Agent skill

Humanize

by Aperivue in Aperivue/medsci-skills

A skill your agent uses when a manuscript or response-to-reviewers letter reads as AI-written.

MITAuto-check passedWriting & Content

Install Humanize

skills CLI
$ npx skills add Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill humanize -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install Aperivue/medsci-skills humanize --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/humanize .claude/skills/humanize && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
humanize
GitHub stars
329
Token cost
~2.9k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,348 words
Files
32 (incl. scripts, references)
Skills in repo
54
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when a manuscript or response-to-reviewers letter reads as AI-written.

  • Works in 4 steps: Scan → Report → Fix → …
  • Response-to-reviewers letter reads as AI-written
  • SKILL.md covers Workflow, The 27 Detection Patterns and Gates
  • Runs Python scripts from its folder; calls python3

What it does

Humanize is an agent skill from Aperivue/medsci-skills. Use when a manuscript or response-to-reviewers letter reads as AI-written. Scans for 27 AI writing patterns and rewrites flagged passages, preserving technical accuracy and bounding how much text changes. Not general copy-editing; that is /polish-language.

Its SKILL.md is about 2.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 35 other files, including scripts and reference files (for example `references/ai_patterns.md`, `scripts/check_rewrite_fidelity.py` and `scripts/check_sentence_variety.py`).

It sits in Writing & Content, covering Humanizing AI text and Copy editing and proofreading. The repository describes itself as: Agent Skills for medical research — literature search, reporting-guideline & citation checks, statistics, publication figures, submission. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor &… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Response-to-reviewers letter reads as AI-written
  • Tasks that involve Humanizing AI text
  • Tasks that involve Copy editing and proofreading

Example prompts

  • “/humanize”

Requirements

  • Python 3

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Scan
  2. Report
  3. Fix
  4. Verify

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 3b14ae2. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships 2 files in scripts/ (Python, from the files we listed), which the agent can run.

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • python3

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Humanize loads about 2.9k tokens when it runs, and up to ~13k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 66 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,348 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~66
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2.9k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~13k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from Aperivue/medsci-skills at commit 3b14ae2, republished under its MIT licence (© Aperivue). 1,348 words, ~2,901 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/humanize/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 31 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
humanize
description
Use when a manuscript or response-to-reviewers letter reads as AI-written. Scans for 27 AI writing patterns and rewrites flagged passages, preserving technical accuracy and bounding how much text changes. Not general copy-editing; that is /polish-language.
metadata.triggers
humanize, AI patterns, AI 문체, remove AI writing, make it sound natural, 자연스럽게, de-AI

Humanize Skill

This skill only removes AI patterns; it does not perform general copy-editing, evaluate scientific quality, check journal formatting, or translate.

Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/ai_patterns.md at the start of every session, before scanning: the definitions, watch words, examples, detection greps, per-pattern fixes and the section-by-section priorities for all 27 patterns live only there.


Workflow

Phase 1: Scan

Scan the section(s) the user provides for all 27 patterns. For response-to-reviewers letters and cover letters, prioritise Patterns 22-24. For a full manuscript, follow the per-section priorities in ai_patterns.md (Section-Specific Application Guide). For each pattern found, record its number and name, the count, the exact passage, and its location (paragraph number or line range).

Output: Pattern Frequency Table

## AI Pattern Scan Report

Section: {section name}
Word count: {N}

| # | Pattern | Count | Severity | Example from text |
|---|---------|-------|----------|-------------------|
| 1 | Significance inflation | 3 | HIGH | "...pivotal role in diagnostic imaging..." |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

Patterns not detected: 2, 4, 9, 14, 15

Total AI pattern instances: {N}
AI pattern density: {N per 1000 words}
Phase 2: Report
  • Severity per pattern: HIGH (>3 occurrences), MEDIUM (1-3), LOW (0, clean).
  • Density: total instances across all 27 patterns per 1000 words. Target: < 2.0.

Gate: Present the report and ask the user which patterns to fix. Default: fix all HIGH and MEDIUM.

Phase 3: Fix

Rewrite flagged passages with each pattern's fix from ai_patterns.md, under these rules:

  1. Preserve technical accuracy. Every number, statistic, p-value, confidence interval, and clinical fact must remain identical.
  2. Preserve citations. Never add, remove, or relocate a citation.
  3. Keep the formal academic register of an experienced radiologist writing for peers in a top-tier journal. Never make the text casual or conversational.
  4. Keep domain-specific terminology intact. "Convolutional neural network," "apparent diffusion coefficient," "Fleiss' kappa" stay as-is.
  5. Never introduce new claims, remove existing ones, or change a sentence's meaning — rephrase, never reinterpret. If a passage cannot be fixed without changing its meaning, leave it and flag it for the user.
  6. Use active voice where natural: "We analyzed" rather than "Analysis was performed."
  7. Vary sentence structure. Mix short declarative sentences (8-12 words) with longer ones (25-35 words). A de-AI pass tends to flatten rhythm — it shortens the long sentences and pads the short ones toward a comfortable middle, which is itself a tell. scripts/check_sentence_variety.py verifies this rule in Phase 4.
  8. Thin out antithesis and cleft constructions (Pattern 27, the M2 heuristic). For each "X rather than Y", "not X but Y" or "X, not Y", apply the negative-form test: delete the negative half and rewrite the clause in the positive. If a fact disappears, the contrast was functional — keep it; if nothing disappears, it was decoration — cut it. Judge by the manuscript's overall rate, not instance by instance, and keep two or three for emphasis. Rewrite clefts ("What … is …", "It is … that …") in plain subject-verb order ("What matters is X" → "X matters"). scripts/check_rhetorical_density.py (in /self-review) measures this in Phase 4.

Output: Present the rewritten text with changes highlighted using diff format or tracked changes.

Phase 4: Verify

Keep the pre-rewrite text. Before editing in place, copy the original somewhere the fidelity check can read it (cp manuscript.md /tmp/pre_humanize.md). Without it Phase 4 can only re-scan for patterns — it cannot tell whether the rewrite preserved numbers and citations.

Run both deterministic checks, then re-scan the rewritten text using the same 27 patterns.

bash
python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/check_rewrite_fidelity.py" \
    --before /tmp/pre_humanize.md --after manuscript.md \
    --out qc/rewrite_fidelity.json --strict
python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/check_sentence_variety.py" \
    --manuscript manuscript.md --out qc/sentence_variety.json

NUMBER_DRIFT, NUMBER_REASSIGNED, CITATION_DROP or CITATION_MOVED means the rewrite broke an invariant — revert that passage, redo it, and flag it for the user. EDIT_FOOTPRINT_HIGH is advisory: Patterns 6 and 18 replace whole paragraphs by design, so a correct pass over an inflated draft can exceed 60% of words changed. Read the diff and confirm the author's argument survived rather than assuming the percentage is a defect.

Known limits: the fidelity gate does not check an added or removed negation, a number written in words, a changed unit, or a direction word next to a non-percentage. A clean exit does not clear these; read the diff for them.

Output: Verification Report

## Verification Report

| Metric | Before | After |
|--------|--------|-------|
| Total instances | 23 | 4 |
| Density (per 1000 words) | 8.2 | 1.4 |
| HIGH severity patterns | 3 | 0 |
| MEDIUM severity patterns | 5 | 2 |

Remaining issues:
- Pattern 17 (hedging): 2 instances remain -- appropriate for the evidence level.

Verdict: PASS (density < 2.0)

If the density remains above 2.0, run another fix-verify cycle (max 3 rounds). When called by another skill, return the verification report so the calling skill can check the pass/fail status.


The 27 Detection Patterns

All 27 are defined in references/ai_patterns.md. Two carry rules to apply exactly as written:

#PatternWhat to look forFix
13Em dash overuseMore than 2 em dashes per 1000 words (the /self-review classical-style gate fails a manuscript above 25 prose em-dashes)Use parentheses or restructure. After converting — X — appositives to (X), run the paren-span safety scan (python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../self-review/scripts/check_paren_spans.py"): a bulk conversion can pair two unrelated dashes across a sentence boundary and wrap a whole sentence (or an ordinal "Sixth, …" limitation) inside one parenthesis — paren-balanced but broken, so a balance check misses it. Operate per-sentence; never match across .
21AI Disclosure boilerplate (body)"## Artificial Intelligence Disclosure", "Generative AI was not used to create..." in manuscript bodyPut it where the target journal asks (the journal profile's Disclosure location): Methods or Acknowledgments for some journals, cover letter, title page or submission form only for others. Do not delete a disclosure the journal requires in the body

Patterns 22-24 apply only to response-to-reviewers letters and editor cover letters, not manuscript bodies. They are defined once in ai_patterns.md (Response-Letter Patterns); for authoring guidance, see the revise skill's references/r2r_voice.md.


Show full SKILL.md (513 more words)Show less

Gates

GateSeverityTriggerAction on fail
AI-pattern density targetADVISORYdensity > 2.0 patterns / 1000 words after sweepwarn; surface remaining flagged passages for manual review
Pattern 13 — paren-span corruption after em-dash conversionENFORCEDafter a — X — → (X) sweeprun python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../self-review/scripts/check_paren_spans.py" --strict; PAREN_SPAN_ORDINAL / PAREN_SPAN_SENTENCE means a conversion wrapped a sentence/ordinal inside parens — fix before finalizing
Pattern 19 — § symbolENFORCED (senior MA reviewer prep)grep -c "§" manuscript.md > 0auto-strip; verify post-rewrite count == 0
Pattern 20 — (see Methods §X) self-referenceENFORCEDmatch foundrewrite to direct section name reference
Pattern 21 — AI disclosure in the wrong placeENFORCEDan AI-use disclosure in the body of a journal that wants it elsewhere, or repeated in several placesmove it to where the target journal asks (journal profile); never reword a required disclosure to hide the tool
Pattern 26 — aphorism densityENFORCEDnegative-definition rate AND short-declarative share both over thresholdrun python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../self-review/scripts/check_aphorism_density.py" --manuscript manuscript.md; APHORISM_DENSITY (Minor) means the prose is a run of epigrams with the explanatory sentences compressed out — absorb most of them into the neighbouring sentence and write the explanation back, keeping two or three for emphasis; do NOT simply delete them, which shortens the prose further
Pattern 27 — antithesis / cleft densityENFORCED"rather than" / "not X but Y" / "X, not Y" or "What … is …" / "It is … that …" over a per-1000 threshold AND raw-count floorrun python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../self-review/scripts/check_rhetorical_density.py" --manuscript manuscript.md; ANTITHESIS_DENSITY / CLEFT_DENSITY (both Minor) — apply Fix rule 8 (the M2 test). A lone functional "rather than" or "instead of" never fires
Pattern 25 — inline-emphasis over-useENFORCEDitalic-emphasis density over threshold after allowlistrun python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../self-review/scripts/check_emphasis_density.py" --manuscript manuscript.md; EMPHASIS_OVERUSE (Minor) means strip inline italics (keep only stat symbols / Latin / gene-species); whole-clause italics are the strongest tell
Patterns 22-24 — R2R editing-mechanism / draft line-number / tooling leakTRIAGE (response letters); § = 0 harddetection greps in ai_patterns.md R2R section surface candidatesreview each hit (analysis narration, quoted additions, revised-manuscript page/line are NOT tells); rewrite confirmed tells to substantive prose
Citation preservation invariantENFORCEDa citation item (each key of a multi-key or locator Pandoc citation, or a numeric marker) removed or changed, or moved out of the sentence of the word it was attached to while that word kept its placescripts/check_rewrite_fidelity.py --before <pre> --after <post> --strict → CITATION_DROP / CITATION_MOVED (Major); revert that single rewrite and flag for the user
Numerical preservation invariantENFORCEDa numeric token's count changed (sign, inequality sign and %-direction are part of the token; writing a sign out in words also fires), or values traded places while the words around them stayedsame script → NUMBER_DRIFT / NUMBER_REASSIGNED (Major); revert and flag. Known limits: a negation, a number written in words, a unit, or a direction word next to a non-percentage is not checked — read the diff for these
Rewrite footprintADVISORYfraction of word tokens changed exceeds --warn-pct (default 70)EDIT_FOOTPRINT_HIGH (Minor) — never blocks; read the diff (Phase 4)
Fix rule 7 — sentence-length uniformityADVISORYprose has no short (≤12 words) or no long (≥25 words) sentencesscripts/check_sentence_variety.py --manuscript <file> → SENTENCE_UNIFORM (Minor); break up or combine sentences until both bands exist. Silent below 15 sentences

© Aperivue, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 31 other files (scripts, references) in skills/humanize of Aperivue/medsci-skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/ai_patterns.md
  • scripts/check_rewrite_fidelity.py
  • scripts/check_sentence_variety.py
  • skill.yml
  • tests/fixtures/fidelity_assign_after_ineq.md
  • tests/fixtures/fidelity_assign_after_same.md
  • tests/fixtures/fidelity_assign_after_swap.md
  • tests/fixtures/fidelity_assign_before.md
  • tests/fixtures/fidelity_cite_after_keyswap.md
  • tests/fixtures/fidelity_cite_after_locator.md
  • tests/fixtures/fidelity_cite_after_moved.md
  • tests/fixtures/fidelity_cite_after_same.md
  • tests/fixtures/fidelity_cite_before.md
  • tests/fixtures/fidelity_reorder_after.md
  • tests/fixtures/fidelity_reorder_before.md
  • tests/fixtures/fidelity_swap_after.md
  • … and 15 more

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 3b14ae2

Compare with similar skills

Humanize next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Humanize compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Humanize this skillAperivue/medsci-skills329—~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
User-Facing Text Cleanupguillaumemeyer/watermarks-remover23k—~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Chinese Text Humanizerop7418/Humanizer-zh19k—~2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Natural Japanese Business Writingcoji/natural-japanese1.9k—~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Zero Slop Prose Editoriflytek/skillhub5.2k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Korean AI-Text Humanizerepoko77-ai/im-not-ai5.9k—~4.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • User-Facing Text Cleanup

    guillaumemeyer/watermarks-remover

    Audits prose for invisible Unicode characters and rewrites it while keeping facts, citations, code and required disclosures unchanged and the writer's voice intact.

    23k GitHub stars~3.5k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Chinese Text Humanizer

    op7418/Humanizer-zh

    Edits Chinese articles, comments and documents to remove filler, repetition and template phrasing while keeping the facts, the level of certainty and the author's voice.

    19k GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated 15 days ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Writes and edits Japanese business documents so they read clearly and naturally, removes AI-sounding phrasing and can score how AI-like a text reads.

    1.9k GitHub stars~2.1k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Zero Slop Prose Editor

    iflytek/skillhub

    Audits and rewrites formulaic, AI-sounding prose while keeping facts, voice and format, using a local Python scorer and inspect-only, rewrite or embedded-gate modes.

    5.2k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Korean AI-Text Humanizer

    epoko77-ai/im-not-ai

    Rewrites Korean text written by AI so it reads like a human wrote it, detecting translationese and other AI patterns while leaving the content untouched.

    5.9k GitHub stars~4.5k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Web Novel AI-Trace Remover

    zenstory-ai/oh-story-claudecode

    Rewrites AI-sounding Chinese web novel text so it reads naturally, changing as little as possible and keeping plot, names and numbers intact.

    7.3k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.6k tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed

More from Aperivue/medsci-skills

All 54 skills in this repo
  • Model Assessment

    Aperivue/medsci-skills

    A skill your agent uses when validating or evaluating a trained medical-imaging model.

    329 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~4.5k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Obsidian Paper Vault

    Aperivue/medsci-skills

    A skill your agent uses when turning a folder of research PDFs into Obsidian notes, even if Obsidian is not named.

    329 GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Radiomics ML

    Aperivue/medsci-skills

    A skill your agent uses when building or auditing a radiomics or tabular clinical-ML prediction model with a classical learner (LASSO, SVM, random forest, XGBoost and similar).

    329 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.7k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Clean Data

    Aperivue/medsci-skills

    A skill your agent uses when a clinical CSV/Excel dataset needs profiling and cleaning before analysis (missing values, outliers, duplicates, type mismatches).

    329 GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Design Study

    Aperivue/medsci-skills

    A skill your agent uses when checking a radiology or medical AI study design before drafting or submission.

    329 GitHub stars~3.9k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Fill Icmje Coi

    Aperivue/medsci-skills

    A skill your agent uses when each author needs an ICMJE Conflict of Interest disclosure form (coidisclosure.docx) for submission.

    329 GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Humanize

What does Humanize do?

A skill your agent uses when a manuscript or response-to-reviewers letter reads as AI-written. Humanize is an agent skill from Aperivue/medsci-skills. Use when a manuscript or response-to-reviewers letter reads as AI-written.

When should I use Humanize?

Humanize fits situations like: response-to-reviewers letter reads as AI-written; tasks that involve Humanizing AI text; tasks that involve Copy editing and proofreading.

How do I install Humanize in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill humanize -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/humanize in Aperivue/medsci-skills) into .claude/skills/humanize in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Humanize in Codex?

Run `npx skills add Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill humanize -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/humanize in Aperivue/medsci-skills) into .agents/skills/humanize in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Humanize in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill humanize -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/humanize, .gemini/skills/humanize, .github/skills/humanize and .opencode/skills/humanize in your project.

What does Humanize need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Humanize needs Python for the scripts in its folder and the command-line tools its instructions call (python3). Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Humanize access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Humanize safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.

What licence does Humanize use?

Humanize is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Humanize use?

About 2.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 12k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 11k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Humanize?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Humanize: User-Facing Text Cleanup (guillaumemeyer/watermarks-remover, 23k stars), Chinese Text Humanizer (op7418/Humanizer-zh, 19k stars), Natural Japanese Business Writing (coji/natural-japanese, 1.9k stars) and Zero Slop Prose Editor (iflytek/skillhub, 5.2k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Humanize?

Aperivue (a GitHub organization) maintains it in Aperivue/medsci-skills, which has 329 GitHub stars. The repository holds 54 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 5, 2026.

Source: Aperivue/medsci-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.