Agent skill

Metrics Review

by aAAaqwq in aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team

Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights.

MITAuto-check passedProduct & Project Management

Install Metrics Review

skills CLI
$ npx skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill metrics-review -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team metrics-review --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/metrics-review .claude/skills/metrics-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
metrics-review
GitHub stars
105
Used in
1 other repo
Token cost
~4.5k tokens
SKILL.md length
2,456 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
167
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights.

  • Works in 5 steps: Gather Metrics Data → Organize the Metrics → Analyze Trends → …
  • Running a weekly
  • SKILL.md covers Usage, Workflow, Product Metrics Hierarchy and Common Product Metrics, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Metrics Review is an agent skill from aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team. Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights. Use when running a weekly, monthly, or quarterly metrics review, investigating a sudden spike or drop, comparing performance against targets, or turning raw numbers into a scorecard with recommended actions.

Its SKILL.md is about 4.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Product & Project Management, covering Product metrics and Forecasting and time series. The repository describes itself as: An installable, cross-framework AI organization: C-suite agents, expert subagents, curated skills, independent review, and one-command setup across 18 AI client/runtime adapters. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Running a weekly
  • Quarterly metrics review
  • Investigating a sudden spike
  • Comparing performance against targets

Example prompts

  • “/metrics-review”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Gather Metrics Data
  2. Organize the Metrics
  3. Analyze Trends
  4. Generate the Review
  5. Follow Up

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 7cefd81. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Metrics Review loads about 4.5k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 76 tokens; SKILL.md has 2,456 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~76
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.5k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team at commit 7cefd81, republished under its MIT licence (© aAAaqwq). 2,456 words, ~4,505 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/metrics-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
metrics-review
description
Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights. Use when running a weekly, monthly, or quarterly metrics review, investigating a sudden spike or drop, comparing performance against targets, or turning raw numbers into a scorecard with recommended actions.
argument-hint
<time period or metric focus>

Metrics Review

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Review and analyze product metrics, identify trends, and surface actionable insights.

Usage

/metrics-review $ARGUMENTS

Workflow

1. Gather Metrics Data

If ~~product analytics is connected:

  • Pull key product metrics for the relevant time period
  • Get comparison data (previous period, same period last year, targets)
  • Pull segment breakdowns if available

If no analytics tool is connected, ask the user to provide:

  • The metrics and their values (paste a table, screenshot, or describe)
  • Comparison data (previous period, targets)
  • Any context on recent changes (launches, incidents, seasonality)

Ask the user:

  • What time period to review? (last week, last month, last quarter)
  • What metrics to focus on? Or should we review the full product metrics suite?
  • Are there specific targets or goals to compare against?
  • Any known events that might explain changes (launches, outages, marketing campaigns, seasonality)?
2. Organize the Metrics

Structure the review using a metrics hierarchy: North Star metric at the top, L1 health indicators (acquisition, activation, engagement, retention, revenue, satisfaction), and L2 diagnostic metrics for drill-down. See Product Metrics Hierarchy below for full definitions.

If the user has not defined their metrics hierarchy, help them identify their North Star and key L1 metrics before proceeding.

For each key metric:

  • Current value: What is the metric today?
  • Trend: Up, down, or flat compared to previous period? Over what timeframe?
  • vs Target: How does it compare to the goal or target?
  • Rate of change: Is the trend accelerating or decelerating?
  • Anomalies: Any sudden changes, spikes, or drops?

Identify correlations:

  • Do changes in one metric correlate with changes in another?
  • Are there leading indicators that predict lagging metric changes?
  • Do segment breakdowns reveal that an aggregate trend is driven by a specific cohort?
4. Generate the Review
Summary

2-3 sentences: overall product health, most notable changes, key callout.

Metric Scorecard

Table format for quick scanning:

MetricCurrentPreviousChangeTargetStatus
[Metric][Value][Value][+/- %][Target][On track / At risk / Miss]
Trend Analysis

For each metric worth discussing:

  • What happened and how significant is the change
  • Why it likely happened (attribution based on known events, correlated metrics, segment analysis)
  • Whether this is a one-time event or a sustained trend
Bright Spots

What is going well:

  • Metrics beating targets
  • Positive trends to sustain
  • Segments or features showing strong performance
Areas of Concern

What needs attention:

  • Metrics missing targets or trending negatively
  • Early warning signals before they become problems
  • Metrics where we lack visibility or understanding

Specific next steps based on the analysis:

  • Investigations to run (dig deeper into a concerning trend)
  • Experiments to launch (test hypotheses about what could improve a metric)
  • Investments to make (double down on what is working)
  • Alerts to set (monitor a metric more closely)
Context and Caveats
  • Known data quality issues
  • Events that affect comparability (outages, holidays, launches)
  • Metrics we should be tracking but are not yet
5. Follow Up

After generating the review:

  • Ask if any metric needs deeper investigation
  • Offer to create a dashboard spec for ongoing monitoring
  • Offer to draft experiment proposals for areas of concern
  • Offer to set up a metrics review template for recurring use

Product Metrics Hierarchy

North Star Metric

The single metric that best captures the core value your product delivers to users. It should be:

  • Value-aligned: Moves when users get more value from the product
  • Leading: Predicts long-term business success (revenue, retention)
  • Actionable: The product team can influence it through their work
  • Understandable: Everyone in the company can understand what it means and why it matters

Examples by product type:

  • Collaboration tool: Weekly active teams with 3+ members contributing
  • Marketplace: Weekly transactions completed
  • SaaS platform: Weekly active users completing core workflow
  • Content platform: Weekly engaged reading/viewing time
  • Developer tool: Weekly deployments using the tool
L1 Metrics (Health Indicators)

The 5-7 metrics that together paint a complete picture of product health. These map to the key stages of the user lifecycle:

Acquisition: Are new users finding the product?

  • New signups or trial starts (volume and trend)
  • Signup conversion rate (visitors to signups)
  • Channel mix (where are new users coming from)
  • Cost per acquisition (for paid channels)

Activation: Are new users reaching the value moment?

  • Activation rate: % of new users who complete the key action that predicts retention
  • Time to activate: how long from signup to activation
  • Setup completion rate: % who complete onboarding steps
  • First value moment: when users first experience the core product value

Engagement: Are active users getting value?

  • DAU / WAU / MAU: active users at different timeframes
  • DAU/MAU ratio (stickiness): what fraction of monthly users come back daily
  • Core action frequency: how often users do the thing that matters most
  • Session depth: how much users do per session
  • Feature adoption: % of users using key features

Retention: Are users coming back?

  • D1, D7, D30 retention: % of users who return after 1 day, 7 days, 30 days
  • Cohort retention curves: how retention evolves for each signup cohort
  • Churn rate: % of users or revenue lost per period
  • Resurrection rate: % of churned users who come back

Monetization: Is value translating to revenue?

  • Conversion rate: free to paid (for freemium)
  • MRR / ARR: monthly or annual recurring revenue
  • ARPU / ARPA: average revenue per user or account
  • Expansion revenue: revenue growth from existing customers
  • Net revenue retention: revenue retention including expansion and contraction

Satisfaction: How do users feel about the product?

  • NPS: Net Promoter Score
  • CSAT: Customer Satisfaction Score
  • Support ticket volume and resolution time
  • App store ratings and review sentiment
L2 Metrics (Diagnostic)

Detailed metrics used to investigate changes in L1 metrics:

  • Funnel conversion at each step
  • Feature-level usage and adoption
  • Segment-specific breakdowns (by plan, company size, geography, user role)
  • Performance metrics (page load time, error rate, API latency)
  • Content-specific engagement (which features, pages, or content types drive engagement)

Common Product Metrics

DAU / WAU / MAU

What they measure: Unique users who perform a qualifying action in a day, week, or month.

Key decisions:

  • What counts as "active"? A login? A page view? A core action? Define this carefully — different definitions tell different stories.
  • Which timeframe matters most? DAU for daily-use products (messaging, email). WAU for weekly-use products (project management). MAU for less frequent products (tax software, travel booking).

How to use them:

  • DAU/MAU ratio (stickiness): values above 0.5 indicate a daily habit. Below 0.2 suggests infrequent usage.
  • Trend matters more than absolute number. Is active usage growing, flat, or declining?
  • Segment by user type. Power users and casual users behave very differently.
Retention

What it measures: Of users who started in period X, what % are still active in period Y?

Common retention timeframes:

  • D1 (next day): Was the first experience good enough to come back?
  • D7 (one week): Did the user establish a habit?
  • D30 (one month): Is the user retained long-term?
  • D90 (three months): Is this a durable user?

How to use retention:

  • Plot retention curves by cohort. Look for: initial drop-off (activation problem), steady decline (engagement problem), or flattening (good — you have a stable retained base).
  • Compare cohorts over time. Are newer cohorts retaining better than older ones? That means product improvements are working.
  • Segment retention by activation behavior. Users who completed onboarding vs those who did not. Users who used feature X vs those who did not.
Conversion

What it measures: % of users who move from one stage to the next.

Common conversion funnels:

  • Visitor to signup
  • Signup to activation (key value moment)
  • Free to paid (trial conversion)
  • Trial to paid subscription
  • Monthly to annual plan

How to use conversion:

  • Map the full funnel and measure conversion at each step
  • Identify the biggest drop-off points — these are your highest-leverage improvement opportunities
  • Segment conversion by source, plan, user type. Different segments convert very differently.
  • Track conversion over time. Is it improving as you iterate on the experience?
Activation

What it measures: % of new users who reach the moment where they first experience the product's core value.

Defining activation:

  • Look at retained users vs churned users. What actions did retained users take that churned users did not?
  • The activation event should be strongly predictive of long-term retention
  • It should be achievable within the first session or first few days
  • Examples: created first project, invited a teammate, completed first workflow, connected an integration

How to use activation:

  • Track activation rate for every signup cohort
  • Measure time to activate — faster is almost always better
  • Build onboarding flows that guide users to the activation moment
  • A/B test activation flows and measure impact on retention, not just activation rate

Goal Setting Frameworks

OKRs (Objectives and Key Results)

Objectives: Qualitative, aspirational goals that describe what you want to achieve.

  • Inspiring and memorable
  • Time-bound (quarterly or annually)
  • Directional, not metric-specific

Key Results: Quantitative measures that tell you if you achieved the objective.

  • Specific and measurable
  • Time-bound with a clear target
  • Outcome-based, not output-based
  • 2-4 Key Results per Objective

Example:

Objective: Make our product indispensable for daily workflows

Key Results:
- Increase DAU/MAU ratio from 0.35 to 0.50
- Increase D30 retention for new users from 40% to 55%
- 3 core workflows with >80% task completion rate
Show full SKILL.md (992 more words)Show less
OKR Best Practices
  • Set OKRs that are ambitious but achievable. 70% completion is the target for stretch OKRs.
  • Key Results should measure outcomes (user behavior, business results), not outputs (features shipped, tasks completed).
  • Do not have too many OKRs. 2-3 objectives with 2-4 KRs each is plenty.
  • OKRs should be uncomfortable. If you are confident you will hit all of them, they are not ambitious enough.
  • Review OKRs at mid-period. Adjust effort allocation if some KRs are clearly off track.
  • Grade OKRs honestly at end of period. 0.0-0.3 = missed, 0.4-0.6 = progress, 0.7-1.0 = achieved.
Setting Metric Targets
  • Baseline: What is the current value? You need a reliable baseline before setting a target.
  • Benchmark: What do comparable products achieve? Industry benchmarks provide context.
  • Trajectory: What is the current trend? If the metric is already improving at 5% per month, a 6% target is not ambitious.
  • Effort: How much investment are you putting behind this? Bigger bets warrant more ambitious targets.
  • Confidence: How confident are you in hitting the target? Set a "commit" (high confidence) and a "stretch" (ambitious).

Metric Review Cadences

Weekly Metrics Check

Purpose: Catch issues quickly, monitor experiments, stay in touch with product health. Duration: 15-30 minutes. Attendees: Product manager, maybe engineering lead.

What to review:

  • North Star metric: current value, week-over-week change
  • Key L1 metrics: any notable movements
  • Active experiments: results and statistical significance
  • Anomalies: any unexpected spikes or drops
  • Alerts: anything that triggered a monitoring alert

Action: If something looks off, investigate. Otherwise, note it and move on.

Monthly Metrics Review

Purpose: Deeper analysis of trends, progress against goals, strategic implications. Duration: 30-60 minutes. Attendees: Product team, key stakeholders.

What to review:

  • Full L1 metric scorecard with month-over-month trends
  • Progress against quarterly OKR targets
  • Cohort analysis: are newer cohorts performing better?
  • Feature adoption: how are recent launches performing?
  • Segment analysis: any divergence between user segments?

Action: Identify 1-3 areas to investigate or invest in. Update priorities if metrics reveal new information.

Quarterly Business Review

Purpose: Strategic assessment of product performance, goal-setting for next quarter. Duration: 60-90 minutes. Attendees: Product, engineering, design, leadership.

What to review:

  • OKR scoring for the quarter
  • Trend analysis for all L1 metrics over the quarter
  • Year-over-year comparisons
  • Competitive context: market changes and competitor movements
  • What worked and what did not

Action: Set OKRs for next quarter. Adjust product strategy based on what the data shows.

Dashboard Design Principles

Effective Product Dashboards

A good dashboard answers the question "How is the product doing?" at a glance.

Principles:

  1. Start with the question, not the data. What decisions does this dashboard support? Design backwards from the decision.

  2. Hierarchy of information. The most important metric should be the most visually prominent. North Star at the top, L1 metrics next, L2 metrics available on drill-down.

  3. Context over numbers. A number without context is meaningless. Always show: current value, comparison (previous period, target, benchmark), trend direction.

  4. Fewer metrics, more insight. A dashboard with 50 metrics helps no one. Focus on 5-10 that matter. Put everything else in a detailed report.

  5. Consistent time periods. Use the same time period for all metrics on a dashboard. Mixing daily and monthly metrics creates confusion.

  6. Visual status indicators. Use color to indicate health at a glance:

    • Green: on track or improving
    • Yellow: needs attention or flat
    • Red: off track or declining
  7. Actionability. Every metric on the dashboard should be something the team can influence. If you cannot act on it, it does not belong on the product dashboard.

Dashboard Layout

Top row: North Star metric with trend line and target.

Second row: L1 metrics scorecard — current value, change, target, status for each key metric.

Third row: Key funnels or conversion metrics — visual funnel showing drop-off at each stage.

Fourth row: Recent experiments and launches — active A/B tests, recent feature launches with early metrics.

Bottom / drill-down: L2 metrics, segment breakdowns, and detailed time series for investigation.

Dashboard Anti-Patterns
  • Vanity metrics: Metrics that always go up but do not indicate health (total signups ever, total page views)
  • Too many metrics: Dashboards that require scrolling to see. If it does not fit on one screen, cut metrics.
  • No comparison: Raw numbers without context (current value with no previous period or target)
  • Stale dashboards: Metrics that have not been updated or reviewed in months
  • Output dashboards: Measuring team activity (tickets closed, PRs merged) instead of user and business outcomes
  • One dashboard for all audiences: Executives, PMs, and engineers need different views. One size does not fit all.
Alerting

Set alerts for metrics that require immediate attention:

  • Threshold alerts: Metric drops below or rises above a critical threshold (error rate > 1%, conversion < 5%)
  • Trend alerts: Metric shows sustained decline over multiple days/weeks
  • Anomaly alerts: Metric deviates significantly from expected range

Alert hygiene:

  • Every alert should be actionable. If you cannot do anything about it, do not alert on it.
  • Review and tune alerts regularly. Too many false positives and people ignore all alerts.
  • Define an owner for each alert. Who responds when it fires?
  • Set appropriate severity levels. Not everything is P0.

Output Format

Use tables for the scorecard. Use clear status indicators. Keep the summary tight — the reader should get the essential story in 30 seconds.

Tips

  • Start with the "so what" — what is the most important thing in this metrics review? Lead with that.
  • Absolute numbers without context are useless. Always show comparisons (vs previous period, vs target, vs benchmark).
  • Be careful about attribution. Correlation is not causation. If a metric moved, acknowledge uncertainty about why.
  • Segment analysis often reveals that an aggregate metric masks important differences. A flat overall number might hide one segment growing and another shrinking.
  • Not all metric movements matter. Small fluctuations are noise. Focus attention on meaningful changes.
  • If a metric is missing its target, do not just report the miss — recommend what to do about it.
  • Metrics reviews should drive decisions. If the review does not lead to at least one action, it was not useful.

© aAAaqwq, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in skills/metrics-review of aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 7cefd81

Used in 1 other repository

We found 1 copy of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

Metrics Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Metrics Review compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Metrics Review this skillaAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team1051 repos~4.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Product Health Analysismohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.4k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Swarmaglitch-rabin/swarma173—~4.4kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Prdjuanandresgs/claude-ctrl193—~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassNone
AI Product Strategy InterviewerPrepLabsAI/InterviewMentor112—~4.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Investigate MetricPostHog/posthog40k—~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Product Health Analysis

    mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

    Interpret product metrics against goals and surface actionable signals.

    1.4k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated today
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Swarma

    glitch-rabin/swarma

    Agent teams that run growth experiments and build their own playbook.

    173 GitHub stars~4.4k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check: notes
  • Prd

    juanandresgs/claude-ctrl

    Write structured feature specifications with problem statements, user journeys, use cases, functional requirements, and success metrics.

    193 GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • AI Product Strategy Interviewer

    PrepLabsAI/InterviewMentor

    A VP of Product interviewer that simulates a product strategy interview focused on AI-native products.

    112 GitHub stars~4.5k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Investigate Metric

    PostHog/posthog

    Official

    Diagnose why a product metric changed (dropped, spiked, or plateaued) by orchestrating breakdowns, actors, paths, lifecycle, retention, and annotations queries.

    40k GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated today
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Ab Testing

    ericrisco/rsc-harness

    A skill your agent uses when designing or analyzing a controlled experiment — falsifiable hypothesis, sample size from an MDE, reading significance/CI/power, CUPED, or rescuing tests that won't go…

    180 GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated today
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed

More from aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team

All 167 skills in this repo
  • Content Creator

    aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team

    Create SEO-optimized marketing content with consistent brand voice.

    105 GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~1.9k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Financial Calculator

    aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team

    Advanced financial calculator with future value tables, present value, discount calculations, markup pricing, and compound interest.

    105 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.5k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Bankr Signals

    aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team

    Transaction-verified trading signals on Base blockchain. An agent skill from aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team.

    105 GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.3k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Erc 8004

    aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team

    Register AI agents on Ethereum mainnet using ERC-8004 (Trustless Agents).

    105 GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~1.2k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Frontend Design Ultimate

    aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team

    Create distinctive, production-grade static sites with React, Tailwind CSS, and shadcn/ui — no mockups needed.

    105 GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.7k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Zsxq Smart Publish

    aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team

    Publish and manage content on 知识星球 (zsxq.com). An agent skill from aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team.

    105 GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Metrics Review

What does Metrics Review do?

Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights. Metrics Review is an agent skill from aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team. Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights.

When should I use Metrics Review?

Metrics Review fits situations like: running a weekly; quarterly metrics review; investigating a sudden spike; comparing performance against targets.

How do I install Metrics Review in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill metrics-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/metrics-review in aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team) into .claude/skills/metrics-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Metrics Review in Codex?

Run `npx skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill metrics-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/metrics-review in aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team) into .agents/skills/metrics-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Metrics Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill metrics-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/metrics-review, .gemini/skills/metrics-review, .github/skills/metrics-review and .opencode/skills/metrics-review in your project.

What does Metrics Review need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Metrics Review is instructions for the agent only.

Does Metrics Review access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Metrics Review safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Metrics Review use?

Metrics Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Metrics Review use?

About 4.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 18k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Metrics Review?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Metrics Review: Product Health Analysis (mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills, 1.4k stars), Swarma (glitch-rabin/swarma, 173 stars), Prd (juanandresgs/claude-ctrl, 193 stars) and AI Product Strategy Interviewer (PrepLabsAI/InterviewMentor, 112 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Metrics Review?

aAAaqwq (a GitHub user) maintains it in aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team, which has 105 GitHub stars. The repository holds 167 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 8, 2026.

Source: aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.