Contribution Architect

# Find largest files (potential God classes)
find src -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" | xargs wc -l | sort -rn | head -20

# Find files with most imports (high coupling)
grep -r "^import" src --include="*.ts" | cut -d: -f1 | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -20

# Find deeply nested code (complexity indicator)
grep -rn "if.*{" src --include="*.ts" | grep -E "^\s{16,}" | head -20

# Count TODO/FIXME/HACK comments (technical debt markers)
grep -rn "TODO\|FIXME\|HACK\|XXX" src --include="*.ts" --include="*.js"

# Strategic Investment List for [Project Name]

## High ROI Opportunities

### 1. [Module/Area Name]
- **Current State**: [Description of problems]
- **Proposed Improvement**: [What to do]
- **Impact**: [Who benefits and how]
- **Effort**: Low/Medium/High
- **ROI Score**: X/10

### 2. [Module/Area Name]
...

## Quick Wins (Low effort, high visibility)
- [ ] Item 1
- [ ] Item 2

## Long-term Investments (High effort, transformational)
- [ ] Item 1
- [ ] Item 2

# RFC: [Feature Title]

**Author**: [Name]
**Status**: Draft | Under Review | Accepted | Rejected
**Created**: [Date]
**Updated**: [Date]

## 1. Problem Statement

### Current Situation
[Describe what exists today]

### Pain Points
- Pain point 1
- Pain point 2

### Who is Affected
[Users, developers, maintainers?]

## 2. Proposed Solution

### Overview
[High-level description]

### Technical Design
[Architecture, components, data flow]

### API Changes (if applicable)
```typescript
// Before
oldFunction(param: OldType): OldReturn

// After
newFunction(param: NewType): NewReturn

### 3. Module Ownership Analysis

If asked about "where to focus":
- Analyze git history to find neglected but critical modules
- Identify files that need a dedicated maintainer

#### Git Analysis Commands

```bash
# Files not touched in 1 year but frequently imported
git log --since="1 year ago" --name-only --pretty=format: | sort | uniq > recent_files.txt
find src -name "*.ts" | while read f; do
  grep -q "$f" recent_files.txt || echo "$f"
done

# Find files with most churn (frequent changes = potential instability)
git log --name-only --pretty=format: --since="6 months ago" | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -20

# Find files with single author (bus factor = 1)
for f in $(find src -name "*.ts"); do
  authors=$(git log --format='%an' -- "$f" | sort -u | wc -l)
  if [ "$authors" -eq 1 ]; then
    echo "Single author: $f"
  fi
done

# Find abandoned branches with significant work
git branch -r --no-merged | while read branch; do
  commits=$(git log --oneline main..$branch | wc -l)
  if [ "$commits" -gt 5 ]; then
    echo "$branch: $commits unmerged commits"
  fi
done

## Module Adoption Assessment: [Module Name]

### Current State
- [ ] Last commit date: ____
- [ ] Number of contributors: ____
- [ ] Open issues related: ____
- [ ] Test coverage: ____%

### Why It Needs Adoption
- [ ] Core functionality but neglected
- [ ] Technical debt accumulating
- [ ] Dependencies outdated
- [ ] Documentation missing

### Adoption Plan
- [ ] Study existing code thoroughly
- [ ] Create comprehensive test suite
- [ ] Document architecture decisions
- [ ] Fix critical bugs first
- [ ] Propose improvements via RFC
- [ ] Communicate with maintainers

1. ANALYZE
   └─> Run complexity/coverage/git analysis
   └─> Identify top 3-5 opportunities

2. VALIDATE
   └─> Check existing issues/PRs for overlap
   └─> Read CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines
   └─> Understand project's decision process

3. COMMUNICATE (Before coding!)
   └─> Open discussion issue
   └─> Share RFC draft
   └─> Get maintainer buy-in

4. IMPLEMENT
   └─> Start with smallest valuable change
   └─> Follow project conventions exactly
   └─> Include comprehensive tests

5. ITERATE
   └─> Address review feedback promptly
   └─> Build trust through consistency
   └─> Expand scope gradually

## Before Opening a PR

### Research
- [ ] Read CONTRIBUTING.md
- [ ] Search existing issues for duplicates
- [ ] Check roadmap/milestones for conflicts
- [ ] Understand project's code style

### Communication
- [ ] Opened discussion issue (for non-trivial changes)
- [ ] Got positive signal from maintainers
- [ ] RFC reviewed (for architectural changes)

### Implementation
- [ ] Changes are minimal and focused
- [ ] Tests cover new functionality
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] No unrelated changes included

### Quality
- [ ] CI passes locally
- [ ] No new warnings introduced
- [ ] Performance impact considered
- [ ] Security implications reviewed