Audit Report
harness/harness-skills
Generate audit reports and compliance trails using Harness audit trail data via MCP v2 tools.
Agent skill
Performing Access Review And Certification
Designs and runs access review and certification campaigns-scoping, reviewer selection, risk-based prioritization, micro-certification, and remediation tracking-to verify user access matches job…
Install Performing Access Review And Certification
$ npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill performing-access-review-and-certification -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills performing-access-review-and-certification --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification .claude/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "performing-access-review-and-certification" agent skill from https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/tree/main/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification into .claude/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "performing-access-review-and-certification", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/tree/main/skills/performing-access-review-and-certificationType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill performing-access-review-and-certification -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills performing-access-review-and-certification --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification .agents/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "performing-access-review-and-certification" agent skill from https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/tree/main/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification into .agents/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "performing-access-review-and-certification", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill performing-access-review-and-certification -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills performing-access-review-and-certification --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification .cursor/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "performing-access-review-and-certification" agent skill from https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/tree/main/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification into .cursor/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "performing-access-review-and-certification", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git --path skills/performing-access-review-and-certification--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill performing-access-review-and-certification -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills performing-access-review-and-certification --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification .gemini/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "performing-access-review-and-certification" agent skill from https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/tree/main/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification into .gemini/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "performing-access-review-and-certification", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills performing-access-review-and-certificationInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill performing-access-review-and-certification -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification .github/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "performing-access-review-and-certification" agent skill from https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/tree/main/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification into .github/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "performing-access-review-and-certification", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill performing-access-review-and-certification -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills performing-access-review-and-certification --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification .opencode/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "performing-access-review-and-certification" agent skill from https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/tree/main/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification into .opencode/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "performing-access-review-and-certification", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
performing-access-review-and-certification- GitHub stars
- 34k
- Token cost
- ~1.6k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 653 words
- Files
- 8 (incl. scripts, references, assets)
- Skills in repo
- 644
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- Apache-2.0
At a glance
Designs and runs access review and certification campaigns-scoping, reviewer selection, risk-based prioritization, micro-certification, and remediation tracking-to verify user access matches job…
- Works in 6 steps: Define Review Scope and Schedule → Data Collection and Aggregation → Reviewer Assignment → …
- Executing periodic access recertification
- SKILL.md covers Overview, When to Use, Prerequisites and Objectives, plus 5 more sections
- Runs Python scripts from its folder
What it does
Performing Access Review And Certification is an agent skill from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills. Designs and runs access review and certification campaigns-scoping, reviewer selection, risk-based prioritization, micro-certification, and remediation tracking-to verify user access matches job roles for SOX, HIPAA, and PCI DSS compliance. Use when planning or executing periodic access recertification or preparing evidence for an IAM compliance audit.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 10 other files, including scripts, reference files and assets (for example `assets/template.md`, `references/api-reference.md` and `references/standards.md`).
It sits in Legal & Compliance, covering Access reviews and audit trails, Healthcare and finance regulation and Prioritization frameworks. The repository describes itself as: 817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents · Mapped to 6 frameworks: MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, MITRE ATLAS, D3FEND, NIST AI RMF & MITRE F3 (Fight Fraud) · agentskills.io…. The licence is Apache-2.0.
When your agent uses it
- Executing periodic access recertification
- Preparing evidence for an IAM compliance audit
Example prompts
- “Use the performing-access-review-and-certification skill to design and runs access review and certification campaigns-scoping, reviewer selection…”
- “/performing-access-review-and-certification”
Requirements
- Python 3
Workflow steps
6 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 54a7988. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
Ships 2 files in scripts/ (Python), which the agent can run.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Performing Access Review And Certification loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs, and up to ~2.8k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 99 tokens; SKILL.md has 653 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills at commit 54a7988, republished under its Apache-2.0 licence (© mukul975). 653 words, ~1,584 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 7 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.- name
- performing-access-review-and-certification
- description
- Designs and runs access review and certification campaigns-scoping, reviewer selection, risk-based prioritization, micro-certification, and remediation tracking-to verify user access matches job roles for SOX, HIPAA, and PCI DSS compliance. Use when planning or executing periodic access recertification or preparing evidence for an IAM compliance audit.
- domain
- cybersecurity
- subdomain
- identity-access-management
- tags
- iam, identity, access-control, access-review, certification, compliance, governance
- version
- 1.0
- author
- mahipal
- license
- Apache-2.0
- nist_csf
- PR.AA-01, PR.AA-02, PR.AA-05, PR.AA-06
- mitre_attack
- T1078, T1110, T1556, T1098
Performing Access Review and Certification
Overview
Conduct systematic access reviews and certifications to ensure users have appropriate access rights aligned with their roles. This skill covers review campaign design, reviewer selection, risk-based prioritization, micro-certification strategies, and remediation tracking for compliance with SOX, HIPAA, and PCI DSS requirements.
When to Use
- When conducting security assessments that involve performing access review and certification
- When following incident response procedures for related security events
- When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
- When validating security controls through hands-on testing
Prerequisites
- Familiarity with identity access management concepts and tools
- Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution
- Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed
- Appropriate authorization for any testing activities
Objectives
- Design and execute access review campaigns across enterprise applications
- Implement risk-based prioritization for review scope
- Configure reviewer selection (manager, application owner, hybrid)
- Automate entitlement data collection and presentation
- Track remediation of inappropriate access findings
- Generate compliance evidence for auditors
Key Concepts
Access Review Types
- User Access Review: Manager certifies all entitlements for their direct reports
- Entitlement Review: Application owner certifies all users with specific entitlement
- Role Review: Role owner certifies role membership and permissions
- Privileged Access Review: Security team reviews high-risk/privileged access
- SOD Review: Verify no users have conflicting separation-of-duty violations
Risk-Based Prioritization
- High Risk: Privileged access, financial systems, PII/PHI systems, external-facing apps
- Medium Risk: Internal business applications, shared drives, collaboration tools
- Low Risk: Standard employee tools, read-only access, public information systems
Review Campaign Lifecycle
- Planning: Define scope, reviewers, timeline, escalation
- Data Collection: Aggregate entitlements from all identity sources
- Distribution: Assign review items to appropriate certifiers
- Certification: Reviewers approve or revoke each entitlement
- Remediation: Revoke inappropriate access, enforce timeline
- Reporting: Generate compliance evidence and metrics
- Closure: Archive campaign, feed findings into next cycle
Workflow
Step 1: Define Review Scope and Schedule
- Identify in-scope applications and systems
- Determine review frequency: quarterly (SOX), semi-annual, annual
- Define campaign timeline: review period, escalation dates, hard close
- Establish escalation chain for non-responsive reviewers
Step 2: Data Collection and Aggregation
- Extract user-entitlement mappings from each application
- Correlate with HR data (active employees, role, department, manager)
- Identify terminated/transferred users still holding access
- Flag high-risk entitlements (admin, DBA, system, privileged)
- Calculate risk scores based on entitlement sensitivity and user role
Show full SKILL.md (272 more words)Show less
Step 3: Reviewer Assignment
- Manager Reviews: Direct manager certifies subordinate access
- Application Owner Reviews: App owner certifies all users of their application
- Hybrid Model: Manager reviews standard access, app owner reviews privileged
- Delegate Management: Allow reviewers to delegate with audit trail
Step 4: Execute Certification Campaign
- Send notifications to reviewers with clear instructions
- Present entitlements with context (last used date, risk level, role justification)
- Require reviewers to explicitly approve or revoke each item
- Track completion percentage and send reminders
- Escalate to management after deadline
Step 5: Remediation and Tracking
- Automatically ticket revocations to IT operations
- Set SLA for revocation execution (24-48 hours for high-risk)
- Verify revocation completed (re-check entitlement)
- Exception management for business-justified deviations
- Document all exceptions with expiration dates
Step 6: Reporting and Evidence
- Generate campaign completion metrics
- Produce per-application compliance reports
- Create audit-ready evidence packages
- Track trends across review cycles
- Feed findings into risk assessment process
Security Controls
| Control | NIST 800-53 | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Access Review | AC-2(3) | Periodic review of account privileges |
| Account Management | AC-2 | Account lifecycle management |
| Least Privilege | AC-6 | Minimum necessary access enforcement |
| Separation of Duties | AC-5 | SOD conflict identification |
| Audit Logging | AU-6 | Review of access audit records |
Common Pitfalls
- Rubber-stamping: reviewers approving all access without examination
- Incomplete scope: missing critical applications from review campaigns
- No remediation tracking: revoking access on paper but not in systems
- Inconsistent reviewer assignment causing gaps in coverage
- Not including service accounts and non-human identities
Verification
- All in-scope applications included in campaign
- Reviewers assigned for 100% of entitlements
- Campaign completion rate exceeds 95%
- Revocations executed within SLA
- Audit evidence package complete and archived
- SOD violations identified and documented
- Exceptions documented with business justification and expiry
© mukul975, Apache-2.0. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
SKILL.md and 7 other files (scripts, references, assets) in skills/performing-access-review-and-certification of mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.
- SKILL.md
- LICENSE
- assets/template.md
- references/api-reference.md
- references/standards.md
- references/workflows.md
- scripts/agent.py
- scripts/process.py
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 54a7988
Compare with similar skills
Performing Access Review And Certification next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performing Access Review And Certification this skillmukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills | 34k | — | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Audit Reportharness/harness-skills | 115 | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Sox ItgcSushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance | 946 | — | ~2.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Security Compliancesangrokjung/claude-forge | 852 | 2 repos | ~7.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Internal Controls And Auditcbrock84/headcount | 2k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Test Cardholder Data Segmentationcyberful/cyberful | 135 | — | ~928 | Automated safety check: Pass | AGPL-3.0 |
Similar skills
Sox Itgc
Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance
Expert SOX IT General Controls (ITGC) advisor for finance, internal audit and IT compliance teams.
Security Compliance
sangrokjung/claude-forge
Guides security professionals in implementing defense-in-depth security architectures, achieving compliance with industry frameworks (SOC2, ISO27001, GDPR, HIPAA), conducting threat modeling and…
Internal Controls And Audit
cbrock84/headcount
Designs and tests controls over financial reporting — segregation of duties, approval limits, evidence, and preparing for audit.
Test Cardholder Data Segmentation
cyberful/cyberful
Test whether every segmentation and scope-reduction control isolates the cardholder data environment from claimed out-of-scope systems and differing security levels.
Audit Remediation Program
mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills
Guides audit findings remediation program management including finding prioritization by severity (critical, high, medium, low), owner assignment, remediation planning, deadline tracking…
More from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
All 644 skills in this repoCampaign Attribution Evidence Analysis
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Weighs infrastructure, TTP, malware code and timing evidence with the Diamond Model and competing hypotheses to reach a confidence-rated attribution.
Go Malware Analysis in Ghidra
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Walks through reverse engineering Go-compiled malware in Ghidra: parsing buildinfo and pclntab, recovering stripped function names and extracting dependencies.
LNK and Jump List Forensics
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Guides forensic analysis of Windows LNK shortcut files and Jump Lists with LECmd, JLECmd and manual parsing to show file access and program execution.
Malware Persistence Analysis with Autoruns
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Hunts Windows malware persistence with Sysinternals Autoruns, covering run keys, services, scheduled tasks and drivers, with baseline comparison.
NTFS MFT Deleted File Recovery
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Guides a Windows forensic examination of the NTFS Master File Table to recover deleted-file evidence, build timelines and spot timestomping.
Network Covert Channel Analysis
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Detects DNS tunneling, ICMP exfiltration and HTTP-based covert channels in packet captures and DNS logs when hunting for hidden command-and-control traffic.
Related
Questions about Performing Access Review And Certification
What does Performing Access Review And Certification do?
Designs and runs access review and certification campaigns-scoping, reviewer selection, risk-based prioritization, micro-certification, and remediation tracking-to verify user access matches job…. Performing Access Review And Certification is an agent skill from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills. Designs and runs access review and certification campaigns-scoping, reviewer selection, risk-based prioritization, micro-certification, and remediation tracking-to verify user access matches job roles for SOX, HIPAA, and PCI DSS compliance.
When should I use Performing Access Review And Certification?
Performing Access Review And Certification fits situations like: executing periodic access recertification; preparing evidence for an IAM compliance audit.
How do I install Performing Access Review And Certification in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill performing-access-review-and-certification -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/performing-access-review-and-certification in mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills) into .claude/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Performing Access Review And Certification in Codex?
Run `npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill performing-access-review-and-certification -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/performing-access-review-and-certification in mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills) into .agents/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Performing Access Review And Certification in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill performing-access-review-and-certification -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification, .gemini/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification, .github/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification and .opencode/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification in your project.
What does Performing Access Review And Certification need to run?
Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Performing Access Review And Certification needs Python for the scripts in its folder. Our summary lists: Python 3.
Does Performing Access Review And Certification access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Performing Access Review And Certification safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.
What licence does Performing Access Review And Certification use?
Performing Access Review And Certification is published under the Apache-2.0 licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Performing Access Review And Certification use?
About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 1.2k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.
What are the alternatives to Performing Access Review And Certification?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Performing Access Review And Certification: Audit Report (harness/harness-skills, 115 stars), Sox Itgc (Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance, 946 stars), Security Compliance (sangrokjung/claude-forge, 852 stars) and Internal Controls And Audit (cbrock84/headcount, 2k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Performing Access Review And Certification?
mukul975 (a GitHub user) maintains it in mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills, which has 34,116 GitHub stars. The repository holds 644 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on August 31, 2026.
Source: mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.