Agent skill

Fin Review Loop

by csmar432 in csmar432/finai-research

经济金融论文的对抗性review循环。对草稿进行多轮严格评审,检查实证严谨性、方法正确性、理论贡献和写作质量,给出可操作的修改建议。(AI review 不能替代同行评审,草稿必须经研究者核实后投稿。)

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Fin Review Loop

skills CLI
$ npx skills add csmar432/finai-research --skill fin-review-loop -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install csmar432/finai-research fin-review-loop --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/csmar432/finai-research.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/.agents/skills/fin-review-loop .claude/skills/fin-review-loop && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
fin-review-loop
GitHub stars
109
Token cost
~970 tokens
SKILL.md length
164 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
15
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

经济金融论文的对抗性review循环。对草稿进行多轮严格评审,检查实证严谨性、方法正确性、理论贡献和写作质量,给出可操作的修改建议。(AI review 不能替代同行评审,草稿必须经研究者核实后投稿。)

  • Works in 3 steps: 读取 output/fin-manuscript/ 下的所有 .tex 文件 → 提取论文结构:Introduction, Literature Review,… → 如文件不存在,扫描项目根目录和 papers/ 目录
  • Tasks that involve Econometrics and empirical research
  • SKILL.md covers 触发条件, 评分维度与权重, 评审难度级别 and 评审难度示例, plus 6 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Fin Review Loop is an agent skill from csmar432/finai-research. 经济金融论文的对抗性review循环。对草稿进行多轮严格评审,检查实证严谨性、方法正确性、理论贡献和写作质量,给出可操作的修改建议。(AI review 不能替代同行评审,草稿必须经研究者核实后投稿。)

Its SKILL.md is about 970 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Econometrics and empirical research. The repository describes itself as: Evidence-first AI workflow for economic and financial research: literature → identification → data → econometrics → verifiable LaTeX. 43 data sources, 58 method modules, 18 AI… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Econometrics and empirical research

Example prompts

  • “/fin-review-loop”

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. 读取 output/fin-manuscript/ 下的所有 .tex 文件
  2. 提取论文结构:Introduction, Literature Review, Data, Methodology, Results, Conclusion
  3. 如文件不存在,扫描项目根目录和 papers/ 目录

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 47eebb7. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are markdown).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Fin Review Loop loads about 970 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 29 tokens; SKILL.md has 164 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~29
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~970

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from csmar432/finai-research at commit 47eebb7, republished under its MIT licence (© csmar432). 164 words, ~970 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/fin-review-loop/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
fin-review-loop
description
经济金融论文的对抗性review循环。对草稿进行多轮严格评审,检查实证严谨性、方法正确性、理论贡献和写作质量,给出可操作的修改建议。(AI review 不能替代同行评审,草稿必须经研究者核实后投稿。)
trigger
review|评审|审稿|检查论文
version
1.0.0
created
2026-06-13
tags
paper, review, adversarial, quality

fin-review-loop

经济金融论文的对抗性review循环。对草稿进行多轮严格评审,检查实证严谨性、方法正确性、理论贡献和写作质量,给出可操作的修改建议。(AI review 不能替代同行评审,草稿必须经研究者核实后投稿。)

触发条件

  • 关键词: review 评审 审稿 检查论文 对抗性review 论文检查
  • Skill语法: Skill: fin-review-loop

评分维度与权重

维度权重通过阈值
新颖性 (Novelty)30%>= 6.0
实证严谨性 (Empirical Rigour)30%>= 6.0
文献覆盖 (Literature Coverage)15%>= 5.0
写作清晰 (Writing Clarity)15%>= 5.0
学术影响 (Academic Impact)10%>= 5.0

其中"写作清晰"维度必须包含 AI 味检测:全文不得出现 AI 典型句式 (详见 docs/writing-guide/ANTI_AI_WRITING_GUIDE.md), 结论段必须包含底气要素(具体数字/经济规模/机制描述/对比发现之一)。

评审难度级别

  • standard: 模拟标准学术审稿人
  • strict: 模拟顶刊审稿人 (JF/JFE 级别)
  • nightmare: 模拟严苛批评型审稿人 (如被拒稿后的防御性检查)

评审难度示例

standard
  • 发现问题时会给出温和建议
  • 接受主流方法选择
  • 关注核心贡献是否清晰
strict
  • 要求所有实证细节完备
  • 质疑识别策略的每一步
  • 检查文献是否覆盖最新顶刊
nightmare
  • 预设论文会被拒,准备攻击
  • 寻找方法论上的致命缺陷
  • 模拟最严格的匿名审稿人

停止条件 (立即终止评审并报告用户)

满足以下任一条件时,立即停止评审:

  • 新颖性 < 6.0 → 建议重新评估研究定位
  • 实证严谨性 < 6.0 → 必须修复实证问题才能继续
  • 已达到最大评审轮次 (4轮)

评审流程

第一步:解析论文
  1. 读取 output/fin-manuscript/ 下的所有 .tex 文件
  2. 提取论文结构:Introduction, Literature Review, Data, Methodology, Results, Conclusion
  3. 如文件不存在,扫描项目根目录和 papers/ 目录
第二步:诊断性检查

自动运行以下检查:

□ 平行趋势检验结果是否存在
□ 稳健性检验 >= 6 种
□ 异质性分析是否包含
□ 机制分析是否包含
□ 参考文献是否包含近3年顶刊论文
□ 变量定义表是否完整
□ 数据来源是否标注
□ 实证方法选择是否合理
第三步:逐维度评分

对每个维度进行 1-10 分评分,并说明理由:

维度评分理由
新颖性X边际贡献是什么?与现有文献区别?
实证严谨性X识别策略是否合理?数据是否可靠?
文献覆盖X是否覆盖最新顶刊?经典文献?
写作清晰X逻辑是否清晰?论证是否连贯?
学术影响X对该领域的潜在影响?引用潜力?
第四步:生成逐节反馈

为论文每个章节生成具体、可操作的反馈:

### Introduction
- 问题: 边际贡献描述不够具体
- 建议: 明确说明与X论文的区别,本文的增量贡献是什么

### Data & Methodology
- 问题: 平行趋势图缺少统计显著性标注
- 建议: 在图中标注pre-treatment各期系数的置信区间

### Results
- 问题: 基准回归系数解读不够严谨
- 建议: 添加经济显著性解释(1个标准差变动对应Y变化X%)
第五步:识别审稿人攻击点

识别论文中最可能被审稿人攻击的弱点:

## 审稿人攻击点
1. [高风险] 审稿人会质疑平行趋势假设——需要pre-trends test p值
2. [中风险] 样本期间选择——为何选择2012-2022年?
3. [低风险] 稳健性检验中未包含安慰剂检验
第六步:生成修订计划

生成 REVISION_PLAN.md,按优先级列出修复项:

markdown
# 修订计划 — Round N

## 优先级 P0 (必须修复)
1. [实证] 添加平行趋势检验的p值到图中
2. [实证] 补充安慰剂检验

## 优先级 P1 (强烈建议)
1. [写作] 明确边际贡献表述
2. [文献] 补充近3年JF/JFE论文引用

## 优先级 P2 (可选优化)
1. [写作] 优化摘要结构
2. [格式] 检查参考文献格式
第七步:等待用户确认修订
[CHECKPOINT] 评审完成。请确认:
1. 接受修订计划 → 开始修订
2. 修改修订计划 → 告知修改内容
3. 终止评审 → 记录当前状态
第八步:重复评审

修订完成后,重新运行评审流程。重复直到通过所有阈值或达到停止条件。

输出格式

markdown
# Review Report — Round N

## Overall Score: X/10 (WEIGHTED)

## Dimension Scores
| Dimension | Score | Pass? |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| Novelty | 7.5 | ✅ |
| Rigour | 6.0 | ✅ |
| Literature | 7.0 | ✅ |
| Clarity | 6.5 | ✅ |
| Impact | 7.0 | ✅ |

## Diagnostic Checks
| Check | Status |
|-------|--------|
| Parallel trends test | ✅ |
| Robustness >= 6 types | ✅ |
| Heterogeneity analysis | ✅ |
| Mechanism analysis | ✅ |
| Recent top-journal refs | ✅ |

## Section-by-Section Feedback

### Introduction
- Issue: 边际贡献描述不够具体
- Suggestion: 明确说明与X论文的区别

### Data & Methodology
- Issue: 平行趋势图缺少统计显著性标注
- Suggestion: 在图中标注pre-treatment各期系数的置信区间

## Reviewer Attack Vectors
1. [HIGH RISK] 审稿人会质疑平行趋势假设——需要pre-trends test p-value
2. [MEDIUM RISK] 样本期间选择——为何选择2012-2022年?

## PASS/FAIL/REVISION NEEDED

输出文件

  • output/fin-review/REVIEW_REPORT_ROUND_N.md — 本轮评审报告
  • output/fin-review/REVISION_PLAN.md — 修订计划

依赖项

  • scripts/research_framework/modern_did.py — DID诊断工具
  • scripts/research_framework/robustness_runner.py — 稳健性检验运行器
  • scripts/journal_template.py — 期刊格式验证

约束

  1. 每轮评审必须完整执行所有8个步骤
  2. 停止条件满足时必须立即报告,不得继续评审
  3. 反馈必须具体、可操作,避免泛泛而谈
  4. 攻击点识别必须基于真实审稿人行为模式
  5. 修订计划必须标注优先级 (P0/P1/P2)

© csmar432, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in .agents/skills/fin-review-loop of csmar432/finai-research.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 47eebb7

Compare with similar skills

Fin Review Loop next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Fin Review Loop compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Fin Review Loop this skillcsmar432/finai-research109—~970Automated safety check: PassMIT
Statadylantmoore/stata-skill2911 repos~4.2kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Stata C Pluginsdylantmoore/stata-skill2911 repos~5.8kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Example Datasetspymc-labs/CausalPy1.2k—~587Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Stata AuditSepineTam/mcp-for-stata264—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassAGPL-3.0
Stata Skill Contributordylantmoore/stata-skill2911 repos~2.4kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Stata

    dylantmoore/stata-skill

    Comprehensive Stata reference for writing correct .do files, data management, econometrics, causal inference, graphics, Mata programming, and 20 community packages (reghdfe, estout, did, rdrobust…

    291 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~4.2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Stata C Plugins

    dylantmoore/stata-skill

    Develop high-performance C/C++ plugins for Stata using the stplugin.h SDK.

    291 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~5.8k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Example Datasets

    pymc-labs/CausalPy

    Load built-in CausalPy example datasets for demos, tutorials, tests, and quick causal-analysis prototypes.

    1.2k GitHub stars~587 tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Stata Audit

    SepineTam/mcp-for-stata

    Inspect, validate, summarize, and render local Stata-MCP audit evidence under .statamcp.

    264 GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Stata Skill Contributor

    dylantmoore/stata-skill

    Guide for contributing to the stata-skill project. An agent skill from dylantmoore/stata-skill.

    291 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.4k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Diagnostic Dofile

    SepineTam/mcp-for-stata

    A skill your agent uses when the user needs to inspect, audit, or diagnose the safety of a Stata do-file.

    264 GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from csmar432/finai-research

All 15 skills in this repo
  • Fin Arch Diagram

    csmar432/finai-research

    生成研究/项目架构图、流程图、层次图(swimlane / processflow / hierarchytree)。适合 PPT 汇报、技术文档、综述插图。输出风格接近 draw.io,可选 graphviz(高质量)/ matplotlib(零依赖)双后端。

    109 GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Fin Brief Generator

    csmar432/finai-research

    根据用户输入或已有研究输出(文献综述/想法报告/新颖性报告),自动生成或更新FINBRIEF.md,减少用户填写负担. An agent skill from csmar432/finai-research.

    109 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Fin Data Acquisition

    csmar432/finai-research

    根据REFINEDDESIGN.md中的变量定义,自动获取所需数据并生成可执行的回归分析脚本(Python/Stata)。

    109 GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Fin Experiment Design

    csmar432/finai-research

    经济金融实证方法设计。根据研究想法和REFINEDDESIGN.md,生成完整的实证研究设计方案,覆盖识别策略选择、样本构建、变量定义、稳健性检验清单和内生性处理方案。

    109 GitHub stars~4.2k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Fin Generate Idea

    csmar432/finai-research

    针对经济金融研究方向的创意生成与评估。生成8-12个可发表的研究idea,过滤后在数据可行的情况下进行小规模实证验证,输出排序后的研究想法报告。

    109 GitHub stars~2.5k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Fin Idea Discovery

    csmar432/finai-research

    经济金融研究的完整想法发现流程。从研究方向出发,经过文献综述、想法生成、新颖性验证、实证方法设计和数据获取,输出经过数据实证验证的可执行研究方案。

    109 GitHub stars~2.7k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Fin Review Loop

What does Fin Review Loop do?

经济金融论文的对抗性review循环。对草稿进行多轮严格评审,检查实证严谨性、方法正确性、理论贡献和写作质量,给出可操作的修改建议。(AI review 不能替代同行评审,草稿必须经研究者核实后投稿。). Fin Review Loop is an agent skill from csmar432/finai-research.

When should I use Fin Review Loop?

Fin Review Loop fits situations like: tasks that involve Econometrics and empirical research.

How do I install Fin Review Loop in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add csmar432/finai-research --skill fin-review-loop -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (.agents/skills/fin-review-loop in csmar432/finai-research) into .claude/skills/fin-review-loop in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Fin Review Loop in Codex?

Run `npx skills add csmar432/finai-research --skill fin-review-loop -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (.agents/skills/fin-review-loop in csmar432/finai-research) into .agents/skills/fin-review-loop in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Fin Review Loop in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add csmar432/finai-research --skill fin-review-loop -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/fin-review-loop, .gemini/skills/fin-review-loop, .github/skills/fin-review-loop and .opencode/skills/fin-review-loop in your project.

What does Fin Review Loop need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Fin Review Loop is instructions for the agent only.

Does Fin Review Loop access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Fin Review Loop safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Fin Review Loop use?

Fin Review Loop is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Fin Review Loop use?

About 970 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Fin Review Loop?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Fin Review Loop: Stata (dylantmoore/stata-skill, 291 stars), Stata C Plugins (dylantmoore/stata-skill, 291 stars), Example Datasets (pymc-labs/CausalPy, 1.2k stars) and Stata Audit (SepineTam/mcp-for-stata, 264 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Fin Review Loop?

csmar432 (a GitHub user) maintains it in csmar432/finai-research, which has 109 GitHub stars. The repository holds 15 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 6, 2026.

Source: csmar432/finai-research on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.