GitHub organization
Agent skills by redhat-et
- skills
- 19
- repository
- 1
Repositories by redhat-et
Skills by redhat-et, ranked
Ranked by score. Sort bymost stars,trending,newest,recently updated
| # | Skill | Repository | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rules for writing and converting formatted output in ripwire's C++ source with its emit helpers, keeping every printed byte identical to the old printf output. | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~1k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
| 2 | Checks whether a working-tree diff or a pull request is safe to merge: blast radius, tests to run, contract breaks, branch conflicts and stranded work. | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~4.3k | Automated safety check: Notes | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
| 3 | Answers call-graph questions that combine several conditions, such as complex functions that reach a target or untested symbols near main, using ripwire's graph-query mode. | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~1.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
| 4 | Produces a short brief for handing a code subsystem to a teammate or fresh session, using ripwire to rank symbols, expand bodies and surface design docs. | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~1.8k | Automated safety check: Notes | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
| 5 | Answers questions about a named symbol, such as its callers, what it calls, the path between two symbols or the downstream impact of changing it, using the ripwire CLI. | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~4.8k | Automated safety check: Notes | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
| 6 | Contributor guide for reading clang optimization remarks while editing ripwire's own C++, deciding between a source change and a build change such as LTO or PGO. | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
| 7 | Maps an unfamiliar repo or subsystem with the ripwire CLI before reading files, climbing an escalation ladder only until you are oriented. | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~4.5k | Automated safety check: Notes | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
| 8 | Maps a repository with the ripwire CLI before reading code, ranking what to touch, who calls it and which tests to run. | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
| 9 | Maintenance risk in code you did NOT write — inheriting a module, planning a refactor, a suspected god object, 'what's gnarly / where's the rot / safe to touch?': hotspots, dead or inactive code… | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~10k | Automated safety check: Notes | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
| 10 | 10.Ripwire MCP Wire ripwire into an agent as an MCP server — ripwire wrap AGENT (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini…) — and choose the server verb mid-task. | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~5.4k | Automated safety check: Notes | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
| 11 | Security review: (1) vet an untrusted SKILL.md or .mcp.json BEFORE installing it — the injection/exfiltration scanner; CRITICAL blocks the install; (2) audit code on an untrusted-input path (a… | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~2.8k | Automated safety check: Warn | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
| 12 | Code QUALITY of what YOU just wrote, before you commit or say 'done', or verifying a cleanup: --quality-delta lists what got WORSE in 11 kinds and exits 2 only when pre-existing code got materially… | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~8.4k | Automated safety check: Notes | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
| 13 | Starting a FEATURE (multi-symbol work): the plan, the API boundary, the scope — how big does this change get — from the codebase's real structure. | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~2k | Automated safety check: Notes | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
| 14 | You have a SYMPTOM — crash, exception, wrong output, failing test, error string — and don't know which code is responsible. | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~2.2k | Automated safety check: Notes | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
| 15 | About to write ONE symbol (even a 'quick' one-liner) or add a dependency: reuse before you reinvent. | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Notes | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
| 16 | Start HERE when unsure which ripwire skill fits, or asked 'how do I use ripwire / where do I start'. | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~4.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
| 17 | Write tests for EXISTING code that has none — 'this is untested, add coverage', 'add a safety net first'; also verify a new test reaches its intended code. | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~1.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
| 18 | Architecture HEALTH and ENFORCEMENT — 'is this a dependency mess / does the UI reach into the database / enforce module boundaries in CI?': cycles, the godfile, propagation cost (how far a touch… | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Notes | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
| 19 | A MEASURED performance problem: start from a benchmark, flame graph, perf sample or profiler run, locate the hot symbol the profile names, test structural hypotheses (memory-bound → cache-line data… | redhat-et/ | 2.4k | — | ~2.4k | Automated safety check: Notes | Apache-2.0 | 2 days ago |
Questions, answered from the data.
What is the best skill by redhat-et?
Ripwire Output Emission from redhat-et/ripwire ranks first of the 19 skills by redhat-et listed here, with the highest score: its repository has 2.4k GitHub stars, its SKILL.md loads about 1k tokens and it passes the automated safety check with no findings. Next come Ripwire Change Check and Ripwire Graph Query.
Are redhat-et's skills official?
None yet. All 19 skills by redhat-et listed here come from community repositories; a skill counts as official when the product's own GitHub organization publishes it.
How are these skills ranked?
By Skill Navigator score, which combines the GitHub stars of the skill's repository (shared across that repo's skills and discounted for large collections), how many other GitHub owners carry a copy of the skill, and automated SKILL.md quality checks, minus penalties for safety-check warnings and for each further skill from the same repository. Skills that fail the safety check are not listed.