GitHub organization

Agent skills by AIScientists-Dev

Every agent skill AIScientists-Dev publishes on GitHub, ranked by score, with the repositories they come from.
skills
2
repositories
2

Repositories by AIScientists-Dev

Skills by AIScientists-Dev, ranked

Ranked by score. Sort bymost stars,trending,newest,recently updated

Skills by AIScientists-Dev, ranked
#SkillRepositoryStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceUpdated
1

Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and funding proposals (NSF Project Summary/Description, NIH Specific Aims): preserve scholarly conventions…

AIScientists-Dev/academic-humanizer1.8k1 repo~4.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT3 mo ago
2

Turn any source that describes how a kind of task gets done (a SKILL.md, a chat log, a runbook, plain prose) into a runnable Morph trace.

AIScientists-Dev/Flowtrace485—~3.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT4 mo ago

Questions, answered from the data.

What is the best skill by AIScientists-Dev?

Academic Humanizer from AIScientists-Dev/academic-humanizer ranks first of the 2 skills by AIScientists-Dev listed here, with the highest score: its repository has 1.8k GitHub stars, 1 other GitHub owner carry a copy, its SKILL.md loads about 4.2k tokens and it passes the automated safety check with no findings. Next come Make Trace.

Are AIScientists-Dev's skills official?

None yet. All 2 skills by AIScientists-Dev listed here come from community repositories; a skill counts as official when the product's own GitHub organization publishes it.

How are these skills ranked?

By Skill Navigator score, which combines the GitHub stars of the skill's repository (shared across that repo's skills and discounted for large collections), how many other GitHub owners carry a copy of the skill, and automated SKILL.md quality checks, minus penalties for safety-check warnings and for each further skill from the same repository. Skills that fail the safety check are not listed.