Arize Evaluator
github/awesome-copilot
Handles LLM-as-judge evaluation workflows on Arize including creating/updating evaluators, running evaluations on spans or experiments, managing tasks, trigger-run operations, column mapping, and…
A skill your agent uses to understand how Social Forces (SF) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review via ScholarOne, what expert reviewers weigh (rigor, general significance, theoretical…
No licenceAuto-check passed
Install Sf Review Process
$ npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill sf-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install franklee16/academic-research-skills sf-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Social-Forces-Skills/skills/sf-review-process .claude/skills/sf-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "sf-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills/tree/master/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Social-Forces-Skills/skills/sf-review-process into .claude/skills/sf-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "sf-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills/tree/master/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Social-Forces-Skills/skills/sf-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill sf-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install franklee16/academic-research-skills sf-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Social-Forces-Skills/skills/sf-review-process .agents/skills/sf-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "sf-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills/tree/master/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Social-Forces-Skills/skills/sf-review-process into .agents/skills/sf-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "sf-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill sf-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install franklee16/academic-research-skills sf-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Social-Forces-Skills/skills/sf-review-process .cursor/skills/sf-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "sf-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills/tree/master/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Social-Forces-Skills/skills/sf-review-process into .cursor/skills/sf-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "sf-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills.git --path Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Social-Forces-Skills/skills/sf-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill sf-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install franklee16/academic-research-skills sf-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Social-Forces-Skills/skills/sf-review-process .gemini/skills/sf-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "sf-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills/tree/master/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Social-Forces-Skills/skills/sf-review-process into .gemini/skills/sf-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "sf-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install franklee16/academic-research-skills sf-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill sf-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Social-Forces-Skills/skills/sf-review-process .github/skills/sf-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "sf-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills/tree/master/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Social-Forces-Skills/skills/sf-review-process into .github/skills/sf-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "sf-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill sf-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install franklee16/academic-research-skills sf-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Social-Forces-Skills/skills/sf-review-process .opencode/skills/sf-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "sf-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills/tree/master/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Social-Forces-Skills/skills/sf-review-process into .opencode/skills/sf-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "sf-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
sf-review-process- GitHub stars
- 223
- Used in
- 1 other repo
- Token cost
- ~885 tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 347 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 1,617
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- None found
At a glance
A skill your agent uses to understand how Social Forces (SF) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review via ScholarOne, what expert reviewers weigh (rigor, general significance, theoretical…
- Works in 5 steps: Double-anonymized. Reviewers do not know… → Editorial screening. The editorial… → Expert external review. Papers that pass… → …
- Understand how Social Forces (SF) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review via ScholarOne
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How SF review works, Shape the paper to pass and Anti-patterns, plus 2 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Sf Review Process is an agent skill from franklee16/academic-research-skills. Use to understand how Social Forces (SF) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review via ScholarOne, what expert reviewers weigh (rigor, general significance, theoretical grounding), the typical decision categories, and the journal's reported review timeline. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
Its SKILL.md is about 890 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Comprehensive collection of Claude Code skills for academic research in economics, finance, and social sciences.
When your agent uses it
- Understand how Social Forces (SF) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review via ScholarOne
- What expert reviewers weigh (rigor
- General significance
- Theoretical grounding)
Example prompts
- “/sf-review-process”
Workflow steps
5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Double-anonymized. Reviewers do not know the authors and authors do not know reviewers.
- Editorial screening. The editorial office assesses fit for a general social-science audience
- Expert external review. Papers that pass are sent to referees who weigh rigor, identification,
- Decision categories: typically reject, revise and resubmit (major/minor), or accept.
- Timeline. SF reports a median review-to-decision of ~71 days (a reported metric, not a
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 9a4b2db. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Sf Review Process loads about 885 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 93 tokens; SKILL.md has 347 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
Without a licence we can't republish the file, so here is its outline and opening line. It has 347 words (~885 tokens).
“Knowing how Social Forces screens and decides lets you pre-empt the failure modes before submitting. SF is double-anonymized and managed through ScholarOne Manuscript Central for the editorial office at the UNC Department of Sociology. Its reviewers prize methodological rigor, general…”
- name
- sf-review-process
Files
Just SKILL.md in Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Social-Forces-Skills/skills/sf-review-process of franklee16/academic-research-skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 9a4b2db
Used in 1 other repository
We found 1 copy of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in franklee16/academic-research-skills, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.
Compare with similar skills
Sf Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sf Review Process this skillfranklee16/academic-research-skills | 223 | 1 repos | ~885 | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| Arize Evaluatorgithub/awesome-copilot | 40k | 1 repos | ~8.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| LLM Evaluationdavila7/claude-code-templates | 33k | 12 repos | ~3.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Agent Evaluationsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | 47k | 1 repos | ~2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| EvaluatorsArize-ai/phoenix | 12k | — | ~1.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Agent Evaluation Reportingsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | 47k | 1 repos | ~2.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
- Official
LLM Evaluation
davila7/claude-code-templates
Master comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications, from automated metrics to human evaluation and A/B testing.
Agent Evaluation
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
Evaluate agent behavior with versioned cases and explicit verifiers.
Evaluators
Arize-ai/phoenix
Author or refine a Phoenix evaluator — code or LLM-as-a-judge — that scores a run's output.
Agent Evaluation Reporting
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
A skill your agent uses when summarizing agent evaluations where autonomous, assisted, failed, timed-out, or invalid outcomes must remain distinct and comparable.
- Official
Creating Online Evaluations
PostHog/posthog
Author continuously-running online evaluations in PostHog AI observability, grounded in real failure modes you've identified.
More from franklee16/academic-research-skills
All 1,617 skills in this repoEconometric Research Writing
franklee16/academic-research-skills
End-to-end econometric analysis and economics/management paper-writing workflow.
Paper Revision
franklee16/academic-research-skills
Comprehensive workflow for handling journal Revise and Resubmit (R&R) decisions.
Sci Ssci Polishing
franklee16/academic-research-skills
A skill your agent uses when researchers need Chinese academic prose translated into publication-oriented English or English manuscript paragraphs and complete sections polished for SCI, SSCI, or…
Research Defense Radar
franklee16/academic-research-skills
Assess and monitor an ongoing research project's competitor landscape, novelty risk, and method/data opportunities from a proposal, paper, research question, data or method notes, or a suspected…
Academic Grant
franklee16/academic-research-skills
Generate or fill in academic grant application forms (project statement, education plan, pathway to impact, references) using draft research material.
Chinese Reference Formatter Skill
franklee16/academic-research-skills
A skill your agent uses when a user needs通用中文参考文献、GB/T 7714-style bibliography entries, Chinese academic reference formatting, or BibTeX completion from Chinese or English literature titles…
Questions about Sf Review Process
What does Sf Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses to understand how Social Forces (SF) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review via ScholarOne, what expert reviewers weigh (rigor, general significance, theoretical…. Sf Review Process is an agent skill from franklee16/academic-research-skills. Use to understand how Social Forces (SF) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review via ScholarOne, what expert reviewers weigh (rigor, general significance, theoretical grounding), the typical decision categories, and the journal's reported review timeline.
When should I use Sf Review Process?
Sf Review Process fits situations like: understand how Social Forces (SF) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review via ScholarOne; what expert reviewers weigh (rigor; general significance; theoretical grounding).
How do I install Sf Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill sf-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Social-Forces-Skills/skills/sf-review-process in franklee16/academic-research-skills) into .claude/skills/sf-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Sf Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill sf-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Social-Forces-Skills/skills/sf-review-process in franklee16/academic-research-skills) into .agents/skills/sf-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Sf Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill sf-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/sf-review-process, .gemini/skills/sf-review-process, .github/skills/sf-review-process and .opencode/skills/sf-review-process in your project.
What does Sf Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Sf Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Sf Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Sf Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Sf Review Process use?
No licence was found for Sf Review Process or its repository. Without one, default copyright applies: ask the author before reusing or redistributing it.
How many tokens does Sf Review Process use?
About 885 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Sf Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Sf Review Process: Arize Evaluator (github/awesome-copilot, 40k stars), LLM Evaluation (davila7/claude-code-templates, 33k stars), Agent Evaluation (sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, 47k stars) and Evaluators (Arize-ai/phoenix, 12k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Sf Review Process?
franklee16 (a GitHub user) maintains it in franklee16/academic-research-skills, which has 223 GitHub stars. The repository holds 1,617 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 18, 2026.
Source: franklee16/academic-research-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.