Agent skill

Post Review Comments

by dyoshikawa in dyoshikawa/rulesync

Post line-level review comments and an overall review comment on a PR in English with a natural, concise writing style

MITAuto-check passedWriting & Content

Install Post Review Comments

skills CLI
$ npx skills add dyoshikawa/rulesync --skill post-review-comments -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install dyoshikawa/rulesync post-review-comments --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dyoshikawa/rulesync.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/.rulesync/skills/post-review-comments .claude/skills/post-review-comments && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
post-review-comments
GitHub stars
1.5k
Token cost
~528 tokens
SKILL.md length
265 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
40
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Post line-level review comments and an overall review comment on a PR in English with a natural, concise writing style

  • Works in 5 steps: Understand the PR → Prepare Line-Level Comments → Prepare an Overall Review Comment → …
  • Tasks that involve Plain language and style rules
  • SKILL.md covers Step 1: Understand the PR, Step 2: Prepare Line-Level…, Step 3: Prepare an Overall… and Step 4: Post the Review, plus 2 more sections
  • Calls gh

What it does

Post Review Comments is an agent skill from dyoshikawa/rulesync. Post line-level review comments and an overall review comment on a PR in English with a natural, concise writing style

Its SKILL.md is about 530 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Writing & Content, covering Plain language and style rules. The repository describes itself as: A Utility CLI for AI Coding Agents. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Plain language and style rules

Example prompts

  • “/post-review-comments”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Understand the PR
  2. Prepare Line-Level Comments
  3. Prepare an Overall Review Comment
  4. Post the Review
  5. Report

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 2c577d0. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • gh

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md. Its commands use gh, which can reach the network depending on how they are called.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Post Review Comments loads about 528 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 35 tokens; SKILL.md has 265 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~35
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~528

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from dyoshikawa/rulesync at commit 2c577d0, republished under its MIT licence (© dyoshikawa). 265 words, ~528 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/post-review-comments/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
post-review-comments
description
Post line-level review comments and an overall review comment on a PR in English with a natural, concise writing style
targets
*

target_pr = the user's request

If target_pr is not provided, use the PR of the current branch.

Step 1: Understand the PR

Read the PR diff and description to understand:

  • What changed and why
  • The scope and impact of the changes

Step 2: Prepare Line-Level Comments

Identify specific lines in the diff that deserve feedback — bugs, potential issues, style concerns, suggestions for improvement, or questions about intent.

For each comment, note:

  • The file path
  • The line number (in the new version of the file)
  • Your comment text

Step 3: Prepare an Overall Review Comment

Write a brief overall assessment of the PR. This is a summary-level comment, not a repeat of line-level feedback.

Step 4: Post the Review

Use a single gh api call to submit both line-level comments and the overall comment together as one review:

bash
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews \
  --method POST \
  -f event="COMMENT" \
  -f body="<overall comment>" \
  -f 'comments[]={...}' ...

Each line comment requires: path, line (line number in the diff's new file), and body.

If you have no line-level comments, fall back to:

bash
gh pr review <pr_number> --comment --body "<overall comment>"

Writing Style

Write in English only.

Style guidelines — write like a human teammate, not a bot:

  • Use plain paragraphs. Avoid headings (##), horizontal rules (---), and excessive bullet lists.
  • Keep it conversational and direct. Say what matters, skip the filler.
  • Do not use phrases like "Great work!" or "LGTM!" unless you genuinely mean it and have nothing else to add.
  • Be honest. If something looks off, say so clearly but respectfully.
  • Short is fine. A two-sentence comment is better than a five-paragraph essay with no substance.

Step 5: Report

Output the PR number, a count of line-level comments posted, and a brief summary of the overall comment.

© dyoshikawa, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in .rulesync/skills/post-review-comments of dyoshikawa/rulesync.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 2c577d0

Compare with similar skills

Post Review Comments next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Post Review Comments compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Post Review Comments this skilldyoshikawa/rulesync1.5k—~528Automated safety check: PassMIT
Asd Ste100danyuchn/asd-ste100-skill4.2k—~4.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Simple Issue Descriptionevery-app/open-seo23k1 repos~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Ponytail AuditDietrichGebert/ponytail159k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Technical Writing Standardcursor/plugins10k10 repos~2.4kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Natural Japanese Business Writingcoji/natural-japanese1.9k—~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Asd Ste100

    danyuchn/asd-ste100-skill

    A skill your agent uses when English text must be parsed without a human to resolve ambiguity — tool descriptions, error messages, inter-agent instructions, system prompts, status reports — and…

    4.2k GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Simple Issue Description

    every-app/open-seo

    Turn a rough bug report, feature request, support note, or pull request into a short, plain-language issue focused on the problem and desired behavior.

    23k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.2k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Ponytail Audit

    DietrichGebert/ponytail

    Quality audit of a whole repo: bugs, security holes, what breaks under real load, risky code without tests, slow paths, and what to delete, merge or split.

    159k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Official

    Applies four layers of technical-writing rules to docs, RFCs, readmes, PR descriptions and commit messages so a tired engineer follows them on the first read.

    10k GitHub starsUsed in 10 repos~2.4k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Writes and edits Japanese business documents so they read clearly and naturally, removes AI-sounding phrasing and can score how AI-like a text reads.

    1.9k GitHub stars~2.1k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Pgjev

    realZachi/pg-jev

    Install, configure, query and explain pgjev (the jev PostgreSQL extension that filters, ranks and classifies rows with plain-language conditions via TypeSafe's Jev model).

    1.1k GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed

More from dyoshikawa/rulesync

All 40 skills in this repo
  • Rulesync Feature Research

    dyoshikawa/rulesync

    Maps rulesync feature implementations to upstream coding-agent documentation.

    1.5k GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Babysit Dependabot PR

    dyoshikawa/rulesync

    Babysit a Dependabot dependency-bump PR all the way to merge: verify the author is the genuine Dependabot bot, diagnose and resolve any CI failure (excluding or fixing a breaking bump when needed)…

    1.5k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Commit Push PR

    dyoshikawa/rulesync

    Commit current changes, push to remote, and create or update a pull request.

    1.5k GitHub stars~458 tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Git Worktree Runner

    dyoshikawa/rulesync

    Manages git worktrees using git-worktree-runner (gtr). An agent skill from dyoshikawa/rulesync.

    1.5k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check: notes
  • Goal PR

    dyoshikawa/rulesync

    Drive a pull request to a clean state and merge it: run the review-pr skill, fix every mid-or-above finding, and repeat until no mid-or-above findings remain, then merge.

    1.5k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Goal Release

    dyoshikawa/rulesync

    Cut a release end to end: use the draft-release skill to open the release PR and draft GitHub release, wait for CI to turn green, run the merge-pr skill to merge the release PR, then update the…

    1.5k GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Post Review Comments

What does Post Review Comments do?

Post line-level review comments and an overall review comment on a PR in English with a natural, concise writing style. Post Review Comments is an agent skill from dyoshikawa/rulesync.

When should I use Post Review Comments?

Post Review Comments fits situations like: tasks that involve Plain language and style rules.

How do I install Post Review Comments in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add dyoshikawa/rulesync --skill post-review-comments -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (.rulesync/skills/post-review-comments in dyoshikawa/rulesync) into .claude/skills/post-review-comments in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Post Review Comments in Codex?

Run `npx skills add dyoshikawa/rulesync --skill post-review-comments -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (.rulesync/skills/post-review-comments in dyoshikawa/rulesync) into .agents/skills/post-review-comments in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Post Review Comments in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add dyoshikawa/rulesync --skill post-review-comments -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/post-review-comments, .gemini/skills/post-review-comments, .github/skills/post-review-comments and .opencode/skills/post-review-comments in your project.

What does Post Review Comments need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Post Review Comments needs the command-line tools its instructions call (gh).

Does Post Review Comments access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Its commands use gh, which can reach the network depending on how they are called. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Post Review Comments safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Post Review Comments use?

Post Review Comments is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Post Review Comments use?

About 528 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 2.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Post Review Comments?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Post Review Comments: Asd Ste100 (danyuchn/asd-ste100-skill, 4.2k stars), Simple Issue Description (every-app/open-seo, 23k stars), Ponytail Audit (DietrichGebert/ponytail, 159k stars) and Technical Writing Standard (cursor/plugins, 10k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Post Review Comments?

dyoshikawa (a GitHub user) maintains it in dyoshikawa/rulesync, which has 1,508 GitHub stars. The repository holds 40 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 9, 2026.

Source: dyoshikawa/rulesync on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.