Search

jongwony/epistemic-protocols

28 skills found.
Search results
#SkillRepositoryStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceUpdated
1

This skill should be used when the user asks to "run the outcome eval", "paired bare vs protocol", "which decisions did the protocol surface", "count what the AI asked or presented", "does /inquire…

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~1.3kAutomated safety check: NotesMITtoday
2

This skill should be used when the user asks to "run the eval", "test whether the protocol actually works at runtime", "check type realization", "measure protocol fulfillment", "run the…

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~3.3kAutomated safety check: NotesMITtoday
3

This skill should be used when the user asks to "verify protocols", "check consistency before commit", "validate definitions", "run pre-commit checks", "verify soundness", or wants to ensure…

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMITtoday
4

This skill should be used when the user asks to "audit plugin encapsulation", "check self-containment semantics", "find contributor-knowledge assumptions", or invokes /encapsulation.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~2kAutomated safety check: PassMITtoday
5

This skill should be used when the user asks to "formal review", "formal lens review", or invokes /formal-review.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~3.5kAutomated safety check: NotesMITtoday
6

The user vaguely recalls something discussed before but cannot name it — one session, or a line of work, topic, or settled concept across several: find it in past records to recognize.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~8.7kAutomated safety check: PassMITtoday
7

A skill your agent uses when the user asks to "check white bear", "audit prohibitions", "find negative framing", or invokes /white-bear.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~2.5kAutomated safety check: PassMITtoday
8

A skill your agent uses when the user asks to "check zero-shot", "audit few-shot anchoring", "find example anchoring", or invokes /zero-shot.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMITtoday
9

One goal is about to be handed to an autonomous run: cut it into units that each fit one stretch of the run and carry their own conditions for when they are done.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~19kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday
10

The user cannot yet see what a task needs them to decide, or which decisions to keep or entrust: map the whole task first, then open each decision to the depth needed.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~12kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday
11

The work needs several lines of thinking, and their order, independence, combination, stopping point, or where results go is not obvious: settle the method before starting.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~9.9kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday
12

A result may not fit where it lands: check every place it reaches and every intent it was meant to carry, show every misfit and omission on one sheet, and carry out the fixes the user settles.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~8.6kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday
13

The user knows roughly what they want but not which decisions it turns on: trace them from their own material (code, rules, past sessions) and the domain's usual decisions; ask until it settles.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~5.9kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday
14

Something in play — code, a document, a result, quotable in context — needs to be actually understood; the user can't follow it yet or nods along unsure: verify understanding step by step.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~7.2kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday
15

A framework, analogy, or earlier design is carried to a case, or an abstraction tested against its own cases, and what it supports is unclear: back each conclusion with cited evidence, not assent.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~11kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday
16

The idea field is empty, narrowed too early, or thin in places: widen it in width and depth before any candidate is chosen; reads the user's words and what they name.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~8.3kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday
17

Several concrete cases at hand seem to share something no one has named yet: pin down what they have in common, checked against the goal the name serves.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~7.9kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday
18

A task rests on missing context or unchecked assumptions: collect every piece of context the AI can reach on its own, then hand back what it cannot reach as the user's own unknown.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~7.6kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday
19

Quick protocol recommendation from recent sessions, or quest-based learning through scenario, trial, and quiz.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~7.5kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday
20

The user is about to commit to one of several directions that cannot be judged from their descriptions: build throwaway probes showing where they diverge, and decide on what is seen.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~11kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday
21

This skill should be used when a contributor names a core protocol whose Lean contract is to be re-derived, or invokes /rederive.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~4.3kAutomated safety check: NotesMITyesterday
22

Release for this repo — CalVer tag + narrative prepend. An agent skill from jongwony/epistemic-protocols.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~2.8kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday
23

Route the accumulated session context to the loaded core protocol whose deficit it shows — /route.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~3.4kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday
24

Something has to be made that the user cannot describe but would recognize on sight: mark what does not fit on concrete sketches, revising until a form is recognized.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~13kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday
25

Advisor-checked decision gates. An agent skill from jongwony/epistemic-protocols.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~13kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday
26

Deficit Recognition Probe — surface multiple deficit hypotheses for the user's current situation and route by user-constituted recognition (fit review, not protocol scoring).

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~7.4kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday
27

Project guide direction line via three-horizon fusion. An agent skill from jongwony/epistemic-protocols.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~7.2kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday
28

Scoped empirical validation. An agent skill from jongwony/epistemic-protocols.

jongwony/epistemic-protocols173—~5.7kAutomated safety check: PassMITyesterday