Agent skill

Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines

by GPTomics in GPTomics/bioSkills

Authors reproducible Nextflow DSL2 pipelines built on reactive dataflow, where processes communicate only through channels and execution order is not guaranteed.

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines

skills CLI
$ npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-workflow-management-nextflow-pipelines -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install GPTomics/bioSkills bio-workflow-management-nextflow-pipelines --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/workflow-management/nextflow-pipelines .claude/skills/bio-workflow-management-nextflow-pipelines && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
bio-workflow-management-nextflow-pipelines
GitHub stars
1.2k
Used in
1 other repo
Token cost
~4.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,802 words
Files
3
Skills in repo
559
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Authors reproducible Nextflow DSL2 pipelines built on reactive dataflow, where processes communicate only through channels and execution order is not guaranteed.

  • Deciding channel/dataflow (Nextflow) vs rule-based (Snakemake) authoring
  • SKILL.md covers Version Compatibility, The governing principle:…, Decision: Nextflow vs the… and Decision: queue vs value…, plus 12 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Wiring queue vs value channels and fixing shared-reference exhaustion with .first()

What it does

Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines is an agent skill from GPTomics/bioSkills. Authors reproducible Nextflow DSL2 pipelines built on reactive dataflow, where processes communicate only through channels and execution order is not guaranteed. Use when deciding channel/dataflow (Nextflow) vs rule-based (Snakemake) authoring; wiring queue vs value channels and fixing shared-reference exhaustion with .first(); composing DSL2 modules and subworkflows with take/main/emit; selecting container/conda profiles and pinning images by digest for portability across local/SLURM/LSF/AWS Batch/Google…

Its SKILL.md is about 4.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 3 other files (for example `usage-guide.md`).

It sits in Research & Science, covering Reproducible research. It works with Nextflow, Amazon Web Services and Kubernetes. The repository describes itself as: a set of SKILLS.md for doing bioinformatics with agents like claude code. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Deciding channel/dataflow (Nextflow) vs rule-based (Snakemake) authoring
  • Wiring queue vs value channels and fixing shared-reference exhaustion with .first()
  • Composing DSL2 modules and subworkflows with take/main/emit
  • Diagnosing why -resume misses the cache (nondeterministic input order

Example prompts

  • “lenient”
  • “Use the bio-workflow-management-nextflow-pipelines skill to author reproducible Nextflow DSL2 pipelines built on reactive dataflow, where processes…”
  • “/bio-workflow-management-nextflow-pipelines”

Requirements

  • Python 3
  • Docker

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit d91ed3d. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are groovy).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines loads about 4.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 222 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,802 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~222
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from GPTomics/bioSkills at commit d91ed3d, republished under its MIT licence (© GPTomics). 1,802 words, ~4,410 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/bio-workflow-management-nextflow-pipelines/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 2 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
bio-workflow-management-nextflow-pipelines
description
Authors reproducible Nextflow DSL2 pipelines built on reactive dataflow, where processes communicate only through channels and execution order is not guaranteed. Use when deciding channel/dataflow (Nextflow) vs rule-based (Snakemake) authoring; wiring queue vs value channels and fixing shared-reference exhaustion with .first(); composing DSL2 modules and subworkflows with take/main/emit; selecting container/conda profiles and pinning images by digest for portability across local/SLURM/LSF/AWS Batch/Google Batch/Kubernetes executors; diagnosing why -resume misses the cache (nondeterministic input order, mtime on network filesystems, mutable :latest tags) with cache 'lenient' and -dump-hashes; managing work/ vs publishDir and dynamic retry escalation; and choosing whether to adopt an nf-core community pipeline or author from scratch.
tool_type
cli
primary_tool
Nextflow

Version Compatibility

Reference examples tested with: Nextflow 24.04+, fastp 0.23+, Salmon 1.10+, MultiQC 1.21+

Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:

  • CLI: <tool> --version then <tool> --help to confirm flags

If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.

Note: Nextflow is DSL2-only (DSL1 was removed in 22.12) and calendar-versioned (24.x/25.x), so any single-script DSL1 tutorial is dead. The nf-validation plugin is deprecated in favor of nf-schema. A strict, statically-analyzable syntax (VS Code language server) is opt-in now and default in a later release; writing to it future-proofs a pipeline. Pin container images by immutable digest (@sha256:), never a moving tag such as :latest, or both reproducibility and -resume break.

Nextflow Pipelines

"Build a scalable, reproducible pipeline with Nextflow" -> Wire containerized processes together with asynchronous channels (reactive dataflow), so the engine fires each task as soon as its inputs are ready, caches completed tasks for -resume, and moves unchanged across executors by swapping a profile.

  • CLI: nextflow run main.nf -profile docker -resume
  • Groovy: DSL2 process / workflow / channel-operator syntax

The governing principle: Nextflow is reactive dataflow - processes talk ONLY through channels, execution order is NOT guaranteed

Nextflow is push-model dataflow: processes are pure functions wired together by asynchronous channels, every channel item is a future, and a process fires a task the instant a complete set of inputs is available on ALL its input channels. There is no target file, no backward DAG, no filename-to-rule matching. This is the opposite of Snakemake/CWL/WDL, which are pull/goal-oriented (name a target output, the engine walks a dependency DAG backward to decide what runs). Almost every downstream trap traces back to this one axis:

  • The model ENABLES truly dynamic pipelines: a process emits N files computed at runtime, the next process fans out over all N, with no DAG known in advance. Pull engines need a checkpoint/scatter escape hatch for this.
  • The COST is that "what will run" is not knowable by reading the script top-to-bottom. Independent branches interleave nondeterministically, so SAMPLE_A may finish after SAMPLE_Z. Never write logic that assumes order; carry an explicit sample key through the tuple instead.
  • "Why did only the first sample run?" and "why did -resume re-run everything?" are the two most common support questions, and both are direct symptoms of the dataflow model (see queue-vs-value channels and cache-miss diagnosis below).

A second principle sits above the engine: the DAG buys reproducibility of workflow LOGIC and nothing else automatically (Wratten et al. 2021 Nat Methods 18:1161-1168). A clean pipeline over unpinned tools is NOT reproducible. Pin the software environment (container by digest, conda by lockfile), the reference data and params, and control thread/locale/arch leaks (Grüning et al. 2018 Cell Syst 6:631-635). The engine gives one layer; the author pins the rest.

Decision: Nextflow vs the other engines

AxisNextflow (DSL2)SnakemakeWDL (Cromwell/miniwdl)CWL
Modelreactive dataflow (push, no target)pull/goal (target -> backward DAG)pull/goal (declared outputs)pull/goal (typed, declared)
Dynamic DAG (shape depends on runtime data)native, trivialcheckpoints (bolted on)scatter (static-ish)limited
Cloud/executor portabilitybest-in-class (swap by profile)good (v8 plugins, catching up)strong on GCP/Terravia Toil/Arvados
Community pipelinesnf-core (largest, curated)Workflow Catalog (smaller)WARP (Broad)limited
Best whencloud/production, dynamic pipelines, want nf-corePython shop, HPC, file-pattern logicTerra/AnVIL, GATK best practicesvendor-neutral portability, regulated

Honest take: Nextflow wins on executor portability, nf-core, and dynamic pipelines; Snakemake wins on approachability for Python users. Pick by the ecosystem to integrate with, not by benchmarks.

Decision: queue vs value channel (THE #1 footgun)

NeedChannel typeCreate withExhaustion behavior
One item consumed by one task (per-sample reads)queueChannel.of, .fromPath, .fromFilePairs, .splitCsvconsumed once, then empty forever
A shared value reused on EVERY task (a reference/index)value (singleton)Channel.value(x), .first(), .collect(), or a bare paramread unlimited times, never exhausted

The firing rule to memorize: a process launches a new task only when EVERY input channel can supply an item; when a queue input drains, no more tasks fire even if other inputs still have items. So a shared reference passed as a queue channel is consumed by the first sample and every later sample silently never runs (exit 0, no error). Corollary: if all of a process's inputs are value channels its outputs are value channels too; if any input is a queue channel the outputs are queue channels.

Decision: operator selection (and the silent-data-loss traps)

OperatorDoesTrap / when-wrong
maptransform each itempure only; no I/O side effects
collectALL items -> one list item (queue -> value)blocks until upstream closes; gathers inputs for one aggregating task (MultiQC)
groupTuplegroup by key into [key, [items]]bare form WAITS for the whole channel to close (serialization/deadlock); pass size: N or groupKey(key, n); SORT the grouped list or resume breaks
joininner-join two channels by keySILENTLY DROPS non-matching keys by default; use remainder: true or failOnMismatch: true
combineCartesian product (optional by:)intentional all-vs-all; distinct from join (1:1 merge)
mixinterleave channels into oneorder not preserved; pool outputs before a collect
branchroute items to named sub-channelsthe DSL2 idiom for conditional routing (single_end vs paired)
firstfirst item as a VALUE channelTHE queue -> value fix for shared references
ifEmptysupply a default if emptyguards the "empty branch silently vanishes" trap

Decision: executor (the portability payoff)

TargetexecutorBest whenWatch
Laptop/devlocaldevelopment, tiny data, -stub wiring testsone machine only
On-prem HPCslurm, lsf, sge, pbsshared cluster, on-prem datatune queueSize/submitRateLimit; scratch true on slow shared FS
Cloud batchawsbatch, google-batch, azurebatchelastic scale, no on-prem HPCinput localization copy dominates cost/time; Wave + Fusion cut it
Kubernetesk8salready running K8smore setup overhead

Never bake the executor into pipeline code; always set it in a profile so the same code moves across all of them.

Process and DSL2 modules (take / main / emit)

A DSL2 module wraps one tool as a process and can be included and called multiple times (aliased), which DSL1 could not. Subworkflows compose modules with named inputs/outputs.

groovy
// modules/fastqc.nf -- one tool, reusable, tested in isolation
process FASTQC {
    tag "${meta.id}"                                   // meta map threads sample identity through every operator
    container 'quay.io/biocontainers/fastqc:0.12.1--hdfd78af_0'  // pin an immutable tag/digest, never :latest
    label 'process_low'                                // maps to central resource config, decoupled from module code

    input:
    tuple val(meta), path(reads)                       // nf-core convention: [ meta, files ], meta = [id:'x', single_end:false]

    output:
    tuple val(meta), path('*.zip'), emit: zip          // meta round-trips so downstream always knows the sample

    script:
    """
    fastqc -t ${task.cpus} ${reads}
    """
}
groovy
// subworkflows/qc.nf -- take/main/emit names the interface
include { FASTQC } from '../modules/fastqc'
include { MULTIQC } from '../modules/multiqc'

workflow QC {
    take:
    reads

    main:
    FASTQC(reads)
    MULTIQC(FASTQC.out.zip.collect())                  // collect() gathers all samples' zips into ONE aggregating task

    emit:
    report = MULTIQC.out.report                        // access as QC.out.report from the caller
}

Channels: the shared-reference fix, explained

groovy
workflow {
    reads_ch = Channel.fromFilePairs(params.reads)     // queue: [id, [r1, r2]] per sample -- consumed once each
    index_ch = Channel.fromPath(params.index)          // queue: ONE item, the shared index

    // BUG if written ALIGN(reads_ch, index_ch): the index is consumed by sample 1,
    // its queue is then empty, and samples 2..N silently never fire (exit 0, no error).
    // .first() converts the queue to a VALUE channel, reusable on every task invocation.
    ALIGN(reads_ch, index_ch.first())
}
Show full SKILL.md (785 more words)Show less

Resume: the task hash, and diagnosing a cache miss

-resume reuses a task only on an EXACT hit of the task hash, computed from the input file identities, the resolved script text, the container reference, and input values/params. A single-bit change in any component busts the cache and re-runs the task. The notorious silent causes:

  • Nondeterministic input ordering (collect/groupTuple/glob expansion) -> the ordered list is part of the hash. Fix: toSortedList() or .map{ k, v -> [k, v.sort()] }.
  • Mutable container tags (:latest, or a re-pushed version) -> pin by digest.
  • mtime hashing on network filesystems (Lustre/NFS) -> -resume works locally but misses on the cluster. Fix: cache 'lenient' (hashes size + path, ignores mtime).
  • Absolute paths, dates, $RANDOM, or hostname baked into the script string -> the script hash changes every run.
  • A deleted or moved work/ -> the hash hits the DB but the task dir is gone, forcing a re-run.
groovy
process ALIGN {
    // 'lenient' skips mtime -- the single most useful resume fix on HPC/cloud shared filesystems.
    // 'deep' hashes full file CONTENT (slower, robust when metadata lies); 'false' never caches.
    cache 'lenient'
    // ...
}

Definitive diagnosis: run both executions with -dump-hashes and diff which hash component differed, or nextflow log <run_name> -f hash,name,status,workdir to compare per-task hashes across runs. Everything else is guessing.

work/ is truth; publishDir is a side effect

Every task runs in an isolated work/<hash>/ dir holding the real outputs plus the forensic trail (.command.sh resolved script, .command.log, .exitcode). That directory IS the pipeline's output store and the ONLY thing -resume reads. publishDir merely copies or symlinks SELECTED outputs to a human-friendly location, and its failure can be SILENT because the task itself exited 0 in work/. Consequences:

  • mode: 'symlink' (default) breaks if work/ is later deleted; mode: 'copy' is safe to delete afterward; mode: 'move' breaks -resume (the output leaves work/), so use it only for terminal outputs.
  • Never rm -rf work/ if a resume might be wanted; use nextflow clean (which prunes the cache DB consistently). "Outputs missing but the pipeline succeeded" almost always means looking in publishDir instead of work/<hash>/.

Resources: dynamic retry escalation

groovy
process BIG {
    // 137=SIGKILL/OOM, 143=SIGTERM (SLURM wall-time kill); the 130..145 signal band + 104 (transient I/O) retry, fail fast otherwise.
    errorStrategy { task.exitStatus in ((130..145) + 104) ? 'retry' : 'terminate' }
    maxRetries 3
    memory { 8.GB * task.attempt }                     // task.attempt is 1-based; escalates 8 -> 16 -> 24 -> 32 GB
    time   { 4.h  * task.attempt }                     // a transient OOM auto-escalates instead of killing the run

    script:
    """
    memory_intensive_command
    """
}

errorStrategy values are 'terminate' (default), 'retry', 'ignore' (drop the failed task's outputs and continue over survivors), and 'finish' (graceful drain). The nf-core process.resourceLimits directive (Nextflow 24.04+, which replaced the pre-3.0 check_max pattern) clamps the escalated request to the machine/queue ceiling so 8.GB * task.attempt never asks for more than a node has.

Executors and profiles: portability

groovy
// nextflow.config -- executor lives in a profile, never in the pipeline code
profiles {
    docker      { docker.enabled = true }
    singularity { singularity.enabled = true }
    slurm {
        process.executor = 'slurm'
        executor { queueSize = 100; submitRateLimit = '10/1min' }   // avoid hammering the scheduler
    }
    awsbatch {
        process.executor = 'awsbatch'
        aws.region = 'us-east-1'
    }
}

process {
    cpus = 2; memory = '4 GB'; time = '1h'             // sane defaults
    withLabel: 'process_high' { cpus = 16; memory = '64 GB'; time = '12h' }  // labels centralize per-tier tuning
}

Run with -profile slurm,singularity (comma-separated, NO spaces; later profiles override earlier).

Adopt an nf-core pipeline before authoring

For any mainstream analysis (RNA-seq, variant calling, ATAC, methylation, amplicon), a curated nf-core/<pipeline> already encodes years of QC, containerized modules, nf-test regression tests, and institutional configs. Reinventing it is months of work and worse QC. Pin the revision: nextflow run nf-core/rnaseq -r 3.14.0 -profile test,docker --outdir results. DIY is justified only for genuinely novel logic. See workflow-management/nf-core-pipelines for running, configuring, and building samplesheets against community pipelines; this skill covers AUTHORING.

Common Errors

SymptomCauseFix
Only the first sample processed, exit 0, no errorshared reference on a queue channel, exhausted after task 1.first() / Channel.value on the reference
Pipeline hangs at a grouping stepgroupTuple with no size on a channel that never closessize: N or groupKey(key, n)
Some samples silently disappear mid-pipelinejoin dropped non-matching keysremainder: true or failOnMismatch: true
-resume re-runs everythingnondeterministic input order, or :latest tag, or mtime on network FSsort inputs; pin container digest; cache 'lenient'
Resume works locally, misses on the clustermtime unreliable on Lustre/NFScache 'lenient'
Outputs missing but the pipeline "succeeded"publishDir failed silently, or looked in publishDir not work/check work/<hash>/; use mode: 'copy'
Resume broken after cleanupdeleted work/never rm -rf work/; use nextflow clean
OOM kills a long run near the endfixed memory, no escalationmemory { 8.GB * task.attempt } + conditional retry
Wrong result, no error, after a base image updatemutable tag served a stale cache hitpin by digest; cache 'deep' for critical inputs
Huge cloud bill / slow S3 pipelineexplicit stage-in/out copies of large filesWave + Fusion (POSIX over object store)
-profile test docker ignores dockerspace instead of comma-profile test,docker
  • workflow-management/nf-core-pipelines - Run and configure community pipelines (the RUNNING counterpart to this authoring skill)
  • workflow-management/snakemake-workflows - Pull/goal-oriented alternative for Python shops and file-pattern logic
  • workflows/rnaseq-to-de - End-to-end RNA-seq quantification to differential expression
  • read-qc/quality-reports - QC steps a pipeline orchestrates (FastQC/MultiQC)

References

  • Di Tommaso P, Chatzou M, Floden EW, Prieto Barja P, Palumbo E, Notredame C. 2017. Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat Biotechnol 35(4):316-319.
  • Ewels PA, Peltzer A, Fillinger S, Patel H, Alneberg J, Wilm A, Garcia MU, Di Tommaso P, Nahnsen S. 2020. The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines. Nat Biotechnol 38(3):276-278.
  • Wratten L, Wilm A, Göke J. 2021. Reproducible, scalable, and shareable analysis pipelines with bioinformatics workflow managers. Nat Methods 18:1161-1168.
  • Grüning B, Chilton J, Köster J, et al. 2018. Practical computational reproducibility in the life sciences. Cell Syst 6(6):631-635.

© GPTomics, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 2 other files in workflow-management/nextflow-pipelines of GPTomics/bioSkills.

  • SKILL.md
  • examples/rnaseq.nf
  • usage-guide.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit d91ed3d

Used in 1 other repository

We found 1 copy of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in GPTomics/bioSkills, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines this skillGPTomics/bioSkills1.2k1 repos~4.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Add Bactopia Toolbactopia/bactopia522—~4.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Bump Versionsbactopia/bactopia522—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Merge Schemasbactopia/bactopia522—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
LaminDB Biological Data Managementdavila7/claude-code-templates33k12 repos~3.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Latchbio Integrationdavila7/claude-code-templates33k11 repos~2.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Add Bactopia Tool

    bactopia/bactopia

    Scaffold a complete Bactopia Tool across all three tiers -- module, subworkflow, and workflow entry point under workflows/bactopia-tools/.

    522 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Bump Versions

    bactopia/bactopia

    Propagate the Bactopia and nf-bactopia versions declared in versions.yml into the hand-maintained files that carry a literal version (conf/testbase.config, CITATION.cff, bin/bactopia…

    522 GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Merge Schemas

    bactopia/bactopia

    Regenerate nextflow.config and nextflowschema.json for Bactopia workflows by running bactopia-merge-schemas.

    522 GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • LaminDB Biological Data Management

    davila7/claude-code-templates

    Manages biological datasets with LaminDB: versioned artifacts, run lineage, ontology-based annotation, schema validation and links to workflow managers and ML tools.

    33k GitHub starsUsed in 12 repos~3.6k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Latchbio Integration

    davila7/claude-code-templates

    Latch platform for bioinformatics workflows. An agent skill from davila7/claude-code-templates.

    33k GitHub starsUsed in 11 repos~2.4k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Review Docs

    bactopia/bactopia

    Review staleness of reference docs under .agents/docs/ using bactopia-docs --validate.

    522 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from GPTomics/bioSkills

All 559 skills in this repo
  • Bio Alignment Io

    GPTomics/bioSkills

    Read, write, and convert multiple sequence alignment files using Biopython Bio.AlignIO.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~4.9k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • bioSkills Installer

    GPTomics/bioSkills

    Installs the bioSkills collection of 425 bioinformatics skills in one step, or only chosen categories, so sequencing, RNA-seq, single-cell and variant tasks get specialized help.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~789 tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Bio Write Sequences

    GPTomics/bioSkills

    Write biological sequences to files (FASTA, FASTQ, GenBank, EMBL) using Biopython Bio.SeqIO.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~2.1k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Amplicon Primer Clipping

    GPTomics/bioSkills

    Soft- or hard-clips PCR primer footprints from aligned amplicon BAMs so primer bases stop masquerading as confirmed reference sequence.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.2k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Filters BAM alignments by FLAG bits, mapping quality and regions with samtools view or pysam, with recipes for common keep and drop cases.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.6k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Bio Alignment Indexing

    GPTomics/bioSkills

    Create and use BAI/CSI indices for BAM/CRAM files using samtools and pysam.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.4k tokens
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines

What does Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines do?

Authors reproducible Nextflow DSL2 pipelines built on reactive dataflow, where processes communicate only through channels and execution order is not guaranteed. Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines is an agent skill from GPTomics/bioSkills. Authors reproducible Nextflow DSL2 pipelines built on reactive dataflow, where processes communicate only through channels and execution order is not guaranteed.

When should I use Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines?

Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines fits situations like: deciding channel/dataflow (Nextflow) vs rule-based (Snakemake) authoring; wiring queue vs value channels and fixing shared-reference exhaustion with .first(); composing DSL2 modules and subworkflows with take/main/emit; diagnosing why -resume misses the cache (nondeterministic input order.

How do I install Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-workflow-management-nextflow-pipelines -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (workflow-management/nextflow-pipelines in GPTomics/bioSkills) into .claude/skills/bio-workflow-management-nextflow-pipelines in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines in Codex?

Run `npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-workflow-management-nextflow-pipelines -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (workflow-management/nextflow-pipelines in GPTomics/bioSkills) into .agents/skills/bio-workflow-management-nextflow-pipelines in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-workflow-management-nextflow-pipelines -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/bio-workflow-management-nextflow-pipelines, .gemini/skills/bio-workflow-management-nextflow-pipelines, .github/skills/bio-workflow-management-nextflow-pipelines and .opencode/skills/bio-workflow-management-nextflow-pipelines in your project.

What does Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines is instructions for the agent only. Our summary lists: Python 3; Docker.

Does Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines use?

Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines use?

About 4.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 18k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines: Add Bactopia Tool (bactopia/bactopia, 522 stars), Bump Versions (bactopia/bactopia, 522 stars), Merge Schemas (bactopia/bactopia, 522 stars) and LaminDB Biological Data Management (davila7/claude-code-templates, 33k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Bio Workflow Management Nextflow Pipelines?

GPTomics (a GitHub organization) maintains it in GPTomics/bioSkills, which has 1,218 GitHub stars. The repository holds 559 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on August 15, 2026.

Source: GPTomics/bioSkills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.