New: 98,000+ skills indexed from GitHub repos with 100+ stars · every skill safety-checkedBrowse top skillsTop skills
Esc to closeBrowse all skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills

Agent skill

Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz

by lawve-ai in lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

Fast 15-25 minute triage for preliminary EU AI Act classification and compliance assessment.

AGPL-3.0Auto-check passedLegal & Compliance

Install Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz

skills CLI
$ npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill eu-ai-act-triage-oliver-schmidt-prietz -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills eu-ai-act-triage-oliver-schmidt-prietz --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/eu-ai-act-quick-assessment-oliver-schmidt-prietz .claude/skills/eu-ai-act-triage-oliver-schmidt-prietz && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
eu-ai-act-triage-oliver-schmidt-prietz
GitHub stars
847
Token cost
~3.7k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,224 words
Files
7 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
154
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
AGPL-3.0

At a glance

Fast 15-25 minute triage for preliminary EU AI Act classification and compliance assessment.

  • Works in 4 steps: Quick Context (Adaptive 2-Batch Flow) → Rapid Classification (6-Step Gate… → Preliminary Output → …
  • Asks to do a quick AI Act assessment
  • SKILL.md covers Disclaimer (show at session…, When to Search the Web, Quick Assessment Workflow and Critical Reminders, plus 1 more section
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz is an agent skill from lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills. Fast 15-25 minute triage for preliminary EU AI Act classification and compliance assessment. This skill should be used when the user asks to "do a quick AI Act assessment", "check if the AI Act applies to us", "run a preliminary classification", "do an AI Act triage", "quick check", "preliminary assessment", "Schnellprüfung", "Ersteinschätzung", or needs a fast initial assessment before committing to full analysis.

Its SKILL.md is about 3.7k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 7 other files, including reference files (for example `README.md`, `evals.json` and `references/compliance-deadlines.md`).

It sits in Legal & Compliance, covering AI governance. The repository describes itself as: A curated list of awesome Agent Skills for automating legal work. The licence is AGPL-3.0.

When your agent uses it

  • Asks to do a quick AI Act assessment
  • Check if the AI Act applies to us
  • Run a preliminary classification
  • Do an AI Act triage

Example prompts

  • “do a quick AI Act assessment”
  • “check if the AI Act applies to us”
  • “run a preliminary classification”
  • “/eu-ai-act-triage-oliver-schmidt-prietz”

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Quick Context (Adaptive 2-Batch Flow)
  2. Rapid Classification (6-Step Gate Sequence)
  3. Preliminary Output
  4. Template Offer (Optional)

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 045f738. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are markdown).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz loads about 3.7k tokens when it runs, and up to ~9.2k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 114 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,224 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~114
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~3.7k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~9.2k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills at commit 045f738, republished under its AGPL-3.0 licence (© lawve-ai). 1,224 words, ~3,698 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/eu-ai-act-triage-oliver-schmidt-prietz/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 6 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
eu-ai-act-triage-oliver-schmidt-prietz
description
Fast 15-25 minute triage for preliminary EU AI Act classification and compliance assessment. This skill should be used when the user asks to "do a quick AI Act assessment", "check if the AI Act applies to us", "run a preliminary classification", "do an AI Act triage", "quick check", "preliminary assessment", "Schnellprüfung", "Ersteinschätzung", or needs a fast initial assessment before committing to full analysis.
metadata.author
Oliver Schmidt-Prietz
metadata.license
AGPL-3.0
metadata.version
2026.06.05

EU AI Act Quick Assessment

Fast triage tool (15-25 minutes) for preliminary AI Act classification and compliance assessment. Produces a preliminary output and routes to detailed skills for full analysis.

Disclaimer (show at session start, do not block)

Important: This is a preliminary AI Act assessment based on Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, designed for rapid triage. It is not legal advice and does not replace a full assessment — validate results with a full risk-tier classification, an Art. 6 high-risk depth analysis where the high-risk branch is plausible, a role determination, an obligation mapping, a formal report, and qualified legal counsel. Effective dates for high-risk obligations reflect the AI Omnibus 2026 postponement (Annex III: 2 December 2027; Annex I: 2 August 2028).

When to Search the Web

On activation — search for:

EU AI Act latest enforcement updates [current year]
EU AI Act Commission guidelines status [current year]

Quick Assessment Workflow

Phase 1: Quick Context (Adaptive 2-Batch Flow)

Gather context through a conversational 2-batch approach. Maximum 2 interaction turns — 1 if the user is detailed, 2 if gaps remain.

Batch 1: Essential Questions (always asked)

Present these three questions with a natural, conversational welcome:

Let's get started with a quick EU AI Act assessment.

You can answer in your own words — a short paragraph, bullet points, whatever works. I'll ask follow-up questions only if I need more detail.

1. What does the AI system do? (2-3 sentences: what it does, how it works at a high level, what outputs it produces)

2. Where is the system deployed? (For reference: EU/EEA market, Switzerland with EU reach, outside EU but outputs used in EU, or no EU connection)

3. What is your organization's relationship to it? (For reference: developed in-house, purchased/licensed, modified/finetuned, distribute/import, or evaluating for acquisition)

Coverage Analysis (internal — not shown to user)

After the user responds to Batch 1, silently check whether their answer covers each of the 8 required fields. Be generous with extraction — e.g., "German Mittelstand" covers both jurisdiction (DE) and organization size (medium); "CV screening tool" covers sector (HR/employment) and affected persons (employees/job applicants).

#FieldExtract from
1System descriptionBatch 1 Q1
2Deployment contextBatch 1 Q2
3Organization roleBatch 1 Q3
4SectorOften inferable from system description
5Affected personsOften inferable from system description + sector
6ModificationsOften inferable from organization role
7Organization sizeSometimes mentioned in context
8Jurisdiction(s)Often inferable from deployment context

Mark each field: Covered / Partially covered / Not covered.

Batch 2: Adaptive Follow-Up (only if gaps remain)
  • All 8 fields covered → Skip Batch 2. Briefly confirm your extractions and proceed to Phase 2.
  • Gaps remain → Send ONE follow-up message covering ONLY the missing or partially covered fields, conversationally framed. Do not re-ask what was already answered.
  • Partially covered fields → Use confirmation prompts, not full re-asks. Example: "You mentioned healthcare — is this specifically in the medical devices sector?"
  • Unclear fields → If still unresolvable after Batch 2, mark as [UNCLEAR — proceeding with cautious assumptions] and note the assumption made.

Example follow-up (if sector, size, and jurisdiction are missing):

Just a few more details to round out the picture:

  • What sector does this fall into? (e.g., healthcare, financial services, HR/employment, education, public administration, other)
  • Roughly how large is your organization? (e.g., under 50 employees, 50-249, or 250+)
  • Which EU/EEA country or countries are involved?
Information Normalization (internal — before Phase 2)

Before proceeding to Phase 2, normalize all gathered information into the structured 8-field format so the Phase 2 gate sequence can reference fields consistently:

  1. System description — free text
  2. Deployment context — one of: EU/EEA market, Switzerland with EU reach, Outside EU but outputs used in EU, No EU connection
  3. Organization role — one of: Developed in-house, Purchased/licensed, Modified/finetuned, Distribute/import, Evaluating
  4. Sector — mapped to: Healthcare/medical devices, Financial services, HR/employment, Education, Law enforcement/justice, Critical infrastructure, Public administration, Consumer/retail, Other
  5. Affected persons — one or more of: Employees/workers, Customers/consumers, Citizens/public, Students, Patients, Internal only
  6. Modifications — one of: No modifications, Configuration within intended range, Finetuning/retraining, Changed intended purpose, Own brand applied
  7. Organization size — one of: Micro (<10), Small (10-49), Medium (50-249), Large (250+)
  8. Jurisdiction(s) — list of EU/EEA Member States or Switzerland
Show full SKILL.md (550 more words)Show less
Phase 2: Rapid Classification (6-Step Gate Sequence)

Read references/quick-decision-tree.md for the condensed classification logic.

Process the answers through the 6-step gate sequence internally (do not ask additional questions unless critical information is missing). Output the result as a single assessment.

Gate 1: Scope Check (Art. 2)

  • If deployment context is "No EU connection" → likely out of scope → note and proceed cautiously
  • Check for military, personal use, pure R&D exclusions based on system description

Gate 2: AI System Test (Art. 3(1))

  • Quick determination based on system description
  • Apply simplified 3-question test: (1) machine-based? (2) infers/generates beyond rules? (3) influences environment?

Gate 3: Prohibited Practice Screen (Art. 5)

  • Rapid screen based on system description and sector
  • Flag any potential Art. 5 concern for detailed review

Gate 4: High-Risk Assessment (Annex I + III)

  • Map sector + use case to Annex I/III categories
  • Use sector answer as primary trigger indicator
  • If Annex III triggered: quick Art. 6(3) exception check
  • For a full Art. 6 high-risk depth assessment (Commission Guidelines-grounded), follow this triage with a dedicated high-risk depth analysis (Annex I + Annex III examples, Art. 6(3) exception) when the high-risk branch is plausible.

Gate 5: GPAI Check

  • Based on system description: does it use a general-purpose AI model?
  • If yes: note GPAI obligations

Gate 6: Transparency Triggers (Art. 50)

  • Check for direct human interaction, synthetic content generation, emotion recognition, deep fakes
Phase 3: Preliminary Output

Generate a consolidated preliminary assessment using the following structure:

markdown
## AI Act Quick Assessment — PRELIMINARY
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
⚠ PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT — Full analysis required for compliance decisions
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

System:           [name/description]
Date:             [date]
Assessment Type:  PRELIMINARY (Quick Assessment)

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
CLASSIFICATION SUMMARY
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
AI System (Art. 3(1)):     [Likely YES / Likely NO / Unclear — full test needed]
Scope (Art. 2):            [In scope / Likely excluded — Art. 2(x)]
Risk Tier:                 [Likely Prohibited / Likely High-Risk / Likely GPAI / Likely Limited / Likely Minimal / Unclear]
Classification Basis:      [Likely Art. 5(1)(x) / Likely Annex III Nr. X / Likely Art. 50 / Likely minimal]
Confidence:                [High / Medium / Low]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
ROLE ASSESSMENT
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Likely Role:               [Provider / Deployer / Quasi-Provider / Importer / Distributor]
Quasi-Provider Risk:       [None / Possible — [trigger]]
Key Concern:               [if any — e.g., finetuning may trigger Art. 25]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
TOP OBLIGATIONS (if high-risk or GPAI)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
| # | Obligation | Article | Urgency | Effort Estimate |
|---|-----------|---------|---------|-----------------|
| 1 | [top obligation] | [Art. X] | [Immediate/Short-term/Ongoing] | [Low/Medium/High] |
| 2 | [second obligation] | [Art. X] | [Immediate/Short-term/Ongoing] | [Low/Medium/High] |
| 3 | [third obligation] | [Art. X] | [Immediate/Short-term/Ongoing] | [Low/Medium/High] |
| 4 | [fourth obligation] | [Art. X] | [Immediate/Short-term/Ongoing] | [Low/Medium/High] |
| 5 | [fifth obligation] | [Art. X] | [Immediate/Short-term/Ongoing] | [Low/Medium/High] |

For ALL risk tiers:
| - | AI competence (Art. 4) | Art. 4 | Immediate (since Feb 2025) | Low-Medium |

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
COMPLIANCE TIMELINE
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Applicable Deadline:       [2 Feb 2025 / 2 Aug 2025 / 2 Dec 2027 (Annex III — Omnibus) / 2 Aug 2028 (Annex I — Omnibus)]
Days Remaining:            [X days]
Urgency:                   [OVERDUE / CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
JURISDICTION FLAGS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
[Jurisdiction-specific flags based on deployment country, e.g.:]
[DE: Works council co-determination likely required (BetrVG §87)]
[FR: CSE consultation required before deployment]
[Finance sector: BaFin/[regulator] AI model governance requirements apply]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
FINANCIAL EXPOSURE (PRELIMINARY)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Maximum penalty:           [EUR XM or X% turnover — Art. 99(X)]
SME proportionality:       [Applies / Does not apply]
Penalty tier:              [Tier 1/2/3]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
FLAGS & WARNINGS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
[List any flags, e.g.:]
[PROHIBITED PRACTICE RISK — Art. 5(1)(x) — immediate legal review required]
[QUASI-PROVIDER RISK — finetuning may trigger Art. 25]
[PROFILING DETECTED — may affect Art. 6(3) exception]
[GDPR OVERLAP — DPIA likely required under Art. 35 GDPR]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
ASSESSMENT CONTEXT (paste into next skill)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
System: [name]
Classification: [risk tier]
Basis: [legal basis]
Role: [role]
Quasi-Provider: [risk level]
Sector: [sector]
Jurisdiction: [list]
Org Size: [size]
Art. 50: [applicable triggers]
GPAI: [yes/no, systemic risk]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. → Do a full risk-tier classification with documented reasoning
   [Priority: HIGH / MEDIUM — based on preliminary findings]

2. → Do a detailed role determination (provider/deployer/importer/distributor)
   [Priority: HIGH if quasi-provider risk detected / MEDIUM otherwise]

3. → Do a complete obligation mapping with RACI
   [Priority: HIGH if high-risk / MEDIUM if limited risk]

4. → Generate formal assessment documentation
   [Priority: HIGH for regulatory files / MEDIUM for internal tracking]

5. → Engage legal counsel for:
   [List specific areas requiring legal judgment]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
⚠ This preliminary assessment was generated using the AI Act Quick
  Assessment tool. It provides directional guidance only. All
  determinations marked "Likely" require validation through the
  detailed assessment skills listed above.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Phase 4: Template Offer (Optional)

After presenting the preliminary assessment, offer:

"Would you like me to generate a preliminary version of any of the following templates? These will be marked as preliminary and should be finalized after running the full assessment skills."

  1. Classification Record (Prüfprotokoll) — preliminary audit trail
  2. Compliance Register Entry — preliminary obligation tracker
  3. Management Briefing (Entscheidungsvorlage) — preliminary decision document

If requested, produce these as preliminary versions of the standard compliance-documentation templates, and mark all outputs prominently as "PRELIMINARY — Full assessment recommended."

Critical Reminders

  1. This is a triage tool — always recommend a full assessment (classification, role determination, obligation mapping, formal report) before any compliance decision
  2. "Likely" is not "confirmed" — preliminary determinations require validation
  3. Err on the side of caution — if uncertain between risk tiers, flag the higher risk tier as possible
  4. Flag uncertainty explicitly — Low confidence ratings require immediate follow-up with a full assessment
  5. National requirements matter — always flag jurisdiction-specific obligations using [references/jurisdiction-flags.md]
  6. Compliance timeline — reference [references/compliance-deadlines.md] for deadline urgency
  7. Enforcement exposure — for penalty context, note the Art. 99 tiers: up to €35M / 7% of worldwide annual turnover for Art. 5 prohibited-practice violations, and €15M / 3% for other infringements

Part of the EU AI Act suite

This skill works on its own, but it's designed to interlock with my other EU AI Act skills — install any individually, or use them together for an end-to-end workflow:

  • EU AI Act System Classifier — risk-tier classification across all five tiers
  • EU AI Act High-Risk Classifier — depth Annex I / Annex III assessment
  • EU AI Act Role Determination — provider / deployer / importer / distributor (incl. Art. 25)
  • EU AI Act Obligations Mapper — obligations by role and risk tier
  • EU AI Act Examination Report Generator — audit-ready compliance report
  • EU AI Act Knowledge Base — Q&A over the Act + Commission guidelines

Each is available as a separate skill — install only what you need.

© lawve-ai, AGPL-3.0. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 6 other files (references) in skills/eu-ai-act-quick-assessment-oliver-schmidt-prietz of lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • LICENSE.txt
  • README.md
  • evals.json
  • references/compliance-deadlines.md
  • references/jurisdiction-flags.md
  • references/quick-decision-tree.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 045f738

Compare with similar skills

Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz this skilllawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills847—~3.7kAutomated safety check: PassAGPL-3.0
Iso42001Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance9461 repos~3.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
AI Risk Managementbriiirussell/cybersecurity-skills413—~3.7kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
EU AI Act System Inventoryanthropics/claude-for-legal9.6k3 repos~2.8kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Eu AI Act Readinessseb1n/awesome-ai-agent-skills206—~3.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
AI GovernanceHack23/cia239—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • Iso42001

    Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance

    Expert ISO 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) compliance advisor.

    946 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.7k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

  • AI Risk Management

    briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills

    Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency…

    413 GitHub stars~3.7k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check: notes

  • EU AI Act System Inventory

    anthropics/claude-for-legal

    Official

    Maintains a register of AI systems under the EU AI Act, recording each system's role and risk tier separately, because both can differ from one system to the next.

    9.6k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~2.8k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

  • Eu AI Act Readiness

    seb1n/awesome-ai-agent-skills

    Build a preliminary, evidence-based EU AI Act readiness assessment across AI-system inventory, territorial scope, operator roles, prohibited-practice screening, risk classification, transparency…

    206 GitHub stars~3.3k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

  • AI Governance

    Hack23/cia

    AI governance, EU AI Act compliance, OWASP LLM security, responsible AI practices for GitHub Copilot agents

    239 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

  • Compliance Testing

    petrkindlmann/qa-skills

    Test for regulatory compliance: GDPR/CMP consent verification, Google Consent Mode v2, Global Privacy Control (GPC), CCPA/US state opt-out, EU AI Act Article 50 transparency, Better Ads Standards…

    170 GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

More from lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

All 154 skills in this repo

  • Customs Trade Law Onur Kafkas

    lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

    U.S. An agent skill from lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills.

    847 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Eu Data Act Oliver Schmidt Prietz

    lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

    Practitioner skill for advising on EU Regulation 2023/2854 (Data Act).

    847 GitHub stars~3.9k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Litigation Deadline Calendar

    lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

    Calendar litigation and arbitration deadlines from a scheduling order.

    847 GitHub stars~4.3k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Outlook Emails Lawvable

    lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

    Read, search, and download emails and attachments from Microsoft Outlook via OAuth2.

    847 GitHub stars~672 tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Ambiguity Report

    lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

    Turn an interpretive-ambiguity audit of a legal text — contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — into a polished deliverable.

    847 GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Az Eu Website Privacy Audit

    lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

    Audits a website for compliance with Azerbaijan's Law on Personal Data No.

    847 GitHub stars~3.8k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz

What does Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz do?

Fast 15-25 minute triage for preliminary EU AI Act classification and compliance assessment. Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz is an agent skill from lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills. Fast 15-25 minute triage for preliminary EU AI Act classification and compliance assessment.

When should I use Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz?

Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz fits situations like: asks to do a quick AI Act assessment; check if the AI Act applies to us; run a preliminary classification; do an AI Act triage.

How do I install Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill eu-ai-act-triage-oliver-schmidt-prietz -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/eu-ai-act-quick-assessment-oliver-schmidt-prietz in lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills) into .claude/skills/eu-ai-act-triage-oliver-schmidt-prietz in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz in Codex?

Run `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill eu-ai-act-triage-oliver-schmidt-prietz -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/eu-ai-act-quick-assessment-oliver-schmidt-prietz in lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills) into .agents/skills/eu-ai-act-triage-oliver-schmidt-prietz in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill eu-ai-act-triage-oliver-schmidt-prietz -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/eu-ai-act-triage-oliver-schmidt-prietz, .gemini/skills/eu-ai-act-triage-oliver-schmidt-prietz, .github/skills/eu-ai-act-triage-oliver-schmidt-prietz and .opencode/skills/eu-ai-act-triage-oliver-schmidt-prietz in your project.

What does Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz is instructions for the agent only.

Does Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz use?

Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz is published under the AGPL-3.0 licence (from the LICENSE file in the skill folder). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz use?

About 3.7k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 15k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 5.5k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz: Iso42001 (Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance, 946 stars), AI Risk Management (briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills, 413 stars), EU AI Act System Inventory (anthropics/claude-for-legal, 9.6k stars) and Eu AI Act Readiness (seb1n/awesome-ai-agent-skills, 206 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Eu AI Act Triage Oliver Schmidt Prietz?

lawve-ai (a GitHub organization) maintains it in lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills, which has 847 GitHub stars. The repository holds 154 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 2, 2026.

Source: lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.