Search
Security · Test coverage
Skills
Sort:BestMost starsTrending todayTrending this weekTrending this monthNewestRecently updatedName
| # | Skill | Repository | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.Maven Maven build expertise for this multi-module Java project. An agent skill from skjolber/3d-bin-container-packing. | skjolber/ | 568 | — | ~886 | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | today |
| 2 | A skill your agent uses when you need to add or review fuzz testing for Java APIs with CATS — including contract-driven negative testing, malformed payload validation, boundary input exploration, CI… | jabrena/ | 446 | — | ~874 | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | yesterday |
| 3 | Parallel read-only multi-agent review of a current git diff or explicit file scope to find behavioral regressions, security or privacy risks, performance or reliability issues, and contract or test… | Dimillian/ | 4k | 1 repo | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 6 mo ago |
| 4 | A skill your agent uses when preparing for a security audit, performing reconnaissance on a new codebase, or creating a protocol overview. | ccashwell/ | 131 | — | ~25k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 8 days ago |
| 5 | Prepare Solidity projects for a security audit — test coverage, test quality, NatSpec docs, code hygiene, dependency health, best-practice enforcement, deployment readiness, and project… | PlamenTSV/ | 303 | — | ~3.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 12 days ago |
| 6 | Performs security-focused differential review of code changes (PRs, commits, diffs). | waybarrios/ | 533 | 5 repos | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 2 days ago |
| 7 | Triages survived mutants and unnecessary test statements using Trailmark call-graph data, sorting them into false positives, missing unit tests and fuzzing targets. | trailofbits/ | 7.4k | — | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | CC-BY-SA-4.0 | yesterday |
| 8 | Uses mutation testing on cryptographic implementations to find coverage gaps, then writes new test vectors for the uncovered paths and compares kill rates to show they help. | trailofbits/ | 7.4k | — | ~4.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | CC-BY-SA-4.0 | yesterday |
| 9 | Gets your own codebase ready for an external security review: sets review goals, runs static analysis, raises test coverage, removes dead code and writes documentation. | trailofbits/ | 7.4k | — | ~2.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | CC-BY-SA-4.0 | yesterday |
| 10 | Reviews a pull request, commit or diff for security problems, using git history, caller counts and test coverage, and writes a markdown report. | trailofbits/ | 7.4k | — | ~1.8k | Automated safety check: Notes | CC-BY-SA-4.0 | yesterday |
| 11 | Measures and interprets what a fuzzing campaign actually reaches, using llvm-cov, lcov, or a fuzzer's own coverage output. | trailofbits/ | 7.4k | — | ~5.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | CC-BY-SA-4.0 | yesterday |
| 12 | 12.Audit Prep A skill your agent uses when preparing a codebase for security audit. | ccashwell/ | 131 | — | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 8 days ago |
| 13 | Map advanced persistent threat (APT) group TTPs to the MITRE ATT&CK framework using the attackcti Python library to query STIX/TAXII data for group-technique associations, then generate ATT&CK… | mukul975/ | 34k | — | ~667 | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | 1 mo ago |
| 14 | Implements threat modeling using the MITRE ATT&CK framework to map adversary TTPs against organizational assets, assess detection coverage gaps, and prioritize defensive investments. | mukul975/ | 34k | — | ~3.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | 1 mo ago |
| 15 | Maps observed adversary behaviors, security alerts, and detection rules to MITRE ATT&CK techniques and sub-techniques to quantify detection coverage and guide control prioritization. | mukul975/ | 34k | — | ~1.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | 1 mo ago |
| 16 | Run a read-only audit for missing, weak, stale, or mis-scoped test coverage. | github/ | 40k | — | ~3.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | today |
| 17 | Author, validate, test, and deploy YARA-L 2.0 detection rules and evaluate end-to-end detection coverage gaps in Google SecOps. | google/ | 21k | — | ~4.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | today |
| 18 | 18.Review Code Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage gaps and low-value tests by running internal reviews and a peer review in… | tobihagemann/ | 407 | — | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | yesterday |
| 19 | Compose an exec-readable summary from a unified findings JSONL plus the OWASP coverage report. | jeremylongshore/ | 2.8k | — | ~2.2k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | today |
| 20 | Normalize and compare authorized fraud-control observations from local evidence, highlighting decision drift, coverage gaps, and conflicting outcomes without making a fraud or vulnerability verdict. | cyberful/ | 135 | — | ~649 | Automated safety check: Pass | AGPL-3.0 | 1 mo ago |