Assess construction data quality using completeness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness, and validity metrics.

MITAuto-check passedData & Analytics

Install Data Quality Check

skills CLI
$ npx skills add datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill data-quality-check -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction data-quality-check --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/2_DDC_Book/2.6-Data-Quality-Validation/data-quality-check .claude/skills/data-quality-check && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
data-quality-check
GitHub stars
344
Used in
1 other repo
Token cost
~4.9k tokens
SKILL.md length
150 words
Files
3
Skills in repo
43
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Assess construction data quality using completeness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness, and validity metrics.

  • Tasks that involve Data cleaning
  • SKILL.md covers Overview, Quick Start, Data Quality Dimensions and Validation Rules Builder, plus 6 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Data Quality Check is an agent skill from datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction. Assess construction data quality using completeness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness, and validity metrics. Automated validation with regex patterns, thresholds, and reporting.

Its SKILL.md is about 4.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 2 other files (for example `claw.json` and `instructions.md`).

It sits in Data & Analytics, covering Data cleaning. The repository describes itself as: 221 AI skills for construction: BIM analysis, cost estimation, scheduling, document control, and automation with Claude Code. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Data cleaning

Example prompts

  • “/data-quality-check”

Requirements

  • Python 3

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit ce45bbf. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are python).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    Links to these hosts (documentation or services it may open):

    • datadrivenconstruction.io
    • greatexpectations.io

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Data Quality Check loads about 4.9k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 49 tokens; SKILL.md has 150 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~49
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction at commit ce45bbf, republished under its MIT licence (© datadrivenconstruction). 150 words, ~4,887 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/data-quality-check/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 2 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
data-quality-check
description
Assess construction data quality using completeness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness, and validity metrics. Automated validation with regex patterns, thresholds, and reporting.
homepage
https://datadrivenconstruction.io

Data Quality Check for Construction

Overview

Based on DDC methodology (Chapter 2.6), this skill provides comprehensive data quality assessment for construction projects. Poor data quality leads to poor decisions - validate early, validate often.

Book Reference: "Требования к качеству данных и его обеспечение" / "Data Quality Requirements"

"Качество данных определяется пятью ключевыми метриками: полнота, точность, согласованность, своевременность и достоверность." — DDC Book, Chapter 2.6

Quick Start

python
import pandas as pd

# Load construction data
df = pd.read_excel("bim_export.xlsx")

# Quick quality check
quality_score = {
    'completeness': (1 - df.isnull().sum().sum() / df.size) * 100,
    'unique_ids': df['ElementId'].nunique() == len(df),
    'valid_volumes': (df['Volume_m3'] >= 0).all()
}

print(f"Completeness: {quality_score['completeness']:.1f}%")
print(f"Unique IDs: {quality_score['unique_ids']}")
print(f"Valid volumes: {quality_score['valid_volumes']}")

Data Quality Dimensions

The 5 Quality Metrics
python
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import re
from datetime import datetime, timedelta

class DataQualityChecker:
    """Comprehensive data quality assessment for construction data"""

    def __init__(self, df):
        self.df = df.copy()
        self.results = {}
        self.issues = []

    def check_completeness(self, required_columns=None):
        """Check for missing values (Полнота)"""
        if required_columns is None:
            required_columns = self.df.columns.tolist()

        completeness = {}
        for col in required_columns:
            if col in self.df.columns:
                non_null = self.df[col].notna().sum()
                total = len(self.df)
                completeness[col] = (non_null / total) * 100
            else:
                completeness[col] = 0
                self.issues.append(f"Missing required column: {col}")

        overall = np.mean(list(completeness.values()))

        self.results['completeness'] = {
            'by_column': completeness,
            'overall': overall,
            'threshold': 95,
            'passed': overall >= 95
        }

        return self.results['completeness']

    def check_accuracy(self, rules=None):
        """Check data accuracy against rules (Точность)"""
        if rules is None:
            # Default construction data rules
            rules = {
                'Volume_m3': {'min': 0, 'max': 10000},
                'Area_m2': {'min': 0, 'max': 100000},
                'Weight_kg': {'min': 0, 'max': 1000000},
                'Cost': {'min': 0, 'max': 100000000}
            }

        accuracy = {}
        for col, bounds in rules.items():
            if col in self.df.columns:
                valid = self.df[col].between(
                    bounds.get('min', -np.inf),
                    bounds.get('max', np.inf)
                ).sum()
                total = self.df[col].notna().sum()
                accuracy[col] = (valid / total * 100) if total > 0 else 100

                # Log invalid values
                invalid_count = total - valid
                if invalid_count > 0:
                    self.issues.append(
                        f"{col}: {invalid_count} values outside range [{bounds.get('min')}, {bounds.get('max')}]"
                    )

        overall = np.mean(list(accuracy.values())) if accuracy else 100

        self.results['accuracy'] = {
            'by_column': accuracy,
            'overall': overall,
            'threshold': 98,
            'passed': overall >= 98
        }

        return self.results['accuracy']

    def check_consistency(self, unique_cols=None, relationship_rules=None):
        """Check data consistency (Согласованность)"""
        consistency = {}

        # Check unique columns
        if unique_cols is None:
            unique_cols = ['ElementId']

        for col in unique_cols:
            if col in self.df.columns:
                is_unique = self.df[col].nunique() == len(self.df)
                consistency[f'{col}_unique'] = 100 if is_unique else \
                    (self.df[col].nunique() / len(self.df) * 100)

                if not is_unique:
                    duplicates = self.df[self.df[col].duplicated()][col].unique()
                    self.issues.append(f"Duplicate {col}: {len(duplicates)} duplicates found")

        # Check cross-field relationships
        if relationship_rules is None:
            relationship_rules = [
                ('End_Date', '>=', 'Start_Date'),
                ('Gross_Volume', '>=', 'Net_Volume')
            ]

        for col1, op, col2 in relationship_rules:
            if col1 in self.df.columns and col2 in self.df.columns:
                if op == '>=':
                    valid = (self.df[col1] >= self.df[col2]).sum()
                elif op == '>':
                    valid = (self.df[col1] > self.df[col2]).sum()
                elif op == '==':
                    valid = (self.df[col1] == self.df[col2]).sum()

                total = self.df[[col1, col2]].notna().all(axis=1).sum()
                consistency[f'{col1}_{op}_{col2}'] = (valid / total * 100) if total > 0 else 100

        overall = np.mean(list(consistency.values())) if consistency else 100

        self.results['consistency'] = {
            'checks': consistency,
            'overall': overall,
            'threshold': 99,
            'passed': overall >= 99
        }

        return self.results['consistency']

    def check_timeliness(self, date_col='Modified_Date', max_age_days=30):
        """Check data timeliness (Своевременность)"""
        if date_col not in self.df.columns:
            self.results['timeliness'] = {
                'overall': None,
                'message': f'Column {date_col} not found'
            }
            return self.results['timeliness']

        dates = pd.to_datetime(self.df[date_col], errors='coerce')
        cutoff = datetime.now() - timedelta(days=max_age_days)

        recent = (dates >= cutoff).sum()
        total = dates.notna().sum()
        timeliness_pct = (recent / total * 100) if total > 0 else 0

        oldest = dates.min()
        newest = dates.max()
        avg_age = (datetime.now() - dates.mean()).days if dates.notna().any() else None

        self.results['timeliness'] = {
            'recent_percentage': timeliness_pct,
            'oldest_record': oldest,
            'newest_record': newest,
            'average_age_days': avg_age,
            'threshold': 80,
            'passed': timeliness_pct >= 80
        }

        return self.results['timeliness']

    def check_validity(self, patterns=None):
        """Check data validity with regex patterns (Достоверность)"""
        if patterns is None:
            patterns = {
                'ElementId': r'^[A-Z]{1,3}\d{3,6}$',  # e.g., W001, FL12345
                'Level': r'^Level\s*\d+$|^L\d+$|^Уровень\s*\d+$',
                'Email': r'^[\w\.-]+@[\w\.-]+\.\w+$',
                'Phone': r'^\+?\d{10,15}$'
            }

        validity = {}
        for col, pattern in patterns.items():
            if col in self.df.columns:
                non_null = self.df[col].dropna()
                if len(non_null) > 0:
                    matches = non_null.astype(str).str.match(pattern).sum()
                    validity[col] = (matches / len(non_null) * 100)

                    invalid = len(non_null) - matches
                    if invalid > 0:
                        self.issues.append(f"{col}: {invalid} values don't match pattern")
                else:
                    validity[col] = 100

        overall = np.mean(list(validity.values())) if validity else 100

        self.results['validity'] = {
            'by_column': validity,
            'overall': overall,
            'threshold': 95,
            'passed': overall >= 95
        }

        return self.results['validity']

    def run_full_check(self):
        """Run all quality checks"""
        self.check_completeness()
        self.check_accuracy()
        self.check_consistency()
        self.check_timeliness()
        self.check_validity()

        # Calculate overall score
        scores = []
        for metric in ['completeness', 'accuracy', 'consistency', 'validity']:
            if metric in self.results and self.results[metric].get('overall'):
                scores.append(self.results[metric]['overall'])

        self.results['overall_score'] = np.mean(scores) if scores else 0
        self.results['grade'] = self._calculate_grade(self.results['overall_score'])
        self.results['issues'] = self.issues

        return self.results

    def _calculate_grade(self, score):
        """Calculate quality grade"""
        if score >= 98:
            return 'A+'
        elif score >= 95:
            return 'A'
        elif score >= 90:
            return 'B'
        elif score >= 80:
            return 'C'
        elif score >= 70:
            return 'D'
        else:
            return 'F'

    def generate_report(self):
        """Generate quality report"""
        if not self.results:
            self.run_full_check()

        report = []
        report.append("=" * 60)
        report.append("DATA QUALITY REPORT")
        report.append("=" * 60)
        report.append(f"Records analyzed: {len(self.df)}")
        report.append(f"Columns: {len(self.df.columns)}")
        report.append("")
        report.append(f"OVERALL SCORE: {self.results['overall_score']:.1f}% (Grade: {self.results['grade']})")
        report.append("")
        report.append("-" * 60)

        # Detail by dimension
        for metric in ['completeness', 'accuracy', 'consistency', 'validity', 'timeliness']:
            if metric in self.results:
                r = self.results[metric]
                passed = '✓' if r.get('passed', False) else '✗'
                overall = r.get('overall', r.get('recent_percentage', 'N/A'))
                if isinstance(overall, (int, float)):
                    report.append(f"{metric.upper():15s}: {overall:>6.1f}% {passed}")
                else:
                    report.append(f"{metric.upper():15s}: {overall}")

        report.append("-" * 60)

        if self.issues:
            report.append("")
            report.append("ISSUES FOUND:")
            for issue in self.issues[:10]:  # Show first 10
                report.append(f"  • {issue}")
            if len(self.issues) > 10:
                report.append(f"  ... and {len(self.issues) - 10} more issues")

        report.append("")
        report.append("=" * 60)

        return "\n".join(report)

Validation Rules Builder

Custom Validation Rules
python
class ValidationRulesBuilder:
    """Build custom validation rules for construction data"""

    def __init__(self):
        self.rules = []

    def add_not_null(self, column):
        """Column must not have null values"""
        self.rules.append({
            'type': 'not_null',
            'column': column,
            'check': lambda df, col=column: df[col].notna().all()
        })
        return self

    def add_unique(self, column):
        """Column must have unique values"""
        self.rules.append({
            'type': 'unique',
            'column': column,
            'check': lambda df, col=column: df[col].nunique() == len(df)
        })
        return self

    def add_range(self, column, min_val=None, max_val=None):
        """Column values must be within range"""
        self.rules.append({
            'type': 'range',
            'column': column,
            'min': min_val,
            'max': max_val,
            'check': lambda df, col=column, mn=min_val, mx=max_val:
                df[col].between(mn or -np.inf, mx or np.inf).all()
        })
        return self

    def add_regex(self, column, pattern):
        """Column values must match regex pattern"""
        self.rules.append({
            'type': 'regex',
            'column': column,
            'pattern': pattern,
            'check': lambda df, col=column, p=pattern:
                df[col].astype(str).str.match(p).all()
        })
        return self

    def add_in_list(self, column, valid_values):
        """Column values must be in list"""
        self.rules.append({
            'type': 'in_list',
            'column': column,
            'valid_values': valid_values,
            'check': lambda df, col=column, vals=valid_values:
                df[col].isin(vals).all()
        })
        return self

    def add_custom(self, name, check_func):
        """Add custom validation function"""
        self.rules.append({
            'type': 'custom',
            'name': name,
            'check': check_func
        })
        return self

    def validate(self, df):
        """Run all validation rules"""
        results = []

        for rule in self.rules:
            try:
                passed = rule['check'](df)
                results.append({
                    'rule': rule.get('name', f"{rule['type']}:{rule.get('column', 'custom')}"),
                    'passed': passed,
                    'type': rule['type']
                })
            except Exception as e:
                results.append({
                    'rule': rule.get('name', f"{rule['type']}:{rule.get('column', 'custom')}"),
                    'passed': False,
                    'error': str(e)
                })

        return results

# Usage example
rules = (ValidationRulesBuilder()
    .add_not_null('ElementId')
    .add_unique('ElementId')
    .add_range('Volume_m3', min_val=0)
    .add_range('Cost', min_val=0)
    .add_in_list('Category', ['Wall', 'Floor', 'Column', 'Beam', 'Slab'])
    .add_regex('Level', r'^Level\s*\d+$')
)

results = rules.validate(df)
for r in results:
    status = '✓' if r['passed'] else '✗'
    print(f"{status} {r['rule']}")

Automated Quality Pipeline

python
class DataQualityPipeline:
    """Automated data quality pipeline"""

    def __init__(self, config=None):
        self.config = config or self._default_config()
        self.history = []

    def _default_config(self):
        return {
            'required_columns': ['ElementId', 'Category', 'Volume_m3'],
            'unique_columns': ['ElementId'],
            'numeric_ranges': {
                'Volume_m3': (0, 10000),
                'Area_m2': (0, 100000),
                'Cost': (0, 100000000)
            },
            'valid_categories': ['Wall', 'Floor', 'Column', 'Beam', 'Slab',
                                 'Foundation', 'Roof', 'Stair', 'Door', 'Window'],
            'min_quality_score': 90
        }

    def run(self, df, source_name='unknown'):
        """Run quality pipeline"""
        checker = DataQualityChecker(df)

        # Configure checks based on config
        checker.check_completeness(self.config['required_columns'])
        checker.check_accuracy({
            col: {'min': r[0], 'max': r[1]}
            for col, r in self.config['numeric_ranges'].items()
        })
        checker.check_consistency(self.config['unique_columns'])
        checker.check_validity()

        results = checker.run_full_check()

        # Store in history
        self.history.append({
            'timestamp': datetime.now(),
            'source': source_name,
            'records': len(df),
            'score': results['overall_score'],
            'grade': results['grade'],
            'issues_count': len(results['issues'])
        })

        # Check threshold
        passed = results['overall_score'] >= self.config['min_quality_score']

        return {
            'passed': passed,
            'score': results['overall_score'],
            'grade': results['grade'],
            'details': results,
            'report': checker.generate_report()
        }

    def get_history_summary(self):
        """Get quality history summary"""
        if not self.history:
            return "No quality checks performed yet."

        df_history = pd.DataFrame(self.history)
        return {
            'total_checks': len(self.history),
            'avg_score': df_history['score'].mean(),
            'min_score': df_history['score'].min(),
            'max_score': df_history['score'].max(),
            'latest': self.history[-1]
        }

Quality Reporting

Export Quality Report
python
def export_quality_report(df, output_path, include_details=True):
    """Export comprehensive quality report to Excel"""
    checker = DataQualityChecker(df)
    results = checker.run_full_check()

    with pd.ExcelWriter(output_path, engine='openpyxl') as writer:
        # Summary sheet
        summary = pd.DataFrame({
            'Metric': ['Overall Score', 'Grade', 'Records', 'Columns', 'Issues'],
            'Value': [
                f"{results['overall_score']:.1f}%",
                results['grade'],
                len(df),
                len(df.columns),
                len(results['issues'])
            ]
        })
        summary.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Summary', index=False)

        # Completeness details
        if 'completeness' in results:
            comp_df = pd.DataFrame.from_dict(
                results['completeness']['by_column'],
                orient='index',
                columns=['Completeness_%']
            )
            comp_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Completeness')

        # Issues list
        if results['issues']:
            issues_df = pd.DataFrame({'Issue': results['issues']})
            issues_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Issues', index=False)

        # Missing values analysis
        if include_details:
            missing = df.isnull().sum()
            missing_df = pd.DataFrame({
                'Column': missing.index,
                'Missing_Count': missing.values,
                'Missing_%': (missing.values / len(df) * 100).round(2)
            })
            missing_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Missing_Values', index=False)

    return output_path

Quick Reference

MetricDescriptionThreshold
Completeness% non-null values≥ 95%
AccuracyValues within valid range≥ 98%
ConsistencyUnique IDs, valid relationships≥ 99%
ValidityMatch expected patterns≥ 95%
TimelinessRecords updated recently≥ 80%

Common Validation Patterns

python
# Construction-specific regex patterns
PATTERNS = {
    'element_id': r'^[A-Z]{1,3}\d{3,8}$',
    'revit_id': r'^\d{5,8}$',
    'ifc_guid': r'^[A-Za-z0-9_$]{22}$',
    'level': r'^(Level|L|Уровень)\s*[-]?\d+$',
    'grid': r'^[A-Z]{1,2}[-/]?\d{0,3}$',
    'date_iso': r'^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$',
    'cost_code': r'^\d{2,3}[.-]\d{2,4}[.-]?\d{0,4}$'
}

Resources

Next Steps

  • See bim-validation-pipeline for BIM-specific validation
  • See etl-pipeline for data processing pipelines
  • See data-visualization for quality dashboards

© datadrivenconstruction, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 2 other files in 2_DDC_Book/2.6-Data-Quality-Validation/data-quality-check of datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction.

  • SKILL.md
  • claw.json
  • instructions.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit ce45bbf

Used in 1 other repository

We found 1 copy of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

Data Quality Check next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Data Quality Check compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Data Quality Check this skilldatadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction3441 repos~4.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Question2reportrefraction-ray/xalpha2.7k—~3.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Dingo VerifyMigoXLab/dingo757—~741Automated safety check: NotesApache-2.0
Data Validationplatonai/Browser41.2k—~896Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Issues DeduplicationJetBrains/ideavim10k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Pandas ProJeffallan/claude-skills12k1 repos~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Question2report

    refraction-ray/xalpha

    Turn a natural-language financial question into a polished, self-contained HTML report.

    2.7k GitHub stars~3.2k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Dingo Verify

    MigoXLab/dingo

    A skill your agent uses when the user wants to fact-check an article or verify factual claims in a document.

    757 GitHub stars~741 tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check: notes
  • Data Validation

    platonai/Browser4

    Validates data against common and custom rules (required fields, formats, ranges).

    1.2k GitHub stars~896 tokensUpdated today
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Issues Deduplication

    JetBrains/ideavim

    Official

    Handles deduplication of YouTrack issues. An agent skill from JetBrains/ideavim.

    10k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Pandas Pro

    Jeffallan/claude-skills

    Handles pandas DataFrame work: cleaning, merging, groupby aggregation, pivots, time-series resampling and memory tuning, with checks on dtypes, shapes and nulls.

    12k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.5k tokens
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Openbb Data Fetcher

    monarchjuno/vibe-investing

    Fetch financial, market, economic, fundamental, news, options, crypto, ETF, index, and macro data through the OpenBB Python interface instead of the OpenBB MCP server.

    299 GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated 5 mo ago
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check: notes

More from datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction

All 43 skills in this repo
  • AI Agent Orchestration

    datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction

    Orchestrate multiple AI agents for construction workflows: estimator, scheduler, document, QA and safety agents coordinated by a supervisor agent, with human checkpoints.

    344 GitHub stars~679 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Embodied Carbon Esg

    datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction

    Estimate embodied carbon and produce ESG/climate reporting for construction: LCA per work item, material-based carbon factors, EU taxonomy and CSRD alignment.

    344 GitHub stars~664 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Material Passports Circular

    datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction

    Material passports and circular construction: generate per-element material inventories from BOQ/BIM, mark reuse potential and recycled content, and prepare deconstruction data.

    344 GitHub stars~634 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Oce Cost Browser

    datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction

    Browse and search the OpenConstructionERP cost database: classification tree, SQL and semantic search, autocomplete, certainty badges, and the resource catalog.

    344 GitHub stars~637 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Oce Estimate Boq

    datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction

    Create bills of quantities and estimates in OpenConstructionERP: search cost items, build BOQ sections, link BIM elements in bulk, validate the BOQ, and export GAEB/XLSX/JSON.

    344 GitHub stars~763 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Oce Field Ops

    datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction

    Field operations in OpenConstructionERP: punch list, daily diary, HSE observations and task tracking on site.

    344 GitHub stars~532 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Data Quality Check

What does Data Quality Check do?

Assess construction data quality using completeness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness, and validity metrics. Data Quality Check is an agent skill from datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction. Assess construction data quality using completeness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness, and validity metrics.

When should I use Data Quality Check?

Data Quality Check fits situations like: tasks that involve Data cleaning.

How do I install Data Quality Check in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill data-quality-check -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (2_DDC_Book/2.6-Data-Quality-Validation/data-quality-check in datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction) into .claude/skills/data-quality-check in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Data Quality Check in Codex?

Run `npx skills add datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill data-quality-check -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (2_DDC_Book/2.6-Data-Quality-Validation/data-quality-check in datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction) into .agents/skills/data-quality-check in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Data Quality Check in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill data-quality-check -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/data-quality-check, .gemini/skills/data-quality-check, .github/skills/data-quality-check and .opencode/skills/data-quality-check in your project.

What does Data Quality Check need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Data Quality Check is instructions for the agent only. Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Data Quality Check access the network?

SKILL.md names 2 domains. As links in the text: datadrivenconstruction.io and greatexpectations.io. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Data Quality Check safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Data Quality Check use?

Data Quality Check is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Data Quality Check use?

About 4.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 20k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Data Quality Check?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Data Quality Check: Question2report (refraction-ray/xalpha, 2.7k stars), Dingo Verify (MigoXLab/dingo, 757 stars), Data Validation (platonai/Browser4, 1.2k stars) and Issues Deduplication (JetBrains/ideavim, 10k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Data Quality Check?

datadrivenconstruction (a GitHub user) maintains it in datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction, which has 344 GitHub stars. The repository holds 43 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on August 22, 2026.

Source: datadrivenconstruction/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.