branch regex → commit subjects → latest plan → none. Full table, regexes, and fetch mapping in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/requirements-detection.md.

Fetch the detected source into .claude/plans/${SLUG}/reviews/.requirements-input.md (Linear via mcp__linear__get_issue, GitHub via gh issue view, file via Read). Record REQ_SOURCE label (e.g. "Linear ENA-8931") for the verifier heading. On fetch failure, set SOURCE_STATUS=FETCH_FAILED and continue — verifier will emit NOT AVAILABLE rather than block the review.

Step 2: Spawn Review Agents (MANDATORY)

Spawn each agent role once per review. Code analysis belongs to the spawned agents, not this context — a review that spawns zero agents has failed.

  1. If TaskCreate is in your tool list (never ToolSearch for it), create a task per agent, set in_progress
  2. For /phx:review or /phx:review all: select agents dynamically per the selection table in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/agent-spawning.md
  3. For focused reviews (test|security|oban|deploy|iron-laws): spawn only the matching specialist from the focused mode table in the same reference
  4. If Step 1c succeeded (REQ_SOURCE non-empty and --no-requirements not passed): add phx:requirements-verifier to the same parallel batch. Pass these prompt inputs: REQUIREMENTS_TEXT (content of .requirements-input.md), REQUIREMENTS_SOURCE (REQ_SOURCE label), DIFF_FILES (git diff --name-only output), SOURCE_STATUS (only if FETCH_FAILED), output_file: .claude/plans/{slug}/reviews/requirements.md
  5. Spawn in ONE message with run_in_background: true. Do not pass the deprecated Agent mode parameter; Claude Code 2.1.212+ ignores it and subagents inherit the parent session's permission mode
  6. Pass an explicit output_file per agent (mapping in the reference)
  7. Include the CRITICAL prompt block: write by turn ~12, chat body ≤300 words
  8. Scope every agent to the diff: pass git diff --name-only output with "Focus on NEW code. Pre-existing: one-line {file}:{line} — {brief}. Do NOT deep-analyze unchanged files."
  9. With --codex: add phx:codex-reviewer to the same batch (prompt template in agent-spawning.md). Missing CLI degrades to SKIPPED.
Step 3: Collect and Compress Findings

Wait for ALL agents to complete before writing the verdict — a partial panel gives a misleading review. Count one completion notification per agent spawned; mark any task completed.

Missing file fallback — after each agent finishes, verify its expected output_file exists. If missing (turn exhaustion, error):

  1. Append to .claude/plans/{slug}/scratchpad.md: [HH:MM] WARN: {agent} did not write {expected_path} — extracting from message
  2. Parse findings from the agent's return message as fallback
  3. Mark the section in the final review with ⚠️ EXTRACTED FROM AGENT MESSAGE (see scratchpad) — never silent

Verification-runner fallback — if it times out, run directly: mix compile --warnings-as-errors && mix format --check-formatted $(git diff --name-only HEAD~5 | grep '\.exs\?$' | tr '\n' ' ') && mix credo --strict && mix test

Context supervision — for 4+ agents, spawn phx:context-supervisor:

Prompt: "Compress review agent output.
  input_dir: .claude/plans/{slug}/reviews
  output_dir: .claude/plans/{slug}/summaries
  output_file: review-consolidated.md
  priority_instructions: BLOCKERs and WARNINGs: KEEP ALL.
    SUGGESTIONs: COMPRESS similar ones into groups.
    Deconfliction: when iron-law-judge and elixir-reviewer
    flag same code, keep iron-law-judge finding."

Skip the supervisor for focused (1-agent) reviews — read output directly.

Show full SKILL.md (328 more words)Show less
Step 3b: Filter Findings (Anti-Noise)

Before writing the review, apply these overriding filters to each finding:

  1. Would a senior Elixir dev dismiss this as noise?
  2. Does the finding add complexity exceeding the problem's complexity?
  3. Are any findings duplicates reworded by different agents?
  4. Does the finding affect code actually changed in this diff?
  5. Is the finding on unchanged code (not in diff)? → Mark PRE-EXISTING
  6. Flagged by both a Claude agent AND [codex]? → mark HIGH CONFIDENCE

Demote or remove findings that fail filters 1-4. Mark pre-existing per filter 5.

Step 4: Generate Review Summary

Read consolidated/agent output. Write to .claude/plans/{slug}/reviews/{feature}-review.md with verdict: PASS | PASS WITH WARNINGS | REQUIRES CHANGES | BLOCKED.

Requirements Coverage in verdict: if the verifier ran, read its summary line and fold into the verdict:

  • Any UNMET → escalate to REQUIRES CHANGES (even if code-quality PASS)
  • Any PARTIAL (no UNMET) → downgrade PASS → PASS WITH WARNINGS
  • NOT AVAILABLE / all MET / UNCLEAR only → no verdict change

Insert the verifier's ## Requirements Coverage block into the review document before the per-agent findings so it's the first thing the user sees.

Step 5: Present Findings and Ask User

STOP and present the review. Do NOT create tasks or fix anything.

On BLOCKED or REQUIRES CHANGES: Show finding count by severity, then offer via AskUserQuestion: /phx:triage (recommended), /phx:plan .claude/plans/{slug}/reviews/{feature}-review.md (converts findings into a follow-up plan — pass the review file path, not a re-description), fix directly (/phx:codex-loop when codex ran), or "I'll handle it myself".

On PASS / PASS WITH WARNINGS: Suggest /phx:compound, /phx:learn-from-fix.

Convention extraction: After presenting findings, offer: "Any findings to suppress or enforce as conventions?" See ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/conventions.md.

Iron Laws

  1. Review is READ-ONLY — Find and explain, never fix
  2. NEVER auto-fix after review — Always ask the user first
  3. Always offer both paths: /phx:plan and /phx:work
  4. Research before claiming — Agents MUST research before making claims about CI/CD or external services

Integration

/phx:plan → /phx:work → /phx:review (YOU ARE HERE) → Blocked? /phx:triage or /phx:plan | Pass? /phx:compound

See: ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/review-template.md, ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/example-review.md, ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/blocker-handling.md, ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/requirements-detection.md

© oliver-kriska, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 6 other files (references) in plugins/elixir-phoenix/skills/review of oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/agent-spawning.md
  • references/blocker-handling.md
  • references/conventions.md
  • references/example-review.md
  • references/requirements-detection.md
  • references/review-template.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 9767a82

Compare with similar skills

Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Review compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Review this skilloliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix565—~2.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Elixir Architectmaxim-ist/elixir-architect145—~7.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Phoenix Frameworkpodlove/radiator136—~562Automated safety check: PassMIT
Elixir Expertpass-agent/loomkin1811 repos~796Automated safety check: PassMIT
Usage Rulesbradleygolden/claude-marketplace-elixir176—~4.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Elixir Prodavila7/claude-code-templates33k8 repos~486Automated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Elixir Architect

    maxim-ist/elixir-architect

    A skill your agent uses when designing or architecting Elixir/Phoenix applications, creating comprehensive project documentation, planning OTP supervision trees, defining domain models with Ash…

    145 GitHub stars~7.6k tokensUpdated 10 mo ago
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Phoenix Framework

    podlove/radiator

    Use this skill working with Phoenix Framework. An agent skill from podlove/radiator.

    136 GitHub stars~562 tokensUpdated 16 days ago
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Elixir Expert

    pass-agent/loomkin

    Expert in Elixir, Phoenix Framework, and OTP. An agent skill from pass-agent/loomkin.

    181 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~796 tokens
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Usage Rules

    bradleygolden/claude-marketplace-elixir

    Search for package-specific usage rules and best practices from Elixir packages.

    176 GitHub stars~4.9k tokensUpdated 9 mo ago
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check: notes
  • Elixir Pro

    davila7/claude-code-templates

    Write idiomatic Elixir code with OTP patterns, supervision trees, and Phoenix LiveView.

    33k GitHub starsUsed in 8 repos~486 tokens
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Phoenix

    ericrisco/rsc-harness

    A skill your agent uses when building an Elixir web app with Phoenix — contexts, Ecto schemas, changesets and migrations, LiveView, channels and PubSub, the generators, and the boundary between…

    180 GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated yesterday
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check: notes

More from oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

All 109 skills in this repo
  • Codex Ab

    oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

    Run an A/B codex review experiment — holistic codex review vs 3 focused dimension passes (security, ecto, liveview) on the branch diff, classify findings, report a panel-value verdict.

    565 GitHub stars~977 tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Audit

    oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

    Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality.

    565 GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Compound Docs

    oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

    Searchable Elixir/Phoenix/Ecto solution documentation system with; Use when consulting past solutions…

    565 GitHub stars~528 tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Compound Docs

    oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

    Searchable Elixir/Phoenix/Ecto solution documentation system with YAML frontmatter.

    565 GitHub stars~547 tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Deploy

    oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

    Elixir/Phoenix deployment patterns — Dockerfile, fly.toml, runtime.exs, mix release, rel/ overlays.

    565 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Deps Update

    oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

    Bump outdated Hex deps — inventory, snapshot changelogs, update, fix breaks, split reviewable PRs (patches bundled, majors solo).

    565 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Works with

Questions about Review

What does Review do?

Review Elixir/Phoenix changes before committing — bugs, security, Ecto, LiveView, and Oban anti-patterns, via parallel specialist agents. Review is an agent skill from oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix. Review Elixir/Phoenix changes before committing — bugs, security, Ecto, LiveView, and Oban anti-patterns, via parallel specialist agents.

When should I use Review?

Review fits situations like: asked to review changes; tasks that involve LLM observability.

How do I install Review in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (plugins/elixir-phoenix/skills/review in oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix) into .claude/skills/review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Review in Codex?

Run `npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (plugins/elixir-phoenix/skills/review in oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix) into .agents/skills/review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/review, .gemini/skills/review, .github/skills/review and .opencode/skills/review in your project.

What does Review need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Review needs the command-line tools its instructions call (git and gh).

Does Review access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Its commands use git and gh, which can reach the network depending on how they are called. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Review safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Review use?

Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Review use?

About 2.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 4.7k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Review?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Review: Elixir Architect (maxim-ist/elixir-architect, 145 stars), Phoenix Framework (podlove/radiator, 136 stars), Elixir Expert (pass-agent/loomkin, 181 stars) and Usage Rules (bradleygolden/claude-marketplace-elixir, 176 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Review?

oliver-kriska (a GitHub user) maintains it in oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix, which has 565 GitHub stars. The repository holds 109 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 5, 2026.

Source: oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.