Agent skill

Blue Team

by gaasher in gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills

A skill your agent uses when the user has concrete failing cases in code or a guardrail/classifier/filter/prompt/API they own — a red-team failure catalogue OR a CI/CD test-failure report (failing…

MITAuto-check passedTesting & QA

Install Blue Team

skills CLI
$ npx skills add gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills --skill blue-team -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills blue-team --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/loops/blue-team .claude/skills/blue-team && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
blue-team
GitHub stars
174
Token cost
~3.6k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,718 words
Files
5
Skills in repo
20
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when the user has concrete failing cases in code or a guardrail/classifier/filter/prompt/API they own — a red-team failure catalogue OR a CI/CD test-failure report (failing…

  • Works in 3 steps: Find — red-team runs against the frozen… → Fix (this loop) — patch the target to… → Re-verify — a fresh red-team run against…
  • The user has concrete failing cases in code
  • SKILL.md covers When to use, Setup, The loop and Ledger, plus 3 more sections
  • Runs Python scripts from its folder; calls python3, git and pytest

What it does

Blue Team is an agent skill from gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills. Use when the user has concrete failing cases in code or a guardrail/classifier/filter/prompt/API they own — a red-team failure catalogue OR a CI/CD test-failure report (failing pytest/JUnit tests) — and wants the target patched until those failures are closed without breaking what already works. It points straight at the failed cases (normalize any source with tools/ingest.py), fixes one root-cause class per iteration, and re-checks with tools/verify.py — oracle mode against a red-team oracle, or tests mode…

Its SKILL.md is about 3.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 6 other files (for example `examples/run.example.yaml`, `examples/tests.run.yaml` and `tools/ingest.py`). Compatibility notes: Requires Python 3.9+; git + the gh CLI for the pull-request handoff (degrades to a patch series).

It sits in Testing & QA, covering Unit testing, Red teaming and adversary simulation and Security operations. It works with JUnit and pytest. The repository describes itself as: Loop until it's better — drop-in agentic loops (autoresearch, scientific writing, data analysis, code/SQL/prompt optimization, red-teaming) as open-standard Agent Skills… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • The user has concrete failing cases in code
  • Tasks that involve Unit testing
  • Tasks that involve Red teaming and adversary simulation

Example prompts

  • “/blue-team”

Requirements

  • Python 3
  • Compatibility (from SKILL.md): Requires Python 3.9+; git + the gh CLI for the pull-request handoff (degrades to a patch series).

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Find — red-team runs against the frozen target → failures.jsonl (distinct classes).
  2. Fix (this loop) — patch the target to close those classes under the gate, between red-team
  3. Re-verify — a fresh red-team run against the patched target confirms each class is closed

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit f1169e6. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships script files (Python), which the agent can run.

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • python3
    • git
    • pytest
    • gh

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md. Its commands use git and gh, which can reach the network depending on how they are called.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

  • Compatibility

    Requires Python 3.9+; git + the gh CLI for the pull-request handoff (degrades to a patch series).

    From compatibility in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

Context cost

Blue Team loads about 3.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 234 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,718 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~234
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~3.6k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills at commit f1169e6, republished under its MIT licence (© gaasher). 1,718 words, ~3,583 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/blue-team/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 4 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
blue-team
description
Use when the user has concrete failing cases in code or a guardrail/classifier/filter/prompt/API they own — a red-team failure catalogue OR a CI/CD test-failure report (failing pytest/JUnit tests) — and wants the target patched until those failures are closed without breaking what already works. It points straight at the failed cases (normalize any source with tools/ingest.py), fixes one root-cause class per iteration, and re-checks with tools/verify.py — oracle mode against a red-team oracle, or tests mode against the test suite — keeping a patch only if it closes a class while nothing that passed before regresses, else reverting; loops until every class is closed (dry) or the budget runs out, then opens a pull request with the patch set. The defensive fixer half of a find→fix setup. Not for discovering new failures (that is red-team), and not for editing the oracle, tests, or holdout that define ground truth.
compatibility
Requires Python 3.9+; git + the gh CLI for the pull-request handoff (degrades to a patch series).
metadata.version
0.1.0

Blue Team

A defensive fixer loop — the inverse of red-team. The artifact is the target, now writable; the feedback signal is two-part, like optimize-loop: a gate that must hold (nothing that passed before regresses) and a metric that must drop (the count of open failure classes, toward zero). You point it at a set of concrete failed cases and fix them one root-cause class at a time. Each iteration you patch one class, then run tools/verify.py, and keep the patch only if it closes the class with no regression, else revert. You loop until every class is closed (dry) or the budget runs out, then hand the patch set off as a pull request. This is the fix half of a find→fix setup (see Pairing).

The failed cases come from a real source; tools/ingest.py normalizes any of them into one catalogue:

  • oracle mode — a red-team failures.jsonl: each case is an input where the target's verdict disagrees with a ground-truth oracle. A case is closed when target and oracle now agree; a regression is a benign <holdout> input that newly disagrees (most often a new over-block).
  • tests mode — a CI/CD test-failure report (pytest --junitxml / JUnit XML, or a list of failing node ids): each case is a failing test. A case is closed when its test now passes; a regression is any other test that was passing and now fails.

When to use

Use to fix a concrete set of failing cases in code or a guardrail/classifier/filter/prompt/API the user owns — a red-team catalogue, or the failing tests from a CI run — driving the open-class count to zero without breaking what worked. A class is the root-cause group the loop closes as a unit (a red-team technique, or a CI failure area / test class).

Default: pick the mode that matches the source (oracle for red-team, tests for CI/CD). Escape hatch: in oracle mode with no separate functional test suite, the <holdout> alone is the regression guard; in tests mode the suite's own previously-passing tests are the guard. Not for finding new failures (run red-team), and not for editing the ground truth (the oracle, the tests, or the holdout).

Setup

Resolve bindings interactively. If loop.run.yaml exists, load it, confirm the values in one line, and skip to the loop. Otherwise: on Claude Code (the AskUserQuestion tool is available) infer a likely value per binding and recommend it; on other hosts ask each as a quoted prompt. Then write loop.run.yaml and confirm before creating any other files. Two worked configs: examples/run.example.yaml (oracle mode) and examples/tests.run.yaml (tests mode).

bindingmeaningdefaulthow to infer
<source>where the failed cases come from: oracle (red-team) or tests (CI/CD)—red-team failures.jsonl → oracle; failing pytest/JUnit → tests
<target_files>the file(s) the loop may edit to fix the target—the source/guardrail/classifier behind the failures
<catalogue>the failed cases to close, JSONL; build it with tools/ingest.py (see below)<sandbox_root>/catalogue.jsonlred-team's <failures_log>, or a JUnit report
<oracle_cmd>(oracle mode) ground-truth verdict (frozen), same stdin→verdict contract as red-team—a reference checker / policy impl
<holdout>(oracle mode) benign inputs that must keep passing (regression guard)<sandbox_root>/holdout.jsonlknown-good inputs the oracle agrees on
<test_cmd>(tests mode) runs the suite and writes a JUnit XML; regressions read from it—pytest --junitxml=<junit> (or any runner that emits JUnit)
<junit>(tests mode) path to the JUnit XML <test_cmd> writes<sandbox_root>/junit.xml—
<iter_strategy>branches (one commit per kept fix → feeds the PR) or snapshots (folder per iter)branchesdirty / non-git tree → snapshots
<pr_branch>branch the fixes land on and the PR opens fromblue-team/<tag>today's date as <tag>
<sandbox_root>where snapshots + the ledger live./sandbox—
<budget>max iterations8—
<patience>give up on one class after N failed attempts → mark it a residual3—

<skill_dir> is this skill's installed folder; substitute the real path when writing loop.run.yaml.

Build the catalogue first with tools/ingest.py, which normalizes any source into {id, ..., class}:

python3 <skill_dir>/tools/ingest.py --from red-team --in <failures.jsonl> --out <catalogue>   # oracle mode
python3 <skill_dir>/tools/ingest.py --from junit    --in <report.xml>     --out <catalogue>   # tests mode

The signal each iteration is tools/verify.py, in the mode matching <source>:

# oracle mode — <target_cmd> runs <target_files>, e.g. "python3 ./guardrail.py"
python3 <skill_dir>/tools/verify.py --target "<target_cmd>" --oracle "<oracle_cmd>" \
  --catalogue <catalogue> --holdout <holdout>
# tests mode — <test_cmd> writes the JUnit report verify.py then reads
python3 <skill_dir>/tools/verify.py --test-cmd "<test_cmd>" --junit <junit> --catalogue <catalogue>

Either way it prints one JSON object: {mode, open_classes, closed_classes, open_count, closed_count, regressions, regression_count, still_failing}.

The loop

Copy this checklist and tick items off:

  • Iteration 0 — baseline: run tools/verify.py in the <source> mode; record the open classes (should match the catalogue) as the current state and confirm regression_count is 0 — if it is not, the catalogue or holdout is dirty, so fix that before fixing the target. Log the baseline row. Save a pristine copy of <target_files> to <sandbox_root>/iter0/ (snapshots mode) or note the branch base (branches mode) — this is the baseline the final handoff diffs against, and also the snapshot iteration 1 reverts to.
  • In branches mode, open the run on a fresh branch: git checkout -b <pr_branch>.
  • For iteration N (≥1): snapshot the current, pre-patch <target_files> to iter<N>/ (or note the git HEAD) before editing, so a discard can restore exactly this state.
  • Pick one open class. Read its still_failing examples + the suggested fix from the catalogue, and patch <target_files> at the root cause — one fix should close all payloads of that class (e.g. normalize case once, not per-keyword). One class per iteration so each delta is attributable.
  • Check the signal: run tools/verify.py. Discard — restore the snapshot / git reset --hard — if regression_count > 0 (the gate) or the targeted class is still open. verify.py's regression check is the gate: in oracle mode a regression is a newly-broken <holdout> case (e.g. a fix that closes a bypass by over-blocking benign inputs); in tests mode it is any previously-passing test the patch broke.
  • Keep if there are no regressions and open_count strictly dropped. In branches mode commit it: git commit -am "close <class>: <one-line fix>". Append a ledger row.
  • If a class resists <patience> attempts, mark it an open residual and move on rather than thrashing. Stop when open_count = 0 (dry), at <budget>, or when every remaining class is a residual. <budget> counts attempts (each keep or discard is one iteration), not classes closed — a discard still consumes the budget.

On stop, restore the working files to the best iteration (most classes closed, zero regressions) and report: classes closed vs residual, the failures resolved (oracle mode: the bypass/over-block split), and regressions avoided. Then open the pull request (see Handoff).

Fix toolkit. In tests mode the patches are ordinary bug-fixes, grouped by failure area and applied one area per iteration. In oracle mode (hardening a guardrail/filter), reach for these root-cause patterns, mirroring red-team's attack toolkit:

  • Normalize before matching — case-fold, de-leet (homoglyph/leet → letters), strip spacing and punctuation, NFKC-normalize unicode. One normalization step closes case / leetspeak / spacing classes.
  • Broaden the policy — add missing synonyms/expansions to the blocked set (the missing-synonym class), keyed to the oracle's categories, not ad-hoc strings.
  • Tighten over-broad rules — scope a match to whole words / the right context so benign inputs stop tripping it (the overblock class), the most common source of regressions.

Mind the interaction order (both modes): make the narrowing/over-broad fix before a sweeping one. A fix that strips separators (closing spacing) can re-collapse a benign input into an over-broad substring and silently reopen an overblock class — and likewise a broad code change can reopen a test a narrower fix had to protect. Fix the narrow/over-broad case first, then generalize.

Show full SKILL.md (537 more words)Show less

Ledger

<sandbox_root>/ledger.tsv, tab-separated, never commas in the description. regr = regression_count this iteration (the gate: 0 is clean); status ∈ {keep,discard,baseline,residual}. Header iter class_targeted regr open_classes status description:

iter	class_targeted	regr	open_classes	status	description
0	-	0	5	baseline	catalogue: 5 open classes
1	case-bypass	0	4	keep	case-fold the input before matching
2	leetspeak	1	4	discard	de-leet regex also over-blocked a holdout input (regression)
3	leetspeak	0	3	keep	de-leet via translate table, holdout clean
4	missing-synonym	0	2	keep	add passphrase/credentials/api-key to the policy set
5	overblock	0	1	keep	require whole-word "secret key", not bare "secret"
6	spacing	0	0	keep	strip non-alphanumerics before matching — dry

Report the best iteration (open_classes lowest with regr 0), not necessarily the last.

Constraints

  • Only edit <target_files>. The ground truth — the oracle + <holdout> (oracle mode) or the test suite (tests mode) — and tools/verify.py are frozen; editing what measures the fix manufactures a pass (same rule as red-team and optimize-loop). If the oracle or a test is itself wrong, that is a finding to report, not something to patch here.
  • Fix the root cause, not the payload. One fix should close every item of a class; patching a single example string while siblings still fail means the class is not closed. This mirrors red-team's class accounting, so the two loops agree on what "closed" means.
  • The regression gate is non-negotiable. A patch that breaks something that passed before — a new over-block/bypass (oracle mode) or a previously-passing test (tests mode) — is a regression, not progress; revert it regardless of how many classes it closes. Prefer a narrower fix over a sweeping one.
  • One class per iteration, so each delta is attributable and a bad fix is cheap to revert.
  • Keep changes within the project's existing dependency set (stdlib is fine); stay inside the repo and <sandbox_root>; do not pause the loop to ask whether to continue — run until dry, budget, or residuals.

Handoff: the pull request

The deliverable is a human-reviewable pull request — the communication interface to whoever owns the target (a human keeps final approval, as with Copilot Autofix). On stop, with the working tree at the best iteration:

  • In branches mode each kept fix is already a commit on <pr_branch> whose message names the class + the one-line fix. Push and open the PR with gh pr create, body = the ledger (catalogue → fixes, classes closed, residuals listed, regressions avoided) and one reproducible example per closed class.
  • Confirm once before opening the PR — pushing a branch and creating a PR is outward-facing; never auto-push silently.
  • Degrade, don't fail: if there is no remote or gh is unavailable/unauthed, still produce the handoff — leave the commits on <pr_branch>, write git format-patch output and a PR_BODY.md into <sandbox_root>, and tell the user the single command to open the PR themselves. In snapshots mode (no git), emit a unified diff of <target_files> against the iter0/ baseline copy, plus PR_BODY.md, instead.

Pairing

This skill is the fixer — the back half of a find→fix loop. It assumes a catalogue already exists; by itself it closes classes but does not search for new ones.

  1. Find — red-team runs against the frozen target → failures.jsonl (distinct classes).
  2. Fix (this loop) — patch the target to close those classes under the gate, between red-team runs, never inside one.
  3. Re-verify — a fresh red-team run against the patched target confirms each class is closed and surfaces any new class the fix introduced (the regression gate already guards the over-block direction within this loop).

Keep the two agents independent — the attacker that wrote the catalogue should not grade its own patch. The purple-team loop orchestrates the full find → fix → re-verify cycle until a fresh find stays dry; this skill deliberately covers only the fix phase.

© gaasher, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 4 other files in loops/blue-team of gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • examples/run.example.yaml
  • examples/tests.run.yaml
  • tools/ingest.py
  • tools/verify.py

Open the folder on GitHubat commit f1169e6

Compare with similar skills

Blue Team next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Blue Team compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Blue Team this skillgaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills174—~3.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Debug Playwright Prowquay/quay2.8k—~2.2kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Run Testsrunceel/ReactiveProperty944—~3.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
MAUI PR Test Failure Reviewdotnet/maui23k—~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Map Debugazalio/map-framework156—~4.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Map Debugazalio/map-framework156—~4.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Deep-dive diagnosis of a Playwright test failure already isolated to one Quay Prow/OpenShift CI run: downloads its GCS artifacts (results.json, JUnit, build/pod logs, Jaeger traces), classifies real…

    2.8k GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated today
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed
  • Run Tests

    runceel/ReactiveProperty

    Runs .NET tests with dotnet test. An agent skill from runceel/ReactiveProperty.

    944 GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed
  • Official

    Reads CI results for a dotnet/maui pull request and reports in one short comment whether the failures relate to the PR or to the base branch.

    23k GitHub stars~3.5k tokensUpdated today
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed
  • Map Debug

    azalio/map-framework

    Structured MAP debugging via decomposer, actor, and monitor agents.

    156 GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed
  • Map Debug

    azalio/map-framework

    Structured MAP debugging via task-decomposer, actor, and monitor agents.

    156 GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed
  • TDD Guide

    alirezarezvani/claude-skills

    Test-driven development skill for writing unit tests, generating test fixtures and mocks, analyzing coverage gaps, and guiding red-green-refactor workflows across Jest, Pytest, JUnit, Vitest, and…

    28k GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed

More from gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills

All 20 skills in this repo
  • Alpha Evolve

    gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when the user wants to evolve an ML model/program through population-based search rather than a single sequential refine loop — a generational evolution where parallel…

    174 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Anomaly Investigation

    gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when the user has a known, already-observed anomaly in their data — a metric spike or drop, an outlier, an unexpected number — and wants its root cause diagnosed, not guessed.

    174 GitHub stars~2.1k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Data Analysis

    gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when the user wants an iterative, self-checking exploratory analysis of a dataset — surfacing findings that are each verified by re-running the computation, not asserted.

    174 GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Hypothesis Gen

    gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when the user wants to generate and literature-vet a pool of novel, testable research hypotheses for a question or domain.

    174 GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Karpathy

    gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when the user wants the LLM to do its own ML research: a fully-autonomous loop that hacks the training code, runs it, and keeps changes that lower a single scalar metric (e.g.

    174 GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Dueling Autoresearch

    gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when the user wants two approaches raced head-to-head on a single shared metric — e.g.

    174 GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Auto-check: warnings

Works with

Questions about Blue Team

What does Blue Team do?

A skill your agent uses when the user has concrete failing cases in code or a guardrail/classifier/filter/prompt/API they own — a red-team failure catalogue OR a CI/CD test-failure report (failing…. Blue Team is an agent skill from gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills. Use when the user has concrete failing cases in code or a guardrail/classifier/filter/prompt/API they own — a red-team failure catalogue OR a CI/CD test-failure report (failing pytest/JUnit tests) — and wants the target patched until those failures are closed without breaking what already works.

When should I use Blue Team?

Blue Team fits situations like: the user has concrete failing cases in code; tasks that involve Unit testing; tasks that involve Red teaming and adversary simulation.

How do I install Blue Team in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills --skill blue-team -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (loops/blue-team in gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills) into .claude/skills/blue-team in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Blue Team in Codex?

Run `npx skills add gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills --skill blue-team -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (loops/blue-team in gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills) into .agents/skills/blue-team in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Blue Team in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills --skill blue-team -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/blue-team, .gemini/skills/blue-team, .github/skills/blue-team and .opencode/skills/blue-team in your project.

What does Blue Team need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Blue Team needs Python for the scripts in its folder and the command-line tools its instructions call (python3, git, pytest and gh). Our summary lists: Python 3. Compatibility (from SKILL.md): Requires Python 3.9+; git + the gh CLI for the pull-request handoff (degrades to a patch series)..

Does Blue Team access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Its commands use git and gh, which can reach the network depending on how they are called. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Blue Team safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Blue Team use?

Blue Team is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Blue Team use?

About 3.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 14k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Blue Team?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Blue Team: Debug Playwright Prow (quay/quay, 2.8k stars), Run Tests (runceel/ReactiveProperty, 944 stars), MAUI PR Test Failure Review (dotnet/maui, 23k stars) and Map Debug (azalio/map-framework, 156 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Blue Team?

gaasher (a GitHub user) maintains it in gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills, which has 174 GitHub stars. The repository holds 20 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on June 30, 2026.

Source: gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.