Search
Product & Project Management · nurettincoban/ai-prd-workflow
Skills
Sort:BestMost starsTrending todayTrending this weekTrending this monthNewestRecently updatedName
| # | Skill | Repository | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Break the PRD into sequenced implementation RFCs under RFCs/ with an RFCS.md index, then cold-read each RFC for gaps. | nurettincoban/ | 298 | — | ~2.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 3 days ago |
| 2 | Report which workflow artifacts exist, which RFCs are implemented and reviewed, what has drifted, and the next step. | nurettincoban/ | 298 | — | ~994 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 3 days ago |
| 3 | Document an existing codebase as PRD.md, FEATURES.md and RULES.md, so new work is planned against the code as it is. | nurettincoban/ | 298 | — | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 3 days ago |
| 4 | Write RULES.md, the project standards the AI must follow, with registry-verified dependency versions and permanent rule IDs. | nurettincoban/ | 298 | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 3 days ago |
| 5 | Review PRD.md for gaps, contradictions and unverifiable claims, write an improved PRD.md and record the findings in PRD-REVIEW.md. | nurettincoban/ | 298 | — | ~1.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 3 days ago |
| 6 | Turn PRD.md into FEATURES.md: permanent feature IDs, MoSCoW priorities, acceptance criteria and the PRD requirement each feature comes from. | nurettincoban/ | 298 | — | ~1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 3 days ago |
| 7 | Interview the user about a product idea and write PRD.md. An agent skill from nurettincoban/ai-prd-workflow. | nurettincoban/ | 298 | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 3 days ago |
| 8 | Implement one RFC: check its predecessors, present a plan for approval, write the code, then demonstrate every acceptance criterion. | nurettincoban/ | 298 | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 3 days ago |
| 9 | Review an implemented RFC in a fresh context against its acceptance criteria, RULES.md and the test plan, and save the review to reviews/. | nurettincoban/ | 298 | — | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 3 days ago |
| 10 | Assess a requirement change mid-project against the rules and past decisions, then update every affected artifact together. | nurettincoban/ | 298 | — | ~1.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 3 days ago |
