PR Review
jaemk/self_update
Targeted, read-only review of a PR or checked-out branch. An agent skill from jaemk/self_update.
Multi-agent code review for Rust CLI/TUI. An agent skill from mag123c/toktrack.
Install Review
$ npx skills add mag123c/toktrack --skill review -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install mag123c/toktrack review --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mag123c/toktrack.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/.claude/skills/review .claude/skills/review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "review" agent skill from https://github.com/mag123c/toktrack/tree/main/.claude/skills/review into .claude/skills/review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/mag123c/toktrack/tree/main/.claude/skills/reviewType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add mag123c/toktrack --skill review -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install mag123c/toktrack review --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mag123c/toktrack.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/.claude/skills/review .agents/skills/review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "review" agent skill from https://github.com/mag123c/toktrack/tree/main/.claude/skills/review into .agents/skills/review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add mag123c/toktrack --skill review -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install mag123c/toktrack review --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mag123c/toktrack.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/.claude/skills/review .cursor/skills/review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "review" agent skill from https://github.com/mag123c/toktrack/tree/main/.claude/skills/review into .cursor/skills/review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/mag123c/toktrack.git --path .claude/skills/review--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add mag123c/toktrack --skill review -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install mag123c/toktrack review --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mag123c/toktrack.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/.claude/skills/review .gemini/skills/review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "review" agent skill from https://github.com/mag123c/toktrack/tree/main/.claude/skills/review into .gemini/skills/review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install mag123c/toktrack reviewInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add mag123c/toktrack --skill review -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mag123c/toktrack.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/.claude/skills/review .github/skills/review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "review" agent skill from https://github.com/mag123c/toktrack/tree/main/.claude/skills/review into .github/skills/review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add mag123c/toktrack --skill review -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install mag123c/toktrack review --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mag123c/toktrack.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/.claude/skills/review .opencode/skills/review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "review" agent skill from https://github.com/mag123c/toktrack/tree/main/.claude/skills/review into .opencode/skills/review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
review- GitHub stars
- 195
- Token cost
- ~1.2k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 503 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 6
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
Multi-agent code review for Rust CLI/TUI. An agent skill from mag123c/toktrack.
- Works in 3 steps: Collect context (diff, conventions,… → Launch Code Review Agent only… → Parse verdict → PASS → /wrap, FAIL → fix…
- Tasks that involve UX design
- SKILL.md covers Override: UX Review Inactive, Override: Code Review…, Execution and Rules
- Calls cargo
What it does
Review is an agent skill from mag123c/toktrack. Multi-agent code review for Rust CLI/TUI. UX Review inactive (terminal UI — no web frontend). Code Review only. Includes Rust/clippy-specific checklist.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Development, covering UX design and Code review. It works with Rust. The repository describes itself as: Ultra-fast token & cost tracker for LLM Token Usage (e.g. Claude Code). The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Tasks that involve UX design
- Tasks that involve Code review
Example prompts
- “/review”
Workflow steps
3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Collect context (diff, conventions, architecture, Sprint Contract)
- Launch Code Review Agent only (feature-dev:code-reviewer)
- Parse verdict → PASS → /wrap, FAIL → fix → /verify → re-review
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 75a86fa. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
Shell commands in SKILL.md call:
cargo
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Review loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 40 tokens; SKILL.md has 503 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from mag123c/toktrack at commit 75a86fa, republished under its MIT licence (© mag123c). 503 words, ~1,198 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- review
- description
- Multi-agent code review for Rust CLI/TUI. UX Review inactive (terminal UI — no web frontend). Code Review only. Includes Rust/clippy-specific checklist.
- required_context
- .claude/ai-context/architecture.md, .claude/ai-context/conventions.md
Review (toktrack override)
Follows the global /review multi-agent pattern, with the following overrides:
Override: UX Review Inactive
This project is a terminal TUI app — do not run the UX Review Agent. Run Code Review Agent only.
Override: Code Review Checklist Extension
In addition to the global checklist, append the following to the Code Review Agent prompt:
Critical (PLAN gate)
| Category | Items |
|---|---|
| PLAN assumption refutation | Does the diff falsify the [agent-inferred]/[unverified-gate] assumptions from the PLAN (falsified → P1+, carry to wrap) |
Author Review Gate (P0 — Identity / Matrix)
This repo is OSS and the reviewer is the author (receiving PRs). Generic code health is covered by Rust/TUI/clippy below; this section examines product-specific risks that only the author can validate. Perspective SSOT: session memory feedback_review_perspective.md.
| Tier | Category | Items |
|---|---|---|
| reject | Identity ① ultra-fast | Adding latency·blocking IO·synchronous network to hot path/startup → reject |
| reject | Identity ② persistent cache / data preservation | Risk of cache·history loss or corruption → reject. backward-compat·graceful degradation are the means to uphold this |
| ruthless | Irreversible | breaking change · data migration · public behavior change |
| ruthless | Environment/state matrix (contributors test only their own machine) | OS(paths·home·file locks·Windows) / source schema version(forward new-schema+backward old-format, new source·parser PRs require old-version·unknown-schema fixture) / data shape(empty·large·corrupt·partial·permissions) / locale·TZ·DST / concurrency(read race while source file is being written) / terminal(width·color·TERM) / first-run vs upgrade migration |
| bias to YES | Other features·ideas | Stars are the goal — acceptance bias. But if it taxes either core(weighing down hot path·startup·cache paths), request location·approach adjustment only. additive/opt-in/lazy/behind a flag = welcome |
| lenient | Style·naming preferences | Linter takes precedence, bikeshed prohibited (uniform strictness = contributor friction → star loss) |
| signal | Direction/growth fit (not a gate) | Beyond code quality·conventions, every contribution(issue·PR) also gets a direction-fit verdict in the review output: strengthens wedge (persistent cache/data preservation) / neutral (additive) / dilutes focus (e.g. feature-parity chasing) + 1–2 lines of rationale. Weigh holistically: maintenance cost vs value, real value to target users(AI CLI heavy users), contribution to project direction. Never a reject reason — the two identities above remain the only gates, bias-to-YES stands |
Show full SKILL.md (187 more words)Show less
Rust-specific
| Category | Items |
|---|---|
| Safety | Minimize unsafe usage, comment with justification |
| Ownership | Unnecessary .clone(), to_string(), to_owned() |
| Error | anyhow/thiserror pattern consistency, no unwrap() (tests excluded) |
| Performance | Unnecessary allocation, Vec vs iterator chain, Box<dyn> vs generic |
| SIMD | Check fallback branch in simd-json parsing path |
| Concurrency | Check shared mutable state in rayon parallel path |
TUI-specific
| Category | Items |
|---|---|
| Widget | ratatui Widget trait implementation consistency |
| Theme | Use theme.rs semantic colors (no hardcoded colors) |
| Layout | Handle terminal resize (Rect boundary check) |
| Input | Missing keyboard event handling (shortcuts registered in help vs actual handlers) |
Clippy/Fmt Pre-check
Code Review Agent checks the following before review:
cargo fmt --check
cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warningsIf there are clippy warnings, FAIL before starting review (should have been caught by verify).
Execution
- Collect context (diff, conventions, architecture, Sprint Contract)
- PLAN provenance tags/gates (if present) —
[agent-inferred]/[unverified-gate]
- PLAN provenance tags/gates (if present) —
- Launch Code Review Agent only (feature-dev:code-reviewer)
- Global
agents/code-review.mdprompt + above author gates + Rust/TUI checklist append
- Global
- Parse verdict → PASS → /wrap, FAIL → fix → /verify → re-review
Rules
- Sub-agent model: launch the Code Review Agent via the Agent tool with
model: "sonnet"(Sonnet 5). - Do not run UX Review Agent (TUI project)
- PASS → run /wrap immediately
- FAIL → fix → /verify → re-review (max 3)
© mag123c, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in .claude/skills/review of mag123c/toktrack.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 75a86fa
Compare with similar skills
Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Review this skillmag123c/toktrack | 195 | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| PR Reviewjaemk/self_update | 961 | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Worktrunk Tend CI Guidancemax-sixty/worktrunk | 9.2k | — | ~6.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| SeekDB Code Reviewoceanbase/seekdb | 3.1k | — | ~2.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| PR Reviewjaemk/cached | 2.1k | — | ~2.5k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Cross-Language Coding Standardszereight/gitlab-mcp | 2k | 1 repos | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Worktrunk Tend CI Guidance
max-sixty/worktrunk
Adds Worktrunk-specific rules to the tend CI workflows: Codecov polling, Rust test commands, labels and review criteria for pull requests handled in CI.
SeekDB Code Review
oceanbase/seekdb
Reviews seekdb pull requests and diffs for real defects in correctness, resources, concurrency, security and tests, reporting only Blocker or Major findings.
PR Review
jaemk/cached
Targeted, read-only review of a PR or checked-out branch. An agent skill from jaemk/cached.
Cross-Language Coding Standards
zereight/gitlab-mcp
Shared reference for naming, function size, complexity and error handling rules that reviewer agents apply across TypeScript, Python, Go, Rust, Java, C# and Swift.
Resolve PR Review
shencangsheng/easydb_app
Resolve pull request code review comments end-to-end. An agent skill from shencangsheng/easydb_app.
More from mag123c/toktrack
Clarify
mag123c/toktrack
Adaptive requirements clarification with auto-depth routing.
Implement
mag123c/toktrack
TDD implementation (RED→GREEN→REFACTOR) → verify → review. An agent skill from mag123c/toktrack.
Verify
mag123c/toktrack
Self-healing verification loop (test → clippy → fmt). An agent skill from mag123c/toktrack.
Next
mag123c/toktrack
Session start - check progress, suggest next task. An agent skill from mag123c/toktrack.
Wrap
mag123c/toktrack
Session end - document updates, commit
Related
Works with
Questions about Review
What does Review do?
Multi-agent code review for Rust CLI/TUI. An agent skill from mag123c/toktrack. Review is an agent skill from mag123c/toktrack. Multi-agent code review for Rust CLI/TUI.
When should I use Review?
Review fits situations like: tasks that involve UX design; tasks that involve Code review.
How do I install Review in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add mag123c/toktrack --skill review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (.claude/skills/review in mag123c/toktrack) into .claude/skills/review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Review in Codex?
Run `npx skills add mag123c/toktrack --skill review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (.claude/skills/review in mag123c/toktrack) into .agents/skills/review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add mag123c/toktrack --skill review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/review, .gemini/skills/review, .github/skills/review and .opencode/skills/review in your project.
What does Review need to run?
Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Review needs the command-line tools its instructions call (cargo).
Does Review access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Review safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Review use?
Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Review use?
About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Review?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Review: PR Review (jaemk/self_update, 961 stars), Worktrunk Tend CI Guidance (max-sixty/worktrunk, 9.2k stars), SeekDB Code Review (oceanbase/seekdb, 3.1k stars) and PR Review (jaemk/cached, 2.1k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Review?
mag123c (a GitHub user) maintains it in mag123c/toktrack, which has 195 GitHub stars. The repository holds 6 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 1, 2026.
Source: mag123c/toktrack on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.