Agent skill

Programmatic SEO Spy

by gooseworks-ai in gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

Reverse-engineer how competitors do programmatic SEO. An agent skill from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills.

MITAuto-check passedMarketing & SEO

Install Programmatic SEO Spy

skills CLI
$ npx skills add gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill programmatic-seo-spy -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install gooseworks-ai/goose-skills programmatic-seo-spy --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/seo/composites/programmatic-seo-spy .claude/skills/programmatic-seo-spy && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
programmatic-seo-spy
GitHub stars
1.2k
Used in
1 other repo
Token cost
~2.9k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,069 words
Files
2
Skills in repo
273
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Reverse-engineer how competitors do programmatic SEO. An agent skill from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills.

  • Works in 7 steps: Intake → Sitemap Crawl → Pattern Detection → …
  • Tasks that involve Programmatic SEO
  • SKILL.md covers When to Use, Tool Enhancement (Optional), Phase 0: Intake and Phase 1: Sitemap Crawl, plus 8 more sections
  • Calls python3; needs DATAFORSEO_PASSWORD and SEMRUSH_API_KEY

What it does

Programmatic SEO Spy is an agent skill from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills. Reverse-engineer how competitors do programmatic SEO. Detects URL pattern clusters (vs/, integrations/, for-{industry}/), estimates page count per pattern, analyzes template quality, infers which patterns actually drive traffic, and identifies gaps you can exploit. Outputs a competitive pSEO landscape report.

Its SKILL.md is about 2.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 1 other file (for example `skill.meta.json`).

It sits in Marketing & SEO, covering Programmatic SEO. It works with Ahrefs. The repository describes itself as: Library of Growth & GTM skills + data APIs for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor to run ads, social, content, lead gen, seo and data scraping. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Programmatic SEO

Example prompts

  • “/programmatic-seo-spy”

Requirements

  • Python 3
  • A credential in SEMRUSH_API_KEY
  • A credential in AHREFS_API_TOKEN

Workflow steps

7 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Intake
  2. Sitemap Crawl
  3. Pattern Detection
  4. Traffic & Performance Analysis
  5. Template Quality Assessment
  6. Gap Analysis
  7. Output

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit c650c6d. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • python3

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names these keys or tokens, usually read from environment variables:

    • DATAFORSEO_PASSWORD
    • SEMRUSH_API_KEY
    • AHREFS_API_TOKEN
    • SIMILARWEB_API_KEY
    • APIFY_API_TOKEN

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Programmatic SEO Spy loads about 2.9k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 83 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,069 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~83
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills at commit c650c6d, republished under its MIT licence (© gooseworks-ai). 1,069 words, ~2,923 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/programmatic-seo-spy/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 1 other file; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
programmatic-seo-spy
description
Reverse-engineer how competitors do programmatic SEO. Detects URL pattern clusters (vs/, integrations/, for-{industry}/), estimates page count per pattern, analyzes template quality, infers which patterns actually drive traffic, and identifies gaps you can exploit. Outputs a competitive pSEO landscape report.
tags
seo

Programmatic SEO Competitor Spy

Before building your own programmatic SEO pages, know what your competitors are already doing. This skill crawls competitor sitemaps, detects which URL patterns are programmatic, estimates which ones actually drive traffic, assesses template quality, and finds the gaps they're missing.

Core principle: The best pSEO strategy starts with competitive intelligence. If 3 competitors have /vs/ pages and none have /for-{industry}/ pages, that's a signal. This skill turns competitor site structures into strategic intelligence.

When to Use

  • "What programmatic SEO are competitors doing?"
  • "Reverse-engineer competitor SEO pages"
  • "Which pSEO patterns actually work in our space?"
  • "Find pSEO gaps our competitors are missing"
  • "Analyze competitor URL structure for SEO patterns"

Tool Enhancement (Optional)

This skill works with existing capabilities but is dramatically better with domain analytics data that shows actual traffic per URL pattern.

Agent Prompt to User

"I can analyze competitor site structures with our existing crawling tools. For the most accurate results — especially knowing which patterns actually drive traffic vs. just existing — I'd recommend connecting a domain analytics API."

Recommended: DataForSEO (pay-per-use, ~$0.02-0.05 per domain analysis)

  • Sign up at dataforseo.com → get API login + password
  • Set DATAFORSEO_LOGIN and DATAFORSEO_PASSWORD env vars

Alternatives that also work:

  • SEMrush API (if you have a subscription) → set SEMRUSH_API_KEY
  • Ahrefs API (if you have a subscription) → set AHREFS_API_TOKEN
  • SimilarWeb API (if you have access) → set SIMILARWEB_API_KEY

"Want to use one of these, or should I proceed with baseline mode? Baseline will detect patterns and assess template quality, but traffic estimates will be inferred rather than measured."

Mode Selection
  • Enhanced mode — Domain analytics API provides organic keywords and estimated traffic per URL. Enables confident "this pattern drives X traffic" conclusions. Can show which specific pages within a pattern rank well.
  • Baseline mode — Uses site-content-catalog for URL crawling, seo-domain-analyzer for domain-level metrics, web_search for spot-checking rankings. Pattern detection is equally good. Traffic attribution is directional, based on page count × domain authority × keyword indicators.

Phase 0: Intake

  1. Competitors — 1-5 competitor URLs to analyze
  2. Your product URL — So we can compare coverage
  3. Category — What market/category are these competitors in?
  4. Specific interest? — Looking for anything specific (vs/ pages, integrations, etc.) or full analysis?
  5. Tool preference — Enhanced mode with domain analytics API, or baseline? (see Tool Enhancement above)

Phase 1: Sitemap Crawl

For each competitor, run site-content-catalog:

bash
python3 skills/site-content-catalog/scripts/catalog_content.py \
  --url "<competitor_url>" \
  --output json

Collect:

  • All URLs from sitemap and internal crawl
  • Page titles
  • URL structure/hierarchy
  • Last modified dates (if available)

Phase 2: Pattern Detection

2A: URL Clustering

Group URLs by structural patterns using regex matching:

Pattern RegexExample URLsCategory
/vs/.* or /compare/.*/vs/competitor-a, /vs/competitor-bComparison
/integrations?/.*/integrations/slack, /integrations/hubspotIntegration
/for-.* or /solutions/.*/for-startups, /for-enterpriseVertical
/use-cases?/.*/use-cases/project-managementUse case
/alternatives?(-to)?/.*/alternatives/competitor-aAlternatives
/templates?/.* or /examples?/.*/templates/invoice, /templates/proposalTemplates
/glossary/.* or /what-is/.*/glossary/term-a, /what-is/crmGlossary
/tools?/.* or `/calculat(ore)/.*`/tools/roi-calculator
/blog/.* (exclude from pSEO)/blog/how-to-xEditorial (not pSEO)

For each detected pattern:

  • Page count — How many pages follow this pattern?
  • Data axis — What varies per page? (competitor name, tool name, industry, etc.)
  • URL consistency — Are URLs cleanly structured or messy?
  • Coverage completeness — Have they covered the obvious variations?
2B: Programmatic vs. Editorial Classification

Not every URL pattern is programmatic. Classify each cluster:

  • Programmatic — Clearly templated: consistent URL structure, similar page titles following a pattern, high page count, structured content
  • Semi-programmatic — Template with heavy manual customization
  • Editorial — Individually written, no template pattern
  • Auto-generated — Thin/low-quality programmatic (tag pages, archive pages)

Focus analysis on Programmatic and Semi-programmatic clusters only.

Phase 3: Traffic & Performance Analysis

Enhanced Mode (DataForSEO / SEMrush / Ahrefs)

For each competitor domain, pull organic keywords data:

# DataForSEO example
POST /v3/dataforseo_labs/google/ranked_keywords/live
{
  "target": "competitor.com",
  "filters": [
    ["ranked_serp_element.serp_item.url", "contains", "/vs/"]
  ]
}

Per pattern cluster:

  • Total ranking keywords across all pages in the pattern
  • Estimated monthly organic traffic to the pattern
  • Average ranking position for pages in this pattern
  • Top-performing pages within the pattern (which variations rank best?)
  • Keyword difficulty distribution (are they targeting easy or hard keywords?)
Show full SKILL.md (438 more words)Show less
Baseline Mode

Estimate traffic indicators:

  • Run seo-domain-analyzer for overall domain metrics
  • Spot-check 3-5 pages per pattern via web_search — do they appear in top 10?
  • Check if pages are indexed (site:competitor.com/vs/)
  • Infer relative traffic: pattern page count × indexation rate × domain authority proxy
  • Note: these are directional estimates, not exact numbers

Phase 4: Template Quality Assessment

For each programmatic pattern, fetch 3-5 sample pages via fetch_webpage:

bash
# Pick pages from the pattern — one high-variation, one low-variation, one middle

Evaluate template quality on:

DimensionScore 1-5What to Look For
Content depthWord count, sections, detail level
Unique value per pageDoes each page offer something you can't get from the template alone?
Data richnessTables, comparisons, stats, screenshots
Freshness signalsUpdated dates, current pricing, recent reviews
Internal linkingLinks to related pages, hub structure
CTA integrationContextual CTAs vs. generic banners
Schema markupStructured data, FAQ schema, review schema

Quality tiers:

  • 4-5 avg: Well-executed pSEO — hard to beat without significant differentiation
  • 3-4 avg: Decent but improvable — opportunity to out-template them
  • 1-3 avg: Thin/low-quality — easy to dominate with better content

Phase 5: Gap Analysis

5A: Pattern Coverage Matrix
Pattern TypeCompetitor ACompetitor BCompetitor CYouGap?
vs/ comparisons25 pages ★★★★10 pages ★★★00✓ A leads
integrations/40 pages ★★★60 pages ★★★★20 pages ★★0✓ B leads
for-{industry}/008 pages ★★0✓ Wide open
alternatives/5 pages ★★★000✓ Lightly competed
glossary/100 pages ★★050 pages ★★★0⚠️ Volume play
5B: Variation Gaps

Within each pattern competitors use, find missing variations:

  • Competitors they haven't written vs/ pages for
  • Integrations they support but haven't built pages for
  • Industries they serve but haven't targeted
  • These are your quick-win entries
5C: Pattern White Space

Entire pattern types no competitor has built:

  • Highest opportunity — no one to outrank, first-mover advantage
  • Validate search demand exists (Phase 1D of programmatic-seo-planner)
5D: Quality Gaps

Patterns where competitors have pages but they're low quality:

  • Thin content (< 500 words, no unique data)
  • Outdated (old screenshots, wrong pricing)
  • Missing schema markup
  • No visual differentiation between pages
  • These are "out-template" opportunities

Phase 6: Output

markdown
# Programmatic SEO Competitive Landscape — [Category] — [DATE]

## Competitors Analyzed
- [Competitor A] — [domain metrics, total pages crawled]
- [Competitor B] — [domain metrics, total pages crawled]
- [Competitor C] — [domain metrics, total pages crawled]

## Executive Summary
- [N] programmatic patterns detected across [M] competitors
- Strongest competitor pSEO: [Competitor X] with [pattern] ([N] pages, [quality])
- Biggest opportunity: [pattern type] — [reasoning]
- Quick wins: [N] variation gaps in existing competitor patterns

---

## Pattern-by-Pattern Analysis

### Pattern: [vs/ Comparisons]
**Who's doing it:** [Competitor A (25 pages, ★★★★), Competitor B (10 pages, ★★★)]
**Traffic estimate:** [X monthly visits across pattern] (enhanced) / [directional estimate] (baseline)
**Template quality:** [summary of strengths/weaknesses]
**Top-performing pages:** [specific pages that rank well]
**Variation gaps:** [competitors/variations they're missing]
**Your opportunity:** [specific recommendation]

### Pattern: [integrations/]
...

---

## Opportunity Ranking

| Priority | Pattern | Opportunity Type | Effort | Expected Impact |
|----------|---------|-----------------|--------|----------------|
| P0 | [pattern] | White space — no competitors | Medium | High |
| P0 | [pattern] | Quality gap — beat weak templates | Low | Medium |
| P1 | [pattern] | Variation gap — fill missing pages | Low | Medium |
| P2 | [pattern] | Head-to-head — outrank strong competitor | High | High |

---

## Recommended Action Plan

1. **Immediate (Week 1-2):** Build [pattern] — [rationale]
2. **Short-term (Month 1):** Build [pattern] — [rationale]
3. **Medium-term (Month 2-3):** Build [pattern] — [rationale]

---

## Raw Data
[Link to crawl data, pattern clusters, sample pages analyzed]

Save to the current working directory or wherever the user prefers.

Cost

ComponentCost
Site catalog per competitor (Apify)~$0.05-0.10
SEO domain analyzer per competitor~$0.10-0.20
Page fetches (3-5 per pattern × N patterns)~$0.01-0.05
DataForSEO domain analytics (enhanced)~$0.10-0.50 per competitor
AnalysisFree (LLM reasoning)
Total (baseline, 3 competitors)~$0.50-1.00
Total (enhanced, 3 competitors)~$0.80-2.00

Tools Required

  • Apify API token — APIFY_API_TOKEN env var
  • Upstream skills: site-content-catalog, seo-domain-analyzer, fetch_webpage
  • Optional (enhanced): DataForSEO (DATAFORSEO_LOGIN + DATAFORSEO_PASSWORD), SEMrush (SEMRUSH_API_KEY), Ahrefs (AHREFS_API_TOKEN), or SimilarWeb (SIMILARWEB_API_KEY)

Trigger Phrases

  • "What pSEO are competitors doing?"
  • "Reverse-engineer competitor programmatic pages"
  • "Analyze competitor URL structure"
  • "Find pSEO gaps in our space"
  • "What comparison pages do competitors have?"

© gooseworks-ai, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 1 other file in skills/seo/composites/programmatic-seo-spy of gooseworks-ai/goose-skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • skill.meta.json

Open the folder on GitHubat commit c650c6d

Used in 1 other repository

We found 1 copy of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in gooseworks-ai/goose-skills, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

Programmatic SEO Spy next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Programmatic SEO Spy compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Programmatic SEO Spy this skillgooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.2k1 repos~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Global SEO Growthminhnv0807/ai-business-skills609—~5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Google Search Console Toolgarrettjsmith/localseoskills121—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
SEO AgiLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills2.2k—~6.4kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
SEO Competitor Comparison PagesAgriciDaniel/claude-seo19k5 repos~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Research Keywordsonvoyage-ai/gtm-engineer-skills1.3k—~4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Global SEO Growth

    minhnv0807/ai-business-skills

    Covers six SEO layers for a website: crawl and index audit, local SEO, search-intent content, AI search visibility, schema markup and backlink or directory distribution.

    609 GitHub stars~5k tokensUpdated 29 days ago
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Google Search Console Tool

    garrettjsmith/localseoskills

    When the user wants to know what queries drive traffic to their site, which pages are indexed, click-through rates, organic search performance, or technical indexing issues.

    121 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • SEO Agi

    LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills

    Write SEO pages that rank in Google AND get cited by LLMs (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude).

    2.2k GitHub stars~6.4k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check: notes
  • SEO Competitor Comparison Pages

    AgriciDaniel/claude-seo

    Generates X vs Y comparison pages, alternatives-to-X pages, best-tools roundups and feature-matrix tables, with schema markup and verifiable data rules.

    19k GitHub starsUsed in 5 repos~1.9k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Research Keywords

    onvoyage-ai/gtm-engineer-skills

    Finds high-value SEO and GEO keywords using web search, AI analysis, and optionally paid tools like Ahrefs or Semrush.

    1.3k GitHub stars~4k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Geo Difficulty

    OpenClaudia/openclaudia-skills

    Score how hard a keyword is to rank for in the AI-search era — page-level URL Rating of real competitors (not just domain DR), Ahrefs keyword difficulty, and whether a given site already ranks or is…

    713 GitHub stars~694 tokensUpdated today
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed

More from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

All 273 skills in this repo
  • Reddit Post Finder

    gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

    Scrape and search Reddit posts using Apify. An agent skill from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.2k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Create Image Fal

    gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

    Generate or edit an image via any FAL image model (nano-banana edit, gpt-image, flux, ...), ROUTED THROUGH THE fal-proxy so it bills the Ads agent.

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Render Hook Replacement

    gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

    Replace an existing video's opening with a supplied clip or free kinetic text hook while retaining and verifying every original body frame, audio, captions and ending.

    1.2k GitHub stars~2.3k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Blog Feed Monitor

    gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

    Scrape blog posts via RSS feeds (free, no API key) with Apify fallback for JS-heavy sites.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~578 tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Competitor Post Engagers

    gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

    Find leads by scraping engagers from a competitor's top LinkedIn posts.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.8k tokens
    Auto-check: notes
  • Render Chatgpt Chat

    gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

    Assemble a ChatGPT chat-reveal video ad from a thread + timeline JSON — one continuous Playwright recording of a ChatGPT mobile chat (user types with the iOS keyboard up → taps send → keyboard…

    1.2k GitHub stars~2.3k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed

Works with

Categories

Questions about Programmatic SEO Spy

What does Programmatic SEO Spy do?

Reverse-engineer how competitors do programmatic SEO. An agent skill from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills. Programmatic SEO Spy is an agent skill from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills. Reverse-engineer how competitors do programmatic SEO.

When should I use Programmatic SEO Spy?

Programmatic SEO Spy fits situations like: tasks that involve Programmatic SEO.

How do I install Programmatic SEO Spy in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill programmatic-seo-spy -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/seo/composites/programmatic-seo-spy in gooseworks-ai/goose-skills) into .claude/skills/programmatic-seo-spy in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Programmatic SEO Spy in Codex?

Run `npx skills add gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill programmatic-seo-spy -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/seo/composites/programmatic-seo-spy in gooseworks-ai/goose-skills) into .agents/skills/programmatic-seo-spy in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Programmatic SEO Spy in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill programmatic-seo-spy -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/programmatic-seo-spy, .gemini/skills/programmatic-seo-spy, .github/skills/programmatic-seo-spy and .opencode/skills/programmatic-seo-spy in your project.

What does Programmatic SEO Spy need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Programmatic SEO Spy needs the command-line tools its instructions call (python3) and credentials named DATAFORSEO_PASSWORD, SEMRUSH_API_KEY, AHREFS_API_TOKEN and SIMILARWEB_API_KEY. Our summary lists: Python 3; A credential in SEMRUSH_API_KEY; A credential in AHREFS_API_TOKEN.

Does Programmatic SEO Spy access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Programmatic SEO Spy safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Programmatic SEO Spy use?

Programmatic SEO Spy is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Programmatic SEO Spy use?

About 2.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 12k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Programmatic SEO Spy?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Programmatic SEO Spy: Global SEO Growth (minhnv0807/ai-business-skills, 609 stars), Google Search Console Tool (garrettjsmith/localseoskills, 121 stars), SEO Agi (LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills, 2.2k stars) and SEO Competitor Comparison Pages (AgriciDaniel/claude-seo, 19k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Programmatic SEO Spy?

gooseworks-ai (a GitHub organization) maintains it in gooseworks-ai/goose-skills, which has 1,240 GitHub stars. The repository holds 273 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 8, 2026.

Source: gooseworks-ai/goose-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.