Agent skill

Case Briefer

by lawve-ai in lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

Produces detailed law-school case briefs of United States judicial opinions in a fixed nine-section structure: memory jogger, facts, procedural history, judicial votes, holding, opinion-by-opinion…

Apache-2.0Auto-check passedDocuments & Office

Install Case Briefer

skills CLI
$ npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill case-briefer -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills case-briefer --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/case-briefer-seth-chandler .claude/skills/case-briefer && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
case-briefer
GitHub stars
847
Token cost
~2k tokens
SKILL.md length
953 words
Files
5
Skills in repo
154
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
Apache-2.0

At a glance

Produces detailed law-school case briefs of United States judicial opinions in a fixed nine-section structure: memory jogger, facts, procedural history, judicial votes, holding, opinion-by-opinion…

  • Works in 9 steps: Memory Jogger → Detailed Case Facts → Procedural History → …
  • Someone asks to brief a case
  • SKILL.md covers Core Case Brief Structure, Verification, Tone and Quality Standards and Additional Capabilities, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Case Briefer is an agent skill from lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills. Produces detailed law-school case briefs of United States judicial opinions in a fixed nine-section structure: memory jogger, facts, procedural history, judicial votes, holding, opinion-by-opinion analysis, five future-application hypotheticals, critique, and verified key quotations. Also builds vote tables, cross-case consistency tables, perspective-based critiques, and LaTeX in article, Beamer and casebook-chapter formats. Use whenever someone asks to brief a case, analyse or explain an opinion, summarise a…

Its SKILL.md is about 2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 5 other files (for example `README.md` and `resources/latex-preambles.md`).

It sits in Documents & Office, covering LaTeX. It works with LaTeX. The repository describes itself as: A curated list of awesome Agent Skills for automating legal work. The licence is Apache-2.0.

When your agent uses it

  • Someone asks to brief a case
  • Explain an opinion
  • Summarise a decision for students
  • Generate hypotheticals from a holding

Example prompts

  • “brief this case”
  • “case brief”
  • “explain the holding”
  • “/case-briefer”

Workflow steps

9 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Memory Jogger
  2. Detailed Case Facts
  3. Procedural History
  4. Judicial Votes
  5. Holding
  6. Analysis of Opinions
  7. Examples: Future Applications
  8. Critique
  9. Key Quotations

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 045f738. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Case Briefer loads about 2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 257 tokens; SKILL.md has 953 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~257
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills at commit 045f738, republished under its Apache-2.0 licence (© lawve-ai). 953 words, ~2,007 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/case-briefer/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 4 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
case-briefer
description
Produces detailed law-school case briefs of United States judicial opinions in a fixed nine-section structure: memory jogger, facts, procedural history, judicial votes, holding, opinion-by-opinion analysis, five future-application hypotheticals, critique, and verified key quotations. Also builds vote tables, cross-case consistency tables, perspective-based critiques, and LaTeX in article, Beamer and casebook-chapter formats. Use whenever someone asks to brief a case, analyse or explain an opinion, summarise a decision for students, generate hypotheticals from a holding, critique a judgment, tabulate how justices voted, or convert case analysis to LaTeX. Triggers on "brief this case", "case brief", "explain the holding", "what did the court hold", "hypotheticals based on", "critique this opinion", "vote table", "Beamer presentation", "chapter brief", and on any reference to a judicial opinion or Supreme Court decision in a teaching context. Requires web search to verify quotations, votes and holdings.
metadata.author
Seth J. Chandler
metadata.author_link
https://legaled.ai
metadata.license
Apache-2.0
metadata.version
2026-07-29
metadata.jurisdiction
United States
metadata.language
English
metadata.requires
Web search

Case Briefer

Deliver detailed case briefs with comprehensive analysis, examples, and critique for law students and professors.

Core Case Brief Structure

Every case brief includes these 9 sections:

1. Memory Jogger

One sentence capturing the case's essence — its facts, central holding, or most salient feature.

  • Example for Carolene Products: "Footnote 4 establishes justification for tiers of scrutiny."
2. Detailed Case Facts

Include:

  • Key facts giving rise to the dispute
  • Relevant statutes, regulations, or constitutional provisions
  • Explain the statutory scheme and specific provisions challenged
  • Historical or political context when relevant
3. Procedural History

Focus on procedural aspects relevant to disposition:

  • Lower court rulings and reasoning
  • Basis for appeal
  • Note distinctions like "the court did not rule plaintiffs prevailed, merely that they pled enough to survive a motion to dismiss"
4. Judicial Votes

Group by:

  • Majority: Author and joining justices/judges
  • Concurrence(s): Author(s) and any joining justices/judges
  • Dissent(s): Author(s) and any joining justices/judges
5. Holding

Succinct statement of the court's judgment and the rule announced.

6. Analysis of Opinions

For each opinion (majority, concurrences, dissents):

  • Reasoning employed
  • Key constitutional, statutory, regulatory, or treaty provisions cited
  • Key precedents and how they were applied to this case's facts
  • Logical structure of the argument
7. Examples: Future Applications

Create 5 hypotheticals showing how the rule applies:

  • 2 same-side: Cases that would come out the same way as the principal case
  • 2 opposite-side: Cases that would come out the opposite way
  • 1 fence-sitter: Genuinely unclear outcome

For each, explain why it falls where it does under the rule.

8. Critique
  • Recapitulate scholarly criticism of the opinion(s)
  • Develop independent analysis of logical weaknesses
  • Identify values or premises that would lead to different conclusions
  • Consider both progressive and originalist/textualist perspectives when relevant
9. Key Quotations

Present 3–5 important quotes from the opinions, subject to the verification rule below.

Verification

Quotations, vote counts, and holdings are the three places this skill can do real damage if it is wrong, because each is the kind of claim a reader will repeat without checking.

  • Verify every quotation against the text of the opinion by web search before including it.
  • Verify vote line-ups and the identity of opinion authors the same way.
  • Where a quotation cannot be verified, either omit it or mark it explicitly as unverified. Never present an unverified quotation as though it had been checked.
  • Where web search is unavailable, say so at the top of the brief and treat every quotation, vote count, and citation in it as unverified.

Distinguish holdings from dicta. Note circuit splits, later overruling, and subsequent statutory or doctrinal developments where relevant.

Tone and Quality Standards

  • Professional and objective throughout
  • Audience: law students and law professors
  • For controversial cases, present multiple scholarly perspectives fairly
  • If a response is too long for a single output, continue across multiple messages

Additional Capabilities

General Discussion

Engage in dialogue about cases as in normal conversation.

Quotation Requests

When asked for specific quotations, apply the verification rule above.

Vote Tables

Create tables showing how each justice or judge voted in a case.

Consistency Tables

Compare voting patterns across multiple cases — showing which justices voted which way in each case.

Perspective-Based Critiques

Offer critiques from specified perspectives:

  • "Criticize Seila Law from a progressive perspective"
  • "Criticize Chevron from a historical perspective"

LaTeX Conversion

Three output formats are supported. The preambles, slide-structure examples, and chapter skeleton live in resources/latex-preambles.md — read that file when producing LaTeX rather than reconstructing the preambles from memory.

Show full SKILL.md (384 more words)Show less
Article format

A standalone brief. Use the article preamble from the resource file.

Beamer presentation format

A slide deck. Use the Beamer preamble from the resource file, and observe the slide limits: roughly 5 main items per slide, at most 2 subitems each, and no more than 9 items and subitems in total.

Chapter brief format (for casebooks)

Input pattern: Brief [Case Name]. Emphasize [Specific Concept or Historical Context]

Output: a modular LaTeX chapter file for \input{filename} in a larger book project.

Do NOT include a document class, package imports, or any preamble — the parent document supplies them. Begin at \chapter{} and follow the section skeleton in the resource file, which mirrors the nine-section structure above.

Workflow

  1. Receive case request → identify the case and any emphasis requested
  2. Research → use web search to gather accurate information about the case
  3. Draft brief → follow the 9-section structure
  4. Verify → check holdings, quotations, and vote counts against sources
  5. Deliver → present in the requested format (standard, LaTeX article, Beamer, or chapter)

Bundled resources

  • resources/latex-preambles.md — article and Beamer preambles, Beamer slide guidelines and a worked slide example, and the no-preamble chapter skeleton. Read when producing any LaTeX output.

Limitations and risks

This skill produces teaching and study materials about United States judicial opinions. It is not legal advice and does not produce authority. A brief generated here is a study aid: it must not be cited, filed, or relied upon in practice in place of reading the opinion.

Three risks are worth naming. First, quotation and vote-count accuracy depends on web search being available and on the opinion text being reachable; without it the model may reconstruct plausible but incorrect language, which is why the verification rule requires unverified material to be marked or omitted. Second, briefs reflect the state of the law at the time of generation and will not know of later overruling, vacatur, or amendment unless the search surfaces it. Third, the critique and perspective sections are argumentative by design — they present the strongest form of a position, including positions the user did not ask about, and should not be read as a neutral account of scholarly consensus.

The skill contains no executable code, makes no network calls of its own beyond the host's web search, and moves no data outside the session.

© lawve-ai, Apache-2.0. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 4 other files in skills/case-briefer-seth-chandler of lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • LICENSE
  • NOTICE
  • README.md
  • resources/latex-preambles.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 045f738

Compare with similar skills

Case Briefer next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Case Briefer compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Case Briefer this skilllawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills847—~2kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Fill In NotesPolaris-Aeterna/loom-notes167—~975Automated safety check: PassCustom licence
Thesis Figure Skill0xE1337/thesis-figure-skill144—~9.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Latex OutputNorman-bury/research-writing-skill3.4k—~977Automated safety check: PassMIT
Repo Maintenancewengan-li/ncku-thesis-template-latex151—~4.3kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Sci PptShZhao27208/Aut_Sci_Write209—~757Automated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Fill In Notes

    Polaris-Aeterna/loom-notes

    Turn a textbook chapter, lecture, or paper into beautiful "fill-in" study notes — written to be READ (clean statements, intuition) yet engineered to be FILLED (blanks, proof skeletons, "your turn"…

    167 GitHub stars~975 tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed
  • Thesis Figure Skill

    0xE1337/thesis-figure-skill

    生成学术论文配图:LaTeX/TikZ 代码(结构化图表,直接嵌入论文)或 draw.io XML (技术路线图、汇报配图)。自动按论文领域风格设计,编译验证后交付。

    144 GitHub stars~9.1k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed
  • Latex Output

    Norman-bury/research-writing-skill

    A skill your agent uses when user requests LaTeX format output or has provided school/journal LaTeX templates

    3.4k GitHub stars~977 tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed
  • Repo Maintenance

    wengan-li/ncku-thesis-template-latex

    A skill your agent uses for maintaining and releasing this repository.

    151 GitHub stars~4.3k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed
  • Sci Ppt

    ShZhao27208/Aut_Sci_Write

    Generate professional academic PowerPoint (PPTX) presentations from paper PDFs, structured outlines, or plain text.

    209 GitHub stars~757 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed
  • Latex Thesis Zh

    brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

    Chinese LaTeX thesis assistant for existing .tex degree thesis projects (XeLaTeX/LuaLaTeX/latexmk).

    4.6k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed

More from lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

All 154 skills in this repo
  • Customs Trade Law Onur Kafkas

    lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

    U.S. An agent skill from lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills.

    847 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Eu Data Act Oliver Schmidt Prietz

    lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

    Practitioner skill for advising on EU Regulation 2023/2854 (Data Act).

    847 GitHub stars~3.9k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Litigation Deadline Calendar

    lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

    Calendar litigation and arbitration deadlines from a scheduling order.

    847 GitHub stars~4.3k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Outlook Emails Lawvable

    lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

    Read, search, and download emails and attachments from Microsoft Outlook via OAuth2.

    847 GitHub stars~672 tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ambiguity Report

    lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

    Turn an interpretive-ambiguity audit of a legal text — contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — into a polished deliverable.

    847 GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Az Eu Website Privacy Audit

    lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

    Audits a website for compliance with Azerbaijan's Law on Personal Data No.

    847 GitHub stars~3.8k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Works with

Questions about Case Briefer

What does Case Briefer do?

Produces detailed law-school case briefs of United States judicial opinions in a fixed nine-section structure: memory jogger, facts, procedural history, judicial votes, holding, opinion-by-opinion…. Case Briefer is an agent skill from lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills. Produces detailed law-school case briefs of United States judicial opinions in a fixed nine-section structure: memory jogger, facts, procedural history, judicial votes, holding, opinion-by-opinion analysis, five future-application hypotheticals, critique, and verified key quotations.

When should I use Case Briefer?

Case Briefer fits situations like: someone asks to brief a case; explain an opinion; summarise a decision for students; generate hypotheticals from a holding.

How do I install Case Briefer in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill case-briefer -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/case-briefer-seth-chandler in lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills) into .claude/skills/case-briefer in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Case Briefer in Codex?

Run `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill case-briefer -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/case-briefer-seth-chandler in lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills) into .agents/skills/case-briefer in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Case Briefer in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill case-briefer -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/case-briefer, .gemini/skills/case-briefer, .github/skills/case-briefer and .opencode/skills/case-briefer in your project.

What does Case Briefer need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Case Briefer is instructions for the agent only.

Does Case Briefer access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Case Briefer safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Case Briefer use?

Case Briefer is published under the Apache-2.0 licence (from the LICENSE file in the skill folder). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Case Briefer use?

About 2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Case Briefer?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Case Briefer: Fill In Notes (Polaris-Aeterna/loom-notes, 167 stars), Thesis Figure Skill (0xE1337/thesis-figure-skill, 144 stars), Latex Output (Norman-bury/research-writing-skill, 3.4k stars) and Repo Maintenance (wengan-li/ncku-thesis-template-latex, 151 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Case Briefer?

lawve-ai (a GitHub organization) maintains it in lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills, which has 847 GitHub stars. The repository holds 154 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 2, 2026.

Source: lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.