Scikit Learn
zLanqing/codex-claude-academic-skills
Machine learning in Python with scikit-learn. An agent skill from zLanqing/codex-claude-academic-skills.
End-to-end biomarker discovery workflow from expression data to validated biomarker panels.
$ npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install GPTomics/bioSkills bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/workflows/biomarker-pipeline .claude/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline" agent skill from https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills/tree/main/workflows/biomarker-pipeline into .claude/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills/tree/main/workflows/biomarker-pipelineType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install GPTomics/bioSkills bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/workflows/biomarker-pipeline .agents/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline" agent skill from https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills/tree/main/workflows/biomarker-pipeline into .agents/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install GPTomics/bioSkills bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/workflows/biomarker-pipeline .cursor/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline" agent skill from https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills/tree/main/workflows/biomarker-pipeline into .cursor/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills.git --path workflows/biomarker-pipeline--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install GPTomics/bioSkills bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/workflows/biomarker-pipeline .gemini/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline" agent skill from https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills/tree/main/workflows/biomarker-pipeline into .gemini/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install GPTomics/bioSkills bio-workflows-biomarker-pipelineInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/workflows/biomarker-pipeline .github/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline" agent skill from https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills/tree/main/workflows/biomarker-pipeline into .github/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install GPTomics/bioSkills bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/workflows/biomarker-pipeline .opencode/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline" agent skill from https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills/tree/main/workflows/biomarker-pipeline into .opencode/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
bio-workflows-biomarker-pipelineEnd-to-end biomarker discovery workflow from expression data to validated biomarker panels.
Bio Workflows Biomarker Pipeline is an agent skill from GPTomics/bioSkills. End-to-end biomarker discovery workflow from expression data to validated biomarker panels. Covers feature selection with Boruta/LASSO, leakage-safe cross-validation, calibration, and SHAP interpretation. Use when building and validating diagnostic or prognostic biomarker signatures from omics data.
Its SKILL.md is about 4.7k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 3 other files (for example `examples/biomarker_pipeline.py` and `usage-guide.md`).
It sits in Data & Analytics, covering Machine learning. The repository describes itself as: a set of SKILLS.md for doing bioinformatics with agents like claude code. The licence is MIT.
5 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit d91ed3d. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Ships script files (Python), which the agent can run.
Shell commands in SKILL.md call:
pipFrom the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
No URLs in SKILL.md. Its commands use pip, which can reach the network depending on how they are called.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Bio Workflows Biomarker Pipeline loads about 4.7k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 83 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,334 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
The full file from GPTomics/bioSkills at commit d91ed3d, republished under its MIT licence (© GPTomics). 1,334 words, ~4,685 tokens.
.claude/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 2 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.Reference examples tested with: numpy 1.26+, pandas 2.2+, scikit-learn 1.4+, shap 0.47+ (the feature_perturbation='auto' estimand and per-class 3-D .values behavior the code relies on; xgboost 2.0+ optional).
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signaturesscikit-learn drift: CalibratedClassifierCV(cv='prefit') deprecated in 1.6 (use FrozenEstimator); LogisticRegression(penalty=) deprecated in 1.8, and LogisticRegressionCV(penalty='l1') too -- the 1.8+ migration drops penalty= entirely and passes l1_ratios=(1.0,) alone (leave penalty at its default; penalty='elasticnet' still emits the FutureWarning). XGBoost moved early_stopping_rounds to the constructor in 2.x. If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
"Build a validated biomarker panel from my omics data" -> Orchestrate group-aware splitting, feature selection, leakage-safe cross-validation, calibration, and SHAP interpretation to produce a robust, honestly-validated biomarker signature.
This is a workflow skill: it owns the chaining decisions and hand-offs, not the internals of any one step. Every step below cross-references the component skill that teaches its mechanism.
The whole pipeline stands or falls on four commitments made at the seams; each one, if broken, inflates the reported performance and a held-out set cannot detect the leak because it was already contaminated.
GroupKFold/StratifiedGroupKFold on a subject key. For single-cell-derived features the unit is the donor, not the cell.Expression matrix + Metadata
|
v
[1. Data Preparation] -----> StandardScaler, train/test split
|
v
[2. Feature Selection] ----> Boruta or LASSO stability selection
|
v
[3. Model Training] -------> Pipeline with selection inside CV (leakage-safe)
|
v
[4. Model Interpretation] -> SHAP values, feature importance
|
v
[5. Validation] -----------> Hold-out test, bootstrap CI
|
v
Validated biomarker panel + classifierGoal: Load the matrix and hold out a GROUP-aware test set before anything is fit.
Approach: Split by the subject key so no subject appears in both train and test, then fit the scaler on training only; per-fold scaling is re-applied inside the CV pipeline in Step 3.
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.model_selection import StratifiedGroupKFold
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
expr = pd.read_csv('expression.csv', index_col=0)
meta = pd.read_csv('metadata.csv', index_col=0)
X = expr.T # samples x genes
# y must be 0/1: brier_score_loss and calibration_curve raise on string labels, and sklearn orders
# classes alphabetically -- for a case/control column that makes 'control' the positive class, so
# predict_proba[:, 1], the SHAP [:, :, 1] slice, and Brier all silently describe the wrong class.
# AUC is symmetric and will not expose the flip. Encode the disease class as 1 explicitly.
POSITIVE_CLASS = 'disease'
y = (meta.loc[X.index, 'condition'].values == POSITIVE_CLASS).astype(int)
# The critical key: the SUBJECT (patient/donor/site), not the sample. If truly one
# sample per subject, groups = X.index; otherwise it MUST be the subject id.
groups = meta.loc[X.index, 'subject_id'].values
# Group- AND class-aware hold-out: take one StratifiedGroupKFold fold as the test set so no
# subject spans train/test (train_test_split(stratify=y) alone would leak repeated subjects).
sgkf = StratifiedGroupKFold(n_splits=5, shuffle=True, random_state=42) # 1/5 held out (~0.2)
train_idx, test_idx = next(sgkf.split(X, y, groups))
X_train, X_test = X.iloc[train_idx], X.iloc[test_idx]
y_train, y_test = y[train_idx], y[test_idx]
groups_train = groups[train_idx]
# Fit scaler on training only to prevent data leakage
scaler = StandardScaler()
X_train_scaled = scaler.fit_transform(X_train)
X_test_scaled = scaler.transform(X_test)QC Checkpoint 1: Check class balance, sample counts, and group separation
set(groups[train_idx]) & set(groups[test_idx]) is empty)Goal: Produce the discovery panel (all-relevant with Boruta, or a stable minimal set with LASSO).
Approach: Optionally pre-filter, then run the selector and map the mask back to the full feature space for downstream indexing.
import numpy as np
from boruta import BorutaPy
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.feature_selection import SelectKBest, f_classif
# Pre-filter if >10k features. selected_idx is a positional boolean mask aligned to X_train.columns.
if X_train_scaled.shape[1] > 10000:
selector = SelectKBest(f_classif, k=5000)
selector.fit(X_train_scaled, y_train)
prefilter_idx = np.where(selector.get_support())[0]
X_train_filt = X_train_scaled[:, prefilter_idx]
else:
prefilter_idx = None
X_train_filt = X_train_scaled
# max_depth=5: Shallow trees for stable importances
rf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, max_depth=5, n_jobs=-1, random_state=42)
# max_iter=100: Usually sufficient; 200 if many tentative
boruta = BorutaPy(rf, n_estimators='auto', max_iter=100, random_state=42, verbose=0)
boruta.fit(X_train_filt, y_train)
# Map the (possibly pre-filtered) Boruta mask back onto the FULL feature space.
selected_idx = np.zeros(X_train.shape[1], dtype=bool)
selected_idx[prefilter_idx[boruta.support_] if prefilter_idx is not None else boruta.support_] = True
print(f'Selected {selected_idx.sum()} features')from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegressionCV
import numpy as np
# n_bootstrap=100: Quick; use 500 for publication
n_bootstrap = 100
stability_scores = np.zeros(X_train_scaled.shape[1])
for i in range(n_bootstrap):
idx = np.random.choice(len(y_train), size=len(y_train), replace=True)
# Cs=10: 10 regularization values to search
model = LogisticRegressionCV(penalty='l1', solver='saga', Cs=10, cv=3, random_state=i, max_iter=1000)
model.fit(X_train_scaled[idx], y_train[idx])
stability_scores += (model.coef_[0] != 0).astype(int)
stability_scores /= n_bootstrap
# stability_threshold=0.6: Standard; 0.8 for strict
selected_idx = stability_scores > 0.6
print(f'Selected {selected_idx.sum()} features (stability >0.6)')QC Checkpoint 2:
Goal: Estimate performance without the selection-before-CV leakage that inflates AUC toward 1.0 even on noise.
Approach: The Step 2 selection produced the discovery panel (fit on all training data) -- that is fine for the final panel, but it must NOT be the data the performance number is computed on. Estimate performance with scaling and selection wrapped in a Pipeline so they re-fit inside each fold; for raw RNA-seq, do per-sample normalization outside the fold and gene scaling/selection inside it.
from sklearn.model_selection import StratifiedGroupKFold, cross_val_score
from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from sklearn.feature_selection import SelectKBest, f_classif
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
# Selection lives INSIDE the pipeline -> re-fit per fold, no leakage. Use the unscaled X_train.
pipe = Pipeline([
('scaler', StandardScaler()),
('select', SelectKBest(f_classif, k=min(50, X_train.shape[1]))),
('clf', LogisticRegression(max_iter=5000, class_weight='balanced')),
])
# Group-aware outer CV: pass groups_train so no subject spans a fold boundary.
outer_cv = StratifiedGroupKFold(n_splits=5, shuffle=True, random_state=42)
cv_scores = cross_val_score(pipe, X_train, y_train, groups=groups_train, cv=outer_cv, scoring='roc_auc')
print(f'Leakage-safe CV AUC: {cv_scores.mean():.3f} +/- {cv_scores.std():.3f}')
# If hyperparameters are tuned, wrap a GridSearchCV (inner group CV) as the pipeline's estimator
# and report the OUTER cross_val_score -- flat CV that both tunes and reports is optimistic (Varma & Simon 2006).QC Checkpoint 3:
Goal: Audit what the final model keys on, not select biomarkers.
Approach: Fit the final model on the discovery panel, then compute interventional SHAP against a background and aggregate over modules to catch shortcut/batch learning.
import shap
import numpy as np
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
# Fit the FINAL model on the discovery panel for interpretation and deployment.
sel = X_train.columns[selected_idx]
clf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=300, random_state=42, n_jobs=-1).fit(X_train[sel], y_train)
# Interventional SHAP ('what the model uses') needs a background; set feature_perturbation
# explicitly because the 0.47+ 'auto' default flips the estimand on whether data= is given.
background = shap.utils.sample(X_train[sel], 100)
explainer = shap.TreeExplainer(clf, data=background, feature_perturbation='interventional')
shap_values = explainer(X_test[sel])
# RF returns one output per class in shap 0.47+ (n_samples, n_features, n_classes); keep the positive class.
if shap_values.values.ndim == 3:
shap_values = shap_values[:, :, 1]
mean_shap = np.abs(shap_values.values).mean(axis=0)QC Checkpoint 4:
Goal: Report honest held-out performance, including calibration when risks will be used.
Approach: Report discrimination with an interval, but if the panel will produce risk estimates, also check calibration: AUC is invariant to any monotone transform of the score, so a high AUC says nothing about whether the probabilities are honest (machine-learning/model-validation). External validation on an independent cohort is the real bar.
from sklearn.metrics import roc_auc_score
from sklearn.metrics import brier_score_loss
import numpy as np
y_prob = clf.predict_proba(X_test[sel])[:, 1]
test_auc = roc_auc_score(y_test, y_prob)
# Bootstrap CI for AUC (1000 resamples). Skip single-class resamples (roc_auc_score is nan there).
boot = []
for _ in range(1000):
i = np.random.choice(len(y_test), len(y_test), replace=True)
if len(np.unique(y_test[i])) == 2:
boot.append(roc_auc_score(y_test[i], y_prob[i]))
ci_lower, ci_upper = np.percentile(boot, [2.5, 97.5])
print(f'Hold-out AUC: {test_auc:.3f} 95% CI [{ci_lower:.3f}, {ci_upper:.3f}]')
print(f'Brier score (calibration + refinement): {brier_score_loss(y_test, y_prob):.3f}') # y must be 0/1-encoded; string labels raise unless pos_label is passed
# If risks will be used, recalibrate on a disjoint fold and report a reliability curve
# (machine-learning/model-validation); do not resample for imbalance -- it breaks calibration.| Step | Parameter | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Split | n_splits (StratifiedGroupKFold) | 5 -> ~0.2 held out; lower n_splits for a larger test fraction |
| Boruta | max_iter | 100 (sufficient), 200 if tentative features |
| LASSO | n_bootstrap | 100 (quick), 500 for publication |
| LASSO | stability_threshold | 0.6 (standard), 0.8 for strict |
| Leakage-safe CV | folds | 5 (standard), 10 for small datasets; selection inside each fold |
| RF | n_estimators | 100-500 |
| XGBoost | learning_rate | 0.1 (conservative) |
The leakage seams first (each silently inflates performance and a held-out set cannot detect it), then operational issues.
| Symptom | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Near-perfect CV AUC that collapses on external data | Features selected on the full dataset, then only the classifier CV'd | Wrap selection INSIDE the pipeline so it re-fits per fold (Ambroise & McLachlan 2002) |
| Optimistic AUC despite in-fold selection | Scaler/ComBat/PCA/imputation fit on all data before the split | Fit every data-dependent transform inside the fold (Pipeline) |
| Great CV, poor real-world performance | Repeated subjects (biopsies/longitudinal/replicates) split across train/test | Split by subject with StratifiedGroupKFold; the unit is the donor, not the sample |
| Reported AUC higher than any real fold | Same CV used to tune hyperparameters AND report | Nest: inner CV tunes, outer CV reports (Varma & Simon 2006) |
| Good AUC but risk estimates are miscalibrated | Resampling (SMOTE/undersampling) for imbalance, or AUC used as the only metric | Report AUPRC/MCC + Brier; recalibrate on a disjoint fold; do not resample-then-report calibration |
| No features selected | Too strict threshold | Lower stability threshold, increase iterations |
| Too many features (>200) | Noisy data | Add pre-filtering, increase regularization |
| Low CV AUC (<0.6) | No signal, low power | Check data quality, add samples |
| High variance across folds | Small sample size | Repeated stratified k-fold with an interval (LOOCV is degenerate for AUC) |
| SHAP features differ from selected | Correlated features split credit; attribution describes the model | Aggregate over modules; do not expect SHAP to match selection |
import pandas as pd
import joblib
# Save biomarker panel
feature_names = X_train.columns[selected_idx].tolist()
pd.DataFrame({'feature': feature_names}).to_csv('biomarker_panel.csv', index=False)
# Save model and scaler for deployment
joblib.dump(clf, 'biomarker_classifier.joblib')
joblib.dump(scaler, 'feature_scaler.joblib')© GPTomics, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
SKILL.md and 2 other files in workflows/biomarker-pipeline of GPTomics/bioSkills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit d91ed3d
We found 1 copy of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in GPTomics/bioSkills, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.
Bio Workflows Biomarker Pipeline next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bio Workflows Biomarker Pipeline this skillGPTomics/bioSkills | 1.2k | 1 repos | ~4.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Scikit LearnzLanqing/codex-claude-academic-skills | 4.7k | 16 repos | ~3.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | BSD-3-Clause | |
| Agentic Kaggle WorkflowFrankS-IntelLab/agentic-kaggle-skill | 188 | — | ~4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Senior Data ScientistRaidriar7170/hermes-skilleval | 125 | 5 repos | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Geomlitalo-goncalves/geoML | 109 | — | ~4.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | GPL-3.0 | |
| QuantMind Training Config Generatorqusong0627/QuantMind | 1.7k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | AGPL-3.0 |
zLanqing/codex-claude-academic-skills
Machine learning in Python with scikit-learn. An agent skill from zLanqing/codex-claude-academic-skills.
FrankS-IntelLab/agentic-kaggle-skill
Takes a Kaggle competition from rules and validation design through baselines, ensembling and notebook architecture to a scored submission.
Raidriar7170/hermes-skilleval
World-class data science skill for statistical modeling, experimentation, causal inference, and advanced analytics.
italo-goncalves/geoML
Working knowledge of the geoML Python package (github.com/italo-goncalves/geoML): variational Gaussian processes for spatial data, implicit geological modelling, block models, drillhole data…
qusong0627/QuantMind
Turns a plain-language model training request into a validated QuantMind training config file that can be imported from the Model Training page.
liangdabiao/claude-data-analysis-ultra-main
Analyze user retention and churn using survival analysis, cohort analysis, and machine learning.
GPTomics/bioSkills
Read, write, and convert multiple sequence alignment files using Biopython Bio.AlignIO.
GPTomics/bioSkills
Installs the bioSkills collection of 425 bioinformatics skills in one step, or only chosen categories, so sequencing, RNA-seq, single-cell and variant tasks get specialized help.
GPTomics/bioSkills
Write biological sequences to files (FASTA, FASTQ, GenBank, EMBL) using Biopython Bio.SeqIO.
GPTomics/bioSkills
Soft- or hard-clips PCR primer footprints from aligned amplicon BAMs so primer bases stop masquerading as confirmed reference sequence.
GPTomics/bioSkills
Filters BAM alignments by FLAG bits, mapping quality and regions with samtools view or pysam, with recipes for common keep and drop cases.
GPTomics/bioSkills
Create and use BAI/CSI indices for BAM/CRAM files using samtools and pysam.
Categories
End-to-end biomarker discovery workflow from expression data to validated biomarker panels. Bio Workflows Biomarker Pipeline is an agent skill from GPTomics/bioSkills. End-to-end biomarker discovery workflow from expression data to validated biomarker panels.
Bio Workflows Biomarker Pipeline fits situations like: building and validating diagnostic; prognostic biomarker signatures from omics data.
Run `npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (workflows/biomarker-pipeline in GPTomics/bioSkills) into .claude/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
Run `npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (workflows/biomarker-pipeline in GPTomics/bioSkills) into .agents/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline, .gemini/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline, .github/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline and .opencode/skills/bio-workflows-biomarker-pipeline in your project.
Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Bio Workflows Biomarker Pipeline needs Python for the scripts in its folder and the command-line tools its instructions call (pip). Our summary lists: Python 3.
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Its commands use pip, which can reach the network depending on how they are called. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
Bio Workflows Biomarker Pipeline is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
About 4.7k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 19k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Bio Workflows Biomarker Pipeline: Scikit Learn (zLanqing/codex-claude-academic-skills, 4.7k stars), Agentic Kaggle Workflow (FrankS-IntelLab/agentic-kaggle-skill, 188 stars), Senior Data Scientist (Raidriar7170/hermes-skilleval, 125 stars) and Geoml (italo-goncalves/geoML, 109 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
GPTomics (a GitHub organization) maintains it in GPTomics/bioSkills, which has 1,218 GitHub stars. The repository holds 559 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on August 15, 2026.
Source: GPTomics/bioSkills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.