Product Health Analysis
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Interpret product metrics against goals and surface actionable signals.
Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights.
$ npx skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill metrics-review -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team metrics-review --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/metrics-review .claude/skills/metrics-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "metrics-review" agent skill from https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team/tree/main/skills/metrics-review into .claude/skills/metrics-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "metrics-review", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team/tree/main/skills/metrics-reviewType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill metrics-review -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team metrics-review --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/metrics-review .agents/skills/metrics-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "metrics-review" agent skill from https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team/tree/main/skills/metrics-review into .agents/skills/metrics-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "metrics-review", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill metrics-review -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team metrics-review --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/metrics-review .cursor/skills/metrics-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "metrics-review" agent skill from https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team/tree/main/skills/metrics-review into .cursor/skills/metrics-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "metrics-review", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team.git --path skills/metrics-review--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill metrics-review -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team metrics-review --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/metrics-review .gemini/skills/metrics-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "metrics-review" agent skill from https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team/tree/main/skills/metrics-review into .gemini/skills/metrics-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "metrics-review", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team metrics-reviewInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill metrics-review -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/metrics-review .github/skills/metrics-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "metrics-review" agent skill from https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team/tree/main/skills/metrics-review into .github/skills/metrics-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "metrics-review", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill metrics-review -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team metrics-review --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/metrics-review .opencode/skills/metrics-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "metrics-review" agent skill from https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team/tree/main/skills/metrics-review into .opencode/skills/metrics-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "metrics-review", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
metrics-reviewReview and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights.
Metrics Review is an agent skill from aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team. Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights. Use when running a weekly, monthly, or quarterly metrics review, investigating a sudden spike or drop, comparing performance against targets, or turning raw numbers into a scorecard with recommended actions.
Its SKILL.md is about 4.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Product & Project Management, covering Product metrics and Forecasting and time series. The repository describes itself as: An installable, cross-framework AI organization: C-suite agents, expert subagents, curated skills, independent review, and one-command setup across 18 AI client/runtime adapters. The licence is MIT.
5 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 7cefd81. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Metrics Review loads about 4.5k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 76 tokens; SKILL.md has 2,456 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
The full file from aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team at commit 7cefd81, republished under its MIT licence (© aAAaqwq). 2,456 words, ~4,505 tokens.
.claude/skills/metrics-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Review and analyze product metrics, identify trends, and surface actionable insights.
/metrics-review $ARGUMENTSIf ~~product analytics is connected:
If no analytics tool is connected, ask the user to provide:
Ask the user:
Structure the review using a metrics hierarchy: North Star metric at the top, L1 health indicators (acquisition, activation, engagement, retention, revenue, satisfaction), and L2 diagnostic metrics for drill-down. See Product Metrics Hierarchy below for full definitions.
If the user has not defined their metrics hierarchy, help them identify their North Star and key L1 metrics before proceeding.
For each key metric:
Identify correlations:
2-3 sentences: overall product health, most notable changes, key callout.
Table format for quick scanning:
| Metric | Current | Previous | Change | Target | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Metric] | [Value] | [Value] | [+/- %] | [Target] | [On track / At risk / Miss] |
For each metric worth discussing:
What is going well:
What needs attention:
Specific next steps based on the analysis:
After generating the review:
The single metric that best captures the core value your product delivers to users. It should be:
Examples by product type:
The 5-7 metrics that together paint a complete picture of product health. These map to the key stages of the user lifecycle:
Acquisition: Are new users finding the product?
Activation: Are new users reaching the value moment?
Engagement: Are active users getting value?
Retention: Are users coming back?
Monetization: Is value translating to revenue?
Satisfaction: How do users feel about the product?
Detailed metrics used to investigate changes in L1 metrics:
What they measure: Unique users who perform a qualifying action in a day, week, or month.
Key decisions:
How to use them:
What it measures: Of users who started in period X, what % are still active in period Y?
Common retention timeframes:
How to use retention:
What it measures: % of users who move from one stage to the next.
Common conversion funnels:
How to use conversion:
What it measures: % of new users who reach the moment where they first experience the product's core value.
Defining activation:
How to use activation:
Objectives: Qualitative, aspirational goals that describe what you want to achieve.
Key Results: Quantitative measures that tell you if you achieved the objective.
Example:
Objective: Make our product indispensable for daily workflows
Key Results:
- Increase DAU/MAU ratio from 0.35 to 0.50
- Increase D30 retention for new users from 40% to 55%
- 3 core workflows with >80% task completion ratePurpose: Catch issues quickly, monitor experiments, stay in touch with product health. Duration: 15-30 minutes. Attendees: Product manager, maybe engineering lead.
What to review:
Action: If something looks off, investigate. Otherwise, note it and move on.
Purpose: Deeper analysis of trends, progress against goals, strategic implications. Duration: 30-60 minutes. Attendees: Product team, key stakeholders.
What to review:
Action: Identify 1-3 areas to investigate or invest in. Update priorities if metrics reveal new information.
Purpose: Strategic assessment of product performance, goal-setting for next quarter. Duration: 60-90 minutes. Attendees: Product, engineering, design, leadership.
What to review:
Action: Set OKRs for next quarter. Adjust product strategy based on what the data shows.
A good dashboard answers the question "How is the product doing?" at a glance.
Principles:
Start with the question, not the data. What decisions does this dashboard support? Design backwards from the decision.
Hierarchy of information. The most important metric should be the most visually prominent. North Star at the top, L1 metrics next, L2 metrics available on drill-down.
Context over numbers. A number without context is meaningless. Always show: current value, comparison (previous period, target, benchmark), trend direction.
Fewer metrics, more insight. A dashboard with 50 metrics helps no one. Focus on 5-10 that matter. Put everything else in a detailed report.
Consistent time periods. Use the same time period for all metrics on a dashboard. Mixing daily and monthly metrics creates confusion.
Visual status indicators. Use color to indicate health at a glance:
Actionability. Every metric on the dashboard should be something the team can influence. If you cannot act on it, it does not belong on the product dashboard.
Top row: North Star metric with trend line and target.
Second row: L1 metrics scorecard — current value, change, target, status for each key metric.
Third row: Key funnels or conversion metrics — visual funnel showing drop-off at each stage.
Fourth row: Recent experiments and launches — active A/B tests, recent feature launches with early metrics.
Bottom / drill-down: L2 metrics, segment breakdowns, and detailed time series for investigation.
Set alerts for metrics that require immediate attention:
Alert hygiene:
Use tables for the scorecard. Use clear status indicators. Keep the summary tight — the reader should get the essential story in 30 seconds.
© aAAaqwq, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Just SKILL.md in skills/metrics-review of aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 7cefd81
We found 1 copy of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.
Metrics Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metrics Review this skillaAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team | 105 | 1 repos | ~4.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Product Health Analysismohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills | 1.4k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Swarmaglitch-rabin/swarma | 173 | — | ~4.4k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Prdjuanandresgs/claude-ctrl | 193 | — | ~2.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| AI Product Strategy InterviewerPrepLabsAI/InterviewMentor | 112 | — | ~4.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Investigate MetricPostHog/posthog | 40k | — | ~1.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence |
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Interpret product metrics against goals and surface actionable signals.
glitch-rabin/swarma
Agent teams that run growth experiments and build their own playbook.
juanandresgs/claude-ctrl
Write structured feature specifications with problem statements, user journeys, use cases, functional requirements, and success metrics.
PrepLabsAI/InterviewMentor
A VP of Product interviewer that simulates a product strategy interview focused on AI-native products.
PostHog/posthog
Diagnose why a product metric changed (dropped, spiked, or plateaued) by orchestrating breakdowns, actors, paths, lifecycle, retention, and annotations queries.
ericrisco/rsc-harness
A skill your agent uses when designing or analyzing a controlled experiment — falsifiable hypothesis, sample size from an MDE, reading significance/CI/power, CUPED, or rescuing tests that won't go…
aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team
Create SEO-optimized marketing content with consistent brand voice.
aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team
Advanced financial calculator with future value tables, present value, discount calculations, markup pricing, and compound interest.
aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team
Transaction-verified trading signals on Base blockchain. An agent skill from aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team.
aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team
Register AI agents on Ethereum mainnet using ERC-8004 (Trustless Agents).
aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team
Create distinctive, production-grade static sites with React, Tailwind CSS, and shadcn/ui — no mockups needed.
aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team
Publish and manage content on 知识星球 (zsxq.com). An agent skill from aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team.
Categories
Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights. Metrics Review is an agent skill from aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team. Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights.
Metrics Review fits situations like: running a weekly; quarterly metrics review; investigating a sudden spike; comparing performance against targets.
Run `npx skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill metrics-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/metrics-review in aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team) into .claude/skills/metrics-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
Run `npx skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill metrics-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/metrics-review in aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team) into .agents/skills/metrics-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill metrics-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/metrics-review, .gemini/skills/metrics-review, .github/skills/metrics-review and .opencode/skills/metrics-review in your project.
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Metrics Review is instructions for the agent only.
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
Metrics Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
About 4.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 18k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Metrics Review: Product Health Analysis (mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills, 1.4k stars), Swarma (glitch-rabin/swarma, 173 stars), Prd (juanandresgs/claude-ctrl, 193 stars) and AI Product Strategy Interviewer (PrepLabsAI/InterviewMentor, 112 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
aAAaqwq (a GitHub user) maintains it in aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team, which has 105 GitHub stars. The repository holds 167 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 8, 2026.
Source: aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.