Official agent skill

Observability K8s Investigation

by elastic in elastic/agent-skills

Investigate Kubernetes workload, node, and control-plane issues using OTel telemetry (EDOT).

OfficialApache-2.0Auto-check passedDevOps & Cloud

Install Observability K8s Investigation

skills CLI
$ npx skills add elastic/agent-skills --skill observability-k8s-investigation -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install elastic/agent-skills observability-k8s-investigation --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/elastic/agent-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/observability/k8s-investigation .claude/skills/observability-k8s-investigation && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
observability-k8s-investigation
GitHub stars
592
Token cost
~8.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
3,228 words
Files
3 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
26
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
Apache-2.0

At a glance

Investigate Kubernetes workload, node, and control-plane issues using OTel telemetry (EDOT).

  • Diagnosing pod failures (CrashLoopBackOff
  • SKILL.md covers Environment Configuration, Scope, Guidelines and Indices and fields, plus 7 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Resource exhaustion

What it does

Observability K8s Investigation is an agent skill from elastic/agent-skills, published by the product's own GitHub organization. Investigate Kubernetes workload, node, and control-plane issues using OTel telemetry (EDOT). Use when diagnosing pod failures (CrashLoopBackOff, OOMKilled, Error), node pressure, resource exhaustion, image pull failures, admission rejections, autoscaling anomalies, or correlating K8s state with application signals. OTel ingest path only — the legacy ECS Kubernetes integration shape is out of scope.

Its SKILL.md is about 8.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 3 other files, including reference files (for example `references/failure-modes.md` and `references/query-recipes.md`). Compatibility notes: Requires the elastic CLI (= 0.2) with an Elasticsearch context, and Kubernetes telemetry ingested through EDOT / the OpenTelemetry kube-stack collector into…

It sits in DevOps & Cloud, covering Container orchestration and Observability. It works with Kubernetes, OpenTelemetry and Elasticsearch. The repository describes itself as: Official Elastic Skills. The licence is Apache-2.0.

When your agent uses it

  • Diagnosing pod failures (CrashLoopBackOff
  • Resource exhaustion
  • Image pull failures
  • Admission rejections

Example prompts

  • “/observability-k8s-investigation”

Requirements

  • Compatibility (from SKILL.md): Requires the `elastic` CLI (>= 0.2) with an Elasticsearch context, and Kubernetes telemetry ingested through EDOT / the OpenTelemetry kube-stack collector into OTel-receiver-namespaced data streams. The base floor is Elasticsearch 8.11 or later, or Serverless. One query uses the `VALUES()` aggregation, which is GA on Serverless but preview from 8.14 and GA only in 9.4 on Stack; a `VALUES()`-free rewrite is given at the point of use. Alert-state lookups additionally need a Kibana context.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit baa5111. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are esql).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    Links to these hosts (documentation or services it may open):

    • github.com

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

  • Compatibility

    Requires the `elastic` CLI (>= 0.2) with an Elasticsearch context, and Kubernetes telemetry ingested through EDOT / the OpenTelemetry kube-stack collector into OTel-receiver-namespaced data streams. The base floor is Elasticsearch 8.11 or later, or Serverless. One query uses the `VALUES()` aggregation, which is GA on Serverless but preview from 8.14 and GA only in 9.4 on Stack; a `VALUES()`-free rewrite is given at the point of use. Alert-state lookups additionally need a Kibana context.

    From compatibility in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

Context cost

Observability K8s Investigation loads about 8.3k tokens when it runs, and up to ~12k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 108 tokens; SKILL.md has 3,228 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~108
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~8.3k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~12k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from elastic/agent-skills at commit baa5111, republished under its Apache-2.0 licence (© elastic). 3,228 words, ~8,310 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/observability-k8s-investigation/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 2 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
observability-k8s-investigation
description
Investigate Kubernetes workload, node, and control-plane issues using OTel telemetry (EDOT). Use when diagnosing pod failures (CrashLoopBackOff, OOMKilled, Error), node pressure, resource exhaustion, image pull failures, admission rejections, autoscaling anomalies, or correlating K8s state with application signals. OTel ingest path only — the legacy ECS Kubernetes integration shape is out of scope.
compatibility
Requires the `elastic` CLI (>= 0.2) with an Elasticsearch context, and Kubernetes telemetry ingested through EDOT / the OpenTelemetry kube-stack collector into OTel-receiver-namespaced data streams. The base floor is Elasticsearch 8.11 or later, or Serverless. One query uses the `VALUES()` aggregation, which is GA on Serverless but preview from 8.14 and GA only in 9.4 on Stack; a `VALUES()`-free rewrite is given at the point of use. Alert-state lookups additionally need a Kibana context.
metadata.author
elastic
metadata.version
0.5.1
metadata.universal
true

Kubernetes Investigation

Diagnose Kubernetes issues using OTel telemetry collected via EDOT (Elastic Distribution of OpenTelemetry) and the kube-stack collector. Correlate cluster state, pod runtime metrics, K8s events, application logs, and APM to identify root cause across the workload, node, and control-plane layers.

<!-- begin-partial: preamble -->

Environment Configuration

This skill executes Elasticsearch operations through the elastic CLI. If the elastic CLI is not installed, tell the user what it is needed for. Do not guess credentials, call the HTTP API directly, or attempt other workarounds.

This skill references operations in HTTP-shorthand form (e.g., GET /, GET /_cat/indices, GET /{index}/_mapping, GET /{index}/_settings/index.mode, POST /_query). The Operations table at the end of this document maps each shorthand to the equivalent elastic CLI command — always use the CLI rather than calling the HTTP API directly.

<!-- end-partial: preamble -->
Analysis without cluster access

The CLI check above gates querying the cluster — it does not gate analysis. When the user has already supplied the evidence in their question (metric values, counts, status reasons, log lines, alert payloads, configuration), reason from that evidence and deliver the conclusion.

When you genuinely do need data the user has not provided, still say what you would check and how — name the specific query, index, and field that would settle the question — and then ask for CLI setup. An answer that names the check is useful without a cluster; one that only asks for setup is not.

Every ES|QL query in this skill and in references/query-recipes.md runs via POST /_query. Alert state is read with GET kbn:/api/alerting/rules/_find. Field-presence checks use GET /<index>/_mapping or GET /_field_caps. The Operations table maps each to its elastic CLI equivalent.

Scope

In scope: OTel-receiver-namespaced indices (metrics-kubeletstatsreceiver.otel-*, metrics-k8sclusterreceiver.otel-*, logs-k8seventsreceiver.otel-*, logs-k8sobjectsreceiver.otel-*) and OTel semantic conventions (k8s.pod.name, k8s.namespace.name, k8s.container.restarts).

Out of scope:

  • The legacy Elastic Agent Kubernetes integration (metrics-kubernetes.*, logs-kubernetes.*, kubernetes.* fields). Being deprecated — do not author queries against these paths.
  • APM-layer analysis (service SLO breaches, transaction error rates, upstream dependency health). Different domain — once a K8s root cause is ruled in or out, hand off to the observability-sre-triage skill, which owns SLO status and burn rate, active alerting rules, throughput, latency, error rate, dependency health, and log funnelling. That is also the skill to use when the workload turns out not to be Kubernetes-hosted at all.
  • Cluster provisioning, capacity planning, cost optimization. Different domain.

Guidelines

These apply to every investigation. When in doubt, re-read them before writing the synthesis.

Absence of evidence is not evidence. Do not confabulate from empty results. If log queries return 0 rows, logs are likely not collected or the pod has no recent lines — this does not mean "dependency unavailable" or any other specific failure mode. Report no_logs_available and weight remaining signals accordingly.

Empty dependency data ≠ upstream healthy. Services without APM instrumentation (load generators, workers) emit no destination metrics. Report insufficient_dependency_data, not "upstreams OK."

Co-symptoms are not causes. Two services degrading simultaneously usually share an upstream, not a causal link. Only attribute causation when (a) one service's degradation clearly precedes the other's, and (b) the delta is large (>5× error rate, >3× latency).

OOMKilled ≠ memory leak by default. The limit might simply be undersized for the workload's working set. Tell them apart by the shape of the memory curve: a monotonic climb to the limit that resets on each restart, with load flat against the prior week and no recent deploy, is the leak signature — commit to it at high confidence. Reach for a 7-day same-hour baseline when the shape is ambiguous — spiky, diurnal, or load-correlated — not as a precondition for every OOMKilled finding.

Error-termination ≠ application bug by default. Check k8s.container.cpu_limit_utilization first. CFS throttling driving liveness probe timeouts is the most common misdiagnosis in this space.

Average CPU hides throttling. A pod can look healthy at 40–60% average cpu_limit_utilization while being throttled severely at p99. Linux enforces CPU limits in 100ms periods; bursty workloads reach quota mid-period and stall. Look at max and p95, not only the average.

Restart count is boolean, not a counter. k8s.container.restarts is pulled directly from the K8s API and can be pruned by the kubelet at any time, so the absolute value is unreliable. Treat it as == 0 (no recent restarts) versus > 0 (recently restarting); do not derive backoff timing or "linear versus exponential" patterns from it. Confirm the restart pattern via K8s Killing / BackOff events instead.

Prefer to report uncertainty over manufacturing confidence. If the evidence is ambiguous, the synthesis should say so. Competing hypotheses are a valid output.

Equally, do not manufacture uncertainty. The rule above is about ambiguous evidence, not about tone. When the pivotal signal is present and corroborated, commit to it at high confidence. Hedging an unambiguous finding down to "medium" is as much a defect as overclaiming.

Deliver the synthesis and stop. State confidence once, in the HYPOTHESIS line — not again per bullet. Do not narrate which queries were run unless a result changed the conclusion, and do not restate the alert back to the reader. End on RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS or DOWNSTREAM IMPACT; never close with an offer such as "want me to look further?". Follow-up work belongs in the recommendations list, phrased as a recommendation.

Indices and fields

Where to look
SignalIndex patternUse
Pod/container runtimemetrics-kubeletstatsreceiver.otel-*CPU, memory, network, filesystem. Utilization ratios.
Cluster statemetrics-k8sclusterreceiver.otel-*Restarts, phase, last-terminated reason, HPA, quota, node condition
K8s eventslogs-k8seventsreceiver.otel-*Killing, BackOff, FailedScheduling, Evicted, image pull events
K8s object snapshotslogs-k8sobjectsreceiver.otel-*Deployment/service/configmap state over time
Application logslogs-*.otel-*body.text, severity_text, filtered by k8s.pod.name
APMtraces-*.otel-*, metrics-service_*.otel-defaultCorrelate via service.name + K8s resource attrs
ML anomalies.ml-anomalies-*Memory-growth, restart-rate, throttle jobs (if configured)
Key fields

Flat OTel paths work in ES|QL. Prefer the flat form for readability; the nested resource.attributes.* form is for raw log documents only.

FieldIndexWhat it is
k8s.pod.nameall k8sPod name
k8s.namespace.namemetrics onlyNamespace. Mapped but null on k8seventsreceiver
attributes.k8s.namespace.namek8seventsreceiverNamespace on events — filter on this form there
k8s.container.nameall k8sContainer within pod
k8s.deployment.namek8sclusterreceiver + othersParent deployment
k8s.pod.phasek8sclusterreceiverPending=1/Running=2/Succeeded=3/Failed=4/Unknown=5
k8s.container.restartsk8sclusterreceiverTotal container restart count
k8s.container.status.last_terminated_reasonk8sclusterreceiverOOMKilled, Error, Completed, ContainerCannotRun
k8s.pod.status_reasonk8sclusterreceiverPod-level reason (Evicted, NodeLost)
k8s.container.memory_limit_utilizationkubeletstatsreceiver0.0–1.0+ (can exceed 1 transiently before OOM)
k8s.container.cpu_limit_utilizationkubeletstatsreceiver0.0–N (frequently >1 under CFS throttling)
k8s.pod.memory_limit_utilizationkubeletstatsreceiverWhole-pod aggregate; see the note below before using it
k8s.pod.cpu_limit_utilizationkubeletstatsreceiverWhole-pod aggregate; see the note below before using it
k8s.pod.memory.usage / .working_setkubeletstatsreceiverBytes
k8s.node.condition_memory_pressurek8sclusterreceiver1 = pressure, 0 = ok
k8s.node.condition_readyk8sclusterreceiver0 = NotReady
k8s.hpa.current_replicas / .desired_replicask8sclusterreceiverHPA state
attributes.k8s.event.reasonk8seventsreceiverEvent reason (filter on this)
body.textk8seventsreceiver / logsEvent message / log message
k8s.object.namek8seventsreceiverinvolvedObject name (log attribute, use flat form)
Container-level against pod-level limit utilization

Read limit utilization at the container level. k8s.container.cpu_limit_utilization and k8s.container.memory_limit_utilization are the default; the pod-level pair is a different measurement, not a synonym.

The receiver emits the two families on separate documents in the same data stream: pod-level fields appear on documents that carry no k8s.container.name, and container-level fields appear only on documents that do. A STATS ... BY k8s.container.name therefore returns null for every pod-level field, and the reverse holds too. Measured over one hour on a live 9.6.0 cluster: of 42,240 documents without a container name, 360 carried k8s.pod.cpu_limit_utilization and none carried the container field; of 18,240 documents with a container name, 900 carried the container field and none carried the pod field.

Availability differs too. Container-level utilization is emitted for each container that declares the limit, while the pod-level aggregate requires every container in the pod to declare it. Across two live clusters over three hours, no pod carried the pod-level field without also carrying the container-level one, while 27 pods carried the container-level field with the pod-level field absent — every one of them a multi-container pod in which only some containers declared limits. A pod-level throttling check on a sidecar-injected pod silently returns null.

ClusterContainer level onlyBoth levelsNeitherPod level only
forge-factory187440
k8s-demo96400

Use the pod-level fields only when the question is genuinely about the pod as a whole — total consumption against the sum of its containers' limits — and only after confirming they are populated. observability-sre-triage applies the same rule, so the two skills return the same answer for the same pod.

Field availability

Several fields above are off by default in stock kube-stack collectors and require explicit configuration. Verify presence with GET /<index>/_mapping or GET /_field_caps before relying on them; if absent, fall back as noted and call out the substitution in the synthesis.

FieldWhy it might be missingFall-back
k8s.container.status.last_terminated_reasonOptional metric in k8sclusterreceiver; gated behind metrics_collected.metadata config.Infer from K8s Killing / OOMKilling events in logs-k8seventsreceiver.otel-* and exit codes in app logs.
k8s.pod.status_reasonSame — optional metric on k8sclusterreceiver.Infer from events: Evicted, NodeLost, Preempted.
k8s.container.cpu_limit_utilization / memory_limit_utilizationOnly emitted for a container that declares the corresponding limit, and only when the kubeletstatsreceiver metric is enabled.k8s.pod.cpu.node.utilization / k8s.pod.memory.node.utilization express consumption as a fraction of node capacity and are emitted whether or not limits are declared; or trend absolute container.cpu.usage / container.memory.usage against a baseline. Both fall-backs live on the pod-level documents, so group by k8s.pod.name, not k8s.container.name.
k8s.pod.cpu_limit_utilization / memory_limit_utilizationRequires every container in the pod to declare the limit, so it is absent on most multi-container pods.Use the container-level fields, which are available strictly more often.
k8s.node.condition_memory_pressureGated behind k8sclusterreceiver node_conditions_to_report (default omits this).Compare k8s.node.memory.usage against k8s.node.allocatable_memory, or look for Evicted events on the node.

If a fall-back is used, note it in the synthesis (for example, (via memory.usage; limit_utilization not collected)) so the reader knows the signal is indirect.

ES|QL gotchas

Before writing queries, know these. Each of them silently produces wrong answers rather than failing loudly.

VALUES() returns scalar for single distinct value, array for multiple. Templating that assumes array shape (for example, | first) extracts the first character of the string when scalar. Use MV_FIRST(VALUES(...)) or handle both.

VALUES() is newer than this skill's base floor. It is GA on Serverless, but on Stack it is preview from 8.14.0 and GA only in 9.4.0, and it does not exist at all below 8.14. Check GET / before using it: build_flavor: "serverless" means it is available, otherwise read version.number. Where it is not available, move the field into the BY clause instead of aggregating it — one row per distinct value carries the same information:

esql
| STATS restarts = MAX(k8s.container.restarts), phase = MAX(k8s.pod.phase)
    BY term_reason = k8s.container.status.last_terminated_reason
| SORT restarts DESC
| LIMIT 10

PERCENTILE does not work on OTel histogram type (as of 8.15). For APM duration percentiles, use AVG on the aggregate_metric_double summary field (AVG(transaction.duration.summary) divides sum by value_count). For true percentiles, fall back to Kibana Query DSL.

COUNT(agg_metric_double) returns value_count (events), not doc count. SUM(field) gives the sum component; AVG(field) gives sum/value_count. Do not use SUM(transaction.duration.summary) as an event-count proxy — it returns total duration.

K8s metrics use flat OTel field paths in ES|QL. k8s.pod.name, not resource.attributes.k8s.pod.name. The nested form is for raw log documents.

Failure-mode taxonomy

The classification vocabulary — pivotal signal and corroborating checks for each mode across the workload, node, control plane, autoscaling and networking layers, plus what to do when two modes fit — lives in references/failure-modes.md. Read it before classifying.

Signal interpretation

Memory
  • Monotonic rise over 30–60 min → leak. Check GC metrics for the language: JVM jvm.gc.duration, Go process.runtime.go.gc.pause_ns, Node v8js_gc_duration. Rising GC frequency/pause with stable live-set is the canonical leak signature.
  • Diurnal / load-correlated spikes → load-driven, not leak. Consider HPA tuning or limit increase.
  • Hits 1.0, then restart → OOMKilled confirmed. Exit code 137 (SIGKILL) in app logs consistent.
CPU
  • cpu_limit_utilization > 1.0 sustained → CFS throttling. Node has spare CPU; the pod is quota-blocked.
  • Symptoms of throttling (not the throttle metric itself): liveness probe timeouts, p99 latency 4–16× p50, queue backpressure upstream, Error-reason container terminations.
  • Average can look healthy while p95 is throttled. Do not trust average alone.
Show full SKILL.md (1,298 more words)Show less
Restart patterns
  • restarts > 0 recently → workload has been restarting. Don't read magnitude into the count (see Restart count is boolean); confirm the pattern from K8s Killing / BackOff event timestamps in logs-k8seventsreceiver.otel-*.
  • Restarts correlated with memory pressure (memory_limit_utilization → 1.0) → OOMKilled path.
  • Restarts without memory/CPU pressure → probe misconfig, app bug, or startup dependency failure. Pull events for Unhealthy and Killing.
Termination reasons
  • OOMKilled → memory path.
  • Error → non-zero exit. Check app logs; if empty/minimal, check CPU throttling before attributing to app logic.
  • Completed → ran to completion. Normal for Jobs/CronJobs/init containers; anomalous otherwise.
  • ContainerCannotRun → runtime/image/exec issue. Check image pull events.

Investigation flow

An investigation is not a checklist. The sections below describe a typical arc — compress, skip, or revisit them based on what you find. Terminate as soon as you have enough evidence to synthesize at a known confidence. Chasing signals past the point of diminishing returns is a failure mode, not thoroughness.

Orient

Resolve the target: k8s.pod.name, k8s.namespace.name, optionally k8s.deployment.name and service.name. If no time window is given, default to the last hour for pod-level investigations, last 2 hours for event correlation, last 6 hours for ongoing/unresolved incidents.

If the alert payload already tells you the failure mode (for example, it fires specifically on OOMKilled), note that and skip classification; move to confirmation and baseline comparison.

Characterize

Get the shape of the workload's recent behavior: restart count, termination reasons, phase, utilization. One or two queries usually suffice.

esql
FROM metrics-k8sclusterreceiver.otel-*
| WHERE k8s.pod.name == "<pod>" AND k8s.namespace.name == "<ns>"
  AND @timestamp > NOW() - 1 hour
| STATS restarts = MAX(k8s.container.restarts),
        term_reasons = VALUES(k8s.container.status.last_terminated_reason),
        phase = MAX(k8s.pod.phase)

VALUES() needs Serverless or Stack 8.14+ (GA 9.4). On an older Stack cluster use the BY-clause rewrite in ES|QL gotchas rather than dropping the termination reason from the query.

esql
FROM metrics-kubeletstatsreceiver.otel-*
| WHERE k8s.pod.name == "<pod>" AND @timestamp > NOW() - 15 minutes
| STATS mem_pct = ROUND(MAX(k8s.container.memory_limit_utilization) * 100, 1),
        cpu_pct = ROUND(MAX(k8s.container.cpu_limit_utilization) * 100, 1)
    BY k8s.container.name

Group by container: a sidecar-injected pod has several, and only the ones that declare limits report utilization. If every column comes back null, no limits are declared — fall back as described under Field availability rather than reading null as idle.

Classify

Use the taxonomy in references/failure-modes.md. The pivotal signal should match; the "Investigate" column tells you what corroboration to seek.

When two modes fit, note both and proceed with the one that has the stronger pivotal signal. You can revise during corroboration.

Corroborate

Pull the evidence your classification predicts you'll find. Typical sources:

K8s events for the namespace and window:

esql
FROM logs-k8seventsreceiver.otel-*
| WHERE attributes.k8s.namespace.name == "<ns>"
  AND @timestamp > NOW() - 2 hours
  AND attributes.k8s.event.reason IN (
    "BackOff", "Killing", "Unhealthy", "Failed",
    "FailedScheduling", "Evicted", "SuccessfulRescale",
    "Pulling", "Pulled", "Started", "Created"
  )
| SORT @timestamp DESC
| KEEP @timestamp, attributes.k8s.event.reason, body.text, k8s.object.name
| LIMIT 30

Namespace is a log attribute on this receiver, not a resource attribute. Filter attributes.k8s.namespace.name, not the flat k8s.namespace.name. The flat form is mapped on this data stream, so a query using it parses and executes and returns zero rows with no error — on a Stack 9.4.4 cluster the flat field was populated on 0 of 832 events while the attributes. form carried the namespace on all of them, so the flat filter discarded 300 matching BackOff, Killing and Unhealthy events. The flat k8s.* paths do work on metrics-kubeletstatsreceiver.otel-* and metrics-k8sclusterreceiver.otel-*, where namespace is a resource attribute; the events receiver is the exception. Confirm with COUNT(attributes.k8s.namespace.name) against COUNT(*) before trusting an empty event result.

Application logs if available — look at the 200 most recent lines before the termination timestamp. If absent, flag no_logs_available; do not invent a log pattern.

APM if the pod runs an instrumented service — resolve service.name from pod resource attributes for later correlation. SLO / latency / error-rate analysis itself is APM-layer work and out of scope for this skill.

Baseline comparison — for utilization-based findings, compare current values to 7-day-prior at the same hour-of-day. "High memory" is meaningful only relative to what's normal for this workload.

Check for upstream cause (conditional)

Only pursue if the symptom pattern suggests it. Threshold: upstream error rate >5× baseline or latency >3× baseline, AND degradation started before the symptom on the target service. Co-symptoms do not establish causation.

If metrics-service_destination.1m.otel-default has no rows for the service, report insufficient_dependency_data — not "upstreams healthy."

Check for recent change (conditional)

SuccessfulCreate / Pulled events in the last 2 hours often correlate with deploys. logs-k8sobjectsreceiver.otel-* shows configmap/secret/deployment spec changes. A change within 15 minutes of the symptom onset is a strong correlation, but still a correlation — verify it plausibly explains the mode you've classified.

Synthesize and stop

Synthesize as soon as you have enough evidence to support a hypothesis at known confidence. You do not need to complete every preceding section — investigation terminates when either:

  • You have a high-confidence hypothesis with corroboration, or
  • You have a low/medium-confidence hypothesis and further queries are unlikely to change the picture (for example, logs are unavailable, APM isn't instrumented, no recent changes found).

Synthesis

Default structure:

text
HYPOTHESIS (confidence: high | medium | low)
<One paragraph: service, symptom, most likely cause. Name the failure mode from the taxonomy.>

EVIDENCE
- <Finding from characterization, with the concrete metric or value.>
- <Finding from events / logs / APM.>
- <Finding from baseline comparison, dependency check, or change correlation if pursued.>

CONFIDENCE NOTE
<Only if not 'high'. What specific evidence is missing or ambiguous.>

RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS
1. <Most actionable — typically a config check or metric to observe.>
2. <Secondary.>

DOWNSTREAM IMPACT
<Services depending on this workload, or 'No downstream dependencies identified.'>

Scale. The whole synthesis runs 250–400 words. HYPOTHESIS is two or three sentences. EVIDENCE is three to five single-line bullets, each citing a concrete value rather than re-explaining it. RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS is two or three single-line items — the ones you would actually do first, not everything that could be done. DOWNSTREAM IMPACT is one or two sentences. A well-evidenced alert fits inside this comfortably; length is not thoroughness, and the on-call reader scanning mid-incident will not get past the first screen.

When two hypotheses are live: replace HYPOTHESIS with COMPETING HYPOTHESES; list both, say which you lean toward and why, and list the evidence that would disambiguate them.

When no incident is found (symptom resolved, or alert appears spurious): say so directly. ALERT FIRED BUT SYSTEM APPEARS HEALTHY is a valid output. List what you checked and what you didn't find.

Confidence calibration

Start at high and downgrade based on what's missing:

  • Downgrade to medium if: primary signal is clear but corroboration is missing (no logs, no APM, no baseline comparison possible). Or: two modes fit and you can't disambiguate.
  • Downgrade to low if: only a single signal supports the hypothesis, signals conflict, or the mode requires evidence you couldn't fetch.

Never return high when application log data was absent and the hypothesis depends on application behavior. Absence of evidence does not corroborate a hypothesis.

Query recipes

Ready-made queries for the most-restarting-pods, CPU-throttling, node-memory-pressure, admission-denial, and firing-alert paths live in references/query-recipes.md.

Examples

"Why is my pod CrashLoopBackOff-ing?"

Characterize first: get restart count, termination reason, memory and CPU utilization.

  • If last_terminated_reason == "OOMKilled" and memory utilization reached 1.0 → memory path. Corroborate with 7-day baseline: monotonic rise over days = leak; spiky = load-driven. Check GC metrics if language is known.
  • If last_terminated_reason == "Error" and cpu_limit_utilization > 1.0 → CPU throttling path. Corroborate with liveness probe config (initialDelaySeconds, timeoutSeconds) and K8s events for Unhealthy.
  • If last_terminated_reason == "Error" and CPU is fine → application-logic path. Pull recent logs before termination.
  • If last_terminated_reason == "ContainerCannotRun" → image/exec path. Check K8s events for Failed pull events.

Synthesize with appropriate confidence. If logs were unavailable on the Error path, downgrade to medium and say so.

"Is my rollout stuck?"

Authoritative signal: k8s.deployment.available < k8s.deployment.desired for > 10 minutes.

Diagnose the constraint:

  • K8s events on the new ReplicaSet: FailedCreate → admission rejection (quota, webhook, PSP). FailedScheduling → no node fits.
  • New-pod utilization: all at 0% memory → never started (image pull failure); high CPU with low memory → slow startup hitting readiness probe.
  • HPA state: stable current_replicas < desired_replicas under load → unready-pod dampening.
"Alert fired but everything looks healthy"

Possible and worth naming explicitly. Check:

  • Has the symptom resolved? Compare current utilization/restart rate to the alert trigger point.
  • Was the alert a transient spike that's already decayed?
  • Is the alert tuned appropriately (for example, a too-short evaluation window)?

Output: ALERT FIRED BUT SYSTEM APPEARS HEALTHY with what you checked. Recommend alert tuning if the pattern is recurrent.

  • Workflow: K8s CrashLoopBackOff Investigation — alert-triggered automated version of the pod-level path above. Runs deterministic ESQL + branches; this skill provides the interpretation layer the workflow lacks.
  • Forge genome library: 16 K8s failure scenarios (OOMKill cascade, CPU throttling, probe misconfig, node NotReady, admission webhook block, and so on) validating this skill's coverage.

Operations

HTTP API (shorthand)elastic CLI command
GET /elastic es info
POST /_queryelastic es esql query --format tsv --query '<esql>'
GET /<index>/_mappingelastic es indices get-mapping --index '<index>'
GET /_field_capselastic es field-caps --index '<index>' --fields '<fields>'
GET kbn:/api/alerting/rules/_findelastic kb alerting get-alerting-rules-find --filter '<filter>'

© elastic, Apache-2.0. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 2 other files (references) in skills/observability/k8s-investigation of elastic/agent-skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/failure-modes.md
  • references/query-recipes.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit baa5111

Compare with similar skills

Observability K8s Investigation next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Observability K8s Investigation compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Observability K8s Investigation this skillelastic/agent-skills592—~8.3kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Logfire Infrastructurepydantic/skills140—~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Domain Cloud Nativemoeru-ai/auv1001 repos~1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Otel Profilesollygarden/opentelemetry-agent-skills106—~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Alloygrafana/skills282—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Opentelemetrygrafana/skills282—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • Logfire Infrastructure

    pydantic/skills

    Official

    Monitor hosts, Docker containers, Kubernetes clusters, database/queue/cache servers, and cloud-provider metrics with Pydantic Logfire — no application code required.

    140 GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • A skill your agent uses when building cloud-native apps. An agent skill from moeru-ai/auv.

    100 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1k tokens
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Otel Profiles

    ollygarden/opentelemetry-agent-skills

    OpenTelemetry profiles signal and the eBPF profiler (otelcol-ebpf-profiler, profiling receiver).

    106 GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated today
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Alloy

    grafana/skills

    Official

    Build a unified telemetry pipeline with Grafana Alloy — one OpenTelemetry-compatible binary that collects metrics, logs, traces, and profiles and ships to Grafana Cloud / Prometheus / Loki / Tempo /…

    282 GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Opentelemetry

    grafana/skills

    Official

    Instrument any app with OpenTelemetry and ship metrics / logs / traces to Grafana Cloud or self-hosted Mimir / Loki / Tempo / Pyroscope.

    282 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Syntax reference for KFL2, the CEL-based display filter language used to search Kubernetes network traffic captured by Kubeshark, loaded before any filter is written.

    12k GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated yesterday
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed

More from elastic/agent-skills

All 26 skills in this repo
  • Security Alert Triage

    elastic/agent-skills

    Official

    Triage Elastic Security alerts — gather context, classify threats, create cases, and acknowledge.

    592 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.5k tokens
    Auto-check: notes
  • Security Case Management

    elastic/agent-skills

    Official

    Create, search, update, and manage SOC cases via the Kibana Cases API.

    592 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.6k tokens
    Auto-check: notes
  • Official

    Create, tune, and manage Elastic Security detection rules (SIEM and Endpoint).

    592 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.9k tokens
    Auto-check: notes
  • Kibana Dashboards

    elastic/agent-skills

    Official

    Create and manage Kibana Dashboards and Lens visualizations.

    592 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.7k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Official

    Generate sample security events, attack scenarios, and synthetic alerts for Elastic Security.

    592 GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Cloud Onboarding

    elastic/agent-skills

    Official

    Onboard an Elastic Cloud organization: configure the elastic CLI's Cloud context and API key, establish a default region, then invite users, assign predefined or custom Serverless project roles, and…

    592 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Observability K8s Investigation

What does Observability K8s Investigation do?

Investigate Kubernetes workload, node, and control-plane issues using OTel telemetry (EDOT). Observability K8s Investigation is an agent skill from elastic/agent-skills, published by the product's own GitHub organization. Investigate Kubernetes workload, node, and control-plane issues using OTel telemetry (EDOT).

When should I use Observability K8s Investigation?

Observability K8s Investigation fits situations like: diagnosing pod failures (CrashLoopBackOff; resource exhaustion; image pull failures; admission rejections.

How do I install Observability K8s Investigation in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add elastic/agent-skills --skill observability-k8s-investigation -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/observability/k8s-investigation in elastic/agent-skills) into .claude/skills/observability-k8s-investigation in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Observability K8s Investigation in Codex?

Run `npx skills add elastic/agent-skills --skill observability-k8s-investigation -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/observability/k8s-investigation in elastic/agent-skills) into .agents/skills/observability-k8s-investigation in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Observability K8s Investigation in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add elastic/agent-skills --skill observability-k8s-investigation -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/observability-k8s-investigation, .gemini/skills/observability-k8s-investigation, .github/skills/observability-k8s-investigation and .opencode/skills/observability-k8s-investigation in your project.

What does Observability K8s Investigation need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Observability K8s Investigation is instructions for the agent only. Compatibility (from SKILL.md): Requires the `elastic` CLI (>= 0.2) with an Elasticsearch context, and Kubernetes telemetry ingested through EDOT / the OpenTelemetry kube-stack collector into OTel-receiver-namespaced data streams. The base floor is Elasticsearch 8.11 or later, or Serverless. One query uses the `VALUES()` aggregation, which is GA on Serverless but preview from 8.14 and GA only in 9.4 on Stack; a `VALUES()`-free rewrite is given at the point of use. Alert-state lookups additionally need a Kibana context. .

Does Observability K8s Investigation access the network?

SKILL.md names 1 domain. As links in the text: github.com. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Observability K8s Investigation safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Observability K8s Investigation use?

Observability K8s Investigation is published under the Apache-2.0 licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Observability K8s Investigation use?

About 8.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 33k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 3.3k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Observability K8s Investigation?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Observability K8s Investigation: Logfire Infrastructure (pydantic/skills, 140 stars), Domain Cloud Native (moeru-ai/auv, 100 stars), Otel Profiles (ollygarden/opentelemetry-agent-skills, 106 stars) and Alloy (grafana/skills, 282 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Observability K8s Investigation?

elastic (a GitHub organization, an official publisher) maintains it in elastic/agent-skills, which has 592 GitHub stars. The repository holds 26 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 7, 2026.

Source: elastic/agent-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.