Agent skill

Seedance Interview

by Emily2040 in Emily2040/seedance-2.0

This skill should be used when the user wants creative guidance, story development, scene planning, or a director interview to turn a Seedance 2.0 idea into a production-ready prompt - adapting to…

MITAuto-check passedMedia & Creative

Install Seedance Interview

skills CLI
$ npx skills add Emily2040/seedance-2.0 --skill seedance-interview -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install Emily2040/seedance-2.0 seedance-interview --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Emily2040/seedance-2.0.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/seedance-interview .claude/skills/seedance-interview && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
seedance-interview
GitHub stars
7.6k
Token cost
~3.9k tokens
SKILL.md length
2,134 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
29
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

This skill should be used when the user wants creative guidance, story development, scene planning, or a director interview to turn a Seedance 2.0 idea into a production-ready prompt - adapting to…

  • Works in 8 steps: Ask in pictures, not parameters. Offer… → One batch, never an interrogation: at… → Every question ships with a default. End… → …
  • Wants creative guidance
  • SKILL.md covers Start Where They Are, Intent, Starting Points and Question Quality Rules, plus 6 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Seedance Interview is an agent skill from Emily2040/seedance-2.0. This skill should be used when the user wants creative guidance, story development, scene planning, or a director interview to turn a Seedance 2.0 idea into a production-ready prompt - adapting to users who have no idea yet, a rough concept, or precise professional direction in shots, lenses, and blocking.

Its SKILL.md is about 3.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Media & Creative, covering AI video generation. It works with Seedance. The repository describes itself as: Comprehensive production pipeline for quad-modal AI filmmaking with Seedance 2.0. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Wants creative guidance
  • Story development
  • A director interview to turn a Seedance 2.0 idea into a production-ready prompt - adapting to users who have no idea yet
  • A rough concept

Example prompts

  • “/seedance-interview”

Workflow steps

8 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Ask in pictures, not parameters. Offer up to three concrete directions the user can compare by their consequences. Never: What camera…
  2. One batch, never an interrogation: at most five numbered questions in a single message so the user can answer everything in one reply…
  3. Every question ships with a default. End it with (not sure? I'll choose [option] because [reason tied to this brief]). "I don't know" is…
  4. One question, one decision. Never bundle two asks into one sentence, and never ask anything whose answer would not change the prompt.
  5. Keep their words. If the user says "swooshy," say "swooshy" back - and translate it into camera language silently, inside the brief.
  6. Run the whole interview in the user's language - questions, options, treatment, and switches. Keep imported reference tags literal…
  7. Honor professional direction. If the user specifies shot size, lens, camera move, blocking, or performance, capture it verbatim and…
  8. Expert detect: if the user speaks production language fluently (shot list, lens, deliverables, LUT, coverage) or works for an agency or…

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 4668457. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Seedance Interview loads about 3.9k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 82 tokens; SKILL.md has 2,134 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~82
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~3.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from Emily2040/seedance-2.0 at commit 4668457, republished under its MIT licence (© Emily2040). 2,134 words, ~3,850 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/seedance-interview/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
seedance-interview
description
This skill should be used when the user wants creative guidance, story development, scene planning, or a director interview to turn a Seedance 2.0 idea into a production-ready prompt - adapting to users who have no idea yet, a rough concept, or precise professional direction in shots, lenses, and blocking.
license
MIT
user-invocable
true
tags
creative-direction, interview, brief, seedance-20
metadata.version
6.7.0
metadata.updated
2026-08-01
metadata.parent
seedance-20
metadata.author
Iamemily2050 (@iamemily2050)
metadata.repository
https://github.com/Emily2040/seedance-2.0

seedance-interview

Before producing prompt text, a prompt-ready block, a rewrite, an example, or a compiled clip, load the Director's Read, classify the brief, and complete its canonical narrative or non-narrative record. Translate that record into visible or audible carriers and keep its internal labels out of final generation prose.

The front door - and three different people walk through it. The same questions do not serve all three:

  • someone with no idea yet, carrying only a feeling and no words for it;
  • someone with a rough idea they can half-describe;
  • a professional who already thinks in shots, lenses, blocking, and performance.

Read which one is in front of you before asking anything. The baseline assumption is still no film background - every plain question must be answerable by someone who has never heard the words "shot," "aspect ratio," or "blocking" - but never ask a question the person cannot answer, and never flatten someone who already knows exactly what they want.

Load the Director's Read before converting any answer into a brief. It is the canonical pre-compilation contract on casual, professional, single-clip, and sequence routes alike.

Start Where They Are

No idea yet - do not interrogate. A blank-slate user cannot answer "who is the star?" because they have not decided yet; asking is exactly what makes the tool feel unfriendly. Lead with something to react to instead of a question to answer: offer the Starting Points menu below, or draft one complete concept from whatever scrap they gave and invite a reaction. "I don't know" and "surprise me" are complete answers - they select a proposal, never a stall.

Rough idea - run the plain Priority Question Pool, skipping every question the idea already answers, and propose the mini-treatment as early as one round in, or zero rounds if the idea is already rich.

Professional - the moment the user gives, or offers to give, explicit shot size, lens, camera move, blocking, or performance direction, switch to a precise intake in their own vocabulary. Load pro-filmmaking-standards and cinematography-shot-language, capture their direction verbatim, fill only the gaps they left, and never translate their craft into plain words or re-decide what they already decided.

When the level is unclear, let them choose rather than guessing: "I can keep this simple - or, if you already think in shots and lenses, tell me and I'll skip straight to a precise spec."

Intent

This is the translator between a scene that exists in someone's head and one that exists on screen. For the blank-slate user the job is to make them feel their idea was already a film and someone finally saw it - success sounds like "that's exactly what I meant." For the professional the job is the opposite kind of respect: execute their direction precisely, add rigor, and waste none of their momentum. As the story evolves the questions disappear: every answer becomes memory, every reaction to a draft becomes direction, and nothing already decided is ever asked again.

Starting Points

For a blank-slate user, draft a complete concept from the available clue or offer up to three brief-specific directions using interview-starters. Each option changes what the viewer notices, understands, or feels through different action, staging, timing, or sound. Include the meaningful tradeoff in plain words; do not reuse a luxury/soft-light/slow-camera menu for unrelated subjects.

Invite a choice, a compatible mix, another idea, or “choose for me.” A delegated choice is enough: select one, briefly explain why it fits, and draft without another confirmation. Preserve selected and rejected directions through revisions. Keep this menu optional and inside the existing question limit.

Question Quality Rules

  1. Ask in pictures, not parameters. Offer up to three concrete directions the user can compare by their consequences. Never: What camera style and aspect ratio?
  2. One batch, never an interrogation: at most five numbered questions in a single message so the user can answer everything in one reply. Follow up only when an answer creates a real fork.
  3. Every question ships with a default. End it with (not sure? I'll choose [option] because [reason tied to this brief]). "I don't know" is always a valid answer; it simply selects the default and never stalls the interview.
  4. One question, one decision. Never bundle two asks into one sentence, and never ask anything whose answer would not change the prompt.
  5. Keep their words. If the user says "swooshy," say "swooshy" back - and translate it into camera language silently, inside the brief.
  6. Run the whole interview in the user's language - questions, options, treatment, and switches. Keep imported reference tags literal (@Image1, @Video1, @Audio1, @图片1, @视频1). For localized starting-point menus and feeling-to-craft cues in the six supported languages, load interview-starters.
  7. Honor professional direction. If the user specifies shot size, lens, camera move, blocking, or performance, capture it verbatim and execute it precisely - never simplify, translate, or override it. Fill only the gaps they left, and compile a shot-contract-grade result (shot size, lens feel, camera support and move, blocking, performance beat, light setup, timing, audio, constraints).
  8. Expert detect: if the user speaks production language fluently (shot list, lens, deliverables, LUT, coverage) or works for an agency or production, drop plain mode, load pro-filmmaking-standards, and run the professional intake instead.

Priority Question Pool

Each plain question secretly decides a production parameter the user never has to know about. Skip every question the idea already answers. Keep the existing limit on unnecessary questioning: at most five questions in one batch. Questions 1-5 are the core set for a single clip; questions 6-9 belong to the sequence branch - raise them only when the idea is already a longer story or the user signals a series, part two, continuation, or making it longer. For a plain single-clip idea, assume one clip and do not surface sequence, continuation-source, or cross-clip-lock questions.

#Ask (plain)Secretly decidesDefault if unsure
1Who or what is the star of this video - one person, pet, product, or place?subject anchorthe most concrete noun in their idea
2What happens? What is different at the end compared to the start?action beat, durationone simple action with a visible ending
3Where does it happen, and what time of day?scene, light sourcethe supplied setting, or a stated reversible setting that serves the action
4What should someone feel watching it - excited, calm, moved, amused, amazed, or tense?camera, light, sound, pacethe stated audience intention; otherwise propose a brief-specific direction
5Where will people watch it - phone apps like TikTok/Reels (tall screen), or YouTube/TV (wide screen)?aspect ratio, pacingtall 9:16
6Is this one complete clip, two or three connected clips, a longer scene that should be divided, or are you unsure?standalone_clip vs sequence_projectunsure means plan the full story but finalize one clip at a time
7How must the complete story end?final story outcomea visible changed state
8Do you already have an accepted previous clip or final frame this must continue from?continuation source gateno source means do not invent continuation state
9Which details must never change across clips - face, wardrobe, product, place, direction, sound, or something else?immutable continuity lockssubject identity and exact reference tags

When real material likely exists (a business, product, pet, person, or place the user owns), the reference question takes one of the five slots — swap out question 3, which defaults well: Do you have photos, clips, or sound of the real [subject]? Real material keeps the video looking like yours. The batch never exceeds five questions total. Map anything they provide to reference roles via reference-workflow.

For a sequence project, determine whether the request is the complete video or part of a longer story, how the complete story ends, target total duration, likely clip count, current clip job, references and their intended roles, active surface, audio needs, immutable continuity requirements, and any accepted source footage. Do not add these questions blindly when the answer is already clear.

Show full SKILL.md (811 more words)Show less

Feeling-to-Film Translation

Treat a feeling as an intention to resolve through the scene, not a lookup table for lighting or lens moves. Ask what the viewer should notice and what changes over time. “Exciting” might mean following a launch, holding a frame while action crosses it, or revealing a surprising result. Preserve the user's interpretation and supplied camera or performance direction. Use interview-starters for consequence-based choices when the answer is still open; do not translate every “cinematic” request into warm sun and a slow push-in.

Direct the Scene, Don't Decorate It

The feeling answer is not a style label to sprinkle on; it is the input to a directorial decision. Classify the idea with the Director's Read. Complete the canonical record for the selected lane. Keep lane definitions in that reference rather than broadening them here or inventing fields to fit a genre. From the chosen lane, genre, feeling, reference look, and viewing surface, set one coherent setup - camera, lens, light, blocking or material action, and sound serving one intention - rather than a generic "cinematic" look. Load directing-engine when scenes need distinct treatment, one voice must hold across many clips, or the right setup is genuinely unclear. Keep the read in the internal production brief and translate it into visible or audible carriers before final prompt prose; never quiz the user about its field names.

When the idea has more than one scene, give each scene its own read and setup but the same voice, and plan how the look should tighten toward the turning point so the finished story feels authored by one hand. Performance is written as one true visible gesture per beat, not as an emotion word.

Propose, Then Adjust

After one round of answers - or zero rounds, if the idea is already rich or the user picked a starting point - stop asking and show:

  1. A mini-treatment: two or three plain sentences describing the finished video exactly as a viewer would see it. No production vocabulary.
  2. The assumptions made, each with a one-word switch: I assumed we stay beside the repair bench - say "wider" to show the room.
  3. The production brief beneath, in full director language.

Reacting to a draft is easier than answering questions: a non-expert says "yes, but slower" far more readily than they specify pacing. Treat their reaction as the second interview round. For a blank-slate user, prefer proposing before asking; for a professional, propose the shot contract and adjust on their notes.

Process

  1. Read who is in front of you (Start Where They Are), and build a safe draft premise immediately from the user input. For a blank-slate user, lead with the Starting Points menu or a drafted concept instead of a question batch.
  2. Run the priority question pool in one batch only when the user has a rough idea, skipping every question the idea already answers. For a professional, skip plain questions and take a precise intake in their own terms.
  3. Identify the genre path: product, lifestyle, drama, music video, landscape, commercial, animation, UGC, or experimental. Load the Director's Read, classify each scene, and complete either the canonical narrative record or the non-narrative refusal before deriving its coherent setup. Load directing-engine when scenes diverge or a voice must hold across clips.
  4. If the user is a filmmaker, agency, producer, editor, localization team, or client-review owner, load pro-filmmaking-standards and cinematography-shot-language and collect deliverables, territory, aspect ratio, approval owner, rights, shot/lens/blocking direction, and post/delivery needs - preserving their explicit direction verbatim.
  5. If the idea is a sequence project, load seedance-sequence and output a full-story mini-treatment, final story outcome, sequence beat map, continuity bible, first clip contract, first clip prompt, provisional future intent cards, and Project State Capsule.
  6. For standalone work, propose the mini-treatment with switchable assumptions, adjust on reaction, end with a concise creative brief, and route to seedance-prompt, seedance-prompt-short, or seedance-pipeline.

Output Contract

Match the depth of the output to the person; do not hand a blank-slate user a production dossier.

Blank-slate or casual single clip - keep it short: the mini-treatment in two or three plain sentences, two or three switchable assumptions each with a one-word switch, the chosen directorial voice in a single line, and the next prompt path. Nothing more.

Professional or sequence - return the full contract: production phase and role; the shot contract (shot size, lens feel, camera support and move, blocking, performance beat, light setup, timing, audio, constraints) with the user's explicit direction preserved verbatim; reference and rights map; continuity anchors; core scene, mood, camera intent, sound intent; safety/rights notes; deliverables if known; and post/delivery notes when the output leaves the prompt stage. For a sequence project, return the sequence output contract from seedance-sequence.

Run the entire interview and every deliverable in the user's language. Do not ask a long questionnaire when the user already supplied enough information to write the prompt.

© Emily2040, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in skills/seedance-interview of Emily2040/seedance-2.0.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 4668457

Compare with similar skills

Seedance Interview next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Seedance Interview compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Seedance Interview this skillEmily2040/seedance-2.07.6k—~3.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Seedancesongguoxs/seedance-prompt-skill2.9k1 repos~2.5kAutomated safety check: PassNone
SN Motion HTMLOpenSenseNova/SenseNova-Skills5.7k—~2.2kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Seedance Prompt Endexhunter/seedance2-skill4.2k—~3.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Seedance 2 5 Video Directorliyue-aigc/seedance-2-5-video-director561—~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Seedance Prompt Zhdexhunter/seedance2-skill4.2k—~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Seedance

    songguoxs/seedance-prompt-skill

    This skill should be used when the user asks to "generate video prompts", "create Seedance prompts", "write video descriptions", mentions "Seedance", "seedance", "即梦", "即梦平台", "视频提示词", "视频生成"…

    2.9k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.5k tokens
    Media & CreativeAuto-check passed
  • SN Motion HTML

    OpenSenseNova/SenseNova-Skills

    Builds HTML stories where one continuous camera journey advances with page progress, using researched structure, AI stills, Seedance video clips and browser QA.

    5.7k GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated today
    Media & CreativeAuto-check: notes
  • Seedance Prompt En

    dexhunter/seedance2-skill

    Write effective prompts for Jimeng Seedance 2.0 multimodal AI video generation.

    4.2k GitHub stars~3.8k tokensUpdated 20 days ago
    Media & CreativeAuto-check passed
  • Seedance 2 5 Video Director

    liyue-aigc/seedance-2-5-video-director

    Design, derive, optimize, diagnose, and rewrite scripts or copy-ready prompts specifically for Dreamina/即梦 Seedance 2.5.

    561 GitHub stars~3.5k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Media & CreativeAuto-check passed
  • Seedance Prompt Zh

    dexhunter/seedance2-skill

    为即梦 Seedance 2.0 多模态AI视频生成模型撰写高质量提示词。当用户需要使用文本、图片、视频、音频等多模态输入创作视频提示词时触发。涵盖@引用语法、运镜复刻、特效模仿、视频延长、视频编辑、音乐卡点、电商广告、短剧创作、科普教育等场景。

    4.2k GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 20 days ago
    Media & CreativeAuto-check passed
  • Seedance

    MapleShaw/seedance2.0-prompt-skill

    Generate production-ready Chinese video prompts and image prompts for ByteDance Seedance 2.0 (即梦), and optionally execute them via the official dreamina CLI.

    806 GitHub stars~5.5k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Media & CreativeAuto-check passed

More from Emily2040/seedance-2.0

All 29 skills in this repo
  • Seedance 2.0 Video Prompting

    Emily2040/seedance-2.0

    Routes Seedance 2.0 video work across Dreamina, API and router surfaces, covering prompts, reference handling, audio and lip-sync, pricing and model-ID questions.

    7.6k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~7.4k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Seedance IP-Safe Prompt Rewriter

    Emily2040/seedance-2.0

    Rewrites Seedance 2.0 video prompts that name characters, brands, celebrities, songs or real people into original, rights-safe versions that keep the creative intent.

    7.6k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~930 tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Seedance Japanese Prompt Examples

    Emily2040/seedance-2.0

    Provides Japanese prompt patterns and safe example rewrites for Seedance 2.0 video generation, with reference tags kept intact and each example labeled by risk.

    7.6k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~898 tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Seedance Korean Prompt Examples

    Emily2040/seedance-2.0

    Korean-language prompt patterns for Seedance 2.0 video generation, each labeled as safe, needing an owned reference, or requiring a rewrite.

    7.6k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~942 tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Seedance Chinese Prompt Examples

    Emily2040/seedance-2.0

    Supplies Chinese example prompts for Seedance 2.0 video generation, labeled by safety, with notes on rewriting prompts that name protected people or brands.

    7.6k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~862 tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Seedance Anti-Slop Prompt Editor

    Emily2040/seedance-2.0

    Rewrites Seedance 2.0 video prompts to replace filler, hollow superlatives and vague cinematic wording with production-specific detail while keeping the user's style.

    7.6k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.1k tokens
    Auto-check passed

Works with

Questions about Seedance Interview

What does Seedance Interview do?

This skill should be used when the user wants creative guidance, story development, scene planning, or a director interview to turn a Seedance 2.0 idea into a production-ready prompt - adapting to…. 0.0 idea into a production-ready prompt - adapting to users who have no idea yet, a rough concept, or precise professional direction in shots, lenses, and blocking.

When should I use Seedance Interview?

Seedance Interview fits situations like: wants creative guidance; story development; A director interview to turn a Seedance 2.0 idea into a production-ready prompt - adapting to users who have no idea yet; A rough concept.

How do I install Seedance Interview in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add Emily2040/seedance-2.0 --skill seedance-interview -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/seedance-interview in Emily2040/seedance-2.0) into .claude/skills/seedance-interview in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Seedance Interview in Codex?

Run `npx skills add Emily2040/seedance-2.0 --skill seedance-interview -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/seedance-interview in Emily2040/seedance-2.0) into .agents/skills/seedance-interview in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Seedance Interview in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add Emily2040/seedance-2.0 --skill seedance-interview -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/seedance-interview, .gemini/skills/seedance-interview, .github/skills/seedance-interview and .opencode/skills/seedance-interview in your project.

What does Seedance Interview need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Seedance Interview is instructions for the agent only.

Does Seedance Interview access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Seedance Interview safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Seedance Interview use?

Seedance Interview is published under the MIT licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Seedance Interview use?

About 3.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 15k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Seedance Interview?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Seedance Interview: Seedance (songguoxs/seedance-prompt-skill, 2.9k stars), SN Motion HTML (OpenSenseNova/SenseNova-Skills, 5.7k stars), Seedance Prompt En (dexhunter/seedance2-skill, 4.2k stars) and Seedance 2 5 Video Director (liyue-aigc/seedance-2-5-video-director, 561 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Seedance Interview?

Emily2040 (a GitHub user) maintains it in Emily2040/seedance-2.0, which has 7,565 GitHub stars. The repository holds 29 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 3, 2026.

Source: Emily2040/seedance-2.0 on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.