Agent skill

Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor

by levnikolaevich in levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills

Audits existing tests for risk coverage, reliable oracles and maintenance value; does not edit tests.

MITAuto-check passedTesting & QA

Install Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor

skills CLI
$ npx skills add levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-55-test-suite-auditor -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills ln-55-test-suite-auditor --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/plugins/quality-assurance-suite/skills/ln-55-test-suite-auditor .claude/skills/ln-55-test-suite-auditor && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
ln-55-test-suite-auditor
GitHub stars
574
Token cost
~4.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
2,193 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
31
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Audits existing tests for risk coverage, reliable oracles and maintenance value; does not edit tests.

  • Works in 5 steps: Map the Portfolio and Baseline → Audit Product Value and Coverage → Audit Isolation and Determinism → …
  • Tasks that involve Test generation
  • SKILL.md covers Tool Routing, Evidence Rules, Checklist and Self-Check, plus 1 more section
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor is an agent skill from levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills. Audits existing tests for risk coverage, reliable oracles and maintenance value; does not edit tests.

Its SKILL.md is about 4.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Testing & QA, covering Test generation. The repository describes itself as: Help your AI agent finish the job: solve the right problem, keep changes focused, and show what was verified. For Claude Code and Codex. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Test generation

Example prompts

  • “Use the ln-55-test-suite-auditor skill to audit existing tests for risk coverage, reliable oracles and maintenance value; does not edit tests”
  • “/ln-55-test-suite-auditor”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Map the Portfolio and Baseline
  2. Audit Product Value and Coverage
  3. Audit Isolation and Determinism
  4. Audit Structure, Maintenance, and Oracles
  5. Validate Findings and Report

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 0ce8796. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor loads about 4.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 32 tokens; SKILL.md has 2,193 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~32
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills at commit 0ce8796, republished under its MIT licence (© levnikolaevich). 2,193 words, ~4,282 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/ln-55-test-suite-auditor/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
ln-55-test-suite-auditor
description
Audits existing tests for risk coverage, reliable oracles and maintenance value; does not edit tests.

Test Suite Auditor

Goal: Audit the test portfolio as a read-only lifecycle and confidence system. Determine which important failures it detects, which evidence is untrustworthy or obsolete, and which additions, changes, consolidations, retirements, or explicit omissions produce the smallest sustainable portfolio.

Execution contract: The checklist defines completion. Track each item internally as PENDING, PROVEN with evidence, CLEARED with evidence its condition is absent, or UNPROVEN with a gap; reading, delegation, tool failure, a zero exit status, or a self-reported success is not proof; only the observed outcome is. Reconcile after each section. Before returning, resolve all PENDING, count only PROVEN and CLEARED, and apply verdict and approval rules to every gap. Preserve intent, scope, and existing authorization. Continue authorized work; ask only for consequential unresolved choices or required external approval. When no one can answer during the run, state the exact question and apply the skill's verdict for the remaining gap instead of waiting or guessing. Scale depth to material risk without skipping checks. Preserve dependency and safety order; otherwise choose an appropriate verification method. Accept equivalent user or repository evidence; no other skill, named artifact, or complete lifecycle is required. Preserve source requirement and decision IDs. Bind reused evidence to relevant source versions, dirty changes, configuration, and environment; invalidate only affected claims. On continuation, reconcile task, authorization, current state, and unresolved evidence. For long work, return a compact continuation record or update an already authorized artifact; read-only skills do not persist it. Distinguish artifact readiness, verified behavior, and external-action authority. Prepare authorized work before required approval. If blocked by an instruction, cite its exact source and unresolved boundary; do not invent approval gates from caution.

Tool Routing

NeedPreferred toolUse it whenFallback
Source and test inventoryNative file listing, search, manifests, and test configurationMapping domains, test types, runners, fixtures, and generated areasRepository tree plus known test entrypoints
Test-to-code relationshipsLanguage server or host-native code intelligenceMapping units, callers, implementations, routes, and test targetsNaming and path search verified by direct reads
Execution and trustRepository-defined test commands through the shellEstablishing pass/fail state, timing, order dependence, or reproducibilityInspect CI results and configuration; mark execution unavailable
Coverage and missed behaviorExisting coverage tools and reportsCoverage data is configured and comparable to source scopeStatic behavior-to-test mapping; never invent percentages
Flake and isolation evidenceRepeated, shuffled, parallel, or seed-controlled runs supported by the repositoryA test is suspected of order, time, randomness, or shared-state dependenceHistory, CI logs, and code-path evidence
Assertion strengthTest reads, failure output, and configured mutation testingDetermining whether tests fail for meaningful behavioral defectsCounterfactual reasoning tied to specific assertions
Framework semanticsOfficial test-runner or framework documentationA finding depends on lifecycle, fixtures, retries, isolation, or mocking behaviorPrimary-source web research; otherwise mark UNVERIFIED

Run only safe test and diagnostic commands. Do not rewrite snapshots, update golden files, regenerate fixtures, or accept changed output during the audit.

Evidence Rules

  • Coverage indicates execution, not proof. Require an assertion or observable oracle for important behavior.
  • A slow test is not low-value when it uniquely protects a critical journey; a fast test is not high-value when it proves framework behavior.
  • A flaky failure must be separated from an intermittently failing product dependency or genuinely nondeterministic requirement.
  • Deletion recommendations require proof that the test basis is obsolete or that other evidence covers every still-required behavior and failure mode with equal or better trust.
  • Merge recommendations require demonstrated duplicate or fragmented coverage and must preserve distinct business and failure scenarios, oracle strength, and failure localization; a larger test is not inherently better.
  • Known regression guards and the only proof of a rare critical edge case are not deletion candidates merely because a numeric value heuristic is low.
  • A real dependency is not inherently a test defect. Judge whether its version, state, ownership, reset, availability, and failure evidence make the result reproducible.
  • Keep portfolio action (KEEP, ADD, UPDATE, MERGE, DELETE, NO_TEST) separate from execution status (PASS, FAIL, BLOCKED, UNPROVEN, QUARANTINED). NO_TEST requires existing proof, another control, or explicit residual-risk acceptance.
  • Do not require a new registry by default. Prefer traceability derivable from repository-native test paths, behavioral names, tags, requirements, CI configuration, and review evidence.
  • External testing guidance becomes actionable only when it explains a concrete weakness in this suite.

Checklist

1. Map the Portfolio and Baseline
  • Detect test runners, configurations, commands, directories, fixtures, factories, snapshots, golden files, manual scripts, coverage, and mutation tooling.
  • Map source domains and critical entrypoints to unit, integration, contract, end-to-end, and manual test surfaces.
  • Trace requirements, product risks, incidents, public contracts, and changed behavior to tests and results where evidence exists; identify tests with no current test basis and basis elements with no credible proof.
  • Read repository instructions and CI configuration to identify required suites, environment assumptions, retries, sharding, and exclusions.
  • Run representative suites and required gates where feasible; record environment, duration, exit status, discovered/executed scope, failures, skips, and retries. Flag required suites that silently select no tests.
  • Separate generated, vendored, example, migration-history, and infrastructure fixtures from product tests before evaluating the portfolio.
  • Keep the audit read-only and disclose any caches or test artifacts created by permitted commands.
2. Audit Product Value and Coverage
  • Identify uniquely critical local logic: money, authentication, authorization, data integrity, algorithms, domain rules, destructive operations, and irreversible workflows.
  • Trace each critical behavior to at least one test whose oracle would fail for the corresponding defect; name/path matches and line coverage are only discovery evidence.
  • For tests of configuration, queries, schemas, adaptation, validation, or failure handling, trace the asserted behavior to a concrete business rule or outcome; technical coverage alone does not establish value.
  • Check whether end-to-end tests cross the production-shaped boundaries relevant to the risk and prove the terminal durable or user-visible outcome, not only an intermediate status, page, or mock call.
  • Test value and boundary: Require every test to detect a concrete defect in this product's business logic and name the protected business outcome. Prefer E2E through user or external-system boundaries; use integration or unit tests only for business scenarios difficult to exercise reliably through E2E. Reject platform, trivial-wiring, implementation-detail, and duplicate proof with no distinct business failure signal.
  • Inspect error, retry, timeout, authorization, concurrency, migration, compatibility, and recovery behavior where those failures are plausible and costly.
  • Use coverage data to locate unexecuted critical paths, then inspect behavior and assertions before reporting a gap.
  • Classify every material gap and in-scope affected test as KEEP, ADD, UPDATE, MERGE, DELETE, or NO_TEST, justified by impact, plausible failure, uniqueness, trust, and maintenance cost; use UPDATE when valuable intent remains but its basis, setup, boundary, assertion, or oracle must change.
3. Audit Isolation and Determinism
  • Check shared database, filesystem, environment, process, network, cache, clock, random generator, and global state for leakage between tests.
  • Check setup and teardown on success and failure, unique test data, transaction boundaries, cleanup, and parallel-safe resource ownership.
  • Diagnose suspected flakes using only discriminating modes: alone, in-suite, fixed-seed repetition, shuffled/reversed order, or parallel execution. Preserve the first failure, order, seed, worker, and environment; stop when evidence identifies the cause or the bounded diagnostic budget ends.
  • Detect time, timezone, locale, randomness, sleep, scheduler, and race sensitivity; require controllable clocks or seeds where behavior depends on them.
  • For real dependencies and emulators, verify version pinning, readiness, namespace/state reset, failure cleanup, credentials, and CI availability instead of assuming either real or mocked is preferable.
  • Review retries and quarantine rules so they preserve the first failure and reproducibility data rather than converting an initial failure into a silent pass.
  • Require every quarantine to remain visible outside the passing result, with an owner or decision path and a concrete recovery, replacement, or retirement trigger; quarantine is an execution state, not a portfolio action.
  • Distinguish test flakiness from real intermittent product defects using repeated evidence, logs, and the failing path.
Show full SKILL.md (897 more words)Show less
4. Audit Structure, Maintenance, and Oracles
  • Check whether test layout follows source domains or a clear type-based convention and whether contributors can locate the owning tests.
  • Find orphan tests, disabled suites, duplicate fixtures, fragmented scenario coverage, oversized files, and flat directories that obscure ownership.
  • Review temporary characterization, migration, compatibility, incident, workaround, and regression tests against current risk. A fixed incident does not retire its regression guard; require obsolete behavior or trustworthy replacement coverage before recommending merge or deletion.
  • Check test names and arrangement for behavioral intent, prerequisites, action, and expected outcome rather than implementation narration.
  • UI test locators: Use stable project-native semantic locators (roles, accessible names, labels) or explicit IDs/test hooks according to the observable contract and locale strategy. Avoid styling, position, timing, and incidental structure. Treat exact-copy assertions separately when copy is a requirement; do not require product edits solely to add hooks when a robust semantic locator exists.
  • Inspect assertions for specificity, negative proof, state and interaction balance, useful failure messages, and resistance to false positives.
  • Flag tests without a meaningful failure oracle, weak truthiness, snapshots of incidental or unreviewable output, broad exception acceptance, and mocks that bypass tested behavior. Retain snapshots or implicit failure oracles that independently prove the required contract.
  • Check that expected values come from an independent contract, example, invariant, or golden artifact rather than reproducing the implementation's calculation inside the test.
  • Check mocks, fakes, emulators, and generated clients for contract drift; require a contract test or another credible comparison with the real boundary where drift could create false confidence.
  • Inspect non-default configuration cases for business failures hidden by passing defaults; use supported runtime overrides for safe reproduction, not edits to reviewed code or tests.
  • Use existing mutation results or a targeted counterfactual for critical weak-oracle candidates. Execute mutations only in an authorized disposable copy, preserve the reviewed source, and clean run-owned artifacts; otherwise use static reasoning. Do not mandate repository-wide mutation testing.
  • Review manual tests for reproducible setup, fail-fast behavior, explicit expected evidence, idempotency, cleanup, portability, and operator documentation.
  • Check fixture and helper abstraction for readability and honest defaults; hidden behavior in builders must not make important test conditions invisible.
  • Review gate placement and suite cost: required gates protect material release risk, while slower diagnostic or exploratory evidence remains discoverable without blocking routine delivery unnecessarily.
5. Validate Findings and Report
  • Research runner or framework semantics only when lifecycle, fixture, isolation, retry, or mocking behavior can change a finding; use official version-matched sources.
  • Reproduce high-severity trust failures where safe, preserving command, seed, order, and environment evidence.
  • Deduplicate findings that share one root cause, such as a global fixture causing multiple flaky suites.
  • Apply the materiality gate: require concrete critical proof gap, false confidence, delivery risk, or recurring maintenance cost at evidenced scale. Reject taste, theoretical purity, generic practice, hypothetical scale, and reasonable alternatives; require the outcome or constraint, not a preferred implementation.
  • External correction evidence: Ground external corrections in version-matched official contracts, using primary engineering sources for unresolved tradeoffs. Cite the supported mechanism; local evidence suffices for local defects.
  • Make accepted portfolio findings actionable through the protected behavior, owning test boundary, and evidence needed to close the gap; keep changes outside this read-only audit.
  • Classify findings as P0-P3 based on critical behavior left unproven, false confidence, delivery blockage, and maintenance drag.
  • Report decision-useful portfolio signals when evidence exists: material risks by proof state, action distribution, required-gate results and duration, skips, retries, quarantine, and orphan or obsolete candidates. Reject total test count, pass rate without exclusions, raw coverage, and level ratios as standalone quality targets.
  • Use BLOCKED when a required critical suite, environment, or oracle cannot be accessed and no credible static or historical fallback exists; use FAIL when evidence shows critical behavior is unproven, a required gate fails, or false confidence remains in an untrustworthy critical surface; use CONCERNS only for non-blocking portfolio or maintenance risk, and PASS only when required evidence is trustworthy and no critical gap remains.

Self-Check

  • Reconcile before returning. Check item-level evidence, requirement coverage, contradictions, scope, verdict, and applicable cleanup. Correct the report or authorized artifacts. Reuse valid evidence; do not automatically rescan the repository or rerun successful commands. Repeat checks only for relevant changes, failures, or unresolved evidence. Disclose remaining gaps.

Output Contract

Report in the user's language, in this order; label all five fields and state each fact once. Use controlled plain language: one fact per sentence, usually under 20 words, active voice, and one term per concept, with no synonyms for verdicts, IDs, or states. Small results may use one line per field; omit empty tables and do not copy linked artifacts:

  1. Result: The exact skill-specific verdict token first, then the supported outcome.
  2. Scope: Reviewed/changed scope, exclusions, baseline, and material assumptions.
  3. Evidence: Skill-specific fields below; distinguish facts, inferences, and unverified claims. Link artifacts; use tables when useful.
  4. Verification: Checks/results, unavailable evidence, and applicable cleanup/external state.
  5. Completion: Checklist: X/Y complete; Incomplete: None or each UNPROVEN item's reason, outcome impact, and exact next action; residual risks and required decisions.

Skill-specific evidence: Test basis/protected risk → existing test or missing proof → portfolio action → oracle → gate/result → replacement evidence or retirement trigger. Cover critical behavior, isolation, maintenance, assertion strength, lifecycle, net portfolio effect, required/diagnostic gates, duration, skips, retries, and quarantine where evidenced. Findings need priority, test location, missed defect class, impact, unacceptable tradeoff, and minimal correction; preserve unique coverage and distinguish portfolio actions from execution states.

© levnikolaevich, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in plugins/quality-assurance-suite/skills/ln-55-test-suite-auditor of levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 0ce8796

Compare with similar skills

Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor this skilllevnikolaevich/claude-code-skills574—~4.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Emcaklofas/kicad-happy1.4k1 repos~2.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Swig Testswig/swig6.3k—~2.3kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Generate Test Cases342164796/generate-test-cases1201 repos~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Wioworkersio/skills204—~5.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Verify Cc Safety Netkenryu42/cc-safety-net1.6k—~2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Emc

    aklofas/kicad-happy

    EMC pre-compliance risk analysis for KiCad PCB designs — 18 check categories, 44 rule IDs covering ground planes, decoupling, I/O filtering, switching harmonics, clock routing, differential pair…

    1.4k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.8k tokens
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed
  • Swig Test

    swig/swig

    Run SWIG test suite for specific languages. An agent skill from swig/swig.

    6.3k GitHub stars~2.3k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed
  • Generate Test Cases

    342164796/generate-test-cases

    自主学习型测试文档生成器。从需求文档(Markdown)生成测试用例 XMind 文件,支持持久化记忆和持续学习。当用户提到"生成测试用例"、"根据需求生成测试"时触发。

    120 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.9k tokens
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed
  • Wio

    workersio/skills

    Testing workflow skill for finding high-value test candidates, writing focused tests, generating realistic workloads, reviewing test value, and diagnosing test-suite health.

    204 GitHub stars~5.8k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed
  • Verify Cc Safety Net

    kenryu42/cc-safety-net

    Launch and drive the real cc-safety-net CLI — the hook decision path, explain, status/doctor, logs, and the local policy GUI — against an isolated home, capturing evidence.

    1.6k GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated today
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed
  • File Server

    microsoft/WindowsProtocolTestSuites

    Official

    ALWAYS LOAD THIS SKILL when working with FileServer, SMB, SMB2, SMB3, CIFS, file sharing, MS-SMB2, MS-FSCC, MS-FSA, MS-DFSC, MS-FSRVP, MS-RSVD, MS-SQOS, or any file server protocol test…

    567 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 25 days ago
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed

More from levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills

All 31 skills in this repo
  • Ln 53 Documentation Auditor

    levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills

    Audits documentation and comments for trust, coverage, consistency and freshness; read-only.

    574 GitHub stars~3.8k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ln 81 Skill Reviewer

    levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills

    Reviews skill instructions, trigger boundaries and distribution contracts; not product code.

    574 GitHub stars~3.5k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ln 11 Opportunity Evaluator

    levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills

    Evaluates new product opportunities through demand, channels and economics before committing to build.

    574 GitHub stars~3k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ln 12 Product Requirements Builder

    levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills

    Defines product requirements, business rules and acceptance criteria for a committed intent; edits product docs only.

    574 GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ln 13 Interaction Design Builder

    levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills

    Designs user flows, interaction states and mockups for a defined product scope; does not implement UI code.

    574 GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ln 21 System Design Baseline Builder

    levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills

    Defines measurable architecture drivers and constraints before system design; edits architecture docs only.

    574 GitHub stars~2.5k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor

What does Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor do?

Audits existing tests for risk coverage, reliable oracles and maintenance value; does not edit tests. Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor is an agent skill from levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills. Audits existing tests for risk coverage, reliable oracles and maintenance value; does not edit tests.

When should I use Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor?

Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor fits situations like: tasks that involve Test generation.

How do I install Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-55-test-suite-auditor -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (plugins/quality-assurance-suite/skills/ln-55-test-suite-auditor in levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills) into .claude/skills/ln-55-test-suite-auditor in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor in Codex?

Run `npx skills add levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-55-test-suite-auditor -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (plugins/quality-assurance-suite/skills/ln-55-test-suite-auditor in levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills) into .agents/skills/ln-55-test-suite-auditor in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-55-test-suite-auditor -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ln-55-test-suite-auditor, .gemini/skills/ln-55-test-suite-auditor, .github/skills/ln-55-test-suite-auditor and .opencode/skills/ln-55-test-suite-auditor in your project.

What does Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor is instructions for the agent only.

Does Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor use?

Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor use?

About 4.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 17k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor: Emc (aklofas/kicad-happy, 1.4k stars), Swig Test (swig/swig, 6.3k stars), Generate Test Cases (342164796/generate-test-cases, 120 stars) and Wio (workersio/skills, 204 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Ln 55 Test Suite Auditor?

levnikolaevich (a GitHub user) maintains it in levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills, which has 574 GitHub stars. The repository holds 31 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 5, 2026.

Source: levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.