Contract Review
evolsb/claude-legal-skill
Review legal contracts, NDAs, employment agreements, SaaS terms, and M&A documents.
Pick the right LLM for CONTRACT REVIEW — reviewing an existing agreement for risk, deviations from standard, missing protections, and internal contradictions, and proposing redlines.
Install Route Contract Review
$ npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill route-contract-review -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills route-contract-review --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian/skills/route-contract-review .claude/skills/route-contract-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "route-contract-review" agent skill from https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/tree/main/skills/legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian/skills/route-contract-review into .claude/skills/route-contract-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "route-contract-review", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/tree/main/skills/legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian/skills/route-contract-reviewType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill route-contract-review -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills route-contract-review --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian/skills/route-contract-review .agents/skills/route-contract-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "route-contract-review" agent skill from https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/tree/main/skills/legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian/skills/route-contract-review into .agents/skills/route-contract-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "route-contract-review", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill route-contract-review -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills route-contract-review --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian/skills/route-contract-review .cursor/skills/route-contract-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "route-contract-review" agent skill from https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/tree/main/skills/legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian/skills/route-contract-review into .cursor/skills/route-contract-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "route-contract-review", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills.git --path skills/legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian/skills/route-contract-review--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill route-contract-review -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills route-contract-review --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian/skills/route-contract-review .gemini/skills/route-contract-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "route-contract-review" agent skill from https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/tree/main/skills/legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian/skills/route-contract-review into .gemini/skills/route-contract-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "route-contract-review", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills route-contract-reviewInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill route-contract-review -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian/skills/route-contract-review .github/skills/route-contract-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "route-contract-review" agent skill from https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/tree/main/skills/legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian/skills/route-contract-review into .github/skills/route-contract-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "route-contract-review", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill route-contract-review -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills route-contract-review --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian/skills/route-contract-review .opencode/skills/route-contract-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "route-contract-review" agent skill from https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/tree/main/skills/legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian/skills/route-contract-review into .opencode/skills/route-contract-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "route-contract-review", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
route-contract-review- GitHub stars
- 847
- Token cost
- ~1.5k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 526 words
- Files
- 2 (incl. references)
- Skills in repo
- 154
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- AGPL-3.0-or-later
At a glance
Pick the right LLM for CONTRACT REVIEW — reviewing an existing agreement for risk, deviations from standard, missing protections, and internal contradictions, and proposing redlines.
- Works in 3 steps: Infer, then ask only what's missing → Route by sub-task (composed from the… → Output (use this exact shape)
- Someone asks which model to review this contract / NDA / MSA
- SKILL.md covers Contract review is a composite…, Step 1 — Infer, then ask only…, Step 2 — Route by sub-task… and Step 3 — Output (use this…, plus 1 more section
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Route Contract Review is an agent skill from lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills. Pick the right LLM for CONTRACT REVIEW — reviewing an existing agreement for risk, deviations from standard, missing protections, and internal contradictions, and proposing redlines. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 legal benchmarks. Contract review is a COMPOSITE skill (extraction + reasoning + redlining + conflict-detection), so this routes by the dominant sub-task. Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/ language), then recommends a primary model + fallback…
Its SKILL.md is about 1.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 2 other files, including reference files (for example `references/scorecard.md`).
It sits in Legal & Compliance, covering Contract review. The repository describes itself as: A curated list of awesome Agent Skills for automating legal work. The licence is AGPL-3.0-or-later.
When your agent uses it
- Someone asks which model to review this contract / NDA / MSA
- Best AI to redline
- Route this contract review
- Is about to review an agreement without a fixed model
Example prompts
- “which model to review this contract / NDA / MSA”
- “best AI to redline”
- “route this contract review”
- “/route-contract-review”
Requirements
- Pre-approved tools (allowed-tools): AskUserQuestion, Read
Workflow steps
3 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 045f738. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves these tools, so the agent can use them without asking each time:
AskUserQuestionRead
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
Links to these hosts (documentation or services it may open):
legalbenchmarks.aivals.ai
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Route Contract Review loads about 1.5k tokens when it runs, and up to ~2.8k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 192 tokens; SKILL.md has 526 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills at commit 045f738, republished under its AGPL-3.0-or-later licence (© lawve-ai). 526 words, ~1,502 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/route-contract-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 1 other file; get the full folder from GitHub.- name
- route-contract-review
- description
- Pick the right LLM for CONTRACT REVIEW — reviewing an existing agreement for risk, deviations from standard, missing protections, and internal contradictions, and proposing redlines. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 legal benchmarks. Contract review is a COMPOSITE skill (extraction + reasoning + redlining + conflict-detection), so this routes by the dominant sub-task. Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/ language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model to review this contract / NDA / MSA", "best AI to redline", "route this contract review", or is about to review an agreement without a fixed model.
- allowed-tools
- AskUserQuestion, Read
- version
- 0.1.0
- triggers
- which model to review this contract or NDA or MSA, best AI to redline a contract, route this contract review, which LLM to assess an agreement for risk
- license
- AGPL-3.0-or-later
Route: Contract Review
You are a model-routing advisor for contract review — reading an existing agreement to find risk, deviations from market/standard, missing protections, and internal contradictions, and proposing redlines. You recommend which model to review with; you don't review the contract here. Decision support, not legal advice.
Contract review is a composite — route by the dominant sub-task
No public benchmark isolates "contract review." It is: find the clauses (Info Extraction) + judge risk/deviation (legal reasoning) + propose redlines (drafting) + catch contradictions (conflict detection). First decide which sub-task dominates this review, then route.
Step 1 — Infer, then ask only what's missing
Batched, multiple-choice, recommended-first:
- Stakes — Recommended: High for any counterparty-facing agreement.
Quick sanity check·Working review·High — you'll rely on the redlines. - Dominant sub-task — ask this; it drives the pick:
Find/summarize clauses (extraction)·Assess risk & market-standard (reasoning)·Rewrite/redline (drafting)·Full review (all of the above). - Document length —
Short (<30pp)·Long (30–100pp)·Very long (100pp+). - Cost / speed / privacy —
Balanced cloud·Minimize cost·Fast/interactive·Privileged → self-host.
Default if "just pick": High stakes, Full review, Short/medium doc, Balanced cloud.
Step 2 — Route by sub-task (composed from the drafting, extraction & reasoning scorecards, 2026-07)
| Dominant sub-task | Primary | Why | Watch out |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full review (default) | Claude Opus 4.8 | Only model strong at drafting and documented best at flagging contradictions; dependable extraction. Best single-model reviewer. | Verbose output; ~$0.29/task. |
| Extraction-heavy (obligations matrix, "find every clause of type X") | GPT 5.6 Sol | Best exhaustive clause retrieval + cross-doc comparison (89.7% extraction). | Flattens conditionals and worst at drafting through contradictions — bad if the review is really about conflicts. Verify conditionals. |
| Risk / deviation reasoning ("is this indemnity market? what's the exposure?") | Gemini 3 Flash (value) or Fable 5 / Opus 4.8 (safest) | Reasoning models cluster within ~3 pts; buy on cost/speed. | Verify every cited rule/standard. |
| Redline drafting (rewrite to protect the client) | Opus 4.8 or Grok 4.5 | Opus = best drafter + conflict-flagging; Grok = cheaper, leaves sound language untouched. | Avoid GPT 5.6 Sol (polished but misses instructions). |
| Conflict detection across the agreement | Opus 4.8 | Documented standout at surfacing contradictions instead of papering over them. | Avoid GPT 5.6 Sol — worst at silently drafting through contradictions. |
Show full SKILL.md (177 more words)Show less
Length overrides everything above. Advertised context ≠ effective context:
- <30pp — any model in the table.
- 30–100pp — prefer models that hold quality mid-context; verify nothing dropped past ~200K tokens.
- 100pp+ — only Gemini 3 Deep Think reliably holds quality near 1M tokens; for the rest, chunk + map-reduce (review section-by-section, then reconcile) rather than trusting a single long-context pass.
Constraint modifiers
- Minimize cost → Grok 4.5 (drafting/redline) or Gemini 3 Flash (reasoning/extraction triage).
- Privacy / on-prem → Qwen 3.7 Max / DeepSeek V4 Pro — weak on legal reliability (44–62%); heavy human review.
- Non-English / non-US → route language via
route-legal-translation; add a jurisdiction-qualified reviewer.
Step 3 — Output (use this exact shape)
PRIMARY: <model> — <tie to dominant sub-task + length + axes>
FALLBACK: <model> — <when to switch>
ESCALATE IF: <trigger, e.g. "conflicting terms suspected" or "doc > effective context"> → <Opus 4.8 / chunking>
AVOID: <model> — <why> (name GPT 5.6 Sol for conflict-sensitive review; cheap tier for high stakes)
CONFIDENCE: low | med | high
VERIFY: Contradictions surfaced (not papered over) · conditionals preserved · nothing dropped in long
docs · redlines represent every instruction (all-pass). Human sign-off before you send markup.If stakes are High: "Re-check https://www.legalbenchmarks.ai/leaderboard and https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/legal_bench before relying on this."
Non-negotiables
- Route to the sub-task, not the vibe. A polished summary from a model that misses contradictions is worse than a plain one that catches them.
- All-pass bar: a review that catches 8 of 10 risks is materially incomplete, not "80% good."
- Capability ≠ controllability. Verify; keep a lawyer in the loop.
- Deeper notes + full data:
references/scorecard.mdand repodata/scorecard-2026-07.md. - Routes models, not legal advice.
© lawve-ai, AGPL-3.0-or-later. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
SKILL.md and 1 other file (references) in skills/legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian/skills/route-contract-review of lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills.
- SKILL.md
- references/scorecard.md
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 045f738
Compare with similar skills
Route Contract Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Route Contract Review this skilllawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills | 847 | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | AGPL-3.0-or-later | |
| Contract Reviewevolsb/claude-legal-skill | 464 | 1 repos | ~3.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Commercial Legal Plapiotrowski-afk/commercial-legal-pl | 176 | 1 repos | ~4.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Hand Drawnthreerocks/hand-drawn-styles | 2.2k | — | ~398 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Tabular Document Reviewanthropics/claude-for-legal | 9.6k | 3 repos | ~4.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Tw Formal WritingImbad0202/tw-formal-writing | 179 | — | ~1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Commercial Legal Pl
apiotrowski-afk/commercial-legal-pl
Skill do analizy i tworzenia umów według polskiego prawa, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem umów B2B, IP i IT (body leasing, NDA, wdrożenia, SaaS, przeniesienie praw autorskich, ugody).
Hand Drawn
threerocks/hand-drawn-styles
A skill your agent uses when users ask for a hand-drawn or illustrated image prompt, name one of the repository's 20 numbered styles or the 3.1 stable variant, or mention triggers such as…
- Official
Tabular Document Review
anthropics/claude-for-legal
Builds a review grid with one row per document and one column per data point, each cell cited to a verbatim quote, built for M&A diligence and other batch reviews.
Tw Formal Writing
Imbad0202/tw-formal-writing
台灣正式文件撰寫助手 — 涵蓋政府公文、政府機關其他文件、法律文件、人民對政府文書四類中文正式文件的撰寫（不含學術論文、商業文書、私人書信等，見下方排除清單）。
Contract Review Pro
CSlawyer1985/contract-review-pro
专业合同审核 Skill：7步工作流（含立场声明、框架审阅、类型路由）、5类通用门禁+16个专项门禁、终稿三件套+HTML可视化报告、8维度风险评分、修订5分类路由。完全自包含，零外部依赖。
More from lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills
All 154 skills in this repoCustoms Trade Law Onur Kafkas
lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills
U.S. An agent skill from lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills.
Eu Data Act Oliver Schmidt Prietz
lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills
Practitioner skill for advising on EU Regulation 2023/2854 (Data Act).
Litigation Deadline Calendar
lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills
Calendar litigation and arbitration deadlines from a scheduling order.
Outlook Emails Lawvable
lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills
Read, search, and download emails and attachments from Microsoft Outlook via OAuth2.
Ambiguity Report
lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills
Turn an interpretive-ambiguity audit of a legal text — contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — into a polished deliverable.
Az Eu Website Privacy Audit
lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills
Audits a website for compliance with Azerbaijan's Law on Personal Data No.
Related
Categories
Questions about Route Contract Review
What does Route Contract Review do?
Pick the right LLM for CONTRACT REVIEW — reviewing an existing agreement for risk, deviations from standard, missing protections, and internal contradictions, and proposing redlines. Route Contract Review is an agent skill from lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills. Pick the right LLM for CONTRACT REVIEW — reviewing an existing agreement for risk, deviations from standard, missing protections, and internal contradictions, and proposing redlines.
When should I use Route Contract Review?
Route Contract Review fits situations like: someone asks which model to review this contract / NDA / MSA; best AI to redline; route this contract review; is about to review an agreement without a fixed model.
How do I install Route Contract Review in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill route-contract-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian/skills/route-contract-review in lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills) into .claude/skills/route-contract-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Route Contract Review in Codex?
Run `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill route-contract-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian/skills/route-contract-review in lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills) into .agents/skills/route-contract-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Route Contract Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill route-contract-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/route-contract-review, .gemini/skills/route-contract-review, .github/skills/route-contract-review and .opencode/skills/route-contract-review in your project.
What does Route Contract Review need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Route Contract Review is instructions for the agent only. Its frontmatter pre-approves these tools: AskUserQuestion, Read.
Does Route Contract Review access the network?
SKILL.md names 2 domains. As links in the text: legalbenchmarks.ai and vals.ai. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Route Contract Review safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Route Contract Review use?
Route Contract Review is published under the AGPL-3.0-or-later licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Route Contract Review use?
About 1.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 1.3k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.
What are the alternatives to Route Contract Review?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Route Contract Review: Contract Review (evolsb/claude-legal-skill, 464 stars), Commercial Legal Pl (apiotrowski-afk/commercial-legal-pl, 176 stars), Hand Drawn (threerocks/hand-drawn-styles, 2.2k stars) and Tabular Document Review (anthropics/claude-for-legal, 9.6k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Route Contract Review?
lawve-ai (a GitHub organization) maintains it in lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills, which has 847 GitHub stars. The repository holds 154 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 2, 2026.
Source: lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.