Agent skill

Bio Covalent Design

by GPTomics in GPTomics/bioSkills

Designs covalent inhibitors and warheads targeting cysteine, lysine, serine, threonine, tyrosine, and aspartate residues, with explicit handling of warhead reactivity (acrylamide, chloroacetamide…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Bio Covalent Design

skills CLI
$ npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-covalent-design -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install GPTomics/bioSkills bio-covalent-design --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/chemoinformatics/covalent-design .claude/skills/bio-covalent-design && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
bio-covalent-design
GitHub stars
1.2k
Used in
1 other repo
Token cost
~4.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,630 words
Files
3
Skills in repo
559
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Designs covalent inhibitors and warheads targeting cysteine, lysine, serine, threonine, tyrosine, and aspartate residues, with explicit handling of warhead reactivity (acrylamide, chloroacetamide…

  • Designing covalent inhibitors for targeted covalent inhibition (TCI)
  • SKILL.md covers Version Compatibility, Reactive Residue Taxonomy, Warhead Chemistry and Decision Tree by Scenario, plus 10 more sections
  • Runs Python scripts from its folder; calls pip
  • KRAS G12C-style approaches

What it does

Bio Covalent Design is an agent skill from GPTomics/bioSkills. Designs covalent inhibitors and warheads targeting cysteine, lysine, serine, threonine, tyrosine, and aspartate residues, with explicit handling of warhead reactivity (acrylamide, chloroacetamide, vinyl sulfone, sulfonyl fluoride, fluorosulfate, aldehyde, boronate, nitrile), reversibility (kinact/Ki, tresidence), glutathione (GSH) stability, intrinsic reactivity assays, and covalent docking (DOCKovalent, GOLD, HCovDock). Use when designing covalent inhibitors for targeted covalent inhibition (TCI), KRAS…

Its SKILL.md is about 4.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 3 other files (for example `examples/warhead_classifier.py` and `usage-guide.md`).

It sits in Research & Science. It works with RDKit. The repository describes itself as: a set of SKILLS.md for doing bioinformatics with agents like claude code. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Designing covalent inhibitors for targeted covalent inhibition (TCI)
  • KRAS G12C-style approaches
  • Rationalizing covalent SAR

Example prompts

  • “Use the bio-covalent-design skill to design covalent inhibitors and warheads targeting cysteine, lysine, serine, threonine, tyrosine, and aspartate…”
  • “/bio-covalent-design”

Requirements

  • Python 3

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit d91ed3d. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships script files (Python), which the agent can run.

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • pip

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md. Its commands use pip, which can reach the network depending on how they are called.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Bio Covalent Design loads about 4.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 146 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,630 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~146
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from GPTomics/bioSkills at commit d91ed3d, republished under its MIT licence (© GPTomics). 1,630 words, ~4,270 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/bio-covalent-design/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 2 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
bio-covalent-design
description
Designs covalent inhibitors and warheads targeting cysteine, lysine, serine, threonine, tyrosine, and aspartate residues, with explicit handling of warhead reactivity (acrylamide, chloroacetamide, vinyl sulfone, sulfonyl fluoride, fluorosulfate, aldehyde, boronate, nitrile), reversibility (kinact/Ki, t_residence), glutathione (GSH) stability, intrinsic reactivity assays, and covalent docking (DOCKovalent, GOLD, HCovDock). Use when designing covalent inhibitors for targeted covalent inhibition (TCI), KRAS G12C-style approaches, or rationalizing covalent SAR.
tool_type
python
primary_tool
RDKit

Version Compatibility

Reference examples tested with: RDKit 2024.09+, OpenEye / AutoDock Vina 1.2+ (for covalent extensions), GOLD (commercial), DOCKovalent (web service), HCovDock 1.0+.

Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:

  • Python: pip show rdkit then help(rdkit.Chem) to check signatures
  • CLI: check version output of each docking tool

If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.

Covalent Inhibitor Design

Design molecules that form covalent bonds with target protein residues. Clinically validated targeted covalent inhibitors include KRAS G12C inhibitors (sotorasib, adagrasib), BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib), and EGFR inhibitors (osimertinib). Covalent design requires balancing intrinsic reactivity (must form bond) vs selectivity (only the intended residue), reversibility (irreversible vs reversible covalent), and drug-likeness (warheads can hurt PK).

For warhead substructure filtering (in non-covalent contexts), see chemoinformatics/substructure-search. For non-covalent docking, see chemoinformatics/virtual-screening. For pose validation, see chemoinformatics/pose-validation.

Reactive Residue Taxonomy

ResidueNucleophileExample compatible warheadsDesign note
CysteineThiol / thiolateAcrylamide, haloacetamide, nitrileCommonly targeted; local pKa and geometry control reactivity
LysineAmineSulfonyl fluoride, aldehydeAldehydes can form reversible imines with amines
SerineAlcohol / alkoxideβ-lactam, boronateOften requires catalytic activation
ThreonineAlcohol / alkoxideBoronateContext-dependent and less commonly targeted
TyrosinePhenol / phenolateSulfonyl fluoride, fluorosulfateLocal environment strongly affects reaction
Aspartate/GlutamateCarboxylateResidue-specific electrophiles require experimental validationDo not infer aldehyde Schiff-base formation with carboxylates

Cysteine is frequently targeted because its thiol/thiolate can be nucleophilic and its local environment can support selective proximity-driven reaction. GSH and off-target cysteines are competing thiols, not intrinsically distinguishable from the target by the warhead alone; the complete ligand's recognition, exposure, and intrinsic reactivity determine selectivity.

Warhead Chemistry

WarheadSMARTS patternReactivityReversibilityCys-selective
Acrylamide[CX3](=[OX1])([NX3])[CX3]=[CX3]Moderate (Michael acceptor)Usually irreversibleOften Cys-directed
Chloroacetamide[CX3](=[OX1])([NX3])[CH2]ClHigh (SN2)IrreversibleOften Cys-directed
α-haloketone[CX3](=O)C[F,Cl,Br]Very highIrreversibleYes (but reactive)
Vinyl sulfoneS(=O)(=O)C=CModerate (Michael)IrreversibleYes
Sulfonyl fluorideS(=O)(=O)FModerateIrreversibleLys/Tyr/Ser
Fluorosulfate (SuFEx)OS(=O)(=O)FModerateIrreversibleTyr/Lys
Aldehyde[CX3H1](=O)VariableOften reversible (covalent equilibrium)Context-dependent Cys/Lys/Ser chemistry
Boronate (B-OH or B(OH)2)B(O)OModerateReversibleSer/Thr
NitrileC#NLowReversible (Cys-S adduct)Cys
EpoxideC1OC1HighIrreversibleCys/Lys/Asp
α,β-unsaturated ketone[CX3](=O)C=CModerate (Michael)IrreversibleCys
IsothiocyanateN=C=SHighIrreversibleCys/Lys
MaleimideO=C1N(C(=O)C=C1)Often highCommonly irreversible under assay conditionsOften Cys-directed
Cysteine-selective heterocyclevariousModerateVariableYes (designed)

Practical hierarchy: Acrylamides are common attenuated electrophiles in cysteine-directed TCIs, including KRAS G12C, EGFR, and BTK programs. Haloacetamides are generally more intrinsically reactive, but actual selectivity must be measured for the complete molecule and target context.

Decision Tree by Scenario

GoalWarhead choiceReactivity tier
Cysteine TCI programAcrylamide is one common starting classMeasure complete-compound target and intrinsic reactivity
Cysteine probe programHaloacetamides are one common classHigher intrinsic reactivity can aid labeling but requires selectivity profiling
Lysine TCI (uncommon)Sulfonyl fluorideModerate
Tyrosine TCIFluorosulfate (SuFEx)Moderate
Reversible covalentWarhead with demonstrated reversible adduct chemistry, such as selected cyanoacrylamides, aldehydes, nitriles, or boronatesConfirm reversibility experimentally
Activity-based protein profiling (ABPP)Iodoacetamide / chloroacetamideVery high
Boronic acid inhibitor (proteasome)BoronateReversible
Aldehyde inhibitor (calpain)AldehydeReversible covalent

Kinetics: kinact / Ki

Covalent inhibition kinetics:

  • Ki: reversible binding affinity (initial, like non-covalent IC50)
  • kinact: rate of covalent bond formation (sec^-1)
  • kinact/Ki: second-order rate constant, "covalent efficiency" (M^-1 s^-1)

For irreversible two-step inhibition that follows the corresponding kinetic model, report fitted kinact, Ki, and kinact/Ki rather than only a time-dependent IC50. Two compounds with the same IC50 can have different kinetic components:

  • Low Ki, low kinact: tight binding, slow covalent bond
  • High Ki, high kinact: loose binding, fast covalent bond

Because kinact/Ki depends on the target, construct, assay conditions, and kinetic model, compare values within a matched assay series and alongside exposure, intrinsic reactivity, target engagement, and selectivity. Reversible-covalent systems may require different mechanistic models and residence-time or washout measurements.

Intrinsic Reactivity Assays

Before committing to a warhead, measure intrinsic reactivity (off-target risk):

python
# Generic GSH stability assay readout - measure half-life of warhead with 10 mM GSH
# kinact_GSH from time-course of warhead disappearance

Do not assign a universal GSH half-life from the warhead name alone. Substitution, electronics, ionization, solubility, and assay conditions can change the observed rate. Report the GSH concentration, buffer, temperature, analytical method, and fitted half-life or second-order rate constant for the complete compound.

Covalent Docking Tools

ToolApproachStrengthFails when
DOCKovalent (London et al 2014 Nat Chem Biol 10:1066)Constraint-based DOCKFree, well-validatedBrowser-based; small library
GOLD covalent (CCDC)GOLD with covalent constraintCommercial; selectivityLicense cost
AutoDock 4 covalentAD4 with covalent bondOpen sourceSlower than Vina
CovDock (Schrödinger)Glide-based + covalentCommercial two-stage covalent docking workflowLicense cost
MOE covalentTriposite DiscoveryCommercialLicense cost
HCovDock (Wu Q, Huang S-Y 2023 Briefings Bioinform 24:bbac559)Hierarchical fragment + covalentOpen; supports many residuesNewer, less validated
ICM-Pro covalentActive site grid + covalentCommercial; metal centersLicense cost

For open-source covalent docking, HCovDock (2023) is the modern alternative; DOCKovalent is the longstanding standard.

Example: KRAS G12C Inhibitor Design Workflow

Goal: Decorate a co-crystal scaffold with a cysteine-targeting warhead and rank candidates by covalent efficiency.

Approach: Load scaffold SMILES, enumerate acrylamide-bearing analogs, filter by reactivity selectivity, dock under covalent constraint, and rank by kinact/Ki surrogates.

python
from rdkit import Chem

# Step 1: scaffold from co-crystal (4LRW or AMG510)
scaffold_smi = 'c1ccc(C(=O)NCC)cc1'  # generic valid scaffold for code illustration
scaffold = Chem.MolFromSmiles(scaffold_smi)

# Step 2: enumerate analogs with acrylamide warhead
def add_acrylamide(scaffold, attachment_atom_idx):
    """Project hook: attach a mapped acrylamide with an audited reaction."""
    raise NotImplementedError(
        'Provide a project-specific mapped reaction and validate atom mapping, '
        'valence, regioisomer identity, and product sanitization.'
    )

# Step 3: filter for reactive group selectivity
# Step 4: dock with DOCKovalent / GOLD covalent / HCovDock
# Step 5: rank by kinact/Ki surrogate (compute reactive Michael acceptor reactivity)

Reactivity Surrogates (computed without experiment)

For ranking warheads without wet-lab data:

DescriptorUse case
LUMO energy (DFT)Michael acceptor reactivity (lower LUMO = more reactive)
Electrophile partial chargeSN2 reactivity
RDKit rdMolDescriptors.CalcLabuteASASteric accessibility
Experimentally supported binding pose or validated docking modelGeometric fit to reactive residue

Goal: Record alpha-carbon substitution as a structural feature for an acrylamide series.

Approach: Parse the SMILES, locate the acrylamide substructure, and count neighbors on the alpha carbon outside the matched warhead. This count is not a LUMO estimate or a stand-alone reactivity prediction; substituent electronics and the rest of the molecule must be considered, and reactivity should be measured.

python
def acrylamide_alpha_substitution_count(smi):
    mol = Chem.MolFromSmiles(smi)
    if mol is None:
        return None
    acryl_pat = Chem.MolFromSmarts(
        '[CX3:1](=[OX1:2])([NX3:3])[CX3:4]=[CX3:5]'
    )
    matches = mol.GetSubstructMatches(acryl_pat, uniquify=True)
    if not matches:
        return None
    alpha_query_idx = next(
        atom.GetIdx() for atom in acryl_pat.GetAtoms()
        if atom.GetAtomMapNum() == 4
    )
    alpha_c = mol.GetAtomWithIdx(matches[0][alpha_query_idx])
    n_subs = len([n for n in alpha_c.GetNeighbors() if n.GetIdx() not in matches[0]])
    return n_subs

For a reactivity model, use experimentally measured rates or a validated quantum-chemical workflow; a single frontier-orbital energy is not sufficient on its own.

Per-Tool Failure Modes

Show full SKILL.md (658 more words)Show less
Wrong warhead for residue

Trigger: A warhead/residue pairing is assumed from a broad class label.

Mechanism: Reaction depends on the residue microenvironment, electrophile, binding pose, and catalytic assistance; a class label does not establish residue selectivity.

Symptom: No covalent adduct observed despite docking pose.

Fix: Use literature-supported residue/warhead chemistry as a hypothesis, then verify site-specific adduct formation and competing reactivity experimentally.

Excessive reactivity (off-target)

Trigger: Chloroacetamide in drug-candidate context.

Mechanism: Excess intrinsic electrophile reactivity can increase reaction with GSH and off-target nucleophiles.

Symptom: Toxicity in cell-based assays; non-specific binding signal.

Fix: Test a less intrinsically reactive electrophile and measure its GSH and target-reaction kinetics; alpha substitution can tune behavior but does not guarantee selectivity or stability.

Geometric mismatch

Trigger: The ligand's reactive atom is poorly positioned relative to the target nucleophile.

Mechanism: Covalent reaction requires warhead-specific distance and approach geometry between the electrophilic atom and the nucleophilic atom (Cys Sγ for cysteine).

Symptom: No covalent labeling in mass spec despite predicted docking.

Fix: Identify the reaction atoms, inspect the pre-reaction Sγ-to-electrophile distance and reaction-specific angles, and use a docking protocol parameterized for that reaction. Do not substitute Cβ distance for the reacting sulfur.

Reversibility unintended

Trigger: Designed irreversible TCI but warhead is reversible.

Mechanism: Reversibility depends on the complete electrophile, adduct chemistry, protein environment, and assay timescale; class-level labels are only hypotheses.

Symptom: Activity wanes after substrate washout in cellular assays.

Fix: Select chemistry with demonstrated behavior in the intended context and verify reversibility by dilution, washout, intact-protein MS, or another suitable experiment.

kinact/Ki conflation

Trigger: Optimizing for IC50 instead of kinact/Ki.

Mechanism: Compounds with same IC50 differ in covalent efficiency.

Symptom: Compounds with similar endpoint IC50 values show different time-dependent target engagement or pharmacodynamic duration.

Fix: Fit a mechanistically appropriate kinetic model. Use kinact/Ki for qualifying irreversible two-step systems; use equilibrium, residence-time, or washout measurements where appropriate for reversible covalent systems.

DOCKovalent over-prediction

Trigger: Default DOCKovalent run.

Mechanism: Covalent constraint forces docking; many ligands "succeed" but are unrealistic.

Symptom: Many compounds pass docking; few label in vitro.

Fix: Review measured/validated reactivity, reaction-atom geometry (Cys Sγ for cysteine), non-covalent recognition, strain, and site-specific experimental labeling.

Reconciliation: Irreversible vs Reversible Covalent

AspectIrreversibleReversible covalent
ExamplesKRAS G12C (acrylamide), BTK (ibrutinib)Boronate (bortezomib), aldehyde (calpain inhibitors)
Toxicity profileOff-target Cys labeling potentialOff-target equilibrium
Resistance mechanismMutation of reactive CysMutation reduces affinity
Design decisionConsider duration of target engagement, safety, exposure, and resistanceConsider equilibrium, residence time, and recovery after washout

Common Errors

SymptomCauseFix
Warhead not matching SMARTSDifferent stereochemistry or chargedUse canonicalized + neutral SMARTS
DOCKovalent rejects ligandNo suitable Cys in pocketRe-check residue accessibility
GSH adduct dominatesWarhead too reactiveUse less reactive warhead; or alpha-substitute
Off-target labeling in cellsPromiscuous warheadIterate warhead reactivity vs selectivity
Docking pose but no labelingGeometric mismatchDistance check; rotamer search
Intended irreversible inhibitor shows recovery after washoutAdduct chemistry is reversible or covalent reaction is incompleteRe-evaluate the mechanism and fit the appropriate kinetic model
HCovDock fails on PROTACTool optimized for monomer covalentUse specialized tools for bivalent

References

  • Lonsdale & Ward, Chem. Soc. Rev. 47:3816-3830 (2018) -- irreversible-inhibitor discovery, optimization, and kinetics (DOI 10.1039/C7CS00720C).
  • Singh J, Petter RC, Baillie TA, Whitty A. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10:307-317 (2011) -- TCI design principles (DOI 10.1038/nrd3410).
  • London N et al., Nat. Chem. Biol. 10:1066-1072 (2014) -- DOCKovalent (DOI 10.1038/nchembio.1666).
  • Wu Q et al., Brief. Bioinform. 24:bbac559 (2023) -- HCovDock (DOI 10.1093/bib/bbac559).
  • Yu W, Weber DJ, MacKerell AD Jr. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19:3007-3021 (2023) -- SILCS-Covalent and Cys-sulfur/reactive-atom geometry (DOI 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00232).
  • Backus et al., Nature 534:570-574 (2016) -- proteome-wide covalent ligand discovery (DOI 10.1038/nature18002).
  • Pettinger et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56:15200-15209 (2017) -- lysine-targeting covalent inhibitors (DOI 10.1002/anie.201707630).
  • Ostrem et al., Nature 503:548-551 (2013) -- KRAS G12C disulfide-tethered fragments (DOI 10.1038/nature12796).
  • chemoinformatics/molecular-io - Parse warhead SMILES
  • chemoinformatics/substructure-search - Warhead SMARTS detection
  • chemoinformatics/virtual-screening - Pre-dock candidate non-covalent fit
  • chemoinformatics/pose-validation - Validate covalent docking
  • chemoinformatics/conformer-generation - Warhead conformer ensembles
  • chemoinformatics/admet-prediction - ADMET of covalent leads
  • chemoinformatics/molecular-descriptors - Reactivity surrogate descriptors

© GPTomics, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 2 other files in chemoinformatics/covalent-design of GPTomics/bioSkills.

  • SKILL.md
  • examples/warhead_classifier.py
  • usage-guide.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit d91ed3d

Used in 1 other repository

We found 1 copy of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in GPTomics/bioSkills, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

Bio Covalent Design next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Bio Covalent Design compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Bio Covalent Design this skillGPTomics/bioSkills1.2k1 repos~4.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
DiffDock Molecular DockingK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills48k1 repos~3kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Biopipelineslocbp-uzh/biopipelines109—~2.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Edu Chem Reactionwy51ai/edulab1.4k—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
RDKit Cheminformatics Practicesaiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw15k—~708Automated safety check: PassMIT
Rowanlamm-mit/scienceclaw2464 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: WarnProprietary

Similar skills

  • DiffDock Molecular Docking

    K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

    Predicts how small molecules bind to a protein with DiffDock, covering batch docking, pose ranking by confidence and checks on the results; not for binding affinity.

    48k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Biopipelines

    locbp-uzh/biopipelines

    Design and run computational protein and ligand workflows on a GPU: binder and enzyme design, de novo backbone generation, inverse folding and sequence redesign, structure prediction, protein-ligand…

    109 GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Edu Chem Reaction

    wy51ai/edulab

    把一个化学反应做成自包含的微观 3D 交互演示网页:左/上为 Three.js 可交互分子动画 (拖滑块看断键·成键·原子重组,分步高亮),右为 KaTeX 反应方程 + 分步讲解 + 原子守恒计数 + 可选能量-反应进程曲线。支持三入口——给定文字反应/方程、随机出题、上传图片识别后演示。

    1.4k GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • RDKit Cheminformatics Practices

    aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw

    Reference guide for working with molecules in RDKit: reading SMILES and SDF files, computing descriptors and fingerprints, and searching substructures.

    15k GitHub stars~708 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Rowan

    lamm-mit/scienceclaw

    Cloud-based quantum chemistry platform with Python API. An agent skill from lamm-mit/scienceclaw.

    246 GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~3.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: warnings
  • Coot Rdkit

    pemsley/coot

    RDKit molecular manipulation and visualization within Coot's Python environment.

    168 GitHub stars~981 tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from GPTomics/bioSkills

All 559 skills in this repo
  • Bio Alignment Io

    GPTomics/bioSkills

    Read, write, and convert multiple sequence alignment files using Biopython Bio.AlignIO.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~4.9k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • bioSkills Installer

    GPTomics/bioSkills

    Installs the bioSkills collection of 425 bioinformatics skills in one step, or only chosen categories, so sequencing, RNA-seq, single-cell and variant tasks get specialized help.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~789 tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Bio Write Sequences

    GPTomics/bioSkills

    Write biological sequences to files (FASTA, FASTQ, GenBank, EMBL) using Biopython Bio.SeqIO.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~2.1k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Amplicon Primer Clipping

    GPTomics/bioSkills

    Soft- or hard-clips PCR primer footprints from aligned amplicon BAMs so primer bases stop masquerading as confirmed reference sequence.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.2k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Filters BAM alignments by FLAG bits, mapping quality and regions with samtools view or pysam, with recipes for common keep and drop cases.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.6k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Bio Alignment Indexing

    GPTomics/bioSkills

    Create and use BAI/CSI indices for BAM/CRAM files using samtools and pysam.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.4k tokens
    Auto-check passed

Works with

Questions about Bio Covalent Design

What does Bio Covalent Design do?

Designs covalent inhibitors and warheads targeting cysteine, lysine, serine, threonine, tyrosine, and aspartate residues, with explicit handling of warhead reactivity (acrylamide, chloroacetamide…. Bio Covalent Design is an agent skill from GPTomics/bioSkills. Designs covalent inhibitors and warheads targeting cysteine, lysine, serine, threonine, tyrosine, and aspartate residues, with explicit handling of warhead reactivity (acrylamide, chloroacetamide, vinyl sulfone, sulfonyl fluoride, fluorosulfate, aldehyde, boronate, nitrile), reversibility (kinact/Ki, tresidence), glutathione (GSH) stability, intrinsic reactivity assays, and covalent docking (DOCKovalent, GOLD, HCovDock).

When should I use Bio Covalent Design?

Bio Covalent Design fits situations like: designing covalent inhibitors for targeted covalent inhibition (TCI); KRAS G12C-style approaches; rationalizing covalent SAR.

How do I install Bio Covalent Design in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-covalent-design -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (chemoinformatics/covalent-design in GPTomics/bioSkills) into .claude/skills/bio-covalent-design in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Bio Covalent Design in Codex?

Run `npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-covalent-design -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (chemoinformatics/covalent-design in GPTomics/bioSkills) into .agents/skills/bio-covalent-design in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Bio Covalent Design in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-covalent-design -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/bio-covalent-design, .gemini/skills/bio-covalent-design, .github/skills/bio-covalent-design and .opencode/skills/bio-covalent-design in your project.

What does Bio Covalent Design need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Bio Covalent Design needs Python for the scripts in its folder and the command-line tools its instructions call (pip). Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Bio Covalent Design access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Its commands use pip, which can reach the network depending on how they are called. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Bio Covalent Design safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Bio Covalent Design use?

Bio Covalent Design is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Bio Covalent Design use?

About 4.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 17k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Bio Covalent Design?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Bio Covalent Design: DiffDock Molecular Docking (K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills, 48k stars), Biopipelines (locbp-uzh/biopipelines, 109 stars), Edu Chem Reaction (wy51ai/edulab, 1.4k stars) and RDKit Cheminformatics Practices (aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw, 15k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Bio Covalent Design?

GPTomics (a GitHub organization) maintains it in GPTomics/bioSkills, which has 1,218 GitHub stars. The repository holds 559 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on August 15, 2026.

Source: GPTomics/bioSkills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.