PR Babysitter
openinterpreter/openinterpreter
Watches an open GitHub pull request until it merges, handling review comments, diagnosing CI failures and retrying flaky checks along the way.
Triage pull requests against upstream main — one verdict, action items, and whether it needs the user's eyes.
$ npx skills add DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture --skill review-pr -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture review-pr --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/.agents/skills/review-pr .claude/skills/review-pr && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "review-pr" agent skill from https://github.com/DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture/tree/main/.agents/skills/review-pr into .claude/skills/review-pr/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review-pr", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture/tree/main/.agents/skills/review-prType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture --skill review-pr -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture review-pr --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/.agents/skills/review-pr .agents/skills/review-pr && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "review-pr" agent skill from https://github.com/DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture/tree/main/.agents/skills/review-pr into .agents/skills/review-pr/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review-pr", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture --skill review-pr -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture review-pr --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/.agents/skills/review-pr .cursor/skills/review-pr && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "review-pr" agent skill from https://github.com/DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture/tree/main/.agents/skills/review-pr into .cursor/skills/review-pr/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review-pr", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture.git --path .agents/skills/review-pr--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture --skill review-pr -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture review-pr --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/.agents/skills/review-pr .gemini/skills/review-pr && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "review-pr" agent skill from https://github.com/DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture/tree/main/.agents/skills/review-pr into .gemini/skills/review-pr/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review-pr", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture review-prInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture --skill review-pr -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/.agents/skills/review-pr .github/skills/review-pr && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "review-pr" agent skill from https://github.com/DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture/tree/main/.agents/skills/review-pr into .github/skills/review-pr/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review-pr", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture --skill review-pr -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture review-pr --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/.agents/skills/review-pr .opencode/skills/review-pr && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "review-pr" agent skill from https://github.com/DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture/tree/main/.agents/skills/review-pr into .opencode/skills/review-pr/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review-pr", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
review-prTriage pull requests against upstream main — one verdict, action items, and whether it needs the user's eyes.
Review PR is an agent skill from DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture. Triage pull requests against upstream main — one verdict, action items, and whether it needs the user's eyes. Use when the user asks to review a PR by number, review all the open PRs, or asks whether a PR is worth their time.
Its SKILL.md is about 2.8k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 3 other files (for example `REVIEW.md` and `agents/openai.yaml`).
It sits in Development, covering Pull requests. It works with GitHub. The repository describes itself as: An electronic data capture platform for administering remote and in-person clinical instruments. The licence is Apache-2.0.
7 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 432dec8. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Shell commands in SKILL.md call:
ghpnpmFrom the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
No URLs in SKILL.md. Its commands use gh and pnpm, which can reach the network depending on how they are called.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Review PR loads about 2.8k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 59 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,584 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
The full file from DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture at commit 432dec8, republished under its Apache-2.0 licence (© DouglasNeuroInformatics). 1,584 words, ~2,767 tokens.
.claude/skills/review-pr/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 2 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.Triage PRs so the user opens only the ones that need them. The run completes unattended: everything that can be said on GitHub is posted without asking, and the user is interrupted exactly once — at the end, for the judgment calls only they can make.
Every reviewed PR ends on one verdict with a stated confidence, one document, and an evidence ledger recording what was and was not checked.
Two paths through this skill, and the reviewing itself belongs to neither — a sub-agent per PR
follows REVIEW.md:
review-pr 1443, or a PR the user names.main that is not a draft, not authored by joshunrau, and not a dependency bump by a bot.Two buckets, and the bucket is the answer to "does this need me?":
misc/pr-reviews/
├── action-required/ CLOSE · REQUIRES_HUMAN_REVIEW · MERGE
└── no-action/ REWORK · BLOCKED · PENDINGaction-required/ holds only what the user must personally do — close it, judge it, merge it.
Work the author owes is never a reason to file a document here; it goes to the author on GitHub.
The user is not a courier.
Three invariants:
<N>.md, delete any existing
misc/pr-reviews/*/<N>.md. When a settled question changes a verdict, mv the document to the
other bucket — never write a second copy.no-action/: number, title, headRefOid, the block reason, and whether a comment was posted.## Action items entry in every document, in
either bucket, has reached GitHub by step 7.Every body this skill posts — review or comment — ends with:
Reviewed at commit <headRefOid>.That line is how the skill knows on the next run what it has already said, so it is not optional.
gh pr list --state open --base main --limit 100 \
--json number,title,url,author,isDraft,headRefOid,additions,deletions,changedFiles,mergeable,statusCheckRollupFor a single PR use gh pr view <N> --json <same fields>. A named PR is reviewed whoever authored it
and whatever its draft state — the exclusions above shape the batch only.
Done when every PR in the set carries its number, headRefOid, author, size, mergeability and check
rollup.
For every <N> with a document under either bucket, whether or not it is in this run's set:
gh pr view <N> --json state --jq .stateDelete the document when the state is MERGED or CLOSED. A merged PR is not a to-do.
This runs before the gate so a stale document can never satisfy the cache check below.
The gate runs on metadata alone. No fetch, no worktree, no install until a PR passes it.
| Gate state | Meaning | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
Any check FAILURE/ERROR/CANCELLED | CI is red | BLOCKED — notified in step 4, no review |
mergeable: CONFLICTING | conflicts with main | BLOCKED — notified in step 4, no review |
Any check PENDING/IN_PROGRESS | CI still running | PENDING — stub only, no comment |
statusCheckRollup: [] | CI never ran | Review it; ledger records CI unavailable |
Checks SUCCESS and mergeable: MERGEABLE | green | Review it |
mergeable: UNKNOWN means GitHub has not computed the merge yet — re-query that PR once before
deciding.
A PR whose misc/pr-reviews/*/<N>.md carries a review verdict at the current headRefOid is
cached: skip it, spend nothing. A BLOCKED or PENDING stub never suppresses work, however recent —
CI may have gone green since it was written.
No approval, no draft shown to the user. For each BLOCKED PR, first read back what the PR already says:
gh pr view <N> --json reviews,comments --jq '[.reviews[].body, .comments[].body] | join("\n")'If that text already contains the current headRefOid, stay silent — the author has already been
told about this exact commit. Otherwise request changes: name the failing check or the conflict, say
what the author should do, say that review resumes once it is green. Facts only — no verdict, no
review content, no findings.
gh pr review <N> --request-changes --body-file <path>GitHub refuses a review on the user's own PR; fall back to gh pr comment <N> --body-file <path>
there — the same fallback applies everywhere this skill posts.
Then write the stub to no-action/<N>.md and move on. Blocked PRs never reach the user's attention
beyond a count in the final tally.
Spawn one general-purpose sub-agent per surviving PR, at most three in flight. Each prompt carries:
the PR number, URL, title, author, headRefOid, size, the worktree path to use under the scratchpad
directory, and this instruction —
Read
.agents/skills/review-pr/REVIEW.mdand follow it exactly for this PR. Return only the verdict, confidence, the document path, and the reply-body path where there is one.
Setup failing inside a worktree splits two ways, and the split matters:
pnpm install or pnpm generate:env fails → BLOCKED (machine). Post nothing; the machine is
broken, not the PR. Report it to the user directly.pnpm lint fails → BLOCKED (PR). The merge result does not typecheck against current main.
Request changes asking the author to update their branch, subject to the same headRefOid guard as
step 4, and write the stub.Action items belong to the author, so they go to the author. Never carry one back to the user to relay — that is the user doing the reviewer's errand. As each document lands, post its reply body immediately: no approval, no waiting for the other reviews.
| Verdict | Posted |
|---|---|
REWORK | request changes |
CLOSE | request changes — but never gh pr close |
BLOCKED (PR) | request changes — lint fails against current main |
MERGE | nothing — a MERGE has nothing left to say |
BLOCKED (machine) | nothing — reported to the user directly |
A PR with an outstanding action item is never MERGE. One action item is one round trip, so the verdict is REWORK and the review requests changes. There is no "merge it, and by the way fix these five things" — that hands the user a decision the author has not finished earning, and it buries the items in a comment on a PR nobody will reopen. The corollary binds the other way too: if the only thing standing between a PR and MERGE is a list of remarks that name no real defect and no documented standard, the remarks were never action items and should not have been written.
REQUIRES_HUMAN_REVIEW is the one verdict that waits, and only until step 6: its questions may
change its action items, so posting now risks a second review that contradicts the first. It is
posted there, minutes later, and never left for the user to pass on.
Closing a PR is the user's call, so gh pr close is never run — CLOSE posts its reply and
nothing more.
Every finding is one of two kinds, and only one of them is the user's:
## What needs you.Once every sub-agent has returned, put all the toss-ups to the user in one message, grouped by PR, each with a recommended answer. One interruption for the whole run.
Then fold each answer back where it belongs: record it in that PR's document, revise its action items
if the answer changed them, revise the verdict if the answer changed that, and mv the document if
the bucket changed.
Then post every REQUIRES_HUMAN_REVIEW PR that has action items — per its settled verdict in the
step 5 table, and as a request for changes if it is still REQUIRES_HUMAN_REVIEW, since outstanding
action items are what a changes-requested review is for. Write that reply body yourself, carrying the
same model line and Reviewed at commit line every other posted body carries. An answer the user
declined to give does not hold the author's items back.
An answer that clears every question on a REQUIRES_HUMAN_REVIEW PR does not make it MERGE — its
action items still do. Settling the questions moves it to REWORK, and the document to no-action/,
unless the answer left it with nothing outstanding at all.
Done when no document has an unanswered ## What needs you entry that the user could have settled in
a sentence, and no document has an ## Action items entry that has not reached GitHub. What remains
is what genuinely needs them in the code.
Say nothing about action items while reviews are still running — a partial list reads as the whole list. Every sub-agent has returned and every toss-up is settled by now; reply with two things and nothing else.
One or two sentences of tally. "Reviewed all 10. Three need you, one should be closed, four went back to their authors, two are blocked on red CI."
Then one line per PR in action-required/, and each line names something only the user can do:
CLOSE → close #N — one clause on why; the reply is already posted.REQUIRES_HUMAN_REVIEW → review #N — name the part that needs them, and the document path.MERGE → merge #N — nothing is outstanding, which is what the verdict means.Never list what the author has to fix. Those items are on GitHub; repeating them here turns the reply into a second inbox for work that is not the user's.
Nothing in no-action/ gets a line. REWORK replies are posted; blocked and pending PRs never reached
a sub-agent — the tally's count is the whole of what the user hears about them, and it is what
explains why a set of ten yielded eight reviews.
End with the misc/pr-reviews/action-required/ path. The documents hold the reasoning; do not repeat
it in the terminal.
© DouglasNeuroInformatics, Apache-2.0. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
SKILL.md and 2 other files in .agents/skills/review-pr of DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 432dec8
Review PR next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Review PR this skillDouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture | 119 | — | ~2.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| PR Babysitteropeninterpreter/openinterpreter | 69k | 3 repos | ~4.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Check PRonyx-dot-app/onyx | 32k | 2 repos | ~2.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Contributor-First PR MergeHKUDS/OpenHarness | 16k | 1 repos | ~847 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Create Pull Requestcline/cline | 70k | 1 repos | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Pull Request Title and Body Writeropeninterpreter/openinterpreter | 69k | 2 repos | ~1.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 |
openinterpreter/openinterpreter
Watches an open GitHub pull request until it merges, handling review comments, diagnosing CI failures and retrying flaky checks along the way.
onyx-dot-app/onyx
Checks a GitHub, GitLab, or Perforce (p4) pull request (or merge request, or shelved changelist) for unresolved review comments, failing status checks, and incomplete PR descriptions.
HKUDS/OpenHarness
Merges external GitHub pull requests while keeping the original author credited, and fixes conflicts after the merge instead of rewriting the contribution.
cline/cline
Opens a GitHub pull request from your current branch with the gh CLI, after reviewing the commits and diff and gathering the details the PR needs.
openinterpreter/openinterpreter
Rewrites the title and body of one or more pull requests with gh, leading with why the change was made, then what changed, and describing only the net result.
prisma/orm
Runs a loop on a GitHub pull request: fetch review state, triage comments into actions, implement them and resolve threads, repeating until nothing actionable is left.
DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture
Write or correct this repo's agent documentation — a workspace AGENTS.md (or its CLAUDE.md symlink), a playbook under .agents/docs/playbooks, an architecture doc, or the workspace map.
DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture
Test a change in Open Data Capture. An agent skill from DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture.
DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture
Open a pull request against main for the current branch. An agent skill from DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture.
DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture
File a GitHub issue for Open Data Capture with its labels. An agent skill from DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture.
DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture
What actually breaks in Open Data Capture — a failing build, lint, unit test or e2e run; a change with no visible effect; a suite that stays green after you broke the code on purpose; an error…
DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture
Close out a change to Open Data Capture before committing, opening a PR, or reporting it done.
Works with
Categories
Triage pull requests against upstream main — one verdict, action items, and whether it needs the user's eyes. Review PR is an agent skill from DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture. Triage pull requests against upstream main — one verdict, action items, and whether it needs the user's eyes.
Review PR fits situations like: the user asks to review a PR by number; review all the open PRs; asks whether a PR is worth their time.
Run `npx skills add DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture --skill review-pr -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (.agents/skills/review-pr in DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture) into .claude/skills/review-pr in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
Run `npx skills add DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture --skill review-pr -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (.agents/skills/review-pr in DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture) into .agents/skills/review-pr in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture --skill review-pr -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/review-pr, .gemini/skills/review-pr, .github/skills/review-pr and .opencode/skills/review-pr in your project.
Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Review PR needs the command-line tools its instructions call (gh and pnpm).
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Its commands use gh, which can reach the network depending on how they are called. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
Review PR is published under the Apache-2.0 licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
About 2.8k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 11k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Review PR: PR Babysitter (openinterpreter/openinterpreter, 69k stars), Check PR (onyx-dot-app/onyx, 32k stars), Contributor-First PR Merge (HKUDS/OpenHarness, 16k stars) and Create Pull Request (cline/cline, 70k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
DouglasNeuroInformatics (a GitHub organization) maintains it in DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture, which has 119 GitHub stars. The repository holds 16 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 7, 2026.
Source: DouglasNeuroInformatics/OpenDataCapture on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.