New: 98,000+ skills indexed from GitHub repos with 100+ stars · every skill safety-checkedBrowse top skillsTop skills
Esc to closeBrowse all skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills

Agent skill

Ahr Review Process

by franklee16 in franklee16/academic-research-skills

A skill your agent uses to understand how The American Historical Review (AHR) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind anonymous review by at least six scholars, a six-to-eight-month timeline, an…

No licenceAuto-check passed

Install Ahr Review Process

skills CLI
$ npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill ahr-review-process -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install franklee16/academic-research-skills ahr-review-process --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/American-Historical-Review-Skills/skills/ahr-review-process .claude/skills/ahr-review-process && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
ahr-review-process
GitHub stars
223
Used in
1 other repo
Token cost
~936 tokens
SKILL.md length
390 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
1,617
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
None found

At a glance

A skill your agent uses to understand how The American Historical Review (AHR) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind anonymous review by at least six scholars, a six-to-eight-month timeline, an…

  • Works in 6 steps: Anonymous review. The manuscript is… → Editorial screening, then external… → At least six readers. "Every article… → …
  • Understand how The American Historical Review (AHR) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind anonymous review by at least six scholars
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How AHR review works (verify…, What reviewers weigh in a… and The review (book/media)…, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Ahr Review Process is an agent skill from franklee16/academic-research-skills. Use to understand how The American Historical Review (AHR) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind anonymous review by at least six scholars, a six-to-eight-month timeline, an 8-10% acceptance rate, and the large commissioned book/media review section. Sets expectations and shapes the article to survive review; it does not contact editors.

Its SKILL.md is about 940 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Comprehensive collection of Claude Code skills for academic research in economics, finance, and social sciences.

When your agent uses it

  • Understand how The American Historical Review (AHR) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind anonymous review by at least six scholars
  • A six-to-eight-month timeline
  • An 8-10% acceptance rate
  • The large commissioned book/media review section

Example prompts

  • “/ahr-review-process”

Workflow steps

6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Anonymous review. The manuscript is masked; reviewers do not know the author. Prepare
  2. Editorial screening, then external review. A portion of submissions advance to full external
  3. At least six readers. "Every article published in the AHR has been reviewed by at least six
  4. Timeline. The editors aim to decide within six to eight months of submission.
  5. Acceptance rate. Roughly 8–10% of about 360 submissions per year. Most strong papers are
  6. Exclusivity. No concurrent submission elsewhere, and nothing already published or in press.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 9a4b2db. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Ahr Review Process loads about 936 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 90 tokens; SKILL.md has 390 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~90
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~936

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

Without a licence we can't republish the file, so here is its outline and opening line. It has 390 words (~936 tokens).

“Knowing how the AHR screens and decides lets you pre-empt failure modes before submitting. The AHR is anonymous (double-blind), reviews intensively, and accepts only a small fraction of submissions, so the article must be significant, well-argued, and source-criticized before it…”

— opening of SKILL.md by franklee16
name
ahr-review-process

Read the full SKILL.md on GitHub

Files

Just SKILL.md in Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/American-Historical-Review-Skills/skills/ahr-review-process of franklee16/academic-research-skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 9a4b2db

Used in 1 other repository

We found 1 copy of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in franklee16/academic-research-skills, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

Ahr Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Ahr Review Process compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Ahr Review Process this skillfranklee16/academic-research-skills2231 repos~936Automated safety check: PassNone
NotebookLM Research AssistantPleasePrompto/notebooklm-skill7.8k14 repos~2.4kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Hypothesis Generationspacering-net/codeg3.9k14 repos~3.6kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
GitHub Deep Researchbytedance/deer-flow84k4 repos~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills47k2 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Agent ReachPanniantong/Agent-Reach95k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • NotebookLM Research Assistant

    PleasePrompto/notebooklm-skill

    Lets Claude Code ask questions of your Google NotebookLM notebooks through browser automation and return answers grounded in your uploaded sources.

    7.8k GitHub starsUsed in 14 repos~2.4k tokens
    Knowledge ManagementAuto-check: notes

  • Hypothesis Generation

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. An agent skill from spacering-net/codeg.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 14 repos~3.6k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes

  • GitHub Deep Research

    bytedance/deer-flow

    Researches a GitHub repository over four rounds using the GitHub API and web search, then writes a structured markdown report with timeline, metrics and Mermaid diagrams.

    84k GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~1.3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

  • Nature Paper Card

    Yuan1z0825/nature-skills

    Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

  • Agent Reach

    Panniantong/Agent-Reach

    Routes web research and platform lookups across 16 sites, including Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, Bilibili, Xiaohongshu and GitHub, through one command-line tool.

    95k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Productivity & AutomationAuto-check passed

  • Tavily Web Search

    allenpeng0705/EnvoyMesh

    Searches the web through the Tavily API with LLM-friendly output: clean structured results, optional AI-written answers, domain filters, news mode, images and raw content.

    3.1k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~2.5k tokens
    Productivity & AutomationAuto-check: notes

More from franklee16/academic-research-skills

All 1,617 skills in this repo

  • Econometric Research Writing

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    End-to-end econometric analysis and economics/management paper-writing workflow.

    223 GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated 22 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Paper Revision

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    Comprehensive workflow for handling journal Revise and Resubmit (R&R) decisions.

    223 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 22 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Sci Ssci Polishing

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    A skill your agent uses when researchers need Chinese academic prose translated into publication-oriented English or English manuscript paragraphs and complete sections polished for SCI, SSCI, or…

    223 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.5k tokens
    Auto-check passed

  • Research Defense Radar

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    Assess and monitor an ongoing research project's competitor landscape, novelty risk, and method/data opportunities from a proposal, paper, research question, data or method notes, or a suspected…

    223 GitHub stars~4k tokensUpdated 22 days ago
    Auto-check passed

  • Academic Grant

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    Generate or fill in academic grant application forms (project statement, education plan, pathway to impact, references) using draft research material.

    223 GitHub stars~2.8k tokensUpdated 22 days ago
    Auto-check: notes

  • Chinese Reference Formatter Skill

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    A skill your agent uses when a user needs通用中文参考文献、GB/T 7714-style bibliography entries, Chinese academic reference formatting, or BibTeX completion from Chinese or English literature titles…

    223 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 22 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Ahr Review Process

What does Ahr Review Process do?

A skill your agent uses to understand how The American Historical Review (AHR) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind anonymous review by at least six scholars, a six-to-eight-month timeline, an…. Ahr Review Process is an agent skill from franklee16/academic-research-skills. Use to understand how The American Historical Review (AHR) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind anonymous review by at least six scholars, a six-to-eight-month timeline, an 8-10% acceptance rate, and the large commissioned book/media review section.

When should I use Ahr Review Process?

Ahr Review Process fits situations like: understand how The American Historical Review (AHR) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind anonymous review by at least six scholars; A six-to-eight-month timeline; an 8-10% acceptance rate; the large commissioned book/media review section.

How do I install Ahr Review Process in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill ahr-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/American-Historical-Review-Skills/skills/ahr-review-process in franklee16/academic-research-skills) into .claude/skills/ahr-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Ahr Review Process in Codex?

Run `npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill ahr-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/American-Historical-Review-Skills/skills/ahr-review-process in franklee16/academic-research-skills) into .agents/skills/ahr-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Ahr Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill ahr-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ahr-review-process, .gemini/skills/ahr-review-process, .github/skills/ahr-review-process and .opencode/skills/ahr-review-process in your project.

What does Ahr Review Process need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Ahr Review Process is instructions for the agent only.

Does Ahr Review Process access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Ahr Review Process safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Ahr Review Process use?

No licence was found for Ahr Review Process or its repository. Without one, default copyright applies: ask the author before reusing or redistributing it.

How many tokens does Ahr Review Process use?

About 936 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Ahr Review Process?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ahr Review Process: NotebookLM Research Assistant (PleasePrompto/notebooklm-skill, 7.8k stars), Hypothesis Generation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), GitHub Deep Research (bytedance/deer-flow, 84k stars) and Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Ahr Review Process?

franklee16 (a GitHub user) maintains it in franklee16/academic-research-skills, which has 223 GitHub stars. The repository holds 1,617 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 18, 2026.

Source: franklee16/academic-research-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.