Golang Testing

Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats tests as executable specifications. You write tests to constrain behavior, not to hit coverage targets.

Thinking mode: Reason as thoroughly as possible for test strategy design and failure analysis — shallow reasoning misses edge cases and produces brittle tests that pass today but break tomorrow. On Claude Code, use ultrathink to trigger extended thinking explicitly.

Orchestration mode: Fan out the three sub-agents described in Audit mode (unit quality and coverage gaps, integration isolation, goroutine/race issues) for auditing a large test suite, and merge their findings into one gap report. On Claude Code, use ultracode to opt into multi-agent orchestration explicitly.

Modes:

• Write mode — generating new tests for existing or new code. Work sequentially through the code under test; use gotests to scaffold table-driven tests, then enrich with edge cases and error paths.
• Review mode — reviewing a PR's test changes. Focus on the diff: check coverage of new behaviour, assertion quality, table-driven structure, and absence of flakiness patterns. Sequential.
• Audit mode — auditing an existing test suite for gaps, flakiness, or bad patterns (order-dependent tests, missing t.Parallel(), implementation-detail coupling). Launch up to 3 parallel sub-agents split by concern: (1) unit test quality and coverage gaps, (2) integration test isolation and build tags, (3) goroutine leaks and race conditions.
• Debug mode — a test is failing or flaky. Work sequentially: reproduce reliably, isolate the failing assertion, trace the root cause in production code or test setup.

Community default. A company skill that explicitly supersedes samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill takes precedence.

Dependencies:

• gotests: go install github.com/cweill/gotests/gotests@latest

Go Testing Best Practices

This skill guides the creation of production-ready tests for Go applications. Follow these principles to write maintainable, fast, and reliable tests.

Best Practices Summary

1. Table-driven tests MUST use named subtests -- every test case needs a name field passed to t.Run
2. Integration tests MUST use build tags (//go:build integration) to separate from unit tests
3. Tests MUST NOT depend on execution order -- each test MUST be independently runnable
4. Independent tests SHOULD use t.Parallel() when possible
5. NEVER test implementation details -- test observable behavior and public API contracts
6. Packages with goroutines SHOULD use goleak.VerifyTestMain in TestMain to detect goroutine leaks
7. Use testify as helpers, not a replacement for standard library
8. Mock interfaces, not concrete types
9. Keep unit tests fast (< 1ms), use build tags for integration tests
10. Run tests with race detection in CI
11. Include examples as executable documentation
12. Test files MUST be named after the source file under test, not after the function or method being tested
13. Test functions SHOULD appear in the same order as the functions/methods they test in the source file

Test Structure and Organization

File Conventions

// package_test.go - tests in same package (white-box, access unexported)
package mypackage

// mypackage_test.go - tests in test package (black-box, public API only)
package mypackage_test

Name the test file after the source file it tests, not after the function or method under test. Go's convention is one test file per source file (foo.go -> foo_test.go), because tools (go test, coverage reports, IDE "jump to test" navigation, gotests) and reviewers all resolve tests by source file, not by symbol. A source file usually declares several functions/methods; splitting its tests by symbol name scatters them across many files and breaks that file-to-file mapping.

// ✓ Good — one test file per source file
helloworld.go       -> helloworld_test.go   // contains TestHelloWorld, TestAbcd, TestXyz, ...

// ✗ Bad — test file named after the function/method instead of the source file
helloworld.go       -> abcd_test.go         // wrong: should be helloworld_test.go

Exception: very large source files MAY be split into multiple _test.go files by concern (e.g. foo_test.go + foo_edgecases_test.go), but each split file's name MUST still be derived from the source file name, never from an individual function name. Prefer keeping a single _test.go file per source file even when it grows large — splitting adds navigation overhead and is rarely worth it; reach for the exception only when a single file becomes genuinely unwieldy to browse or review.

Within a test file, order test functions to match the order their tested functions/methods appear in the source file. A reader (human or agent) scrolling foo.go alongside foo_test.go can then find the matching test by position instead of searching; drift between the two orderings compounds every time either file grows.

Naming Conventions

func TestAdd(t *testing.T) { ... }               // function test
func TestMyStruct_MyMethod(t *testing.T) { ... } // method test
func BenchmarkAdd(b *testing.B) { ... }          // benchmark
func ExampleAdd() { ... }                        // example
func FuzzAdd(f *testing.F) { ... }               // fuzz test

Table-Driven Tests

Table-driven tests are the idiomatic Go way to test multiple scenarios. Always name each test case.

func TestCalculatePrice(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct {
        name     string
        quantity int
        unitPrice float64
        expected  float64
    }{
        {
            name:      "single item",
            quantity:  1,
            unitPrice: 10.0,
            expected:  10.0,
        },
        {
            name:      "bulk discount - 100 items",
            quantity:  100,
            unitPrice: 10.0,
            expected:  900.0, // 10% discount
        },
        {
            name:      "zero quantity",
            quantity:  0,
            unitPrice: 10.0,
            expected:  0.0,
        },
    }

    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            got := CalculatePrice(tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice)
            if got != tt.expected {
                t.Errorf("CalculatePrice(%d, %.2f) = %.2f, want %.2f",
                    tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice, got, tt.expected)
            }
        })
    }
}

Common Pitfall: Assert Scope Leaking into Subtests

Never create a testify assert/require instance in the parent test function and reuse it inside t.Run closures. assert.New(t) captures the exact *testing.T it was built with, so if that t belongs to the parent, every failure raised inside the subtest gets attributed to the parent test in go test output — the failing subtest itself still reports --- PASS, silently hiding which case broke. This happens whether or not the subtest calls t.Parallel().

// WRONG -- `is` is bound to the parent's t
func TestCalculatePrice(t *testing.T) {
    is := assert.New(t)
    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            is.Equal(tt.expected, CalculatePrice(tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice)) // misattributed on failure
        })
    }
}

// RIGHT -- each subtest builds its own instance from its own t
func TestCalculatePrice(t *testing.T) {
    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            is := assert.New(t)
            is.Equal(tt.expected, CalculatePrice(tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice))
        })
    }
}

Verify with a deliberately-broken case: if go test -v -run TestName shows --- FAIL: TestName but every --- PASS: TestName/subtest_name line still says PASS, the assert scope is leaking.