Agent skill

Ln 61 Repository Publisher

by levnikolaevich in levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills

Commits, pushes and remotely verifies authorized repository changes; does not create releases.

MITAuto-check passed

Install Ln 61 Repository Publisher

skills CLI
$ npx skills add levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-61-repository-publisher -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills ln-61-repository-publisher --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/plugins/delivery-suite/skills/ln-61-repository-publisher .claude/skills/ln-61-repository-publisher && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
ln-61-repository-publisher
GitHub stars
574
Token cost
~2.6k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,369 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
31
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Commits, pushes and remotely verifies authorized repository changes; does not create releases.

  • Works in 5 steps: Result: The exact skill-specific verdict… → Scope: Reviewed/changed scope,… → Evidence: Skill-specific fields below;… → …
  • SKILL.md covers Tool Routing, Checklist, Verdict and Self-Check, plus 1 more section
  • Calls git

What it does

Ln 61 Repository Publisher is an agent skill from levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills. Commits, pushes and remotely verifies authorized repository changes; does not create releases.

Its SKILL.md is about 2.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Help your AI agent finish the job: solve the right problem, keep changes focused, and show what was verified. For Claude Code and Codex. The licence is MIT.

Example prompts

  • “/ln-61-repository-publisher”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Result: The exact skill-specific verdict token first, then the supported outcome.
  2. Scope: Reviewed/changed scope, exclusions, baseline, and material assumptions.
  3. Evidence: Skill-specific fields below; distinguish facts, inferences, and unverified claims. Link artifacts; use tables when useful.
  4. Verification: Checks/results, unavailable evidence, and applicable cleanup/external state.
  5. Completion: Checklist: X/Y complete; Incomplete: None or each UNPROVEN item's reason, outcome impact, and exact next action; residual…

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 0ce8796. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • git

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md. Its commands use git, which can reach the network depending on how they are called.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Ln 61 Repository Publisher loads about 2.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 30 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,369 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~30
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2.6k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills at commit 0ce8796, republished under its MIT licence (© levnikolaevich). 1,369 words, ~2,614 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/ln-61-repository-publisher/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
ln-61-repository-publisher
description
Commits, pushes and remotely verifies authorized repository changes; does not create releases.

Repository Publisher

Goal: Publish only changes the user has authorized, then verify the result from the remote source.

Execution contract: The checklist defines completion. Track each item internally as PENDING, PROVEN with evidence, CLEARED with evidence its condition is absent, or UNPROVEN with a gap; reading, delegation, tool failure, a zero exit status, or a self-reported success is not proof; only the observed outcome is. Reconcile after each section. Before returning, resolve all PENDING, count only PROVEN and CLEARED, and apply verdict and approval rules to every gap. Preserve intent, scope, and existing authorization. Continue authorized work; ask only for consequential unresolved choices or required external approval. When no one can answer during the run, state the exact question and apply the skill's verdict for the remaining gap instead of waiting or guessing. Scale depth to material risk without skipping checks. Preserve dependency and safety order; otherwise choose an appropriate verification method. Accept equivalent user or repository evidence; no other skill, named artifact, or complete lifecycle is required. Preserve source requirement and decision IDs. Bind reused evidence to relevant source versions, dirty changes, configuration, and environment; invalidate only affected claims. On continuation, reconcile task, authorization, current state, and unresolved evidence. For long work, return a compact continuation record or update an already authorized artifact; read-only skills do not persist it. Distinguish artifact readiness, verified behavior, and external-action authority. Prepare authorized work before required approval. If blocked by an instruction, cite its exact source and unresolved boundary; do not invent approval gates from caution.

Tool Routing

NeedPreferred capabilityFallback
Scope, staging, history, and synchronizationNative Git CLIStop if equivalent Git evidence is unavailable
Repository validationProject-native commands and installed validatorsDocumented manual checks
Remote branch and CI stateAuthenticated hosting CLI or connectorGit remote evidence plus direct workflow URLs
Clean-source verificationTemporary clone and isolated host configuration when distribution surfaces changedRemote raw files plus BLOCKED for required install evidence
Static-site verificationDeployment workflow plus direct HTTP requestHosting API deployment state
Current marketplace behaviorOfficial host documentationMark assumptions and avoid destructive retries

Prefer compact Git output first, then open the full diff for files that will be staged. Never pipe commands in a way that hides the failing exit code.

Use hosting APIs for remote facts and Git for repository facts. Local distribution or deployment state cannot prove that a remote consumer update works.

Checklist

Establish scope and evidence
  • Confirm the user explicitly requested a commit and push and identify the intended branch.
  • Read repository instructions, release rules, and the current branch policy before mutation.
  • Check git status -sb, staged and unstaged diffs, untracked files, remotes, and recent commit style.
  • Identify unrelated user changes; do not stage them without explicit whole-worktree authorization.
  • Inspect deletions and generated files as carefully as edited text.
  • Check whether behavior, installation commands, catalogs, layout, or the public site require matching documentation updates.
  • Do not change versions, tags, or release metadata during an ordinary publication unless the request or repository policy explicitly includes them.
  • For marketplace edits, confirm every stable identifier is unchanged unless an intentional migration was approved.
  • When multiple host catalogs exist and repository policy requires parity, confirm they contain the same distribution units in the required order.
  • When metadata is duplicated across manifests or catalogs, confirm descriptions and source paths agree with the canonical source.
Validation Routing
  • Discover and run repository-native validation commands before generic checks.
  • For changed skills, run repository-required or host-native skill validators, or perform their documented manual fallback.
  • For changed plugins or packages, run repository-required validators, or perform their documented manual fallback.
  • Run every host-native strict validator whose distribution surface exists and changed or is required by repository policy.
  • Run only the catalog parity, manifest parsing, stale-reference, local-link, and whitespace checks required by the repository and affected surfaces.
  • Run only relevant product tests; do not invent a heavyweight release gate absent from repository policy.
  • Stop before commit on a confirmed failing required check unless the user explicitly accepts the failure.
  • Record skipped checks with the exact missing dependency or environment.
Synchronization and Commit
  • Fetch the target remote and compare local HEAD with the remote branch before committing.
  • If behind or diverged, inspect both sides and reconcile within the authorized branch workflow while preserving user changes; stop for unresolved semantic conflicts or a required history rewrite. Never force-push implicitly.
  • Stage explicit paths when the worktree is mixed; use whole-worktree staging only when the user approved all changes.
  • Review the cached diff and diffstat after staging; ensure required checks cover this exact tree, rerunning only checks invalidated by synchronization or subsequent edits.
  • Exclude secrets, local caches, temporary artifacts, and unintended credentials from the staged set without deleting user-owned files; if an intended change contains a secret, block that publication and report redacted evidence.
  • Match the repository's commit-message convention and summarize the entire staged change.
  • Preserve configured commit signing and attribution policy; do not invent contributor identities or disable required signing.
  • Create the commit and capture its full SHA.
  • Push to the authorized branch without changing branch protections or using force.
Show full SKILL.md (527 more words)Show less
Remote Verification
  • Verify remote publication refers to the exact checked source state and exclude unverified later changes; repository publication alone does not prove a release or deployment.
  • Verify the published commit on the authorized remote through Git or the hosting API; use a second source only if identity or synchronization is uncertain.
  • Track required CI for the pushed commit with bounded waits and direct run URLs. If execution cannot continue waiting, report pending state as PARTIAL; do not equate pending with success.
  • If the static site changed, wait for deployment and verify live content with a cache-busting request.
  • If installation or marketplace content changed, clone an authorized consumer-accessible remote into a clean temporary directory and validate the affected distribution surface.
  • When install or update behavior changed, test at least one affected package or plugin from its documented distribution source in isolated host configuration.
  • When stable distribution identifiers or versions exist, verify the installed artifact resolves under the expected identifier and version.
  • Keep temporary host configuration isolated from the user's active settings and remove it safely afterward.
  • Recheck local worktree and HEAD against the published commit. If the remote advanced concurrently, verify that it still contains the published commit and report both SHAs; do not overwrite newer work to restore equality.
Safety Gates
  • Never expose authentication tokens or credential values in output.
  • Never create a release, tag, package publication, discussion, or pull request unless explicitly requested.
  • Never delete remote branches or alter the default branch as a side effect.
  • Return BLOCKED rather than bypassing branch protection, authentication, or required checks.

Verdict

  • PUBLISHED — commit, push, required CI, and applicable remote verification succeeded.
  • PARTIAL — the push succeeded but a non-destructive remote check is pending or failed.
  • BLOCKED — publication did not complete because authorization, synchronization, validation, or remote access failed.

Self-Check

  • Reconcile before returning. Check item-level evidence, requirement coverage, contradictions, scope, verdict, and applicable cleanup. Correct the report or authorized artifacts. Reuse valid evidence; do not automatically rescan the repository or rerun successful commands. Repeat checks only for relevant changes, failures, or unresolved evidence. Disclose remaining gaps.

Output Contract

Report in the user's language, in this order; label all five fields and state each fact once. Use controlled plain language: one fact per sentence, usually under 20 words, active voice, and one term per concept, with no synonyms for verdicts, IDs, or states. Small results may use one line per field; omit empty tables and do not copy linked artifacts:

  1. Result: The exact skill-specific verdict token first, then the supported outcome.
  2. Scope: Reviewed/changed scope, exclusions, baseline, and material assumptions.
  3. Evidence: Skill-specific fields below; distinguish facts, inferences, and unverified claims. Link artifacts; use tables when useful.
  4. Verification: Checks/results, unavailable evidence, and applicable cleanup/external state.
  5. Completion: Checklist: X/Y complete; Incomplete: None or each UNPROVEN item's reason, outcome impact, and exact next action; residual risks and required decisions.

Skill-specific evidence: Published/excluded paths, branch, full commit SHA, remote URL, validation results, CI/deployment URLs, and applicable clean-source install/update proof. For PARTIAL, state whether the pushed commit is safe to leave and the observable event that closes verification. Use PUBLISHED only when the remote commit and every applicable required workflow are observed.

© levnikolaevich, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in plugins/delivery-suite/skills/ln-61-repository-publisher of levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 0ce8796

Compare with similar skills

Ln 61 Repository Publisher next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Ln 61 Repository Publisher compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Ln 61 Repository Publisher this skilllevnikolaevich/claude-code-skills574—~2.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Commit, Push, and PREveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin25k—~2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Publishcode-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent70k—~5.5kAutomated safety check: WarnCustom licence
Commitsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills47k2 repos~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Git Commit Pushfarm-fe/farm5.6k—~325Automated safety check: PassMIT
Commitdavila7/claude-code-templates33k3 repos~730Automated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Commit, Push, and PR

    EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin

    Commits staged changes, pushes a branch, and opens or updates a GitHub pull request, including writing its description.

    25k GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Publish

    code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent

    Publish oh-my-opencode to npm by triggering the GitHub Actions publish workflow and verifying its artifacts.

    70k GitHub stars~5.5k tokensUpdated today
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check: warnings
  • Commit

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    ALWAYS use this skill when committing code changes — never commit directly without it.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~1.3k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Git Commit Push

    farm-fe/farm

    Commit and push repository changes safely. An agent skill from farm-fe/farm.

    5.6k GitHub stars~325 tokensUpdated 19 days ago
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Commit

    davila7/claude-code-templates

    Create commit messages following Sentry conventions. An agent skill from davila7/claude-code-templates.

    33k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~730 tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Commit

    windmill-labs/windmill

    Create a git commit with conventional commit format. An agent skill from windmill-labs/windmill.

    18k GitHub stars~447 tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed

More from levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills

All 31 skills in this repo
  • Ln 53 Documentation Auditor

    levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills

    Audits documentation and comments for trust, coverage, consistency and freshness; read-only.

    574 GitHub stars~3.8k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ln 81 Skill Reviewer

    levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills

    Reviews skill instructions, trigger boundaries and distribution contracts; not product code.

    574 GitHub stars~3.5k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ln 11 Opportunity Evaluator

    levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills

    Evaluates new product opportunities through demand, channels and economics before committing to build.

    574 GitHub stars~3k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ln 12 Product Requirements Builder

    levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills

    Defines product requirements, business rules and acceptance criteria for a committed intent; edits product docs only.

    574 GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ln 13 Interaction Design Builder

    levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills

    Designs user flows, interaction states and mockups for a defined product scope; does not implement UI code.

    574 GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ln 21 System Design Baseline Builder

    levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills

    Defines measurable architecture drivers and constraints before system design; edits architecture docs only.

    574 GitHub stars~2.5k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Ln 61 Repository Publisher

What does Ln 61 Repository Publisher do?

Commits, pushes and remotely verifies authorized repository changes; does not create releases. Ln 61 Repository Publisher is an agent skill from levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills. Commits, pushes and remotely verifies authorized repository changes; does not create releases.

How do I install Ln 61 Repository Publisher in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-61-repository-publisher -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (plugins/delivery-suite/skills/ln-61-repository-publisher in levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills) into .claude/skills/ln-61-repository-publisher in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Ln 61 Repository Publisher in Codex?

Run `npx skills add levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-61-repository-publisher -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (plugins/delivery-suite/skills/ln-61-repository-publisher in levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills) into .agents/skills/ln-61-repository-publisher in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Ln 61 Repository Publisher in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-61-repository-publisher -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ln-61-repository-publisher, .gemini/skills/ln-61-repository-publisher, .github/skills/ln-61-repository-publisher and .opencode/skills/ln-61-repository-publisher in your project.

What does Ln 61 Repository Publisher need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Ln 61 Repository Publisher needs the command-line tools its instructions call (git).

Does Ln 61 Repository Publisher access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Its commands use git, which can reach the network depending on how they are called. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Ln 61 Repository Publisher safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Ln 61 Repository Publisher use?

Ln 61 Repository Publisher is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Ln 61 Repository Publisher use?

About 2.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 10k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Ln 61 Repository Publisher?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ln 61 Repository Publisher: Commit, Push, and PR (EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin, 25k stars), Publish (code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent, 70k stars), Commit (sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, 47k stars) and Git Commit Push (farm-fe/farm, 5.6k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Ln 61 Repository Publisher?

levnikolaevich (a GitHub user) maintains it in levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills, which has 574 GitHub stars. The repository holds 31 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 5, 2026.

Source: levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.