Search
wanshuiyin/Anti-Autoresearch
Skills
Sort:BestMost starsTrending todayTrending this weekTrending this monthNewestRecently updatedName
| # | Skill | Repository | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Synthesize the single strongest EVIDENCE-BOUND reviewer case to reject a paper, built ONLY from the evidence ledger (claims.json) + the other auditors' confirmed findings — never free-floating LLM… | wanshuiyin/ | 160 | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 5 days ago |
| 2 | Citation-integrity forensics: is every reference real, correctly attributed, and used in a context the cited work actually supports? | wanshuiyin/ | 160 | — | ~12k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 5 days ago |
| 3 | Flagship intra-paper self-consistency forensics: does the paper contradict ITSELF across abstract/intro/tables/body/appendix, and does the method DESCRIBED match the method EVALUATED? | wanshuiyin/ | 160 | — | ~10k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 5 days ago |
| 4 | Build the deterministic evidence ledger (artifactmanifest.json + claims.json) that every other Anti-Autoresearch auditor reads. | wanshuiyin/ | 160 | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 5 days ago |
| 5 | Family-G proof & derivation integrity forensics: does a THIRD PARTY's written proof/derivation actually establish its theorem, or does it skip an obligation, assume its own conclusion, take an… | wanshuiyin/ | 160 | — | ~13k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | 5 days ago |
