Agent skill

Frb Fix CI

by fzyzcjy in fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge

A skill your agent uses when CI fails in flutterrustbridge - before deep investigation

MITAuto-check passedMobile

Install Frb Fix CI

skills CLI
$ npx skills add fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge --skill frb-fix-ci -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge frb-fix-ci --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/.claude/skills/frb-fix-ci .claude/skills/frb-fix-ci && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
frb-fix-ci
GitHub stars
5.4k
Token cost
~4.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
2,020 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
28
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when CI fails in flutterrustbridge - before deep investigation

  • Works in 5 steps: Check the latest relevant run or job… → If the failure looks flaky, rerun only… → Reproduce the exact failing… → …
  • CI fails in flutterrustbridge - before deep investigation
  • SKILL.md covers Overview, Triage Order, Quick Reference and Dependency Order, plus 4 more sections
  • Calls git, dart and gh

What it does

Frb Fix CI is an agent skill from fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge. Use when CI fails in flutterrustbridge - before deep investigation

Its SKILL.md is about 4.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Mobile, covering Failing and flaky tests and Cross-platform mobile apps. It works with Flutter and Rust. The repository describes itself as: Flutter/Dart <- Rust binding generator, feature-rich, but seamless and simple. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • CI fails in flutterrustbridge - before deep investigation
  • Tasks that involve Failing and flaky tests
  • Tasks that involve Cross-platform mobile apps

Example prompts

  • “/frb-fix-ci”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Check the latest relevant run or job first. Do not reason from stale CI state.
  2. If the failure looks flaky, rerun only the failed jobs.
  3. Reproduce the exact failing ./frb_internal ... command from CI, using frb-dev-env and the active user's environment rules.
  4. Decide where the failure sits in the dependency graph: is it more likely a prerequisite cause (Generate, Integrate, or a high-relevance…
  5. Only do deeper debugging after you have ruled out flakes, stale runs, and failure propagation.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 848e438. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • git
    • dart
    • gh
    • cargo

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md. Its commands use git and gh, which can reach the network depending on how they are called.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Frb Fix CI loads about 4.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 20 tokens; SKILL.md has 2,020 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~20
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge at commit 848e438, republished under its MIT licence (© fzyzcjy). 2,020 words, ~4,394 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/frb-fix-ci/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
frb-fix-ci
description
Use when CI fails in flutter_rust_bridge - before deep investigation

FRB Fix CI

Note: Read frb-dev-env before running commands and follow the active user's environment rules. Note: When reproducing FRB failures remotely, do not run multiple remote commands in parallel against the same workspace/container. Serialize them unless you have isolated workspaces.

Overview

CI failures in flutter_rust_bridge often have simple fixes. Try the appropriate approach below before deep investigation.

Core principle: Start with lazy fixes (re-run, copy diff, --fix) before expensive investigation.

If the CI failure or PR state is caused by merge/rebase conflicts, especially conflicts in generated files after master and a PR both added tests or APIs, read the /frb-fix-merge-conflict skill before resolving them.

Triage Order

Use this order before diving into individual failure types:

  1. Check the latest relevant run or job first. Do not reason from stale CI state.
  2. If the failure looks flaky, rerun only the failed jobs.
  3. Reproduce the exact failing ./frb_internal ... command from CI, using frb-dev-env and the active user's environment rules. If reproducing remotely, keep one remote workspace single-writer: do not run multiple FRB reproduction commands in parallel against that same workspace. Also do not trust a dirty remote workspace by default: FRB remote runs often leave stray generated or untracked files behind, so prefer git reset --hard HEAD && git clean -fdx before a meaningful reproduction.
  4. Decide where the failure sits in the dependency graph: is it more likely a prerequisite cause (Generate, Integrate, or a high-relevance Generate Internal stage) or a downstream symptom (Build :: Flutter, native tests)?
  5. Only do deeper debugging after you have ruled out flakes, stale runs, and failure propagation.
Checking the Right Run

Do not answer from stale CI state. Read the latest relevant run or job information first.

Temporary CI Narrowing

When CI feedback is slow and only one job family matters for the current investigation, read frb-ci-filter before using ci_filter, the ci-manual-dispatch label, or related workflow configuration.

Quick Reference

SymptomFix
Flaky test (passes sometimes)gh run rerun --failed
Git diff shown in CIgit apply OR regenerate
Lint/format errorsAdd --fix flag
Can't reproduce locallyUse same ./frb_internal command from CI, following frb-dev-env

Dependency Order

When several related jobs are failing, use this dependency graph instead of treating all failures as peers:

Legend: rectangles are files or directories. Ovals are CI operations. In each oval, the first line is the CI job name and the second line in parentheses is the corresponding ./frb_internal ... command when there is one.

mermaid
flowchart LR
    CodegenSources["frb_codegen/src/** + codegen config"]
    Versions["pinned Flutter / Dart / Rust versions"]
    Templates["frb_codegen/assets/integration_template/**"]
    Cargokit["cargokit"]
    PureDart["frb_example/pure_dart/**"]
    GeneratedOutputs["frb_example/**/frb_generated.*"]
    PureDartGenerated["frb_example/pure_dart/**/frb_generated.*"]
    ExampleOutputs["integrate outputs under frb_example/**"]
    PureDartPde["frb_example/pure_dart_pde/**"]
    PureDartPdeGenerated["frb_example/pure_dart_pde/**/frb_generated.*"]
    NativeTests(["Test :: Flutter :: Native::*\n(./frb_internal test-flutter-native ...)"])

    Generate(["Generate :: FRB Codegen :: Command Generate\n(./frb_internal generate-run-frb-codegen-command-generate)"])
    Integrate(["Generate :: FRB Codegen :: Command Integrate\n(./frb_internal generate-run-frb-codegen-command-integrate)"])
    Build(["Build :: Flutter\n(./frb_internal build-flutter ...)"])

    subgraph GenerateInternal["Generate Internal stages"]
        GenerateInternalPureDart(["Generate Internal :: frb_example pure_dart chain\n(./frb_internal generate-internal-frb-example-pure-dart)"])
        GenerateInternalRust(["Generate Internal :: Rust\n(./frb_internal generate-internal-rust)"])
        GenerateInternalOther(["Other internal stages\n(book-help / dart-source /\nbuild-runner / contributor / readme)"])
    end

    CodegenSources -->|used by| Generate
    Versions -->|used by| Generate
    Generate -->|writes| GeneratedOutputs

    CodegenSources -->|used by| GenerateInternalPureDart
    Versions -->|used by| GenerateInternalPureDart
    PureDart -->|read by| GenerateInternalPureDart
    GenerateInternalPureDart -->|rewrites| PureDart
    GenerateInternalPureDart -->|derives| PureDartPde
    GenerateInternalPureDart -->|writes| PureDartGenerated
    GenerateInternalPureDart -->|writes| PureDartPdeGenerated

    CodegenSources -->|used by| GenerateInternalRust
    Versions -->|used by| GenerateInternalRust
    Versions -->|used by| GenerateInternalOther

    CodegenSources -->|used by| Integrate
    Versions -->|used by| Integrate
    Templates -->|used by| Integrate
    Cargokit -->|used by| Integrate
    Integrate -->|writes| ExampleOutputs

    GeneratedOutputs -->|consumed by| Build
    GeneratedOutputs -->|consumed by| NativeTests
    PureDartGenerated -->|consumed by| Build
    PureDartPdeGenerated -->|consumed by| Build
    ExampleOutputs -->|consumed by| Build
    ExampleOutputs -->|consumed by| NativeTests
How to Read

Read the graph as artifact and input dependencies, not as a literal GitHub Actions job graph.

Key Chains
  • frb_codegen/assets/integration_template/ + cargokit -> integrate outputs under frb_example/** If Flutter integrate examples, example platform files, Build :: Flutter, and native Flutter tests regress together, suspect these template inputs first. Do not hand-edit generated example outputs. If the bug is actually inside the embedded cargokit submodule, it is acceptable to edit that submodule directly and push to fzyzcjy/cargokit, then update the submodule ref.
  • Apple scaffold under integrate examples: when Linux-side raw create/integrate does not reproduce checked-in Apple files such as .metadata iOS stanzas, ios/**, example/ios/**, macos/Podfile, or Apple-specific pubspec.yaml fragments, do not treat that as proof the checked-in files are wrong. In this repo, checked-in mac-generated Apple scaffold may be the source of truth, and Linux integrate may explicitly apply it before diff comparison.
  • Generate Internal + frb_example/pure_dart/** -> frb_example/pure_dart_pde/** If pure_dart_pde is failing, do not only refresh pure_dart_pde. First check whether ./frb_internal generate-internal-frb-example-pure-dart --set-exit-if-changed ... is still changing frb_example/pure_dart.
When to Consult

Use this graph when several nearby categories start failing together in the same run, especially when earlier nodes such as Generate, Integrate, or the high-relevance Generate Internal stages are already red and later failures look consistent with missing, stale, or mismatched generated files or platform files.

Rule

Prefer fixing prerequisite nodes before symptom nodes. If a prerequisite node is still unstable, treat later failures as propagated symptoms until proven otherwise. If this pattern keeps repeating across multiple commits or CI runs, jump to Whack-a-Mole Prevention.

Whack-a-Mole Prevention

This section is about history across multiple commits or CI runs, not a single failing job.

Use it when the same area keeps becoming green and then red again, especially with commits like refresh, regenerate, sync, and revert.

What this usually means:

  • You may be chasing generated outputs instead of fixing their source inputs
  • A prerequisite node on the dependency graph is still unstable
  • A temporary green run may only mean one symptom was suppressed, not that the root cause was fixed

What to do:

  • Stop adding more generated-output-only sync commits by default
  • Go back to the dependency graph and identify the unstable source of truth first: frb_codegen/src/**, frb_codegen/assets/integration_template/**, pinned Flutter/Dart/Rust versions, generation order, or package relationship
  • Only accept regenerated outputs after that source node is stable in a clean matching environment
  • If you have already accepted two package-level Generate sync commits with very similar generated Dart drift in one session or across adjacent CI runs, stop the package-by-package loop and escalate to a clean remote ./frb_internal precommit-generate

Common FRB patterns:

  • Flutter integrate examples: suspect frb_codegen/assets/integration_template/ and cargokit; do not hand-edit generated example outputs. If the real fix belongs in cargokit, patch the submodule and update its ref instead of only patching copied outputs.
  • pure_dart and pure_dart_pde: if both are moving, stabilize frb_example/pure_dart first and treat pure_dart_pde as a dependent output
  • Repeated Generate failures across different example packages: if the same Generate :: FRB Codegen :: Command Generate symptom keeps rotating across packages with similar generated Dart diffs, stop fixing one package at a time. Re-run clean remote ./frb_internal precommit-generate and treat that full run as the source of truth for the whole Generate chain. Only after that full run stabilizes should you accept any remaining per-package tail diff. Practical cutoff: after two similar package-level sync fixes, the burden of proof switches. Do not add a third similar package sync until you have checked whether clean remote precommit-generate collapses the whole diff surface.
Escalation Protocol for Repeated Generate Drift

Trigger this protocol if both are true:

  • Two or more example packages fail in the same Generate :: FRB Codegen :: Command Generate family across the current session or adjacent CI runs
  • The diffs are mostly generated Dart outputs such as frb_generated.dart, frb_generated.io.dart, frb_generated.web.dart, generated API wrapper files, or nearby formatting/layout churn, with no evidence yet of a package-specific semantic bug or hand-written file change

Then do this, in order:

  1. Stop accepting more package-by-package sync commits
  2. Run clean remote ./frb_internal precommit-generate
  3. Pull back the remote workspace
  4. Inspect the full diff surface
  5. If the full diff surface collapses to one small tail package, accept that tail from this same clean run
  6. If the diff surface is still broad, treat precommit-generate as the authoritative Generate source and debug the shared generation workflow before touching more package-level symptoms
  7. Do not resume package-by-package syncs unless a clearly different failure class appears

Example:

  • If dart_minimal, then rust_ui_counter--ui, then gallery fail in separate Generate jobs with similar generated Dart drift, stop after the second one and escalate to clean remote precommit-generate

Fixes by Failure Type

Flaky Test

Sometimes CI fails due to timing issues, not real bugs. Rerun only failed jobs:

bash
gh run rerun --failed

If it passes on retry -> flaky, not your bug.

Show full SKILL.md (824 more words)Show less
Git Diff Errors

When CI shows a diff, you have two options:

Option A: git apply (faster)

CI already ran the generator. Just apply what it computed:

bash
# Copy the diff from CI, then:
pbpaste | git apply   # macOS

Option B: Regenerate (slower but more "proper")

bash
./frb_internal precommit-generate

After codegen: Follow frb-dev-env and verify generated output is present in the selected worktree before reviewing the diff.

Both are correct. Option A is faster; Option B is more thorough.

Do not hand-edit generated files as the final fix.

You may use CI diffs only as a diagnosis aid to understand what changed, but the final accepted output should come from re-running the appropriate generation workflow in a clean matching environment.

Can't Reproduce Locally

CI shows the command it ran. Read frb-dev-env before running it.

Before reproducing, make sure the toolchain versions match CI closely enough to be meaningful. In practice this usually means Flutter, Dart, Rust, cargo subcommands, and any pinned template or helper dependency should match the versions used by CI.

If reproducing remotely, clean the remote workspace first unless you have a specific reason not to. In FRB this often matters because old generated files and untracked outputs can survive earlier runs and create fake diffs:

bash
git reset --hard HEAD && git clean -fdx

Then run the same command:

bash
# CI shows: ./frb_internal test-dart --package frb_example/pure_dart
./frb_internal test-dart --package frb_example/pure_dart
Lint/Format Errors

For clippy, dart analyze, or format errors, use --fix:

bash
./frb_internal lint --fix

This runs:

  • cargo clippy --fix - Rust lint fixes
  • cargo fmt - Rust format
  • dart format - Dart format
  • dart fix --apply - Dart auto fixes

When lint/format failures happen on generated files, do not default to hand-editing those files just to match formatter output.

Instead:

  • Compare the formatter inputs across branch head, PR merge ref, and remote workspace
  • Check whether generation order, hidden generation steps, or toolchain/environment drift changed the generated file before formatter ran
  • Only accept formatter output after confirming the pre-format generated input is actually the correct one
Command Integrate Failures

When Generate :: FRB Codegen :: Command Integrate fails because integrated output is wrong, do not hand-edit the generated integrate example outputs.

Instead:

  • Fix the source templates under frb_codegen/assets/integration_template/
  • If the bad logic is inside the embedded cargokit submodule, fix and push fzyzcjy/cargokit, then update the submodule ref
  • Re-run integrate generation after updating the templates

Special case: Apple scaffold

  • If Linux-side raw create/integrate drops checked-in Apple files, do not describe the current fix as "restoring old scaffold" unless it really is an accidental workaround.
  • First check whether the repo intentionally treats checked-in mac-generated Apple scaffold as source of truth.
  • If that is the contract, prefer names and comments like "apply checked-in Apple scaffold source of truth" over vague restore/preserve wording.
Generate-caused Failures

If CI previously failed mainly in Generate while other jobs passed, and after accepting generated changes additional non-Generate jobs start failing, treat this as strong evidence that the accepted generated outputs are incorrect or incomplete.

In that situation:

  • Do not continue fixing downstream failures one by one first
  • First validate the generation logic or generation workflow
  • Re-generate from a clean environment
  • Only accept generated outputs after confirming they do not introduce new non-Generate regressions

If the symptom is not one package but a sequence of packages failing with very similar generated Dart drift, prefer validating clean remote ./frb_internal precommit-generate before accepting more package-by-package sync commits.

If clean remote precommit-generate reduces the remaining diff surface to one small tail package, accept that tail from the same clean run and rerun CI. Do not go back into a long per-package loop unless a new failure class appears.

Dart Web Browser Startup Flakes

When Test :: Dart :: Web (...) fails after the web build and server startup already succeeded, and the failure is:

text
Exception: Websocket url not found.

treat it as a likely browser / puppeteer startup flake first, not an immediate code regression.

In that situation:

  • Do not assume the generated code or test logic is broken just from this error
  • Check whether wasm build, dart compile js, and local web server startup already succeeded
  • Prefer rerunning only the failed job first
  • Only start code investigation if the same job keeps failing with the same error repeatedly

Common Mistakes

  • Investigating root cause when a simple re-run would work
  • Not trying git apply first when CI provides a diff
  • Fixing many new downstream test/build failures one by one after accepting generated changes, when CI previously failed mainly in Generate
  • Hand-editing generated files to chase CI formatter output before checking whether CI, merge ref, and remote environments are formatting the same input
  • Hand-editing integrate-generated example outputs instead of fixing frb_codegen/assets/integration_template/
  • Assuming cargokit submodule changes are off-limits when the real bug is there
  • Chasing repeated refresh/regenerate/sync diffs without re-checking the upstream generation inputs
  • Continuing package-by-package Generate sync commits after two similar generated Dart drifts, instead of escalating to clean remote precommit-generate
  • Fixing downstream build/test jobs before upstream generate/integrate/high-relevance generate-internal stages are stable
  • Answering from stale CI state instead of reading the latest relevant run or job information first
  • Forgetting to remove ci-manual-dispatch and rerun normal CI before treating the PR as ready
  • frb-code-generation - Which generation commands to run
  • frb-debugging - Deep debugging when simple fixes don't work

© fzyzcjy, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in .claude/skills/frb-fix-ci of fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 848e438

Compare with similar skills

Frb Fix CI next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Frb Fix CI compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Frb Fix CI this skillfzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge5.4k—~4.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Green GateVeryGoodOpenSource/vgv-ai-flutter-plugin170—~4.7kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Mock Call Count Retry Fallbackdivinevideo/divine-mobile266—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassMPL-2.0
Mockito Stale Mock Silent Trycatch Failuredivinevideo/divine-mobile266—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMPL-2.0
Analyze GitHub Flakeflutter/flutter180k—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassBSD-3-Clause
Puremusicqingyueyin/Pure-music188—~907Automated safety check: PassGPL-3.0

Similar skills

  • Green Gate

    VeryGoodOpenSource/vgv-ai-flutter-plugin

    Drives a Dart or Flutter package fully green through a verify-fix-rerun loop across four gates: analyze, format, test, coverage.

    170 GitHub stars~4.7k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    MobileAuto-check: notes
  • Mock Call Count Retry Fallback

    divinevideo/divine-mobile

    Fix test failures when adding retry/fallback logic causes mock call count mismatches.

    266 GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated yesterday
    MobileAuto-check passed
  • Fix misleading Flutter/Dart test failures where expected data is empty ([]) or default values instead of the mocked response, caused by stale Mockito generated mocks or missing stubs being silently…

    266 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    MobileAuto-check passed
  • Analyze GitHub Flake

    flutter/flutter

    Expertise in analyzing flake github issues in the flutter/flutter repository.

    180k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated today
    MobileAuto-check passed
  • Puremusic

    qingyueyin/Pure-music

    Pure-music 项目开发指南,覆盖 Windows Flutter/Dart 前端、Rust 后端、音频播放、歌词解析与渲染、桌面歌词、主题背景、设置、FFI、文档和测试。处理此仓库的代码理解、问题诊断、功能开发、缺陷修复、性能优化或代码审查时使用。

    188 GitHub stars~907 tokensUpdated today
    MobileAuto-check passed
  • Diagnosing Bugs

    getsentry/sentry-dart

    Official

    A discipline for hard bugs, flaky tests, CI hangs, and performance regressions in this SDK.

    873 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed

More from fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge

All 28 skills in this repo
  • Frb Add Contributor

    fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge

    Add or reconcile flutterrustbridge contributors through all-contributors PRs.

    5.4k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Frb Android Emulator Prepare

    fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge

    A skill your agent uses when preparing, installing, diagnosing, or explaining the host Android Emulator environment for flutterrustbridge local runtime validation, including Android SDK command-line…

    5.4k GitHub stars~2.1k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check: notes
  • Frb Cargokit Dev

    fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge

    Develop or update CargoKit for flutterrustbridge. An agent skill from fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge.

    5.4k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Frb Categorize Code Diff

    fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge

    A skill your agent uses when classifying a flutterrustbridge branch or PR diff into test and non-test changes, including colocated Rust test modules.

    5.4k GitHub stars~524 tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Frb CI Filter

    fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge

    A skill your agent uses when running focused flutterrustbridge GitHub Actions CI via cifilter, adding/removing the ci-manual-dispatch PR label, choosing exact CI jobs or matrix entries, documenting…

    5.4k GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Frb Code Generation

    fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge

    A skill your agent uses when modifying Rust APIs, codegen, generated examples, or platform scaffolds in flutterrustbridge to select generation commands and preserve source-of-truth and convergence…

    5.4k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed

Works with

Questions about Frb Fix CI

What does Frb Fix CI do?

A skill your agent uses when CI fails in flutterrustbridge - before deep investigation. Frb Fix CI is an agent skill from fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge.

When should I use Frb Fix CI?

Frb Fix CI fits situations like: CI fails in flutterrustbridge - before deep investigation; tasks that involve Failing and flaky tests; tasks that involve Cross-platform mobile apps.

How do I install Frb Fix CI in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge --skill frb-fix-ci -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (.claude/skills/frb-fix-ci in fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge) into .claude/skills/frb-fix-ci in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Frb Fix CI in Codex?

Run `npx skills add fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge --skill frb-fix-ci -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (.claude/skills/frb-fix-ci in fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge) into .agents/skills/frb-fix-ci in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Frb Fix CI in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge --skill frb-fix-ci -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/frb-fix-ci, .gemini/skills/frb-fix-ci, .github/skills/frb-fix-ci and .opencode/skills/frb-fix-ci in your project.

What does Frb Fix CI need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Frb Fix CI needs the command-line tools its instructions call (git, dart, gh and cargo).

Does Frb Fix CI access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Its commands use git and gh, which can reach the network depending on how they are called. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Frb Fix CI safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Frb Fix CI use?

Frb Fix CI is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Frb Fix CI use?

About 4.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 18k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Frb Fix CI?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Frb Fix CI: Green Gate (VeryGoodOpenSource/vgv-ai-flutter-plugin, 170 stars), Mock Call Count Retry Fallback (divinevideo/divine-mobile, 266 stars), Mockito Stale Mock Silent Trycatch Failure (divinevideo/divine-mobile, 266 stars) and Analyze GitHub Flake (flutter/flutter, 180k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Frb Fix CI?

fzyzcjy (a GitHub user) maintains it in fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge, which has 5,446 GitHub stars. The repository holds 28 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 10, 2026.

Source: fzyzcjy/flutter_rust_bridge on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.