Agent skill

Wp Review Process

by franklee16 in franklee16/academic-research-skills

A skill your agent uses to understand how World Politics evaluates a manuscript — triple-blind review with author anonymity preserved through the editorial decision, at least two non-Princeton…

No licenceAuto-check passed

Install Wp Review Process

skills CLI
$ npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill wp-review-process -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install franklee16/academic-research-skills wp-review-process --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/World-Politics-Skills/skills/wp-review-process .claude/skills/wp-review-process && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
wp-review-process
GitHub stars
223
Used in
1 other repo
Token cost
~1k tokens
SKILL.md length
379 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
1,617
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
None found

At a glance

A skill your agent uses to understand how World Politics evaluates a manuscript — triple-blind review with author anonymity preserved through the editorial decision, at least two non-Princeton…

  • Works in 5 steps: Triple-blind. Reviewing is "based on the… → Reviewers. Referees are drawn from the… → Timeline. Authors "can expect to receive… → …
  • Understand how World Politics evaluates a manuscript — triple-blind review with author anonymity preserved through the editorial decision
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How World Politics review works, Ethics / human subjects and Shape the paper to pass, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Wp Review Process is an agent skill from franklee16/academic-research-skills. Use to understand how World Politics evaluates a manuscript — triple-blind review with author anonymity preserved through the editorial decision, at least two non-Princeton reviewers and often an editor, a roughly four-month decision target, scope screening, and the APSA human-subjects requirement. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

Its SKILL.md is about 1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Comprehensive collection of Claude Code skills for academic research in economics, finance, and social sciences.

When your agent uses it

  • Understand how World Politics evaluates a manuscript — triple-blind review with author anonymity preserved through the editorial decision
  • At least two non-Princeton reviewers and often an editor
  • A roughly four-month decision target
  • Scope screening

Example prompts

  • “/wp-review-process”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Triple-blind. Reviewing is "based on the anonymity of the author and the confidentiality of
  2. Reviewers. Referees are drawn from the social-science community; published articles "have usually
  3. Timeline. Authors "can expect to receive decisions on their submissions within four months"
  4. Scope screening. A paper deemed inappropriate for World Politics may be **withdrawn from
  5. What reviewers weigh (Reviewer Guidelines): clear research goals; engagement with theoretical

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 9a4b2db. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Wp Review Process loads about 1k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 101 tokens; SKILL.md has 379 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~101
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

Without a licence we can't republish the file, so here is its outline and opening line. It has 379 words (~1,003 tokens).

“Knowing how World Politics screens and decides lets you pre-empt the failure modes before submitting. World Politics uses a triple-blind process and screens for scope (comparative politics / IR; no opinion, policy, theory-only, historical, or journalistic pieces) before and during…”

— opening of SKILL.md by franklee16
name
wp-review-process

Read the full SKILL.md on GitHub

Files

Just SKILL.md in Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/World-Politics-Skills/skills/wp-review-process of franklee16/academic-research-skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 9a4b2db

Used in 1 other repository

We found 1 copy of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in franklee16/academic-research-skills, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

Wp Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Wp Review Process compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Wp Review Process this skillfranklee16/academic-research-skills2231 repos~1kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Arize Evaluatorgithub/awesome-copilot40k1 repos~8.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
LLM Evaluationdavila7/claude-code-templates32k12 repos~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Agent Evaluationsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills47k1 repos~2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Agent Evaluationdavila7/claude-code-templates32k2 repos~519Automated safety check: PassMIT
EvaluatorsArize-ai/phoenix12k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Arize Evaluator

    github/awesome-copilot

    Official

    Handles LLM-as-judge evaluation workflows on Arize including creating/updating evaluators, running evaluations on spans or experiments, managing tasks, trigger-run operations, column mapping, and…

    40k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~8.1k tokens
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check: notes
  • LLM Evaluation

    davila7/claude-code-templates

    Master comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications, from automated metrics to human evaluation and A/B testing.

    32k GitHub starsUsed in 12 repos~3.5k tokens
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Agent Evaluation

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Evaluate agent behavior with versioned cases and explicit verifiers.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2k tokens
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Agent Evaluation

    davila7/claude-code-templates

    Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world…

    32k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~519 tokens
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Evaluators

    Arize-ai/phoenix

    Author or refine a Phoenix evaluator — code or LLM-as-a-judge — that scores a run's output.

    12k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated today
    EducationAuto-check passed
  • Agent Evaluation Reporting

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    A skill your agent uses when summarizing agent evaluations where autonomous, assisted, failed, timed-out, or invalid outcomes must remain distinct and comparable.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.1k tokens
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed

More from franklee16/academic-research-skills

All 1,617 skills in this repo
  • Econometric Research Writing

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    End-to-end econometric analysis and economics/management paper-writing workflow.

    223 GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated 21 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Paper Revision

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    Comprehensive workflow for handling journal Revise and Resubmit (R&R) decisions.

    223 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 21 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Sci Ssci Polishing

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    A skill your agent uses when researchers need Chinese academic prose translated into publication-oriented English or English manuscript paragraphs and complete sections polished for SCI, SSCI, or…

    223 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.5k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Research Defense Radar

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    Assess and monitor an ongoing research project's competitor landscape, novelty risk, and method/data opportunities from a proposal, paper, research question, data or method notes, or a suspected…

    223 GitHub stars~4k tokensUpdated 21 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Academic Grant

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    Generate or fill in academic grant application forms (project statement, education plan, pathway to impact, references) using draft research material.

    223 GitHub stars~2.8k tokensUpdated 21 days ago
    Auto-check: notes
  • Chinese Reference Formatter Skill

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    A skill your agent uses when a user needs通用中文参考文献、GB/T 7714-style bibliography entries, Chinese academic reference formatting, or BibTeX completion from Chinese or English literature titles…

    223 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 21 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Wp Review Process

What does Wp Review Process do?

A skill your agent uses to understand how World Politics evaluates a manuscript — triple-blind review with author anonymity preserved through the editorial decision, at least two non-Princeton…. Wp Review Process is an agent skill from franklee16/academic-research-skills. Use to understand how World Politics evaluates a manuscript — triple-blind review with author anonymity preserved through the editorial decision, at least two non-Princeton reviewers and often an editor, a roughly four-month decision target, scope screening, and the APSA human-subjects requirement.

When should I use Wp Review Process?

Wp Review Process fits situations like: understand how World Politics evaluates a manuscript — triple-blind review with author anonymity preserved through the editorial decision; at least two non-Princeton reviewers and often an editor; A roughly four-month decision target; scope screening.

How do I install Wp Review Process in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill wp-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/World-Politics-Skills/skills/wp-review-process in franklee16/academic-research-skills) into .claude/skills/wp-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Wp Review Process in Codex?

Run `npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill wp-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/World-Politics-Skills/skills/wp-review-process in franklee16/academic-research-skills) into .agents/skills/wp-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Wp Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill wp-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/wp-review-process, .gemini/skills/wp-review-process, .github/skills/wp-review-process and .opencode/skills/wp-review-process in your project.

What does Wp Review Process need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Wp Review Process is instructions for the agent only.

Does Wp Review Process access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Wp Review Process safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Wp Review Process use?

No licence was found for Wp Review Process or its repository. Without one, default copyright applies: ask the author before reusing or redistributing it.

How many tokens does Wp Review Process use?

About 1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Wp Review Process?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Wp Review Process: Arize Evaluator (github/awesome-copilot, 40k stars), LLM Evaluation (davila7/claude-code-templates, 32k stars), Agent Evaluation (sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, 47k stars) and Agent Evaluation (davila7/claude-code-templates, 32k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Wp Review Process?

franklee16 (a GitHub user) maintains it in franklee16/academic-research-skills, which has 223 GitHub stars. The repository holds 1,617 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 18, 2026.

Source: franklee16/academic-research-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.