Agent skill

UX Heuristic

by asgard-ai-platform in asgard-ai-platform/skills

Conduct heuristic evaluation of user interfaces using Nielsen's 10 usability principles.

MITAuto-check passedFrontend & Design

Install UX Heuristic

skills CLI
$ npx skills add asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill ux-heuristic -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install asgard-ai-platform/skills ux-heuristic --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ux-heuristic .claude/skills/ux-heuristic && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
ux-heuristic
GitHub stars
242
Token cost
~1.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
522 words
Files
3 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
207
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Conduct heuristic evaluation of user interfaces using Nielsen's 10 usability principles.

  • Works in 6 steps: Define scope: Which screens/flows to… → Walk through the interface 2-3 times… → Flag violations: Note each violation… → …
  • The user needs to audit a website
  • SKILL.md covers Overview, Framework, Output Format and Examples, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

UX Heuristic is an agent skill from asgard-ai-platform/skills. Conduct heuristic evaluation of user interfaces using Nielsen's 10 usability principles. Use this skill when the user needs to audit a website, app, or interface for usability issues, prioritize UX improvements, or conduct a quick expert review without user testing — even if they say 'review this UI', 'find usability problems', or 'why do users struggle with our app'.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 4 other files, including reference files (for example `examples/sample_scenario.md` and `references/wcag-checklist.md`).

It sits in Frontend & Design, covering UX design and User research. The repository describes itself as: 301 open-source coding agent skills across 22 domains — methodology, judgment & gotchas packaged as Claude Agent Skills for the Asgard AI Platform. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • The user needs to audit a website
  • Interface for usability issues
  • Prioritize UX improvements
  • Conduct a quick expert review without user testing — even if they say review this UI

Example prompts

  • “review this UI”
  • “find usability problems”
  • “why do users struggle with our app”
  • “/ux-heuristic”

Workflow steps

6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Define scope: Which screens/flows to evaluate
  2. Walk through the interface 2-3 times with different user tasks
  3. Flag violations: Note each violation with heuristic #, location, description
  4. Rate severity: 0-4 scale for each violation
  5. Prioritize: Fix severity 4 and 3 first
  6. Report: Organize findings by severity, not by heuristic number

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 4e7f4f8. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are markdown).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

UX Heuristic loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs, and up to ~3.9k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 96 tokens; SKILL.md has 522 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~96
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.4k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~3.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from asgard-ai-platform/skills at commit 4e7f4f8, republished under its MIT licence (© asgard-ai-platform). 522 words, ~1,385 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/ux-heuristic/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 2 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
ux-heuristic
description
Conduct heuristic evaluation of user interfaces using Nielsen's 10 usability principles. Use this skill when the user needs to audit a website, app, or interface for usability issues, prioritize UX improvements, or conduct a quick expert review without user testing — even if they say 'review this UI', 'find usability problems', or 'why do users struggle with our app'.
metadata.category
WP-21 設計/資訊/傳播/公衛
metadata.tags
ux, heuristic-evaluation, usability, nielsen

Heuristic Evaluation (Nielsen's 10 Principles)

Overview

Heuristic evaluation is an expert review method that assesses a user interface against established usability principles. It's fast (2-4 hours), cheap (no user recruitment), and finds 40-60% of usability issues. Use it as a complement to, not replacement for, user testing.

Framework

IRON LAW: Every Violation Gets a Severity Rating

Finding a violation is half the work. Rating its severity is the other half.
A cosmetic inconsistency and a critical workflow blocker are both "violations"
but require completely different response urgency.

0 = Not a usability problem
1 = Cosmetic only — fix if time permits
2 = Minor — low priority
3 = Major — important to fix, high priority
4 = Catastrophe — must fix before release
Nielsen's 10 Heuristics
#HeuristicQuestion to Ask
1Visibility of system statusDoes the user always know what's happening? (loading indicators, progress bars, confirmations)
2Match between system and real worldDoes it use the user's language, not system jargon? Are conventions familiar?
3User control and freedomCan users undo, redo, go back, cancel? Is there an emergency exit?
4Consistency and standardsAre the same actions/words used consistently? Does it follow platform conventions?
5Error preventionDoes the design prevent errors before they happen? (confirmations, constraints, defaults)
6Recognition rather than recallAre options visible? Can users recognize rather than remember?
7Flexibility and efficiency of useAre there shortcuts for experts? Can users customize frequent actions?
8Aesthetic and minimalist designIs every element necessary? Does extra information compete with relevant info?
9Help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errorsAre error messages helpful? Do they explain what went wrong and how to fix it?
10Help and documentationIs help available? Is it searchable, task-oriented, and concise?
Evaluation Process
  1. Define scope: Which screens/flows to evaluate
  2. Walk through the interface 2-3 times with different user tasks
  3. Flag violations: Note each violation with heuristic #, location, description
  4. Rate severity: 0-4 scale for each violation
  5. Prioritize: Fix severity 4 and 3 first
  6. Report: Organize findings by severity, not by heuristic number

Output Format

markdown
# Heuristic Evaluation: {Product/Feature}

## Summary
- Total violations found: {N}
- Severity 4 (catastrophe): {N}
- Severity 3 (major): {N}
- Severity 2 (minor): {N}
- Severity 1 (cosmetic): {N}

## Critical Issues (Severity 3-4)
| # | Location | Heuristic | Issue | Severity | Recommendation |
|---|----------|-----------|-------|----------|---------------|
| 1 | {screen/element} | {#N: name} | {description} | 3/4 | {fix} |

## Other Issues (Severity 1-2)
| # | Location | Heuristic | Issue | Severity |
|---|----------|-----------|-------|----------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

Examples

Show full SKILL.md (243 more words)Show less
Correct Application

Scenario: Evaluating a food delivery app checkout flow

LocationHeuristicIssueSeverity
Cart page#1 VisibilityNo loading indicator when adding items — user taps multiple times3
Payment#5 Error preventionNo confirmation before placing order — accidental orders happen4
Error screen#9 Error recovery"Error 500" with no explanation or retry button4
Address form#6 RecognitionUser must type full address instead of selecting from saved addresses2

Priority: Fix #5 and #9 immediately (severity 4) ✓

Incorrect Application
  • "The app looks ugly" → Not a heuristic violation. "Aesthetic and minimalist design" (#8) is about information hierarchy, not visual attractiveness. A specific violation would be: "Product page shows 15 data fields simultaneously, burying the price and 'Add to Cart' button."

Gotchas

  • 3-5 evaluators find 75% of issues: One evaluator finds ~35%. Diminishing returns after 5. If possible, have multiple evaluators work independently then merge findings.
  • Heuristic evaluation finds problems, not solutions: It tells you what's wrong, not how to fix it. Solution design is a separate step.
  • Not a substitute for user testing: Experts predict user behavior imperfectly. Some "violations" that experts flag don't bother real users, and some real problems experts miss.
  • Mobile vs desktop: Apply heuristics separately for each platform. Touch targets, screen real estate, and interaction patterns differ significantly.
  • Accessibility is not a heuristic: Nielsen's 10 don't explicitly cover accessibility (color contrast, screen reader support, keyboard navigation). Add WCAG checks separately.

References

  • For WCAG accessibility checklist, see references/wcag-checklist.md

© asgard-ai-platform, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 2 other files (references) in ux-heuristic of asgard-ai-platform/skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • examples/sample_scenario.md
  • references/wcag-checklist.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 4e7f4f8

Compare with similar skills

UX Heuristic next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

UX Heuristic compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
UX Heuristic this skillasgard-ai-platform/skills242—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Prototypeplugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills1.6k—~614Automated safety check: PassMIT
Usability Frameworksslgoodrich/agents139—~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Nova Act UsabilityLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills2.2k—~7.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
UX Linterrevfactory/harness-1001.3k—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
UX Research Planmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.4k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Prototype

    plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills

    Move an idea up the fidelity ladder (content-first → wireframe → low-fi → high-fi → code) with a validation plan at each level, plus user-journey mapping and usability-testing scripts.

    1.6k GitHub stars~614 tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Usability Frameworks

    slgoodrich/agents

    Usability testing methodology, Nielsen's heuristics, and usability metrics.

    139 GitHub stars~3.5k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Nova Act Usability

    LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills

    AI-orchestrated usability testing using Amazon Nova Act. An agent skill from LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills.

    2.2k GitHub stars~7.4k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • UX Linter

    revfactory/harness-100

    Checklist and best practices for validating CLI tool user experience.

    1.3k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • UX Research Plan

    mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

    Create a structured UX research plan for any product question or feature.

    1.4k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • UI UX Designer

    aiskillstore/marketplace

    Create interface designs, wireframes, and design systems. An agent skill from aiskillstore/marketplace.

    433 GitHub starsUsed in 7 repos~2.4k tokens
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed

More from asgard-ai-platform/skills

All 207 skills in this repo
  • Algo Ecom Bm25

    asgard-ai-platform/skills

    Implement BM25 ranking function for e-commerce product search relevance scoring.

    242 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Algo Mfg Cpk

    asgard-ai-platform/skills

    Calculate Cpk process capability index to assess whether a process meets specification requirements.

    242 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Algo Price Elasticity

    asgard-ai-platform/skills

    Calculate price elasticity of demand to quantify how price changes affect sales volume.

    242 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Algo Rank Bayesian

    asgard-ai-platform/skills

    Apply Bayesian averaging to rank items by combining observed ratings with prior expectations.

    242 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Algo Rank Elo

    asgard-ai-platform/skills

    Implement Elo rating system to rank items or players from pairwise comparison outcomes.

    242 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Algo Rank Wilson

    asgard-ai-platform/skills

    Calculate Wilson Score confidence intervals for ranking items by positive proportion with sample size correction.

    242 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about UX Heuristic

What does UX Heuristic do?

Conduct heuristic evaluation of user interfaces using Nielsen's 10 usability principles. UX Heuristic is an agent skill from asgard-ai-platform/skills. Conduct heuristic evaluation of user interfaces using Nielsen's 10 usability principles.

When should I use UX Heuristic?

UX Heuristic fits situations like: the user needs to audit a website; interface for usability issues; prioritize UX improvements; conduct a quick expert review without user testing — even if they say review this UI.

How do I install UX Heuristic in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill ux-heuristic -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ux-heuristic in asgard-ai-platform/skills) into .claude/skills/ux-heuristic in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install UX Heuristic in Codex?

Run `npx skills add asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill ux-heuristic -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ux-heuristic in asgard-ai-platform/skills) into .agents/skills/ux-heuristic in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use UX Heuristic in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill ux-heuristic -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ux-heuristic, .gemini/skills/ux-heuristic, .github/skills/ux-heuristic and .opencode/skills/ux-heuristic in your project.

What does UX Heuristic need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: UX Heuristic is instructions for the agent only.

Does UX Heuristic access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is UX Heuristic safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does UX Heuristic use?

UX Heuristic is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does UX Heuristic use?

About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 2.6k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to UX Heuristic?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with UX Heuristic: Prototype (plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills, 1.6k stars), Usability Frameworks (slgoodrich/agents, 139 stars), Nova Act Usability (LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills, 2.2k stars) and UX Linter (revfactory/harness-100, 1.3k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains UX Heuristic?

asgard-ai-platform (a GitHub organization) maintains it in asgard-ai-platform/skills, which has 242 GitHub stars. The repository holds 207 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on June 6, 2026.

Source: asgard-ai-platform/skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.