Agent skill

Adversarial Review

by mengxi-ream in mengxi-ream/read-frog

Adversarial code review using cross-model approach. An agent skill from mengxi-ream/read-frog.

GPL-3.0Auto-check passedDevelopment

Install Adversarial Review

skills CLI
$ npx skills add mengxi-ream/read-frog --skill adversarial-review -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install mengxi-ream/read-frog adversarial-review --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mengxi-ream/read-frog.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/.agents/skills/adversarial-review .claude/skills/adversarial-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
adversarial-review
GitHub stars
10k
Used in
1 other repo
Token cost
~905 tokens
SKILL.md length
397 words
Files
4 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
9
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
GPL-3.0

At a glance

Adversarial code review using cross-model approach. An agent skill from mengxi-ream/read-frog.

  • Works in 5 steps: Load Principles → Determine Scope and Intent → Detect Model and Spawn Reviewers → …
  • Development work in your project
  • SKILL.md covers Step 1 — Load Principles, Step 2 — Determine Scope and…, Step 3 — Detect Model and… and Step 4 — Verify and Synthesize…, plus 1 more section
  • Calls codex and claude

What it does

Adversarial Review is an agent skill from mengxi-ream/read-frog. Adversarial code review using cross-model approach. Spawns reviewers on the opposing model (Claude uses Codex, Codex uses Claude) to challenge work from distinct critical lenses. Produces a synthesized verdict with findings and lead judgment. Triggers: "adversarial review".

Its SKILL.md is about 910 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 4 other files, including reference files (for example `references/reviewer-lenses.md`, `references/reviewer-prompt.md` and `references/verdict-format.md`).

It sits in Development. It works with Chrome Extensions. The repository describes itself as: 🐸 Read Frog - Language Learning & Translate | 🐸 陪读蛙 - 语言学习与翻译. The licence is GPL-3.0.

When your agent uses it

  • Development work in your project

Example prompts

  • “adversarial review”
  • “/adversarial-review”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Load Principles
  2. Determine Scope and Intent
  3. Detect Model and Spawn Reviewers
  4. Verify and Synthesize Verdict
  5. Render Judgment

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 80140ea. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • codex
    • claude

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Adversarial Review loads about 905 tokens when it runs, and up to ~1.6k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 73 tokens; SKILL.md has 397 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~73
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~905
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~1.6k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from mengxi-ream/read-frog at commit 80140ea, republished under its GPL-3.0 licence (© mengxi-ream). 397 words, ~905 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/adversarial-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 3 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
adversarial-review
description
Adversarial code review using cross-model approach. Spawns reviewers on the opposing model (Claude uses Codex, Codex uses Claude) to challenge work from distinct critical lenses. Produces a synthesized verdict with findings and lead judgment. Triggers: "adversarial review".
schedule
After cook sessions that produce large diffs (200+ lines), implement plan phases, or complete a planning session

Adversarial Review

Spawn reviewers on the opposite model to challenge work. Reviewers attack from distinct lenses grounded in brain principles. The deliverable is a synthesized verdict — do NOT make changes.

Hard constraint: Reviewers MUST run via the opposite model's CLI (codex exec or claude -p). Do NOT use subagents, the Agent tool, or any internal delegation mechanism as reviewers — those run on your own model, which defeats the purpose.

Step 1 — Load Principles

Read brain/principles.md. Follow every [[wikilink]] and read each linked principle file. These govern reviewer judgments.

Step 2 — Determine Scope and Intent

Identify what to review from context (recent diffs, referenced plans, user message).

Determine the intent — what the author is trying to achieve. This is critical: reviewers challenge whether the work achieves the intent well, not whether the intent is correct. State the intent explicitly before proceeding.

Assess change size:

SizeThresholdReviewers
Small< 50 lines, 1-2 files1 (Skeptic)
Medium50-200 lines, 3-5 files2 (Skeptic + Architect)
Large200+ lines or 5+ files3 (Skeptic + Architect + Minimalist)

Read references/reviewer-lenses.md for lens definitions.

Step 3 — Detect Model and Spawn Reviewers

Create a temp directory for reviewer output:

sh
REVIEW_DIR=$(mktemp -d /tmp/adversarial-review.XXXXXX)

Determine which model you are, then spawn reviewers on the opposite:

If you are Claude — spawn Codex reviewers via codex exec:

sh
codex exec --skip-git-repo-check -o "$REVIEW_DIR/skeptic.md" "prompt" 2>/dev/null

Use --profile edit only if the reviewer needs to run tests. Default to read-only. Run with run_in_background: true, monitor via TaskOutput with block: true, timeout: 600000.

If you are Codex — spawn Claude reviewers via claude CLI:

sh
claude -p "prompt" > "$REVIEW_DIR/skeptic.md" 2>/dev/null

Run with run_in_background: true.

Name each output file after the lens: skeptic.md, architect.md, minimalist.md.

Build each reviewer's prompt using the template in references/reviewer-prompt.md.

Show full SKILL.md (127 more words)Show less

Step 4 — Verify and Synthesize Verdict

Before reading reviewer output, log which CLI was used and confirm the output files exist:

sh
echo "reviewer_cli=codex|claude"
ls "$REVIEW_DIR"/*.md

If any output file is missing or empty, note the failure in the verdict — do not silently skip a reviewer.

Read each reviewer's output file from $REVIEW_DIR/. Deduplicate overlapping findings. Produce a single verdict using the format in references/verdict-format.md.

Step 5 — Render Judgment

After synthesizing the reviewers, apply your own judgment. Using the stated intent and brain principles as your frame, state which findings you would accept and which you would reject — and why. Reviewers are adversarial by design; not every finding warrants action. Call out false positives, overreach, and findings that mistake style for substance.

Append the Lead Judgment section to the verdict (see references/verdict-format.md).

© mengxi-ream, GPL-3.0. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 3 other files (references) in .agents/skills/adversarial-review of mengxi-ream/read-frog.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/reviewer-lenses.md
  • references/reviewer-prompt.md
  • references/verdict-format.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 80140ea

Used in 1 other repository

We found 1 copy of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in mengxi-ream/read-frog, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

Adversarial Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Adversarial Review compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Adversarial Review this skillmengxi-ream/read-frog10k1 repos~905Automated safety check: PassGPL-3.0
Wxt Browser Extensionsvantezzen/skip-silence4692 repos~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Archifymolvqingtai/WebChat2.6k—~5.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Kimi WebbridgeMoonshotAI/kimi-code7.8k—~3.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Repomix Browser Extension Developeryamadashy/repomix29k1 repos~288Automated safety check: PassMIT
Voyager Contributevoyager-crew/voyager20k—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassGPL-3.0

Similar skills

  • Wxt Browser Extensions

    vantezzen/skip-silence

    WXT browser extension performance optimization guidelines. An agent skill from vantezzen/skip-silence.

    469 GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~1.9k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Archify

    molvqingtai/WebChat

    Create professional architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as standalone HTML files with SVG graphics, a built-in dark/light theme toggle, and one-click export to…

    2.6k GitHub stars~5.6k tokensUpdated 27 days ago
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Kimi Webbridge

    MoonshotAI/kimi-code

    Kimi Browser Extension(Kimi 浏览器扩展,原 Kimi WebBridge)lets AI control the user's real browser — navigate, click, type, read, screenshot, and interact with any website using the user's actual login…

    7.8k GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Use this skill when developing or maintaining browser extension code in the `browser/` directory, including Chrome/Firefox/Edge compatibility, content…

    29k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~288 tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Voyager Contribute

    voyager-crew/voyager

    Prepare Voyager commits, pull requests, and contribution evidence, or claim an issue and check review readiness.

    20k GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated yesterday
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Deepseek Automation

    zhu1090093659/deepseek-pp

    A skill your agent uses when implementing, resuming, reviewing, or verifying the DeepSeek++ Codex-style automation feature in this repository.

    1.9k GitHub stars~2.1k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    DevelopmentAuto-check: notes

More from mengxi-ream/read-frog

All 9 skills in this repo
  • Record Extension Demo

    mengxi-ream/read-frog

    Record polished, evidence-backed demos of the Read Frog extension as MP4 (and optional GIF) by driving real Chrome with the built extension, following captioned scene scripts, asserting extension…

    10k GitHub stars~2.8k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Extension Puppeteer Debugging

    mengxi-ream/read-frog

    Debug the built Read Frog extension in real Chrome. An agent skill from mengxi-ream/read-frog.

    10k GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check: notes
  • Webext Core

    mengxi-ream/read-frog

    Utilities for browser extensions - proxy services for cross-context RPC, type-safe messaging, URL match patterns, fake browser for testing, job scheduling, and shadow DOM isolation.

    10k GitHub stars~633 tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Wxt

    mengxi-ream/read-frog

    Build browser extensions with WXT - a next-gen framework with file-based entrypoints, Vite builds, auto-imports, typed storage with migrations, content script UIs, and multi-browser MV2/MV3 support.

    10k GitHub stars~500 tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Create PR

    mengxi-ream/read-frog

    Create a pull request, optionally for the issue provided as argument

    10k GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Migration Scripts

    mengxi-ream/read-frog

    A skill your agent uses when writing or reviewing database/config migration scripts or migration registries.

    10k GitHub stars~589 tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Adversarial Review

What does Adversarial Review do?

Adversarial code review using cross-model approach. An agent skill from mengxi-ream/read-frog. Adversarial Review is an agent skill from mengxi-ream/read-frog. Adversarial code review using cross-model approach.

When should I use Adversarial Review?

Adversarial Review fits situations like: development work in your project.

How do I install Adversarial Review in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add mengxi-ream/read-frog --skill adversarial-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (.agents/skills/adversarial-review in mengxi-ream/read-frog) into .claude/skills/adversarial-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Adversarial Review in Codex?

Run `npx skills add mengxi-ream/read-frog --skill adversarial-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (.agents/skills/adversarial-review in mengxi-ream/read-frog) into .agents/skills/adversarial-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Adversarial Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add mengxi-ream/read-frog --skill adversarial-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/adversarial-review, .gemini/skills/adversarial-review, .github/skills/adversarial-review and .opencode/skills/adversarial-review in your project.

What does Adversarial Review need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Adversarial Review needs the command-line tools its instructions call (codex and claude).

Does Adversarial Review access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Adversarial Review safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Adversarial Review use?

Adversarial Review is published under the GPL-3.0 licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Adversarial Review use?

About 905 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 735 tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Adversarial Review?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Adversarial Review: Wxt Browser Extensions (vantezzen/skip-silence, 469 stars), Archify (molvqingtai/WebChat, 2.6k stars), Kimi Webbridge (MoonshotAI/kimi-code, 7.8k stars) and Repomix Browser Extension Developer (yamadashy/repomix, 29k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Adversarial Review?

mengxi-ream (a GitHub user) maintains it in mengxi-ream/read-frog, which has 10,029 GitHub stars. The repository holds 9 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 9, 2026.

Source: mengxi-ream/read-frog on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.