Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve.

MITAuto-check passedDevelopment

Install Phx PR Review

skills CLI
$ npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill phx-pr-review -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix phx-pr-review --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/targets/pi/skills/phx-pr-review .claude/skills/phx-pr-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
phx-pr-review
GitHub stars
565
Token cost
~1.5k tokens
SKILL.md length
553 words
Files
4 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
109
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve.

  • Works in 7 steps: Resolve the PR number or URL. Prefer a… → Keep only unresolved threads, preserve… → Gate 1 — read-only selection. Always… → …
  • A PR URL/number
  • SKILL.md covers Usage, Workflow, Iron Laws and References
  • Calls gh; reaches github.com

What it does

Phx PR Review is an agent skill from oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix. Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 4 other files, including reference files (for example `references/bot-triage.md`, `references/gh-commands.md` and `references/response-patterns.md`).

It sits in Development, covering Pull requests and LLM observability. It works with GitHub and Elixir. The repository describes itself as: Claude Code plugin for Elixir/Phoenix/LiveView — 26 specialist agents, Iron Laws enforcement, and Tidewave MCP integration. Plan features with parallel research agents, execute… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • A PR URL/number
  • Reviewer comments

Example prompts

  • “/phx-pr-review”

Workflow steps

7 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Resolve the PR number or URL. Prefer a runtime GitHub connector that returns
  2. Keep only unresolved threads, preserve API order, then group by path and line.
  3. Gate 1 — read-only selection. Always stop after triage for an explicit list
  4. Gate 2 — edit approval. For each selected thread, read current code and
  5. Gate 3 — posting approval. Draft a reply only after verification. Outdated means location drift, not
  6. Gate 4 — resolution approval. First confirm the post from the API response.
  7. Return thread | action | verification | reply | resolution, changed files,

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 9767a82. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • gh

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    Hosts in commands or code, which the agent is likely to contact:

    • github.com

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Phx PR Review loads about 1.5k tokens when it runs, and up to ~3k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 64 tokens; SKILL.md has 553 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~64
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.5k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix at commit 9767a82, republished under its MIT licence (© oliver-kriska). 553 words, ~1,519 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/phx-pr-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 3 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
phx-pr-review
description
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.

PR Review Response

Inspect unresolved pull-request review threads, triage them read-only by default, and apply only explicitly approved fixes. GitHub mutations are never implied.

Usage

text
/skill:phx-pr-review 42
/skill:phx-pr-review 42 --fix
/skill:phx-pr-review https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/42 --bots-only
/skill:phx-pr-review 42 --no-resolve

Workflow

  1. Resolve the PR number or URL. Prefer a runtime GitHub connector that returns thread IDs and resolved state. Otherwise use this exact gh 2.94-compatible fallback (requires command -v gh and gh auth status):
bash
PR_INPUT="${1:?PR number or URL}"
if [[ "$PR_INPUT" =~ ^https://github.com/([^/]+)/([^/]+)/pull/([0-9]+) ]]; then
  OWNER="${BASH_REMATCH[1]}"; REPO="${BASH_REMATCH[2]}"; PR="${BASH_REMATCH[3]}"
else
  OWNER=$(gh repo view --json owner --jq '.owner.login')
  REPO=$(gh repo view --json name --jq '.name'); PR="$PR_INPUT"
fi
gh api graphql --paginate -F owner="$OWNER" -F repo="$REPO" -F pr="$PR"   -f query='query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $pr: Int!, $endCursor: String) { repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) { pullRequest(number: $pr) { reviewThreads(first: 100, after: $endCursor) { nodes { id isResolved isOutdated path line originalLine comments(first: 100) { totalCount nodes { id databaseId body author { login __typename } replyTo { id } } } } pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor } } } } }'
gh api graphql --paginate -F owner="$OWNER" -F repo="$REPO" -F pr="$PR"   -f query='query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $pr: Int!, $endCursor: String) { repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) { pullRequest(number: $pr) { reviews(first: 100, after: $endCursor) { nodes { id state body submittedAt author { login __typename } } pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor } } } } }'

--paginate binds each returned pageInfo.endCursor to $endCursor. Filter isResolved == false after collecting pages. Preserve thread id, root comment id/databaseId, and author.__typename (not login suffixes). comments(first:100) is nested and is not paginated by the outer command: if comments.totalCount > nodes.length, report the thread as TRUNCATED and fetch every comment page with this exact query. The outer query intentionally omits nested comments.pageInfo so gh --paginate follows only the outer reviewThreads.pageInfo cursor:

bash
gh api graphql --paginate -F threadId="$THREAD_ID"   -f query='query($threadId: ID!, $endCursor: String) { node(id:$threadId) { ... on PullRequestReviewThread { comments(first:100, after:$endCursor) { totalCount nodes { id databaseId body author { login __typename } replyTo { id } } pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor } } } } }'

Merge all comment pages in API order and deduplicate by GraphQL id (first occurrence wins). Block triage until every truncated thread is complete. Do not substitute issue comments for review threads. 2. Keep only unresolved threads, preserve API order, then group by path and line. With --bots-only, use API actor type rather than a login suffix. Show one row per thread with author, category, outdated state, and proposed action. Review summaries are separate, non-resolvable context. 3. Gate 1 — read-only selection. Always stop after triage for an explicit list of selected thread IDs. Selection authorizes inspection only. --fix permits later edits but approves nothing and never selects every thread. 4. Gate 2 — edit approval. For each selected thread, read current code and propose the exact patch. Obtain explicit edit approval before editing, or record EDIT: NOT APPLICABLE with evidence. Then show the applied diff and run the smallest relevant compile/test check after every code change. 5. Gate 3 — posting approval. Draft a reply only after verification. Outdated means location drift, not addressed: require current code/diff evidence before that disposition. Show the diff, evidence, and exact verified reply, then obtain a separate explicit posting approval before posting. Use a connector mutation when available, or gh api to reply to the root review comment. If posting is unsupported or fails, report NOT POSTED with the reason. 6. Gate 4 — resolution approval. First confirm the post from the API response. Only then request a separate resolution approval. --no-resolve always disables resolution, regardless of any other flag or approval. Use the connector or resolveReviewThread mutation, then confirm returned state. Never claim replied/resolved from a draft or intent. 7. Return thread | action | verification | reply | resolution, changed files, and precise blockers. Paginated review summaries with CHANGES_REQUESTED or an actionable non-empty body are findings even when there are zero inline threads; report them as non-resolvable context and never call that state clean. Do not commit or push.

Show full SKILL.md (106 more words)Show less

Generic read-only workers may inspect independent threads when the runtime has them, but named custom agents are not required and sequential same-session processing is complete.

Iron Laws

  1. Triage always stops for explicit thread selection — --fix permits but does not approve edits.
  2. Never post, resolve, dismiss, commit, or push without the required approval.
  3. Never resolve before a successful reply and never fabricate mutation state.
  4. Never claim a fix without a shown diff and successful focused verification.
  5. Scrutinize bot and human findings equally; Iron Laws override suggestions.

References

  • references/response-patterns.md — reply templates and tone
  • references/gh-commands.md — GitHub CLI queries and mutations
  • references/bot-triage.md — bot review triage

© oliver-kriska, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 3 other files (references) in targets/pi/skills/phx-pr-review of oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/bot-triage.md
  • references/gh-commands.md
  • references/response-patterns.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 9767a82

Compare with similar skills

Phx PR Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Phx PR Review compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Phx PR Review this skilloliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix565—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Git Workflowlangfuse/langfuse36k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
PR Babysitteropeninterpreter/openinterpreter69k3 repos~4.2kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Check PRonyx-dot-app/onyx32k2 repos~2.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Contributor-First PR MergeHKUDS/OpenHarness16k1 repos~847Automated safety check: PassMIT
Create Pull Requestcline/cline70k1 repos~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • Git Workflow

    langfuse/langfuse

    Langfuse repo Git, GitHub, commit, branch, pull request, issue search, release, and production-promotion workflow.

    36k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • PR Babysitter

    openinterpreter/openinterpreter

    Watches an open GitHub pull request until it merges, handling review comments, diagnosing CI failures and retrying flaky checks along the way.

    69k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~4.2k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Check PR

    onyx-dot-app/onyx

    Checks a GitHub, GitLab, or Perforce (p4) pull request (or merge request, or shelved changelist) for unresolved review comments, failing status checks, and incomplete PR descriptions.

    32k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.3k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Merges external GitHub pull requests while keeping the original author credited, and fixes conflicts after the merge instead of rewriting the contribution.

    16k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~847 tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Opens a GitHub pull request from your current branch with the gh CLI, after reviewing the commits and diff and gathering the details the PR needs.

    70k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.6k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Pull Request Title and Body Writer

    openinterpreter/openinterpreter

    Rewrites the title and body of one or more pull requests with gh, leading with why the change was made, then what changed, and describing only the net result.

    69k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~1.1k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed

More from oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

All 109 skills in this repo
  • Codex Ab

    oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

    Run an A/B codex review experiment — holistic codex review vs 3 focused dimension passes (security, ecto, liveview) on the branch diff, classify findings, report a panel-value verdict.

    565 GitHub stars~977 tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Audit

    oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

    Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality.

    565 GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Compound Docs

    oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

    Searchable Elixir/Phoenix/Ecto solution documentation system with; Use when consulting past solutions…

    565 GitHub stars~528 tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Compound Docs

    oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

    Searchable Elixir/Phoenix/Ecto solution documentation system with YAML frontmatter.

    565 GitHub stars~547 tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Deploy

    oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

    Elixir/Phoenix deployment patterns — Dockerfile, fly.toml, runtime.exs, mix release, rel/ overlays.

    565 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Deps Update

    oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

    Bump outdated Hex deps — inventory, snapshot changelogs, update, fix breaks, split reviewable PRs (patches bundled, majors solo).

    565 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Works with

Categories

Questions about Phx PR Review

What does Phx PR Review do?

Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Phx PR Review is an agent skill from oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix. Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve.

When should I use Phx PR Review?

Phx PR Review fits situations like: A PR URL/number; reviewer comments.

How do I install Phx PR Review in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill phx-pr-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (targets/pi/skills/phx-pr-review in oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix) into .claude/skills/phx-pr-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Phx PR Review in Codex?

Run `npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill phx-pr-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (targets/pi/skills/phx-pr-review in oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix) into .agents/skills/phx-pr-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Phx PR Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill phx-pr-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/phx-pr-review, .gemini/skills/phx-pr-review, .github/skills/phx-pr-review and .opencode/skills/phx-pr-review in your project.

What does Phx PR Review need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Phx PR Review needs the command-line tools its instructions call (gh).

Does Phx PR Review access the network?

SKILL.md names 1 domain. In commands or code: github.com; the agent is likely to contact it when it follows the instructions. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Phx PR Review safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Phx PR Review use?

Phx PR Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Phx PR Review use?

About 1.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 1.4k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Phx PR Review?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Phx PR Review: Git Workflow (langfuse/langfuse, 36k stars), PR Babysitter (openinterpreter/openinterpreter, 69k stars), Check PR (onyx-dot-app/onyx, 32k stars) and Contributor-First PR Merge (HKUDS/OpenHarness, 16k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Phx PR Review?

oliver-kriska (a GitHub user) maintains it in oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix, which has 565 GitHub stars. The repository holds 109 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 5, 2026.

Source: oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.