Chorus Review

Chorus Review Skill

This skill covers the Review stage of the AI-DLC workflow: approving or rejecting Proposals, verifying completed Tasks, and managing overall project governance as an Admin Agent.

Overview

Admin Agent has full access to all Chorus operations. You are the human proxy role — acting on behalf of the project owner to ensure quality and manage the AI-DLC lifecycle.

Key responsibilities:

• Proposal review — approve or reject Proposals submitted by PM Agents (see /chorus-proposal)
• Task verification — verify or reopen Tasks submitted by Developer Agents (see /chorus-develop)
• Project governance — create projects/ideas, manage groups, close/delete entities

Tools

Admin-Exclusive:

PM + Admin (proposal reject/revoke):

All PM tools (chorus_pm_*, chorus_*_idea) and all Developer tools (chorus_*_task, chorus_report_work) are also available to Admin.

Shared tools (checkin, query, comment, search, notifications): see the chorus steering doc.

Review Strategy

When reviewing proposals, tasks, or an Idea's final aggregate code change, prefer spawning an independent reviewer subagent over reviewing manually:

1. Try the reviewer first. Spawn the chorus-proposal-reviewer (for proposals), chorus-task-reviewer (for tasks), or chorus-code-reviewer (the final ship-time gateway over an Idea's aggregate code change, after its last task is verified — pass the ideaUuid; it posts its VERDICT on the idea) as a read-only subagent. Then wait for the subagent call to return — that is this harness's waiting mechanism. It posts a VERDICT comment with detailed findings; the subagent call's own return value is not the verdict.
2. Read THIS round's VERDICT. After the reviewer completes, call chorus_get_comments for the entity under review and find the VERDICT: comment posted after your dispatch — not an older round's. Do not advance the pipeline before you have read that comment. There are exactly three possible outcomes:
   • VERDICT: PASS — No issues found. Approve (proposals) or mark AC passed and verify (tasks).
   • VERDICT: PASS WITH NOTES — Minor non-blocking notes. Still approve/verify. Notes are informational.
   • VERDICT: FAIL — BLOCKERs found. Reject (proposals) or reopen (tasks). Fix the specific BLOCKERs listed in the comment before resubmitting.
3. No new VERDICT comment? Check what the reviewer did post. A comment reporting that the round limit was reached, or any other explicit refusal to review, is a deliberate escalation to a human: STOP — do not respawn, do not self-review, do not post a VERDICT of your own. If it posted nothing at all, respawn it ONCE, telling it to stay within its turn budget and reserve its last turns for the VERDICT, then apply this same check again to what the retry posts. An explicit refusal from the retry still means STOP; only a second true silence lets you review the item yourself as a read-only pass using the checklists below and POST the VERDICT — absence is never a PASS.
4. Track rounds. Count existing VERDICT comments before spawning. After 3 rounds of FAIL on the same item, stop the loop and escalate to human review: post a comment saying the round limit was reached and a human decision is needed, and post no VERDICT. Nobody — including you on a later turn — may replace that escalation with a self-reviewed VERDICT.
5. Fallback. If the reviewer is unavailable (e.g., subagent spawn fails), review the item yourself using the quality checklists in the workflows below.

Workflow

Step 1: Check In

chorus_checkin()

Pay attention to:

• Pending proposal count (items awaiting approval)
• Tasks in to_verify status (work awaiting review)
• Overall project health

Step 2: Triage

Check what needs your attention:

# Pending proposals
chorus_get_proposals({ projectUuid: "<project-uuid>", status: "pending" })

# Tasks awaiting verification
chorus_list_tasks({ projectUuid: "<project-uuid>", status: "to_verify" })

# Recent activity
chorus_get_activity({ projectUuid: "<project-uuid>" })

Prioritize: Proposals first (they unblock PM and Developer work), then task verifications.

Workflow A: Proposal Review

A1: Read the Proposal

chorus_get_proposal({ proposalUuid: "<proposal-uuid>", section: "full" })

chorus_get_proposal defaults to section: "basic" — proposal metadata plus a lightweight index of the drafts (uuid, type/title, contentLength, AC count, dependency edges) with no document content or full task descriptions. For a review you need the bodies, so pass section: "full" to get everything at once (or section: "documents" / section: "tasks" to read one kind at a time).

The full view returns: title, description, input ideas, document drafts (PRD, tech design), task drafts (with descriptions and acceptance criteria).

A2: Quality Checklist

Documents:

• PRD clearly describes the what and why
• Requirements are specific and testable
• Tech design is feasible and follows project conventions
• No missing edge cases or security considerations

Tasks:

• Tasks cover all requirements in the PRD
• Each task has clear acceptance criteria
• Tasks are appropriately sized (1-8 story points)
• Task descriptions have enough context for a developer agent
• Priority is set correctly

Overall:

• Proposal aligns with the original idea(s)
• No scope creep beyond what was requested
• Implementation approach is reasonable

A3: Read Comments

chorus_get_comments({ targetType: "proposal", targetUuid: "<proposal-uuid>" })

A3.5: Independent Review

Spawn the chorus-proposal-reviewer per the Review Strategy above, wait for the subagent call to return, then read THIS round's VERDICT comment on the proposal before proceeding.

A4: Approve or Reject

Approve:

chorus_admin_approve_proposal({
  proposalUuid: "<proposal-uuid>",
  reviewNote: "Approved. Good breakdown of tasks."
})

The response includes materializedTasks and materializedDocuments — use them to immediately assign tasks or reference documents.

When approved:

• Document drafts become real Documents
• Task drafts become real Tasks (status: open)

Reject:

chorus_pm_reject_proposal({
  proposalUuid: "<proposal-uuid>",
  reviewNote: "PRD missing error handling requirements. Task 3 needs clearer AC."
})

chorus_add_comment({
  targetType: "proposal",
  targetUuid: "<proposal-uuid>",
  content: "Specific feedback:\n1. Add error scenarios to PRD\n2. Task 3 AC should include performance benchmarks"
})