Agent skill

Aris Research Refine

by appleweiping in appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI

Review and score refined research questions produced by Claude Code or OpenCode.

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Aris Research Refine

skills CLI
$ npx skills add appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI --skill aris-research-refine -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI aris-research-refine --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/.codex/skills/aris-research-refine .claude/skills/aris-research-refine && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
aris-research-refine
GitHub stars
119
Token cost
~1.1k tokens
SKILL.md length
497 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
51
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Review and score refined research questions produced by Claude Code or OpenCode.

  • Works in 4 steps: Score the Research Question → Kill-Argument → Differentiation Check → …
  • Tasks that involve Hypothesis generation
  • SKILL.md covers Your Mandate, Phase 1: Score the Research…, Phase 2: Kill-Argument and Phase 3: Differentiation Check, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Aris Research Refine is an agent skill from appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI. Review and score refined research questions produced by Claude Code or OpenCode. Evaluate novelty, feasibility, clarity. Provide kill-argument and verdict. Triggers: "review research question", "score this idea", "kill-argument", "evaluate research direction", "is this worth pursuing"

Its SKILL.md is about 1.1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Hypothesis generation. The repository describes itself as: knowledge base managed with an LLM workflow. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Hypothesis generation

Example prompts

  • “review research question”
  • “score this idea”
  • “kill-argument”
  • “/aris-research-refine”

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Score the Research Question
  2. Kill-Argument
  3. Differentiation Check
  4. Verdict

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 76fdc42. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Aris Research Refine loads about 1.1k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 77 tokens; SKILL.md has 497 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~77
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.1k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI at commit 76fdc42, republished under its MIT licence (© appleweiping). 497 words, ~1,133 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/aris-research-refine/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
aris-research-refine
description
Review and score refined research questions produced by Claude Code or OpenCode. Evaluate novelty, feasibility, clarity. Provide kill-argument and verdict. Triggers: "review research question", "score this idea", "kill-argument", "evaluate research direction", "is this worth pursuing"
role
auditor
stage
research-refine

ARIS Research-Refine Auditor

You are the AUDITOR for the research-refine stage. You do NOT implement or refine — you review, score, stress-test, and give a verdict on the research question produced by the implementation agent (Claude Code or OpenCode).

Your Mandate

  • Be adversarial but constructive
  • Find the weakest link before reviewers do
  • Kill bad ideas early to save months of wasted effort
  • A "proceed" verdict means you would stake your reputation on this direction

Phase 1: Score the Research Question

Rate each dimension 1-10 with one-sentence justification:

DimensionQuestion to AnswerScore
NoveltyDoes this add something genuinely new, or is it incremental/obvious?/10
FeasibilityCan this be executed with available compute, data, and time?/10
ClarityIs the question precise enough to know when it's answered?/10
ImpactIf successful, does anyone outside this lab care?/10
TestabilityCan we design an experiment that definitively confirms or refutes?/10
Scoring Rubric
  • 1-3: Fatal flaw. Cannot proceed without fundamental rethink.
  • 4-5: Weak. Needs significant iteration before experiment design.
  • 6-7: Acceptable. Minor gaps that can be addressed in planning.
  • 8-9: Strong. Ready to move forward with minor notes.
  • 10: Exceptional. Rare — reserve for genuinely compelling questions.
Red Flags (auto-deduct 2 points from relevant dimension)
  • "We propose a novel framework" without specifying what's novel → Novelty -2
  • No mention of compute/data requirements → Feasibility -2
  • Question contains "explore" or "investigate" without measurable outcome → Testability -2
  • Cannot name the top-3 closest papers → Novelty -2
  • Success criteria are subjective ("better", "improved") without metric → Clarity -2

Phase 2: Kill-Argument

Write the strongest possible argument for why this research direction will FAIL. This is not devil's advocacy for fun — it's the argument a skeptical reviewer will make.

Structure:

  1. Technical kill: Why the approach fundamentally cannot work
  2. Novelty kill: Why this has already been done (cite specific likely papers)
  3. Impact kill: Why even if it works, nobody will care
  4. Feasibility kill: Why the resources required make this impractical

You must write at least ONE compelling kill-argument. If you cannot find any, state explicitly: "No strong kill-argument found — this is unusually robust."

Show full SKILL.md (152 more words)Show less

Phase 3: Differentiation Check

Identify the 3 closest existing papers/approaches and for each:

Paper/ApproachSimilarityOur DifferentiationDifferentiation Strength
[closest 1]What overlapsWhat's differentWeak/Medium/Strong
[closest 2]What overlapsWhat's differentWeak/Medium/Strong
[closest 3]What overlapsWhat's differentWeak/Medium/Strong

If differentiation strength is "Weak" for all three → automatic "iterate" verdict.

Phase 4: Verdict

Decision Matrix
ConditionVerdict
All dimensions >= 7, no fatal kill-argumentPROCEED
Any dimension <= 3PIVOT (fundamental rethink needed)
Average >= 6 but kill-argument is strongITERATE (address kill-argument)
Average < 6PIVOT
All differentiations "Weak"ITERATE (find unique angle)
Verdict Format
VERDICT: [PROCEED / ITERATE / PIVOT]
CONFIDENCE: [Low / Medium / High]
SCORES: N={novelty} F={feasibility} C={clarity} I={impact} T={testability} AVG={avg}
BLOCKING ISSUE: [one-line summary or "None"]
NEXT ACTION: [what the implementation agent should do next]

Interaction Rules

  • Never suggest implementations. Your job is to judge, not to build.
  • If asked to "help refine", redirect: "I audit. Send me the refined version and I'll score it."
  • Be specific in criticism. "Not novel enough" is useless. "Overlaps with Chen et al. 2024 Section 3.2" is useful.
  • Acknowledge when something is genuinely good. Constant negativity erodes trust.

© appleweiping, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in .codex/skills/aris-research-refine of appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 76fdc42

Compare with similar skills

Aris Research Refine next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Aris Research Refine compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Aris Research Refine this skillappleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI119—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Hypothesis Generationspacering-net/codeg3.9k14 repos~3.6kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills47k2 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Hypothesis GenerationK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer2.4k2 repos~3.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Good QuestionRimagination/good-question3051 repos~4.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
High Stakes Analytics Decision Lablimingrui679-design/high-stakes-analytics-decision-lab1k—~2.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Hypothesis Generation

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. An agent skill from spacering-net/codeg.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 14 repos~3.6k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Nature Paper Card

    Yuan1z0825/nature-skills

    Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Hypothesis Generation

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Formulate evidence-bounded scientific questions, candidate hypotheses, rival explanations, causal or associational claims, discriminating predictions, measurements, and preregistration-ready…

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Good Question

    Rimagination/good-question

    A skill your agent uses when a researcher is choosing, framing, refining, or stress-testing a research question, hypothesis, thesis topic, project idea, grant direction, paper angle, or stalled…

    305 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~4.3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • High Stakes Analytics Decision Lab

    limingrui679-design/high-stakes-analytics-decision-lab

    Build or review source-backed descriptive, diagnostic, predictive, and prescriptive analysis for consequential decisions.

    1k GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Claim-Driven Experiment Planner

    zjYao36/Auto-Research-Refine

    Turns a refined research proposal into a claim-to-evidence-to-run-order roadmap instead of a sprawling benchmark wishlist.

    128 GitHub starsUsed in 6 repos~2.3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes

More from appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI

All 51 skills in this repo
  • Communication Assistant

    appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI

    Unified lazy-mode communication assistant for Vipin across WhatsApp, WeChat, QQ, Feishu/Lark, and email.

    119 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Content Refinement Agent

    appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI

    Step 5 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). An agent skill from appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI.

    119 GitHub stars~3k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Chrome Automation

    appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI

    Connect to and control Google Chrome browser using agent-browser with CDP (Chrome DevTools Protocol).

    119 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~5.3k tokens
    Auto-check: warnings
  • Email Assistant

    appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI

    Personal Gmail and Google Workspace email assistant for Vipin.

    119 GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Wechat Video Channel Publish

    appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI

    A skill your agent uses when the user wants to log into 微信视频号, validate cookie state, upload videos, set scheduled publish time, fill long description, set a cover image, or save drafts through a…

    119 GitHub stars~765 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Feishu Bridge

    appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI

    Route Feishu/Lark content access for Codex. An agent skill from appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI.

    119 GitHub stars~906 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Aris Research Refine

What does Aris Research Refine do?

Review and score refined research questions produced by Claude Code or OpenCode. Aris Research Refine is an agent skill from appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI. Review and score refined research questions produced by Claude Code or OpenCode.

When should I use Aris Research Refine?

Aris Research Refine fits situations like: tasks that involve Hypothesis generation.

How do I install Aris Research Refine in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI --skill aris-research-refine -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (.codex/skills/aris-research-refine in appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI) into .claude/skills/aris-research-refine in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Aris Research Refine in Codex?

Run `npx skills add appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI --skill aris-research-refine -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (.codex/skills/aris-research-refine in appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI) into .agents/skills/aris-research-refine in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Aris Research Refine in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI --skill aris-research-refine -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/aris-research-refine, .gemini/skills/aris-research-refine, .github/skills/aris-research-refine and .opencode/skills/aris-research-refine in your project.

What does Aris Research Refine need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Aris Research Refine is instructions for the agent only.

Does Aris Research Refine access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Aris Research Refine safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Aris Research Refine use?

Aris Research Refine is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Aris Research Refine use?

About 1.1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Aris Research Refine?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Aris Research Refine: Hypothesis Generation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars), Hypothesis Generation (K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer, 2.4k stars) and Good Question (Rimagination/good-question, 305 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Aris Research Refine?

appleweiping (a GitHub user) maintains it in appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI, which has 119 GitHub stars. The repository holds 51 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on August 26, 2026.

Source: appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.