Agent skill

Squad Review

by nicknisi in nicknisi/claude-plugins

Review the current branch with six specialist lenses (security, correctness, conventions, tests, architecture, duplication), then put every finding through an adversarial verifier that tries to…

MITAuto-check passedDevelopment

Install Squad Review

skills CLI
$ npx skills add nicknisi/claude-plugins --skill squad-review -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install nicknisi/claude-plugins squad-review --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nicknisi/claude-plugins.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/plugins/essentials/skills/squad-review .claude/skills/squad-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
squad-review
GitHub stars
114
Token cost
~751 tokens
SKILL.md length
349 words
Files
2 (incl. scripts)
Skills in repo
12
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Review the current branch with six specialist lenses (security, correctness, conventions, tests, architecture, duplication), then put every finding through an adversarial verifier that tries to…

  • The user asks for a thorough
  • SKILL.md covers Run it, Pick the scope yourself, Report the result and Requirements
  • Runs JavaScript scripts from its folder; calls git
  • Paranoid review

What it does

Squad Review is an agent skill from nicknisi/claude-plugins. Review the current branch with six specialist lenses (security, correctness, conventions, tests, architecture, duplication), then put every finding through an adversarial verifier that tries to refute it — so what reaches you has already survived a skeptic. Use when the user asks for a thorough, deep, or paranoid review, a review before merging or shipping, a "real" review, or wants to know what a review would catch that a quick pass misses. Costs 12 agents; for a fast single-pass read, use the built-in…

Its SKILL.md is about 750 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 2 other files, including scripts (for example `scripts/workflow.js`).

It sits in Development. It works with Git. The repository describes itself as: Nick's own marketplace of Claude Plugins. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • The user asks for a thorough
  • Paranoid review
  • A review before merging
  • Wants to know what a review would catch that a quick pass misses

Example prompts

  • “/squad-review”

Requirements

  • Node.js

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 6a6decd. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships 1 file in scripts/ (JavaScript), which the agent can run.

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • git

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md. Its commands use git, which can reach the network depending on how they are called.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Squad Review loads about 751 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 137 tokens; SKILL.md has 349 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~137
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~751

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from nicknisi/claude-plugins at commit 6a6decd, republished under its MIT licence (© nicknisi). 349 words, ~751 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/squad-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 1 other file; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
squad-review
description
Review the current branch with six specialist lenses (security, correctness, conventions, tests, architecture, duplication), then put every finding through an adversarial verifier that tries to refute it — so what reaches you has already survived a skeptic. Use when the user asks for a thorough, deep, or paranoid review, a review before merging or shipping, a "real" review, or wants to know what a review would catch that a quick pass misses. Costs 12 agents; for a fast single-pass read, use the built-in code-review skill instead.
argument-hint
Optional — what to review (defaults to the branch diff vs main)

Squad Review

Six lenses in parallel, each finding then attacked by a verifier that assumes it is wrong until proven otherwise. The verification is the point: an unverified fan-out produces six sections of plausible noise, and you stop reading it by the third review.

Run it

Resolve the script path, then hand it to the Workflow tool:

bash
echo ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/squad-review/scripts/workflow.js
Workflow({
  scriptPath: "<the path printed above>",
  args: { scope: "<git command>", label: "<human description>" }
})

Pick the scope yourself

Read the git state and choose — do not open a menu:

  • On a feature branch with commits → git diff main...HEAD (the normal case)
  • On main, or a branch with only uncommitted work → git diff HEAD
  • Untracked files present and relevant → name them in label so reviewers read them in full; a diff won't show them
  • Nothing to review → say so and stop, don't launch the workflow

Ask only when two scopes both have substantial content and you genuinely can't tell which one the user means. If the user named a scope, use it.

Report the result

findings are ranked and already verified. Present them grouped by severity, not by lens — the lens is metadata, not structure. Lead with blockers. Give each finding its file:line, what breaks, and the fix direction.

Three fields decide whether the review can be trusted, and all three must reach the user:

  • refuted — say how many and why, in one line. That number is the evidence verification happened. Hiding it makes this look like every other review.
  • unverified — findings whose verifier never ruled on them. Report them under a separate heading that says exactly that. They have not survived a skeptic, so never merge them into the findings list.
  • lenses_failed — non-empty means the review is incomplete. Name the lenses that died. Never present a partial review as a clean bill of health.

Do not re-rank or soften what the verifiers confirmed, and do not write the report to a file unless asked.

Requirements

Needs Claude Code's Workflow tool. This skill also ships to Pi via the repo's pi.skills glob, where that tool does not exist — there it will not run, and that is the intended failure rather than a silent degradation to something weaker.

© nicknisi, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 1 other file (scripts) in plugins/essentials/skills/squad-review of nicknisi/claude-plugins.

  • SKILL.md
  • scripts/workflow.js

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 6a6decd

Compare with similar skills

Squad Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Squad Review compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Squad Review this skillnicknisi/claude-plugins114—~751Automated safety check: PassMIT
Finishing a Development Branchobra/superpowers297k5 repos~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Code Review ChecklistshareAI-lab/learn-claude-code78k4 repos~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Contributor-First PR MergeHKUDS/OpenHarness16k1 repos~847Automated safety check: PassMIT
Finishing A Development Branchfarm-fe/farm5.6k35 repos~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Migrate Internal Package into GhostTryGhost/Ghost56k—~3.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Walks the last step of a branch: confirm tests pass, detect the git environment, ask how to integrate, carry out your choice and clean up the worktree.

    297k GitHub starsUsed in 5 repos~1.9k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Code Review Checklist

    shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code

    Reviews code against a five-part checklist covering security, correctness, performance, maintainability and testing, and reports findings in a fixed format.

    78k GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~1.1k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Merges external GitHub pull requests while keeping the original author credited, and fixes conflicts after the merge instead of rewriting the contribution.

    16k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~847 tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • A skill your agent uses when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for…

    5.6k GitHub starsUsed in 35 repos~1.8k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Moves a package from another TryGhost repository into Ghost as an internal workspace package while keeping its Git history, with checkpoints for the steps that need an administrator.

    56k GitHub stars~3.8k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Doc Sync

    JetBrains/ideavim

    Official

    Keeps IdeaVim documentation in sync with code changes. An agent skill from JetBrains/ideavim.

    10k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.6k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed

More from nicknisi/claude-plugins

All 12 skills in this repo
  • Blog Post Writer

    nicknisi/claude-plugins

    Turn Nick Nisi's raw material into a blog post draft in his voice.

    114 GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Image Gen

    nicknisi/claude-plugins

    Generate or edit images via Google Gemini (nano-banana-pro) or OpenAI gpt-image-2.

    114 GitHub stars~502 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Prototype

    nicknisi/claude-plugins

    Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question before committing to real implementation.

    114 GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Tmux

    nicknisi/claude-plugins

    Read and drive other tmux panes when Claude runs inside tmux.

    114 GitHub stars~3.1k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Youtube Notes

    nicknisi/claude-plugins

    Pull captions from a YouTube video and turn them into chapter-aligned notes where every claim carries a clickable timestamp.

    114 GitHub stars~2.8k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Conference Talk Builder

    nicknisi/claude-plugins

    Create conference talk outlines and slide-by-slide content plans using narrative frameworks.

    114 GitHub stars~2.7k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Works with

Categories

Questions about Squad Review

What does Squad Review do?

Review the current branch with six specialist lenses (security, correctness, conventions, tests, architecture, duplication), then put every finding through an adversarial verifier that tries to…. Squad Review is an agent skill from nicknisi/claude-plugins. Review the current branch with six specialist lenses (security, correctness, conventions, tests, architecture, duplication), then put every finding through an adversarial verifier that tries to refute it — so what reaches you has already survived a skeptic.

When should I use Squad Review?

Squad Review fits situations like: the user asks for a thorough; paranoid review; A review before merging; wants to know what a review would catch that a quick pass misses.

How do I install Squad Review in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add nicknisi/claude-plugins --skill squad-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (plugins/essentials/skills/squad-review in nicknisi/claude-plugins) into .claude/skills/squad-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Squad Review in Codex?

Run `npx skills add nicknisi/claude-plugins --skill squad-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (plugins/essentials/skills/squad-review in nicknisi/claude-plugins) into .agents/skills/squad-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Squad Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add nicknisi/claude-plugins --skill squad-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/squad-review, .gemini/skills/squad-review, .github/skills/squad-review and .opencode/skills/squad-review in your project.

What does Squad Review need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Squad Review needs JavaScript for the scripts in its folder and the command-line tools its instructions call (git). Our summary lists: Node.js.

Does Squad Review access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Its commands use git, which can reach the network depending on how they are called. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Squad Review safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.

What licence does Squad Review use?

Squad Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Squad Review use?

About 751 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Squad Review?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Squad Review: Finishing a Development Branch (obra/superpowers, 297k stars), Code Review Checklist (shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code, 78k stars), Contributor-First PR Merge (HKUDS/OpenHarness, 16k stars) and Finishing A Development Branch (farm-fe/farm, 5.6k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Squad Review?

nicknisi (a GitHub user) maintains it in nicknisi/claude-plugins, which has 114 GitHub stars. The repository holds 12 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on August 11, 2026.

Source: nicknisi/claude-plugins on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.